Takeaway employed asylum seeker who had tuberculosis
A chicken takeaway shop was found to be employing three asylum seekers, including one who had tuberculosis.
Home Office officials discovered the Indian workers in the kitchen of the Chicken N Beer restaurant in Bournemouth, Dorset.
The trio were being paid as little as £6 an hour by the owner, an official report stated.
When immigration officials raided the premises in February, all three of the workers fled, with two being apprehended.
Of them, a female, was found hiding at the back of the takeaway. She was wearing a work top with her name on.
Checks showed she had entered the UK in 2023 on a student visa, which expired in May 2024, and had since claimed for asylum.
She said she had worked at Chicken N Beer for over a month and did 15 hours a week, earning £7 an hour cash in hand, significantly under the £11.44 minimum wage.
She admitted she had tested positive for tuberculosis (TB) last September and the report said she claimed that Roy Francis, the owner, knew about it.
But she claimed he had only told her to get a test and seemed to allow her to continue working.
TB is an infectious disease caused by bacteria that most often affects the lungs. It spreads through the air when people with the disease cough, sneeze or spit.
The woman also showed the officials her Application Registration Card (ARC) which clearly stated 'NO WORK'. Her asylum claim is still under consideration.
A male worker, who had been seen prepping vegetables in the kitchen, also ran from of the building when officers arrived.
It was established he had arrived in the UK on a boat in September 2022 but his claim for asylum was withdrawn in February 2024. He never held the right to work in the UK.
When questioned he confirmed he worked three hours a day at £6 an hour cash in hand.
In his interview with immigration officers, the man admitted he had not provided any documents to Mr Francis to confirm he was able to work in the UK – but he still permitted him to work.
Mr Francis allegedly explained that because it takes time and effort to train people only for them just to leave, he doesn't conduct the checks until they are about to be employed.
The case has been revealed in a report presented to Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole council's licensing committee which will decide whether the takeaway can retain its trading licence.
The report stated Chicken N Beer 'posed a serious and considerable risk to public safety' by having an asylum seeker with tuberculosis working there illegally.
The officials found that owner had failed to notify the local health authority about there being a case of TB in the community as required by law.
The report added that while the woman was working Mr Francis failed to take any precautions to prevent the contagious disease that killed 1.25m in the world in 2023 from spreading to his customers.
Following the visit the Home Office Civil Penalties Team issued Mr Francis with a £90,000 penalty.
A statement from the Home Office's immigration enforcement unit said: 'The license holder, Roy Prasnathan Francis, could have protected himself and prevented crime and disorder by completing a straightforward Right to Work check for both individuals.
'One of the persons who was working at the premises was suffering from a notifiable disease. If this worker does have tuberculosis, this poses a serious risk to public safety.'
When contacted for comment, a spokesperson for Chicken N Beer said the eatery was under new management.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Boeing's Air India tragedy complicates the company's path as it seeks 737 Max settlement approval
The cause of Thursday's devastating crash of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner is not yet known, but it could complicate the jet maker's path forward as it tries to finalize an agreement with the US government over two other crashes that happened in the past decade. The aircraft operating from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick was involved in an accident within minutes after takeoff. The number of injured or deceased passengers is unknown. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members, according to Air India CEO Campbell Wilson. "Investigations will take time," Wilson said. Boeing said Thursday that it is prepared to support Air India. The company's stock dropped 5%. "We are in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171 and stand ready to support them. Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected," a spokesperson for Boeing told Yahoo Finance. In international aircraft incidents involving a US-manufactured aircraft, the government of the country where the incident took place leads the investigation. In the event the Indian government requests assistance from US authorities, the US National Transportation Safety Bureau acts as the official US representative, and the US Federal Aviation Administration provides technical support. "We stand ready to launch a team immediately in coordination with the NTSB," an FAA spokesperson told Yahoo Finance, confirming that the FAA is in contact with the NTSB regarding Air India flight AI171. The crash is a major setback for the aerospace giant amid a massive turnaround effort under new CEO Kelly Ortberg following a brutal 2024 sparked by a "door plug" incident on an Alaska Airlines (ALK) flight. A key element of that turnaround is a non-prosecution pact it struck with President Trump's Justice Department last month that would let Boeing out of a criminal trial and guilty plea surrounding two fatal 737 Max 8 crashes that happened in 2018 and 2019. That pact is still not quite complete because a federal judge has yet to sign off — a requirement for the parties to move forward. Reed O'Connor, the federal judge presiding over the agreement and the DOJ's criminal charges against Boeing, is waiting for the families of Max crash victims to file objections to the agreement due June 18. He declined to approve a prior settlement agreement proposed by Boeing and the DOJ. The settlement with Trump's DOJ, which includes $1.1 billion in compensation for victims and fines, was a result that some family members of the crash victims didn't want. Erin