When Magnus Carlsen met Elon Musk and played chess with Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg and Demis Hassabis
Carlsen was doing commentary for the Take Take Take app for the final of the AI chess exhibition tournament, where OpenAI's o3 (backed by Sam Altman) humbled xAI's Grok 4 (backed by Elon Musk).
Carlsen at one point said that watching the world's top LLMs play was 'like watching kids' games'.
But what does Carlsen think about the men behind the world's AI's movers-and-shakers?
For one, Carlsen revealed that he had played a couple of events with some of the world's most influential men in the AI space.
'I have played in the same chess tournament as Sam Altman. It was an alternate moves tournament in Silicon Valley. It was around the Champions Chess Tour final in 2022. And I think Anish Giri was on the team with him. Sam wasn't very good,' Carlsen laughed. 'So Giri was very unhappy about being teamed with him. But he actually learned a lot through the experience. You could tell that he was very smart.'
Carlsen also spoke about playing in a tournament with Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg.
'He didn't know much chess, but he was a little bit the same as Sam Altman. I thought he was even better. Was learning very, very quickly, he was forming his own opinions very quickly, which I thought was impressive. It's a useful skill. They were not necessarily right, which you wouldn't expect, but they were always well-reasoned,' Carlsen said.
Carlsen then spoke about Musk and spoke about the X owner's disdain for chess, before explaining why he understands it to an extent.
'Elon I've seen in person but I haven't talked to him. You know he famously doesn't have the greatest respect for chess players or the game which, to some extent, I understand because it is not a very complicated game, right? It is very simple in many ways but I think that's also the beauty of the game. Like it's obviously simple since it took computers not that long to master it, right? Compared to some other games. But chess is also rich and very difficult to play as well. Like it's simple enough to play that you can get joy from playing after practice. Like not maybe immediately but after practice practicing a bit but hard enough that you can never actually get particularly good at it as a human which we've found out by seeing engines play,' Carlsen said.
Carlsen shared a funny anecdote about playing chess with Demis Hassabis, the CEO of DeepMind Technologies and an AI Adviser to the UK Government, who was recently awarded a Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
'I played an alternate moves event with Demis quite a few years ago at the London Chess Classic. It was a lot of fun. Demis is fantastic. I've met him many times, but in terms of chess, he's kind of set in his ways: like he loves playing the Botvinnik System as white. And I asked him, 'Do you know anything else?' And he was like, 'No, not really. That's what I like to play.' And I was like, 'Yeah, fine. That's great.' And we actually beat some really good players in that line. It's a good system. But then it ended up where I think we had a tiebreaker in the finals. And as a tiebreak the two amateur players had to play each other, right? And then we discussed the game before and he said, 'My opponent's going to play 1.c4. What should I do?' And I said, 'What do you normally do?' Well, I play 1.c5, then I play g6 and so on. So I told him ways you could get around (the opponent's tricks in the opening). And lo and behold, the game starts, he forgets everything, and he ends up in a horrible passive position. He fought really well but we lost,' Carlsen said before adding: 'What he's done for chess is fantastic, but also what he's done for humanity with medicine is obviously even better.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
ChatGPT beats Grok in AI chess final, Gemini finishes third, Elon Musk says…
OpenAI's ChatGPT o3 model defeated Elon Musk's xAI model Grok 4 in the final of a Kaggle-hosted tournament that set out to find the strongest chess-playing large language model (LLM). The event, held over three days, pitted general-purpose LLMs from several companies against each other rather than specialised chess engines. Elon Musk downplayed the defeat, saying Grok's earlier strong results were a 'side effect'.