logo
Q&A with University of Louisiana System President Rick Gallot on higher education

Q&A with University of Louisiana System President Rick Gallot on higher education

Yahoo18-04-2025
University of Louisiana System President Rick Gallot speaks at the Baton Rouge Press Club (Piper Hutchinson/Louisiana Illuminator)
This is an interview with University of Louisiana System President Rick Gallot that took place earlier this month about how the legislative session and federal changes will impact higher education in Louisiana. It has been edited for length and clarity.
You can also listen to a version of this interview on our new podcast The Light Switch.
Piper Hutchinson: What do you think is coming for higher education this session?
Rick Gallot: I think certainly starting with a standstill budget is always better than starting with a proposed cut. So, you know, we're certainly very grateful for that. I think there's a lot of uncertainty, coming out of Washington and with the constitutional amendments that did not pass, obviously that has created some angst in terms of what do we do now, right? And so I think there is, again, just an overall level of uncertainty that we'll see it … kind of play out over time.
I think if you look at the increased revenue from the sales, sales taxes and other things, we're certainly not in a real bad spot right now as a state in terms of our finances. So I'm still optimistic that we will work through the challenges in the session, and we will come out good on the other side.
Hutchinson: Looking at the bills that we have so far, what do you think is going to be the most impactful for higher education?
Gallot: It's hard to say, and when you look at what's filed versus what ultimately makes it through the process; all bills filed on the front end don't always make it. Rep. (Emily) Chenevert has come back with another diversity, equity and inclusion bill. We will certainly have to see how that plays out. The bill she had last year started one way and ended up another. … Certainly with all other higher ed leaders, she was very receptive to meeting with us and working through some of those challenges last year. At the end of the day, I think the budget is always going to be the main focus that could impact the trajectory going forward.
Hutchinson: There's one bill that's going to have a big impact for your system, talking about transferring UNO back to the LSU System. What should we expect on that front?
Gallot: For me personally, it's a full-circle moment. I was in the house when UNO was transferred from LSU to the University of Louisiana System. You know, I just want what's best for the students, for the campus community at the University of New Orleans. It is a legislative prerogative. They have the authority to transfer universities from one system to the other. So if this legislation is successful, we will certainly do our part to ensure that it is a seamless transition. We will work with LSU, with Board of Regents and with the legislature to ensure that the transition is as smooth as it could possibly be.
Hutchinson: What's that like for you [as a former legislator] during the legislative session, being kind of outside the rails?
Gallot: Well, I certainly have a lot of respect for our legislators and the sacrifices they all make in serving. I'm a huge fan of Stephen Covey's 'Seven Habits,' and one of those is: 'Seek, first to understand then to be understood.' And so I think that's helpful to understand the pressures that our legislators are under, knowing that there's a lot that they have to balance. I think it's helpful, quite frankly. And I don't think I burned any bridges while here.
I mean, I did oversee redistricting, so maybe I did [burn] one or two. But for the most part, I still have good relationships with many of my former colleagues … who are still there. I'm grateful to have the opportunity to be a part of the process but from this side.
Hutchinson: There has been a little bit of controversy in the LSU System lately, that's reignited these conversations about curbing tenure. What are you hearing on that front, and what would that mean for higher education as a whole if they did take an axe to tenure?
Gallot: Going back to COVID, and you think about faculty members, who go through the process of, not only a bachelor's and a master's and a terminal degree. You know, they get hired, they're on a tenure track, they're researching, they're writing, they're building their portfolio, and at the appropriate time they apply for tenure. I think we have to respect that process.
I think it is one that is deeply rooted in higher education, and so I think we certainly have to respect faculty and that they have earned this.
Now, having said that, it's always one or two bad apples that will spoil the barrel, as they say. I don't know that simply doing away with tenure is the answer.
If the legislature passes something, then we, as a state system, will certainly abide by whatever changes may be made. I think we want accountability at all levels, that we want our students to be in the best position to learn. We want our faculty to be in the best position to teach, and that our students would graduate and go out and make a difference in society. So we'll certainly be watching it closely, and hopefully we will see thoughtful debate throughout the process. And again, with whatever the ultimate result is, we will work with it.
Hutchinson: I can't not talk about what's going on at the federal level. We're talking about cutting research funding. There are concerns about immigration and graduate students, and certainly tariffs could increase expenses for higher education. How is the UL System adapting to all of this?
Gallot: Right now there's so much uncertainty just across the board. Whether it's the potential loss of research funding and indirect cost, for instance, universities build their budgets based upon what they believe the revenue stream will be from these research grants. I'm hopeful that we will sort of get through this period of uncertainty, and we will see things sort of settle down to be a little more predictable. But you know, at the same time, we will have to adjust if the rules are changed. If the funding formulas are changed, we will just have to adapt. We always have and we always will.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