Applebaum, one of the attorneys for families of victims who died in the crash of Ethiopian Airlines' 737 Max, said it's too soon to know how Thursday's Dreamliner tragedy may impact the Max US litigation. "Until more is known about the cause of the Air India crash, we will refrain from speculating on how it may affect the case against Boeing," Applebaum said. "For now, our hearts are with everyone who lost loved ones today. The MAX families know all too well the pain of sudden, senseless loss, and we extend our deepest condolences to those now facing that same unimaginable grief." The government said in a court filing that family members of more than 110 crash victims from the fatal 737 Max 8 accidents advised the government that they either support the non-prosecution agreement specifically or support the department's efforts to resolve the case without a trial. Some family members of the crash victims said before the deal was announced that they were not in favor of it and viewed it as a sweetheart deal for the aviation giant at the expense of justice and safety. "The message that is sent to corporate America is: Don't worry about killing your customers. Just treat it as a cost of doing business," said Dr. Javier de Luis, a retired aerospace engineer and MIT lecturer whose sister, Graziella de Luis y Ponce, an interpreter, died in one of the crashes. The latest agreement between Boeing and the DOJ takes into account another 737 Max accident that occurred in January 2024 when a door plug blew off a Boeing-made 737 Max 9 flown by Alaska Airlines. The DOJ notified Boeing that the facts involved in the January accident showed Boeing had breached a deferred prosecution agreement that it reached with the DOJ in January 2021. Last year in July, Boeing reached a plea agreement with the Biden administration that admitted its workers conspired to defraud aviation regulators before the fatal 737 Max 8 crashes killed 346 people. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Boeing's Air India tragedy complicates the company's path as it seeks 737 Max settlement approval
The cause of Thursday's devastating crash of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner is not yet known, but it could complicate the jet maker's path forward as it tries to finalize an agreement with the US government over two other crashes that happened in the past decade. The aircraft operating from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick was involved in an accident within minutes after takeoff. The number of injured or deceased passengers is unknown. The aircraft was carrying 230 passengers and 12 crew members, according to Air India CEO Campbell Wilson. "Investigations will take time," Wilson said. Boeing said Thursday that it is prepared to support Air India. The company's stock dropped 5%. "We are in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171 and stand ready to support them. Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected," a spokesperson for Boeing told Yahoo Finance. In international aircraft incidents involving a US-manufactured aircraft, the government of the country where the incident took place leads the investigation. In the event the Indian government requests assistance from US authorities, the US National Transportation Safety Bureau acts as the official US representative, and the US Federal Aviation Administration provides technical support. "We stand ready to launch a team immediately in coordination with the NTSB," an FAA spokesperson told Yahoo Finance, confirming that the FAA is in contact with the NTSB regarding Air India flight AI171. The crash is a major setback for the aerospace giant amid a massive turnaround effort under new CEO Kelly Ortberg following a brutal 2024 sparked by a "door plug" incident on an Alaska Airlines (ALK) flight. A key element of that turnaround is a non-prosecution pact it struck with President Trump's Justice Department last month that would let Boeing out of a criminal trial and guilty plea surrounding two fatal 737 Max 8 crashes that happened in 2018 and 2019. That pact is still not quite complete because a federal judge has yet to sign off — a requirement for the parties to move forward. Reed O'Connor, the federal judge presiding over the agreement and the DOJ's criminal charges against Boeing, is waiting for the families of Max crash victims to file objections to the agreement due June 18. He declined to approve a prior settlement agreement proposed by Boeing and the DOJ. The settlement with Trump's DOJ, which includes $1.1 billion in compensation for victims and fines, was a result that some family members of the crash victims didn't want. Erin Applebaum, one of the attorneys for families of victims who died in the crash of Ethiopian Airlines' 737 Max, said it's too soon to know how Thursday's Dreamliner tragedy may impact the Max US litigation. "Until more is known about the cause of the Air India crash, we will refrain from speculating on how it may affect the case against Boeing," Applebaum said. "For now, our hearts are with everyone who lost loved ones today. The MAX families know all too well the pain of sudden, senseless loss, and we extend our deepest condolences to those now facing that same unimaginable grief." The government said in a court filing that family members of more than 110 crash victims from the fatal 737 Max 8 accidents advised the government that they either support the non-prosecution agreement specifically or support the department's efforts to resolve the case without a trial. Some family members of the crash victims said before the deal was announced that they were not in favor of it and viewed it as a sweetheart deal for the aviation giant at the expense of justice and safety. "The message that is sent to corporate America is: Don't worry about killing your customers. Just treat it as a cost of doing business," said Dr. Javier de Luis, a retired aerospace engineer and MIT lecturer whose sister, Graziella de Luis y Ponce, an interpreter, died in one of the crashes. The latest agreement between Boeing and the DOJ takes into account another 737 Max accident that occurred in January 2024 when a door plug blew off a Boeing-made 737 Max 9 flown by Alaska Airlines. The DOJ notified Boeing that the facts involved in the January accident showed Boeing had breached a deferred prosecution agreement that it reached with the DOJ in January 2021. Last year in July, Boeing reached a plea agreement with the Biden administration that admitted its workers conspired to defraud aviation regulators before the fatal 737 Max 8 crashes killed 346 people. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Whistleblower raised safety fears over Boeing Dreamliner factory