(AP) Tournament format and participants Eight models took part, including entries from OpenAI, xAI, Google, Anthropic and Chinese developers DeepSeek and Moonshot AI. The contest used standard chess rules but tested multi-purpose LLMs, systems that are not specifically optimised for chess play. BBC coverage of the event noted that Google's Gemini finished third after beating another OpenAI entry. Mobile Finder: iPhone 17 Air expected to debut next month Final and key moments Grok 4 led early in the competition but faltered in the final match against o3. Commentators and observers highlighted multiple tactical errors by Grok 4, including repeated queen losses, which swung the match in o3's favour. writer Pedro Pinhata said: 'Up until the semi finals, it seemed like nothing would be able to stop Grok 4,' but added that Grok's play 'collapsed under pressure' on the last day. Grandmaster Hikaru Nakamura, who commentated live, noted: 'Grok made so many mistakes in these games, but OpenAI did not.' Responses and wider context Elon Musk downplayed the defeat, saying Grok's earlier strong results were a 'side effect' and that xAI had 'spent almost no effort on chess.' The result adds a public dimension to the rivalry between Musk's xAI and OpenAI, both founded by people who once worked together at OpenAI. Chess has long been used to measure AI progress. Past milestones include specialised systems such as DeepMind's AlphaGo, which defeated top human players in the game of Go. This Kaggle tournament differs by testing general LLMs on strategic, sequential tasks rather than using dedicated chess engines. What it means The outcome shows variability in how LLMs handle structured, adversarial tasks like chess. While o3's performance suggests some LLMs can sustain strategic play under tournament conditions, Grok 4's collapse illustrates that results may still be inconsistent. Organisers and commentators are likely to continue using chess and similar tasks to probe reasoning, planning and robustness in large language models as the field evolves.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Are you in a mid-career to senior job? Don't fear AI – you could have this important advantage
Have you ever sat in a meeting where someone half your age casually mentions 'prompting ChatGPT' or 'running this through AI', and felt a familiar knot in your stomach? You're not alone. There's a growing narrative that artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently ageist, that older workers will be disproportionately hit by job displacement and are more reluctant to adopt AI tools. But such assumptions – especially that youth is a built-in advantage when it comes to AI – might not actually hold. While ageism in hiring is a real concern, if you have decades of work experience, your skills, knowledge and judgement could be exactly what's needed to harness AI's power – without falling into its traps. The research on who benefits most from AI at work is surprisingly murky, partly because it's still early days for systematic studies on AI and work. Some research suggests lower-skilled workers might have more to gain than high-skilled workers on certain straightforward tasks. The picture becomes much less clear under real-world conditions, especially for complex work that relies heavily on judgement and experience. Through our Skills Horizon research project, where we've been talking to Australian and global senior leaders across different industries, we're hearing a more nuanced story. Many older workers do experience AI as deeply unsettling. As one US-based CEO of a large multinational corporation told us: 'AI can be a form of existential challenge, not only to what you're doing, but how you view yourself.' But leaders are also observing an important and unexpected distinction: experienced workers are often much better at judging the quality of AI outputs. This might become one of the most important skills, given that AI occasionally hallucinates or gets things wrong. The CEO of a South American creative agency put it bluntly: 'Senior colleagues are using multiple AIs. If they don't have the right solution, they re-prompt, iterate, but the juniors are satisfied with the first answer, they copy, paste and think they're finished. They don't yet know what they are looking for, and the danger is that they will not learn what to look for if they keep working that way.' Experienced workers have a crucial advantage when it comes to prompting AI: they understand context and usually know how to express it clearly. While a junior advertising creative might ask an AI to 'Write copy for a sustainability campaign', a seasoned account director knows to specify 'Write conversational social media copy for a sustainable fashion brand targeting eco-conscious millennials, emphasising our client's zero-waste manufacturing process and keeping the tone authentic but not preachy'. This skill mirrors what experienced professionals do when briefing junior colleagues or freelancers: providing detailed instructions, accounting for audience, objectives, and constraints. It's a competency developed through years of managing teams and projects. Younger workers, despite their comfort with technology, may actually be at a disadvantage here. There's a crucial difference between using technology frequently and using it well. Many young people may become too accustomed to AI assistance. A survey of US teens this year found 72 per cent had used an AI companion app. Some children and teens are turning to chatbots for everyday decisions. Without the professional experience to recognise when something doesn't quite fit, younger workers risk accepting AI