Ukraine moves to restore power of anti-graft agencies
Last week's measure by Zelenskiy to place the watchdogs under the oversight of the prosecutor-general prompted rebukes from Ukrainians, the European Union and international rights groups.
It raised fears the government could meddle in investigations and potentially shield its supporters from scrutiny.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars of vital Western aid in the nearly three-and-a-half year all-out war.
It's also an effort that enjoys broad public support.
EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, who called last week's legislative changes "a serious step back", welcomed approval of the bill, saying MPs had "corrected last week's damaging vote".
"Today's law restores key safeguards, but challenges remain," Kos, who monitors the record of countries that are candidates to join the bloc, wrote on X.
Backlash against Zelenskiy's measures brought street protests across the country that were the first major demonstrations since Russia's full-scale invasion began on February 24, 2022.
Though the protests did not call for the president's removal, the controversy threatened to undermine public trust in their leaders at a critical time.
Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities.
There is also uncertainty over how much additional weaponry Ukraine's Western partners can provide and how quickly.
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International also criticised last week's legislation, saying it weakened one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014.
Zelenskiy said his goal had been to speed up prolonged investigations, ensure more convictions and remove Russian meddling in investigations, which he did not detail.
He said he had taken note of the protests and decided to present a new bill to parliament underscoring that the prosecutor-general and his deputies could not give orders to anti-graft agencies or interfere in their work.
MP in Kyiv approved Zelenskiy's new proposal with 331 votes and nine abstentions on Thursday.
Ukraine's parliament has overwhelmingly approved a bill presented by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that restores the independence of two of the country's key anti-corruption watchdogs, reversing his contentious move last week that curbed their power and brought an outcry.
Last week's measure by Zelenskiy to place the watchdogs under the oversight of the prosecutor-general prompted rebukes from Ukrainians, the European Union and international rights groups.
It raised fears the government could meddle in investigations and potentially shield its supporters from scrutiny.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars of vital Western aid in the nearly three-and-a-half year all-out war.
It's also an effort that enjoys broad public support.
EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, who called last week's legislative changes "a serious step back", welcomed approval of the bill, saying MPs had "corrected last week's damaging vote".
"Today's law restores key safeguards, but challenges remain," Kos, who monitors the record of countries that are candidates to join the bloc, wrote on X.
Backlash against Zelenskiy's measures brought street protests across the country that were the first major demonstrations since Russia's full-scale invasion began on February 24, 2022.
Though the protests did not call for the president's removal, the controversy threatened to undermine public trust in their leaders at a critical time.
Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities.
There is also uncertainty over how much additional weaponry Ukraine's Western partners can provide and how quickly.
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International also criticised last week's legislation, saying it weakened one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014.
Zelenskiy said his goal had been to speed up prolonged investigations, ensure more convictions and remove Russian meddling in investigations, which he did not detail.
He said he had taken note of the protests and decided to present a new bill to parliament underscoring that the prosecutor-general and his deputies could not give orders to anti-graft agencies or interfere in their work.
MP in Kyiv approved Zelenskiy's new proposal with 331 votes and nine abstentions on Thursday.
Ukraine's parliament has overwhelmingly approved a bill presented by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that restores the independence of two of the country's key anti-corruption watchdogs, reversing his contentious move last week that curbed their power and brought an outcry.
Last week's measure by Zelenskiy to place the watchdogs under the oversight of the prosecutor-general prompted rebukes from Ukrainians, the European Union and international rights groups.
It raised fears the government could meddle in investigations and potentially shield its supporters from scrutiny.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars of vital Western aid in the nearly three-and-a-half year all-out war.
It's also an effort that enjoys broad public support.
EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, who called last week's legislative changes "a serious step back", welcomed approval of the bill, saying MPs had "corrected last week's damaging vote".
"Today's law restores key safeguards, but challenges remain," Kos, who monitors the record of countries that are candidates to join the bloc, wrote on X.
Backlash against Zelenskiy's measures brought street protests across the country that were the first major demonstrations since Russia's full-scale invasion began on February 24, 2022.
Though the protests did not call for the president's removal, the controversy threatened to undermine public trust in their leaders at a critical time.
Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities.
There is also uncertainty over how much additional weaponry Ukraine's Western partners can provide and how quickly.
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International also criticised last week's legislation, saying it weakened one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014.
