Hezbollah warns Lebanon 'will have no life' if state moves against it
The government wants to control arms in line with a U.S.-backed plan following Israel's military campaign against Hezbollah which was founded four decades ago with the backing of Tehran's Revolutionary Guards.
But the group is resisting pressure to disarm, saying that cannot happen until Israel ends its strikes and occupation of a southern strip of Lebanon that had been a Hezbollah stronghold.
"This is our nation together. We live in dignity together, and we build its sovereignty together - or Lebanon will have no life if you stand on the other side and try to confront us and eliminate us," its leader Naim Qassem said in a televised speech.
Israel has dealt Hezbollah heavy blows in the last two years, killing many of its top brass including former leader Hassan Nasrallah and 5,000 of its fighters, and destroying much of its arsenal.
The Lebanese cabinet last week tasked the army with confining weapons only to state security forces, a move that has outraged Hezbollah.
Qassem accused the government of implementing an "American-Israeli order to eliminate the resistance, even if that leads to civil war and internal strife."
However, he said Hezbollah and the Amal movement, its Shi'ite Muslim ally, had decided to delay any street protests while there was still scope for talks.
"There is still room for discussion, for adjustments, and for a political resolution before the situation escalates to a confrontation no one wants," Qassem said.
"But if it is imposed on us, we are ready, and we have no other choice ... At that point, there will be a protest in the street, all across Lebanon, that will reach the American embassy."
The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel, which left parts of Lebanon in ruins, erupted in October 2023 when the group opened fire at Israeli positions along the southern border in solidarity with its Palestinian ally Hamas at the start of the Gaza war.
Hezbollah and Amal still retain influence politically, appointing Shi'ite ministers to cabinet and holding the Shi'ite seats in parliament. But for the first time in years, they do not hold a "blocking third" of cabinet, enabling them to veto government decisions in the past.
Hezbollah retains strong support among the Shi'ite community in Lebanon, but calls for its disarmament across the rest of society have grown.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Spectator
The Alaska summit doesn't look good for Ukraine
And just like that, the highly-anticipated summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska has been and gone, seemingly without very much at all to show for it. The two presidents met in Anchorage yesterday for what Trump had touted as a 'feel-out' meeting to lay the groundwork for negotiations to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. But despite Trump rating the tête-à-tête a ten out of ten – 'in the sense that we got along great' – on substance, the American president has come away with little to prove that Putin is any closer to stopping his invasion. Yesterday's meeting was a historic event: this was the first time Trump and Putin had met in person since 2019, and the first time the Russian president had stepped foot on American soil in a decade. The American delegation did their best to treat Putin as the global statesman – rather than pariah – that he has always craved. A red carpet was rolled out for him at the airport, with Trump himself there to meet him and shake his hand on landing. Yesterday had the potential to be pivotal for the war in Ukraine. In refusing to pull the trigger on the secondary sanctions he had threatened against countries that buy Russian oil, and instead calling this summit, Trump had created a unique opportunity to appeal directly to Putin. The American president had kept his cards close to his chest in the run up to the summit, but had variously floated ideas about 'land swaps', including retrieving for Ukraine its 'ocean real estate', and bringing in 'severe consequences' in the form of sanctions if Putin didn't comply. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies had spent the week fearing the worst and appealing to Trump not to sign away the country's territory to Putin without consulting Zelensky first. Trump had appeared to agree, saying discussions about exchanging territory would come at a second, follow-up meeting between the three leaders. And yet, despite the global attention yesterday's meeting received, surprisingly little is known about how it went or what – if anything – was agreed. The leaders met one-on-one for three hours, followed by a wider three-hour meeting that also included their political entourages. Ahead of the summit, Trump had said a joint press conference with Putin afterwards, or simply one on his own, would depend on how things between them went. In the event, the two leaders did a short, 12-minute press conference together, taking no questions. The working lunch due to take place between both delegations was cancelled and the two leaders boarded their planes for home shortly afterwards. Trump, who typically likes to think out loud on his Truth Social media platform, remained uncharacteristically quite on there on the trip back to Washington. Speaking to Fox News afterwards though, Trump said the two had a 'very good meeting'. And yet, with little seemingly achieved by the American President to help Ukraine fend off its invader, it's hard to see how this is the case. Things for Putin, however, look rosier. Trump has clearly failed to wield any threats or incentives capable of forcing the Russian president to consider a ceasefire in Ukraine. Indeed, the Kremlin is already boasting this morning that Trump refused to follow through on his threat to increase sanctions on Russia, and that Moscow could negotiate without having to pause its 'special military operation' in Ukraine. In the hours since the summit ended, Trump has been on the phone to debrief Zelensky and Ukraine's European allies. No doubt their reactions to the meeting with Putin will start to filter through in the coming hours. And yet the signs for Ukraine don't look promising. Trump has already started to publicly pile the pressure on Zelensky to 'make a deal' with Putin, who 'wants to solve the problem'. The Ukrainian president will meet with Trump on Monday to discuss the situation further. Many were hoping that yesterday would provide clarity, both on Ukraine's future and the role of Trump and the US in the conflict. Those hopes have been dashed – for a little while longer, Ukraine's fate continues to hang in the balance.
Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP body language expert has revealed how Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump tried to out macho each other during their meeting in Alaska. The US President greeted his Russian counterpart on the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Air Base on Friday. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 The US President greeted Putin with a warm handshake 7 The pair looked relaxed and pleased to see each other 7 A press call turned to chaos when Putin suggested he couldn't hear the journalist's question Credit: Reuters The pair went on to address the world in a brief press conference and negotiate with their teams in private. Putin looked relaxed as he walked down a red carpet towards Trump - giving the US leader a thumbs-up before greeting him with a warm handshake. Both of them then shared a moment alone in Trump's presidential limo - known as The Beast - before posing for journalists during a chaotic photocall. Their public interactions were watched and poured over with fine tooth comb - not just to find out the diplomatic outcome of their historic meeting, but also to dissect the two men's relationship. A top body language expert told The Sun that Trump and Putin tried to display their egos in a "frenzy" moment to perceive themselves as the two most powerful men on earth. Darren Stanton, known as the human lie detector, said Putin and Trump were matching each other's "power gestures" in a show of force to convey confidence and authority. There were also subtle signs showing Trump was trying to look stronger than Vlad. Mr Stanton said: "Both men displayed what we call the reverse steeple gesture, which is used to convey power and authority. "Both Putin and Trump are Alpha males and fully aware of what these gestures mean. Both men are trying to convey confidence, being self-assured. "They used the signs to express, 'I will not be pushed around. I am the most dominant person here'. "Both Putin and Trump match and mirror each other's gestures and behaviours. Putin is the only politician that Trump does not employ his full arsenal of trying to undermine, intimidate and make them look weak. He always meets Putin on mutual ground. "But there were signs that Trump was trying to look stronger and also trying to be subtle." He added that Trump's hero welcome of Putin will likely rattle America's European allies and Zelensky. Mr Stanton added: "Zelensky will not be happy about the way Trump welcomed Putin. The fact that Trump pulled all the stops and gave him a grand welcome." The expert said Trump showed a mutual respect for Putin, and both leaders had a genuine smile on their faces despite all the side issues. This was seen when the US leader lightly applauded his Russian counterpart as he approached him on the tarmac. And later when he "gently patted" his hand - a symbolic gesture of familiarity and friendliness. Trump also broke from his usual approach as the pair shook hands, opting to have his hand under Putin's showing a more "subordinate position". 7 The pair appeared to try and out macho each other Credit: Getty 7 Putin appeared shocked during the press call Body language expert Patty Ann Wood told Newsweek: "Trump typically likes to have his hand on top, but here it appears he presented his palm up—a weaker, more subordinate position—indicating he sees Putin as more powerful." While Trump showed initial deference to the Russian leader, he followed up the handshake with a pat on Putin's back. Ms Wood said this is a subtle "sign of dominance" and it symbolically says "I could strike you if I wanted to." When the pair sat down for questions from journalists, pleasantries turned to chaos as the press pool began throwing tough questions at Putin. One of the journalists asked: 'How can the US trust your word? Will you stop killing?' Smirking Putin then appeared to shout over the journalists before the camera was forced to cut away. He appeared baffled as journalists quizzed him over the slaughter in Ukraine. At one stage, he pointed to his ear to indicate he couldn't hear. But body language expert Dr. Beth Dawson said this was actually a sign of the leader not wanting to answer the difficult question. She told the NY Post: "He's looking down, his mouth is turned down … It doesn't look like a genuine, 'Okay, what are you saying? I can't hear you. Could you repeat it, please?' 7 Putin and Trump were all smiles as they met in Alaska
Western Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
U-turn as Trump administration agrees to keep Washington police chief in place
Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi, in a new memo, directed the district's police to co-operate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. The order came after officials in the nation's capital sued on Friday to block President Donald Trump's takeover of the capital's police. Donald Trump (Jae C Hong/AP) The night before, his administration had escalated its intervention into the city's law enforcement by naming a federal official as the new emergency head of the department, essentially placing the police force under full control of the federal government. The attorney general's new order represents a partial retreat for the Trump administration in the face of intense scepticism from a judge over the legality of Ms Bondi's earlier directive, but she also signalled the administration would continue to pressure DC leaders to help federal authorities aggressively pursue immigrants in the country illegally, despite city laws that limit co-operation between police and immigration authorities. In a social media post on Friday evening, Ms Bondi criticised DC attorney general Brian Schwalb, saying he 'continues to oppose our efforts to improve public safety', but she added: 'We remain committed to working closely with Mayor Bowser.' Mayor Muriel Bowser's office said late on Friday that it was still evaluating how it can comply with the new Bondi order on immigration enforcement operations. The police department had already eased some restrictions on co-operating with federal officials facilitating Mr Trump's mass deportation campaign but reaffirmed that it would follow the district's sanctuary city laws. In a letter sent on Friday night to DC citizens, Ms Bowser wrote: 'It has been an unsettling and unprecedented week in our city. Over the course of a week, the surge in federal law enforcement across DC has created waves of anxiety.' Attorney general Pam Bondi (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) She added that 'our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now', but added that if Washingtonians stick together, 'we will show the entire nation what it looks like to fight for American democracy – even when we don't have full access to it'. The legal battle was the latest evidence of the escalating tensions in a mostly Democratic city that now has its police department largely under the control of the Republican president's administration. Mr Trump's takeover is historic, yet it had played out with a slow ramp-up in federal law enforcement officials and National Guard troops to start the week. As the weekend approached, signs across the city — from the streets to the legal system — suggested a deepening crisis over who controls the city's immigration and policing policies, the district's right to govern itself and daily life for the millions of people who live and work in the metro area. The two sides sparred in court for hours Friday before US District Judge Ana Reyes, who is overseeing the district's lawsuit. She indicated the law is not likely to grant the Trump administration power to fully take over city police, but it probably gives the president more power than the city might like. 'The way I read the statute, the president can ask, the mayor must provide, but the president can't control,' said Judge Reyes, who was nominated to the bench by Joe Biden. The judge pushed the two sides to make a compromise. A lawyer for the Trump administration, Yaakov Roth, said the move to sideline Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith came after an immigration order that still held back some aid to federal authorities. He argued that the president has broad authority to determine what kind of help police in Washington must provide. Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) The police takeover is the latest move by Trump to test the limits of his legal authorities to carry out his agenda, relying on obscure statutes and a supposed state of emergency to bolster his tough-on-crime message and his plans to speed up the mass deportation of people in the United States illegally. It also marks one of the most sweeping assertions of federal authority over a local government in modern times. While Washington has grappled with spikes in violence and visible homelessness, the city's homicide rate ranks below those of several other major US cities, and the capital is not in the throes of the public safety collapse the Trump administration has portrayed. The president has more power over the nation's capital than other cities, but DC has elected its own mayor and city council since the Home Rule Act was signed in 1973. Mr Trump is the first president to exert control over the city's police force since it was passed. The law limits that control to 30 days without congressional approval, though Mr Trump has suggested he would seek to extend it. Ms Bondi's Thursday night directive to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, in charge of the police department came after Ms Smith had told officers to share information with immigration agencies regarding people not in custody, such as someone involved in a traffic stop. The Justice Department said Ms Bondi disagreed with the police chief's instructions because they allowed for continued practice of 'sanctuary policies', which generally limit co-operation by local law enforcement with federal immigration officers.