University of Louisiana at Lafayette president to retire immediately
University of Louisiana at Lafayette president to retire immediately

Yahoo

time31-07-2025

  • Yahoo

University of Louisiana at Lafayette president to retire immediately

A brick wall sign marks the entrance to the University of Louisiana at Lafayette campus on May 15, 2025. (Greg LaRose/Louisiana Illuminator) University of Louisiana at Lafayette President Joseph Savoie will retire at the end of the week. Savoie's retirement was announced Wednesday by University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors Chairman Mark Romero at a special board meeting. Its members voted unanimously to name Savoie ULL's president emeritus. Savoie has served as president since 2008 and oversaw the university's transformation into a major research institution. In 2022, ULL received the prestigious R1 status in the Carnegie Classifications of Institutions, meaning it has very high levels of research activity. The other R1 universities in Louisiana are LSU and Tulane. ULL Provost Jaimie Hebert will serve as interim president while a search is conducted. No timeline to choose Savoie's replacement has been announced. 'I reached the decision to transition to this new position after months of careful consideration,' Savoie said in a news release. 'Higher education has changed immensely in the past two decades. The expectations on colleges and universities are as great as they have ever been and meeting those responsibilities to our community today – and to generations that follow – requires new ideas and fresh approaches.' Savoie's decision to retire early — his employment agreement was slated to expire June 30, 2026 — came after an unfavorable state audit earlier this year that found repeat findings from the previous year, which earned Savoie sharp questions from the board in April. Romero said Savoie was not asked to step down due to the audit. Savoie will stay on at the university as president emeritus. In an interview after the board meeting Wednesday, Savoie said he intends to take an active role in the administration over the next year, primarily working on external relations, before returning to his faculty position in education. Before becoming president of ULL, Savoie was the state's commissioner of higher education, a role in which he oversaw all of the state's university and college systems. Romero said the board has not yet decided on a search timeline for Savoie's replacement, but one would likely be announced at its August meeting. The UL System board also announced that University of New Orleans chief financial officer Edwin Litolff will assume the same position at ULL. Before moving to UNO to aid in their financial crisis, Litolff held the same position at Grambling State University. Savoie's departure means Louisiana's two largest universities – ULL and LSU – are without permanent presidents. Former LSU President William Tate announced his departure in May. Matt Lee, vice president for agriculture and dean of LSU's College of Agriculture, is currently serving as interim president. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Solve the daily Crossword