Zelenskiy said his goal had been to speed up prolonged investigations, ensure more convictions and remove Russian meddling in investigations, which he did not detail.
He said he had taken note of the protests and decided to present a new bill to parliament underscoring that the prosecutor-general and his deputies could not give orders to anti-graft agencies or interfere in their work.
MP in Kyiv approved Zelenskiy's new proposal with 331 votes and nine abstentions on Thursday.
Ukraine's parliament has overwhelmingly approved a bill presented by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that restores the independence of two of the country's key anti-corruption watchdogs, reversing his contentious move last week that curbed their power and brought an outcry.
Last week's measure by Zelenskiy to place the watchdogs under the oversight of the prosecutor-general prompted rebukes from Ukrainians, the European Union and international rights groups.
It raised fears the government could meddle in investigations and potentially shield its supporters from scrutiny.
Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars of vital Western aid in the nearly three-and-a-half year all-out war.
It's also an effort that enjoys broad public support.
EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, who called last week's legislative changes "a serious step back", welcomed approval of the bill, saying MPs had "corrected last week's damaging vote".
"Today's law restores key safeguards, but challenges remain," Kos, who monitors the record of countries that are candidates to join the bloc, wrote on X.
Backlash against Zelenskiy's measures brought street protests across the country that were the first major demonstrations since Russia's full-scale invasion began on February 24, 2022.
Though the protests did not call for the president's removal, the controversy threatened to undermine public trust in their leaders at a critical time.
Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities.
There is also uncertainty over how much additional weaponry Ukraine's Western partners can provide and how quickly.
The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International also criticised last week's legislation, saying it weakened one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014.
Zelenskiy said his goal had been to speed up prolonged investigations, ensure more convictions and remove Russian meddling in investigations, which he did not detail.
He said he had taken note of the protests and decided to present a new bill to parliament underscoring that the prosecutor-general and his deputies could not give orders to anti-graft agencies or interfere in their work.
MP in Kyiv approved Zelenskiy's new proposal with 331 votes and nine abstentions on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser condemns decision to allow Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestinian march
Shadow Attorney-General Julian Leeser has condemned the decision to allow the Sydney Harbour Bridge to be shut down for a pro-Palestinian protest. The Supreme Court on Saturday rejected a New South Wales Government application to deem the Palestinian Action Group's demonstration as unlawful. Mr Leeser told Sky News he condemned the decision 'in the strongest possible terms'. 'I'm a member of parliament who represents Northern Sydney,' he said. 'The Sydney Harbour Bridge links our city and stops division occurring and allows constituents from my community and other communities to access the city. 'The Sydney Harbour Bridge is a symbol of the unity of the city, it should not be used for divisive protests of this sort that disrupt our city. Mr Leeser said people had a right to protest, but it should be done in a peaceful way and in appropriate locations such as outside parliament. 'I always compare those people seeking to change the foreign policy in Gaza to those people seeking to change the foreign policy in Ukraine,' he said. 'The Ukrainian community, the Ukrainian diaspora is a wonderful, peaceful community. 'They hold concerts, they hold public meetings, everything is peaceful. 'There is never the call of the death to anyone, there is never the anger and the violence that you have seen at all too many of these protests. 'People should not be bringing international conflict to our streets. 'People have the right to call for a change to our foreign policy but to so do in a peaceful way that respects that there are a range of different views on these issues in this community is the way we should move forward.' Organisers expert up to 50,000 people to attend the demonstration. The bridge will be closed in both directions between 11:30am and 4pm.
Canberra Times
2 hours ago
- Canberra Times
Ukraine drone attack sparks fire at oil depot in Russia
Also on Sunday, the governor of Voronezh region in southern Russia said four people were injured in a Ukrainian drone strike that caused several fires, while Russia launched a missile attack on Kyiv, according to the military administration of the Ukrainian capital.
