Takeaway employed asylum seeker who had tuberculosis
Home Office officials discovered the Indian workers in the kitchen of the Chicken N Beer restaurant in Bournemouth, Dorset.
The trio were being paid as little as £6 an hour by the owner, an official report stated.
When immigration officials raided the premises in February, all three of the workers fled, with two being apprehended.
Of them, a female, was found hiding at the back of the takeaway. She was wearing a work top with her name on.
Checks showed she had entered the UK in 2023 on a student visa, which expired in May 2024, and had since claimed for asylum.
She said she had worked at Chicken N Beer for over a month and did 15 hours a week, earning £7 an hour cash in hand, significantly under the £11.44 minimum wage.
She admitted she had tested positive for tuberculosis (TB) last September and the report said she claimed that Roy Francis, the owner, knew about it.
But she claimed he had only told her to get a test and seemed to allow her to continue working.
TB is an infectious disease caused by bacteria that most often affects the lungs. It spreads through the air when people with the disease cough, sneeze or spit.
The woman also showed the officials her Application Registration Card (ARC) which clearly stated 'NO WORK'. Her asylum claim is still under consideration.
A male worker, who had been seen prepping vegetables in the kitchen, also ran from of the building when officers arrived.
It was established he had arrived in the UK on a boat in September 2022 but his claim for asylum was withdrawn in February 2024. He never held the right to work in the UK.
When questioned he confirmed he worked three hours a day at £6 an hour cash in hand.
In his interview with immigration officers, the man admitted he had not provided any documents to Mr Francis to confirm he was able to work in the UK – but he still permitted him to work.
Mr Francis allegedly explained that because it takes time and effort to train people only for them just to leave, he doesn't conduct the checks until they are about to be employed.
The case has been revealed in a report presented to Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole council's licensing committee which will decide whether the takeaway can retain its trading licence.
The report stated Chicken N Beer 'posed a serious and considerable risk to public safety' by having an asylum seeker with tuberculosis working there illegally.
The officials found that owner had failed to notify the local health authority about there being a case of TB in the community as required by law.
The report added that while the woman was working Mr Francis failed to take any precautions to prevent the contagious disease that killed 1.25m in the world in 2023 from spreading to his customers.
Following the visit the Home Office Civil Penalties Team issued Mr Francis with a £90,000 penalty.
A statement from the Home Office's immigration enforcement unit said: 'The license holder, Roy Prasnathan Francis, could have protected himself and prevented crime and disorder by completing a straightforward Right to Work check for both individuals.
'One of the persons who was working at the premises was suffering from a notifiable disease. If this worker does have tuberculosis, this poses a serious risk to public safety.'
When contacted for comment, a spokesperson for Chicken N Beer said the eatery was under new management.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Illegal migrant truck driver in deadly Florida crash failed English, road sign test — despite getting licenses from 2 sanctuary states
The Indian immigrant truck driver accused of killing three people in a crash when he made an illegal U-turn across a Florida highway badly flunked English fluency and road sign tests following the smash-up, the US Department of Transportation revealed. Harjinder Singh answered just two of 12 questions correctly when being tested for English language proficiency by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration after the April 12 crash. And when asked to read highway signs and their meanings, Singh could only identify one out of four signs shown to him, the US Department of Transportation announced Tuesday. Advertisement 3 Harjinder Singh answered just two of 12 questions correctly when being tested for English language proficiency by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration after the April 12 crash. Despite these failures, Singh – who is believed to have entered the US illegally in 2018 — had been granted commercial driver's licenses in California and Washington state. 3 Emergency responders arrive to the scene of the crash. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office Advertisement 'This crash was a preventable tragedy directly caused by reckless decisions and compounded by despicable failures,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement. 3 Singh is seen behind the wheel driving the semi-truck that causes the deadly crash. gurubatth5/TikTok 'Non-enforcement and radical immigration policies have turned the trucking industry into a lawless frontier, resulting in unqualified foreign drivers improperly acquiring licenses to operate 40-ton vehicles.' Advertisement Singh is accused of sparking the deadly accident after he attempted an illegal U-turn through a highway cut-through marked 'Official Use Only,' with his massive tractor trailer blocking the four-lane highway. A minivan was left without a chance to brake or turn, and hurtled at full speed into the trailer. All three people in the van were killed, while footage from inside Singh's cab showed him apparently unmoved by the carnage unfolding outside.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK council wins bid to move asylum seekers from hotel amid anti-immigration protests
LONDON (Reuters) -A British district council on Tuesday won its bid to have asylum seekers temporarily removed from a hotel that has become the focal point for protests after a resident was charged with sexual assault. Epping Forest District Council took legal action to stop asylum seekers from being housed in the Bell Hotel in Epping, in the county of Essex, about 20 miles (32.19 km) north of London. Anti-immigration protesters and pro-immigration groups have gathered outside the hotel since an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged in July with sexual assault and other offences. He has denied the charges and is due to stand trial next week. Judge Stephen Eyre granted the council an interim injunction against the owner of the hotel, ruling that asylum seekers should be removed by September 12. The hotel's owner said it would seek to appeal the ruling. Eyre also dismissed a last-minute attempt on Tuesday by the Home Office, Britain's interior ministry, to intervene in the case in support of the hotel owner. The Home Office's lawyer, Edward Brown, had argued the injunction would have a "substantial impact" on the government's ability to comply with its legal duty to provide accommodation, describing the hotel as "a key part of national asylum accommodation infrastructure." Border Security Minister Angela Eagle said in a statement: "We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament (2029)." Hundreds of people have protested outside the Bell Hotel since two asylum seekers were charged over separate incidents, with 16 people also having been charged in relation to what Essex Police described as criminal disorder in Epping. Care4Calais, a charity supporting asylum seekers and refugees, said some residents have felt frightened and frustrated after being threatened, chased, and had objects thrown at them since the protests in Epping began. Local police have been on high alert after nationwide rioting last summer, when racist unrest involving far-right supporters broke out after misinformation that the murderer of three girls in Southport was a radical Islamist migrant. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged to stop thousands of migrants arriving in Britain via small boats, but his government is struggling to do so and faces mounting pressure to show voters he can counter illegal immigration, with support rising for Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK party.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision
Ministers could face further legal challenges over asylum hotels after a council was granted a temporary injunction blocking migrants from being housed there. Nigel Farage hailed the High Court decision in Epping as a 'victory' and said he hopes it 'provides inspiration to others across the country', while the shadow home secretary argued that residents have 'every right to object' to people being housed in their area. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Reacting to the news, Reform UK leader Mr Farage said that 'young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported'. 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country,' he said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. Piers Riley-Smith, for the company, asked the judge to be allowed to appeal against the ruling, citing its 'wide-reaching ramifications'. He said that there was a 'compelling reason for the appeal to be heard', including the 'precedent that would be set' by the ruling and the impact that it could have 'on the wider strategy of the (Home Secretary) in relation to the housing of asylum seekers in hotels as part of meeting their statutory duties'.