America's Toymakers are in Trouble
America's Toymakers are in Trouble

Newsweek

time30-07-2025

  • Newsweek

America's Toymakers are in Trouble

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins and see higher costs being passed onto the consumer. Financial results released last week by America's largest toy manufacturers, Mattel and Hasbro, revealed the continued costs of the trade war and lingering uncertainty around tariffs. Mattel, whose brand portfolio includes Barbie dolls and the UNO card game, reported a 6 percent decline in second quarter net sales. Meanwhile, Hasbro, the company behind Nerf and My Little Pony, reported a 16 percent decline in revenue for its core toys and games business. While this was almost offset by significant improvements in its trading card and digital gaming segments, the company's net sales were nevertheless down 1 percent year-over-year as it reported an $856 million net loss for the quarter. Newsweek contacted Mattel and Hasbro via email on Tuesday for comment. In their results and subsequent earnings calls, both companies cited the continued uncertainty created by tariffs, which continue to weigh on supply chains and inventory levels. Hasbro attributed its net loss in the quarter to a $1 billion impairment charge related to its consumer products segment and caused by the implementation of tariffs. While most sectors of the economy are exposed to major shifts in trade policy, toys are particularly vulnerable given the industry's reliance on globalized supply chains and outsized dependence on Chinese imports, with around three-quarters of the toys sold in America manufactured in China. Prior to the 90-day pause agreed between the U.S. and China in May—which has seen tariffs temporarily lowered from their previous, staggering rates—the two companies were among those who said they may need to raise prices to offset the impact of tariffs. This led to toys—dolls in particular—becoming a surprising flash point in the debate over trade policy, and sparked a confrontation between the Trump administration and Mattel after CEO Ynon Kreiz said that the company had no plans to relocate manufacturing operations to the U.S. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Though both companies said that tariff-related headwinds had eased from earlier this year, price impacts are still set to take effect. Mattel's CFO Paul Ruh told analysts last week that only 40 to 50 percent of toys would remain under $20 despite given the "pricing actions" tariffs had demanded. Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks told CNN earlier this month that toy prices may increase this fall because of tariffs on Chinese and Vietnamese goods. "We have already raised prices due to the tariffs and, unfortunately, the consumer will be paying for this," said Isaac Larian, CEO and founder of the California-based toy company MGA Entertainment. Larian told Newsweek that MGA, known primarily as the company behind Bratz dolls, had tried to absorb the costs associated with tariffs, but that "with small margins in the toy industry we have no choice but to pass along the tariff increases." The price of toys, games, hobbies and play equipment increased by 2.2 percent between April and May, compared to the 0.1 percent increase for all items, according to Labor Department Data. This was followed by a 1.2 percent jump in June, again outpacing the wider 0.3 percent increase. According to MGA's CEO, the impacts of tariffs have been far greater than anticipated by the industry. "In addition to the increased import and export costs, the constant changes to the imposed tariffs have created a lot of uncertainty and nobody can run a business with uncertainty," Larian told Newsweek. Regarding the possibility of bringing manufacturing to the U.S. to offset these impacts, and increasing the share of toys made in its Hudson, Ohio factory, he said that, were this possible, MGA "would do so immediately." "However, it is just not possible to make certain toys in America," he said. "China is the factory of the world - no other country has the know-how and infrastructure of China to make toys currently." Larian expects further price increases throughout the remainder of 2025, but is holding out hope for negotiations between the U.S. and China to permanently bring down tariffs to a manageable level. Representatives of the two countries recently met in Stockholm for another round of trade talks. While the discussions concluded without a fully-fledged agreement to reduce tariffs, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the meeting as "very productive." International Trade Representative for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce Li Chenggang said that both sides will "continue to push" for an extension on the 90-day pause beyond the deadline of August 12, CNN reports.

BlackRock's Panama ports deal gets more complicated
BlackRock's Panama ports deal gets more complicated

Axios

time28-07-2025

  • Axios

BlackRock's Panama ports deal gets more complicated

CK Hutchinson of Hong Kong on Monday said that it plans to add a "major strategic" Chinese investor to its $22.8 billion ports deal with BlackRock, adding that an exclusive negotiating period between the two firms has expired. Why it matters: This complicates March's landmark agreement that would transfer control of 43 ports in 23 countries, including two in Panama that President Trump has threatened to retake by force. State of play: China called Hutchinson's initial deal a "betrayal," and today's announcement appears aimed at securing Beijing's approval. The company didn't provide many additional details, except to say talks are ongoing, but the FT reports that state-owned shipper Cosco is the unnamed investor. Zoom in: BlackRock's initial agreement was bifurcated between the Panama ports and all the rest, although the entire package is currently on hold. Don't be surprised if Cosco, or another PRC-tied investor, only buys into the non-Panama piece. Talks are ongoing, and it appears that Hutchinson was required to let the exclusive negotiating period expire in order to introduce a new investor. Even if a deal were announced shortly, it could take years to close.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store