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Pregnant and in pain, Diana made her way to a maternity hospital. She had no idea what was next door
Sasha collapsed next to her and her pooling blood, which he can still smell, and started to scream. There had been no time to try to save the baby. 'We were waiting for a son and then in one minute, the ... Russians,' he said, using an expletive, his voice trailing off as he described the horrific scene. 'And they were killed.' The military target next door Russia launched the missiles at Kamianske, a busy city in Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, hours after United States President Donald Trump announced he would give Russia 10 to 12 days to agree to a ceasefire before imposing new sanctions. Locals said the strikes probably targeted the first building that was hit, a former medical dispensary that they said was well-known as a makeshift military base. Soldiers used it, they said, despite the maternity hospital next door. The presence of the hospital also did not stop Russia from firing missiles indiscriminately into the centre of the city. Washington Post reporters found several military uniforms and piles of supplies in the remnants of that damaged building, which sat about 200 metres from the hospital. A sign on the door warned visitors to turn their phones to aeroplane mode, a common rule at military sites. A pile of dusty drone controllers sat outside. A handful of soldiers at the scene on Thursday, mostly in civilian clothes, denied it had been used as a base. They said it was a warehouse for non-lethal supplies. Only one said he was there when the missiles hit. Ukrainian military officials did not respond to requests for comment. On Friday, the Russian Defence Ministry bragged that it struck several high-value military targets, including warehouses and drone workshops, between July 26 and August 1. Under international conventions on war, military personnel are required to avoid placing military objects near civilian infrastructure or in heavily populated areas. The conventions also ban attacks that put civilians at disproportionate risk of harm. 'I wouldn't dare bring her to the maternity ward if I knew there were soldiers near there,' Diana's mother, Lina Dranko, said after her funeral. 'I would have brought doctors to our home.' Wartime dreams of a family Sasha and Diana met in 2019 – he was just home from his mandatory military service, while she was a new and pretty face on a visit to her mother's native village. After weeks of sharing walks and kisses, Sasha told her he wanted to celebrate one month of dating. Loading 'We're dating?' she replied. It was October 25. The next year, he proposed on the same day – the ring a perfect fit because he had tested it on his pinkie, which he knew was the right size. On September 25, 2021, they were legally married. When Russia invaded on February 24, 2022, they both felt moved to perform a church wedding to consecrate their vows. The local priest said they failed to complete mandatory rituals, including a brief fasting period. 'We said: 'Come on, it's war,'' Sasha recalled. The priest gave in, and they had their second wedding ceremony the next day. As war raged across Ukraine and Russian forces advanced toward the Dnipropetrovsk region where Sasha and Diana lived, the couple tried to maintain a simple village life. Their parents helped them buy a small house, which they started renovating. Diana worked in the local grocery store, where she befriended soldiers posted to the area. Sasha continued working at the nearby steel factory. They weighed the risks of having a baby during wartime against their dream of a family. The dream won out. Six months ago, they cheered and cried when two pink lines appeared on a rapid test. They tucked the stick away in a plastic envelope for safekeeping. 'It was the happiest moment of our lives,' Sasha said. Diana began filming her belly as it grew – smiling for the camera as she ran her hands over her bump. A funeral instead of a baptism On July 31, Diana's family placed her hands over her bump for the last time. She lay in a wooden coffin in the centre of the same room where she had filmed herself dreaming of motherhood. Sasha pressed his face to hers. Her mother, Lina, bent over her belly. Other relatives – her sister, Karina, her father, Anatolii, her nephew, Daniil – took turns caressing her face. They whispered to her and Damir, wishing them farewell. Loading The car seat, the wooden crib, the tiny mattress decorated with the words 'It's a boy!' sat in the next room. Four men carried the coffin outside, where hundreds of people were waiting, weeping, holding each other. A priest began Diana's funeral rites. The crowd followed to the cemetery. In the last moments before they covered the coffin, Lina wailed. 'I don't want to say goodbye!' 'You dreamed of having this baby!' 'I should have protected you!' They covered Diana and lowered her to the ground. The cross listed her name, birthday and death date. Below, it showed Damir's name with only a date of death – he was never born. One woman became so distressed that she was taken away by ambulance. Everyone else lined up to toss a handful of dirt on Diana's coffin. Then the grave diggers took out shovels to finish. At the sombre lunch reception just after, Lina looked at the room full of family and friends. Loading 'We wish we had this gathering for Damir's baptism instead of this,' she said through tears. Outside, Sasha wept as he clutched his friend. He told him he had visited Diana hours before, then went home to clean the house for her return the next day. 'She was so scared. She was calling to say she was scared. She wanted me to be there,' he said. 'I wasn't there. All I cleaned was for nothing – no one needs it. I don't need that house. I just need her.'