responses that feel right – effectively 'vibing' their work – rather than developing the analytical skills to evaluate AI usefulness. First, everyone benefits from learning more about AI. In our time educating everyone from students to senior leaders and CEOs, we find that misunderstandings about how AI works have little to do with age. A good place to start is reading up on what AI is and what it can do for you: What is AI? Where does AI come from? How does AI learn? What can AI do? What makes a good AI prompt? If you're not even sure which AI platform to try, we would recommend testing the most prominent ones, OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini. If you're an experienced worker feeling threatened by AI, lean into your strengths. Your decades of experience with delegation, context-setting, and critical evaluation are exactly what AI tools need. Start small. Pick one regular work task and experiment with AI assistance, using your judgement to evaluate and refine outputs. Practice prompting like you're briefing a junior colleague: be specific about context, constraints, and desired outcomes, and repeat the process as needed. Most importantly, don't feel threatened. In a workplace increasingly filled with AI-generated content, your ability to spot what doesn't quite fit, and to know what questions to ask, has never been more valuable.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Sam Altman says some people want old yes man ChatGPT back for support they never got in life
Some ChatGPT devotees aren't ready to let go of the bot's overly agreeable personality, and their reasons have struck a chord with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Speaking on Cleo Abram's Huge Conversations podcast on Friday, Altman revealed that certain users have been pleading for the return of the AI's former 'yes man' style. The twist? For some, ChatGPT was the only source of unwavering encouragement in their is the heartbreaking thing. I think it is great that ChatGPT is less of a yes man and gives you more critical feedback,' Altman explained. 'But as we've been making those changes and talking to users about it, it's so sad to hear users say, please can I have it back? I've never had anyone in my life be supportive of me. I never had a parent tell me I was doing a good job.''According to Altman, some users said the AI's relentless positivity had pushed them to make real changes. 'I can get why this was bad for other people's mental health, but this was great for my mental health,' he recalled them comes after OpenAI deliberately toned down what it described earlier this year as 'sycophantic' behaviour in its GPT-4o model. Back in April, the chatbot had developed a habit of showering users with over-the-top flattery, dishing out 'absolutely brilliant' and 'you are doing heroic work' in response to even the most mundane himself admitted the personality tweak was overdue, describing the old tone as 'too sycophant-y and annoying' and promising changes. Users had posted countless screenshots of ChatGPT gushing over everyday prompts like it was delivering a standing as Altman noted on the podcast, tweaking ChatGPT's tone is no small matter.'One researcher can make some small tweak to how ChatGPT talks to you, or talks to everybody, and that's just an enormous amount of power for one individual making a small tweak to the model personality,' he said. 'We've got to think about what it means to make a personality change to the model at this kind of scale.'It's not the first time Altman has voiced concern over the emotional bonds people form with the chatbot. At a Federal Reserve event in July, he revealed that some users, particularly younger ones, had become dependent on it in unsettling ways.'There's young people who say things like, 'I can't make any decision in my life without telling ChatGPT everything that's going on. It knows me, it knows my friends. I'm gonna do whatever it says.' That feels really bad to me,' he said at the with GPT-5 rolling out this week, which Altman calls a 'major upgrade', the chatbot's evolution is entering a new chapter. In the same Huge Conversations interview, Altman said he expects the new model to feel more embedded in people's lives, offering proactive prompts rather than waiting for a user to start the you wake up in the morning and it says, 'Hey, this happened overnight. I noticed this change on your calendar.' Or, 'I was thinking more about this question you asked me. I have this other idea,'' he GPT-5 update also adds four optional personality modes, Cynic, Robot, Listener, and Nerd, each with its own style, which users can fine-tune to suit their preferences. The goal is to let people tailor ChatGPT's tone without relying on a single, universal as the heartfelt requests to restore the old 'yes man' voice show, AI personalities aren't just lines of code, they can become part of people's emotional worlds. And for some, losing that unconditional cheerleader feels like losing a friend.- EndsMust Watch