A whistleblower raised safety concerns about a factory that makes Boeing's Dreamliner model, which crashed in India on Thursday. John Barnett alleged that the company had attempted to 'eliminate' quality checks at the factory where he worked in North Carolina. Mr Barnett, who was found dead in March aged 62, accused the company of 'countless' violations of US law. His claims included that paperwork had been falsified and that a contaminated tube designed to work in an oxygen system was removed from a scrap bin and may have been installed in an aircraft that was now in service. He said that without the part having been sterilised, there was a risk it could cause an explosion and 'bring the whole plane down'. In response to Mr Barnett's claims, Boeing said it was 'saddened' by his passing, but the quality issues that he raised before his retirement in 2017 had been addressed. The airline added: 'Engineering analysis determined the issues he raised did not affect aeroplane safety.' Thursday's crash in India will send a chill through an aviation industry only just recovering from years of upheaval linked to the US firm's safety record. The Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick came down soon after take-off on Thursday morning, with 242 passengers and crew onboard. Video footage showed the Boeing 787's last moments as it lost altitude over the runway before briefly disappearing from view and exploding in a cloud of flame. The Flightradar24 flight-tracking website showed the plane as having reached a maximum altitude of 625 feet. With the airport located at an altitude of about 200 feet, it suggests the aircraft managed to climb to a height of little more than 400 feet. It then began descending with a vertical speed of 475 feet per minute. Flightradar24 listed the crashed plane as having completed return flights from Delhi to Melbourne, Tokyo and Paris over the past five days before flying from the Indian capital to Ahmedabad overnight. The jet, registration number VT-ANB, came off the production line in 2013 and was powered by General Electric engines, according to the Aviation Safety Network. While the crash is the first involving the 787, a model also known as the Dreamliner, it comes six years after the loss of two smaller 737 Max planes claimed 346 lives and plunged Boeing into a near existential crisis. The Max, Boeing's top seller, was grounded for more than 18 months around the world after investigators found that the crashes in 2018 and 2019 had been caused by software meant to improve the handling of the model. Instead, the system effectively wrestled control away from the doomed planes' pilots, who were unaware of how it worked and how it might be overridden. The Air India tragedy comes days before the start of the Paris Air Show, where Boeing executives had been expected to proclaim that the firm was ready to bounce back from a more recent crisis involving the 737. The latest meltdown came after a panel blew out of an Alaska Airlines plane in January last year as it climbed through 16,000 feet, leaving a hole in the side of the fuselage through which passengers were almost sucked to their deaths. The pilot was able to descend to a lower altitude and bring the aircraft under control, narrowly averting disaster. However, subsequent investigations by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) and the US National Transportation Safety Board linked the incident to a litany of production glitches and quality control issues at Boeing and key supplier Spirit Aerosystems. The Max was once again grounded, and even though it was allowed to return to service, a cap was imposed on build rates, reducing deliveries to airlines around the world to a trickle. The production slowdown further disrupted a supply chain that was still struggling to recover following Covid, and handed a huge advantage to arch-rival Airbus, which established a comfortable lead over Boeing in annual airliner deliveries for the first time. There is no suggestion in the immediate wake of the Indian tragedy that Boeing is in any way to blame. Plane crashes on take-off can result from a number of causes, ranging from bird strikes and maintenance issues to pilot error. The 787 has had an exemplary safety record since the early teething problems that followed its entry into service almost 14 years ago. Those early issues saw several aircraft suffer problems with electrical systems linked to the model's lithium-ion batteries. Those included fires in 2013 on planes operated by All Nippon Airlines and Japan Airlines that led the FAA to temporarily ground the model, with Boeing halting deliveries until the issue was fixed. Alex Macheras, an independent aviation analyst, said Air India had a good safety record and had not suffered a fatal accident for decades. Boeing's Dreamliner has also had an unblemished record since its launch 15 years ago, he added, with more than 1,100 in service globally. The planes carry an estimated 400,000 passengers every day. Mr Macheras said: 'The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is an aircraft that has never had a fatal accident since it entered into service 15 years ago. It has an impeccable safety record that is, at the moment, separate to the recent quality concerns that have hampered Boeing over the last couple of years. 'Those concerns are mostly related to a separate aircraft programme, the 737 Max. 'So it is deeply concerning as to why this 787 was struggling to gain altitude in the take-off phase.' With an investigation already underway, parallel conversations would also now be taking place between the airline, Boeing and authorities to 'rule out what could have gone wrong, and if there is a concern with the 787', he added. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.