Home loan balance transfer: 3 smart reasons why you should switch today
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recently reduced the repo rate twice in 2025. First it was reduced to 6.25% in the month of February and then to 6% in the month of April. This has created a fairly reasonable opportunity for all home loan borrowers to try and explore refinancing options.
Now to facilitate the same, one such option is the Home Loan Balance Transfer (HLBT), which allows borrowers to shift and transfer their loans to another reputable lender offering more reasonable terms. Let us explore three smart reasons to consider home loan balance transfer along with the associated pros and cons.
A home loan balance transfer is the process of transferring your existing home loan from one bank or lender to another. This is usually done to take the advantage of improved loan terms, better interest rates, lower EMIs etc. Some salient features of transferring a home loan are discussed below:
Now, a home loan balance transfer helps in EMI savings as generally interest rates are reduced when the lender is changed. Transfer from a higher to a lower interest rate helps in boosting savings. For example: Shifting a ₹ 45 lakh loan from 9.5% to 8.5% can help in savings over ₹ 4.6 lakhs in interest.
As of April 2025, balance transfer rates range between 8.00% and 9.90%. For example: HDFC Bank provides for a transfer rate of 8.75%, SBI provides for 8.50%, LIC Housing Finance provides for 9.10% as defined by the following table:
Banks Transfer Rate State Bank of India 8.50% per annum HDFC Bank 8.75% per annum LIC Housing Finance 9.10% per annum Bank of Baroda 8.85% per annum
Note: The rates discussed above are illustrative in nature. For the exact figures refer to the official websites of the respective financial institutions.
Now it is a given that lower EMI burdens can improve monthly cash flow. They can hence leave a bigger amount of cash in the hands of the home loan borrower. All one needs in this case is efficient planning with a certified tax consultant.
HLBT is not just about lower interest rates. It also provides better clarity and repayment flexibility to the borrowers. Some lenders even provide tenures of up to 30 years and EMI modification and customisation opportunities.
Several others offer top up loans alongside transfer that can be used for expenses such as home redevelopment, medical needs and education.
Borrowers often consider switching due to hidden charges, processing fees, improper service at their existing financial institutions. New lenders might offer a more fair fee structure, seamless support and better digital platforms, making the switch more than just a financial decision. Processing fees: Typically 0.35% to 1% of the loan amount. Still, this can change with added processing fees depending on the financial institution.
Typically 0.35% to 1% of the loan amount. Still, this can change with added processing fees depending on the financial institution. Administrative & legal complications: This varies from lender to lender but needs to be kept in mind.
This varies from lender to lender but needs to be kept in mind. Prepayment penalties: There are no charges on floating-rate loans (as per RBI); fixed-rate loans may still attract fees. For more you should reach out to the customer support team of your respective financial institution.
There are no charges on floating-rate loans (as per RBI); fixed-rate loans may still attract fees. For more you should reach out to the customer support team of your respective financial institution. Hidden costs: Always check the fine print carefully. Then ask for a detailed fee breakdown, if possible ask for a printed brochure of the same.
Always check the fine print carefully. Then ask for a detailed fee breakdown, if possible ask for a printed brochure of the same. Cost-benefit analysis: Do make sure interest savings outweigh total switching costs.
With declining interest rates and competitive lenders, this entire year of 2025 is a smart time to consider a home loan balance transfer if the numbers are as per your expectations.
Disclaimer: Interest rates and charges mentioned are illustrative and subject to change. Please verify details with your lender or financial advisor before proceeding with a home loan balance transfer.
First Published: 25 Apr 2025, 01:26 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Is IBC an effective resolution tool?
The story so far: More than eight years have passed since the enactment of India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). According to data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), creditors have realised ₹3.89 lakh crore under the framework, with a recovery rate of over 32.8% against admitted claims. Why was the IBC enacted? India enacted the IBC, its first comprehensive bankruptcy law, in 2016 to improve the overall corporate insolvency resolution process. Shifting control from debtors to creditors, the IBC introduced a time-bound resolution mechanism to streamline bankruptcy proceedings, reduce judicial delays, and improve creditor recoveries. According to current provisions, a maximum timeline of 330 days is allowed to find a resolution for a company admitted into the insolvency resolution process. Otherwise, the company goes into liquidation. So far, the Code has rescued 1,194 companies through resolution plans. Is IBC a preferred route for debt recovery? As per the Reserve Bank of India report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India released in December 2024, the IBC emerged as the dominant recovery route, accounting for 48% of all recoveries made by banks followed by the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act (32%), Debt Recovery Tribunals (17%), and Lok Adalats (3%) in the Financial Year 2023-24. The realisation under IBC is more than 170.1% as against the liquidation value. Resolution plans, on average, are yielding 93.41% of the fair value of the Corporate Debtors (CDs), IBBI said. Further, 1,276 cases have been settled through appeal, review, or settlement, and 1,154 cases have been withdrawn under section 12A. The Code has referred 2,758 companies for liquidation, as per IBBI data. Nearly 10 companies are being resolved against five going into liquidation. Has IBC been an effective recovery mechanism? Akshat Khetan, Founder, AU Corporate Advisory and Legal Services, pointed out that IBC has changed the underlying credit culture. As the Supreme Court once observed, 'the defaulter's paradise is lost' and the Code has created a credible threat that ensures timely repayment. On the recovery rate of 32.8%, Mr. Khetan pointed out that it must be interpreted in light of the distressed nature of the assets that come into the IBC process, often after years of erosion. As the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has rightly remarked in one of its rulings, 'IBC is not a recovery mechanism; it is a resolution framework.' Compared to legacy systems, where recovery rates were often below 20% with timelines extending into decades, a 32.8% realisation is a leap forward, he said. Mr. Khetan also stated that the statistic does not capture qualitative gains, such as job preservation, improved enterprise value, and restored investor confidence. In a framework designed to balance resolution over liquidation, the broader economic impact of IBC far outweighs numerical recovery alone, he said. The provisions of the IBC have prompted debtors to take early action in distress situations, marking a shift in their behaviour. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) data show that 30,310 cases were settled prior to admission, covering underlying defaults worth ₹13.78 lakh crore till December 2024. A study by the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, submitted to IBBI, said IBC has injected discipline in the credit allocation process and has prompted borrowers to adhere to stipulated payment schedules. The gross non-performing assets of the scheduled commercial banks have declined from a peak of 11.2% in March 2018 to 2.8% in March 2024. A part of that reduction is attributable to resolution processes enabled under IBC, it said. The study also indicated a 3% reduction in the cost of debt for distressed firms post-IBC, compared to non-distressed firms , indicating an improved credit environment for distressed firms. The IBC has had a positive impact on corporate governance, reflected in the increased proportion of independent directors on the boards of companies resolved under the Code. What are the major challenges? In a recent report, India Ratings and Research said that judicial delays and post-resolution uncertainties continue to affect confidence in the IBC framework. Even when resolution applicants are ready and the Committee of Creditors has granted approval, delays at the NCLT continue to push recovery timelines. In several cases, such delays result in extended litigation or failed implementation, increasing the risk of liquidation for a viable asset that requires timely execution, it said. The future insolvencies also raise questions about the Code's readiness to handle non-traditional enterprise defaults. While the IBC is legally broad enough to accommodate various resolution strategies, key commercial elements such as intellectual property valuation, treatment of employee dues, and tech continuity require a clearer treatment under the framework to make it future-ready, India Ratings said. To enhance its effectiveness, India must invest in strengthening tribunal infrastructure, allow for pre-packaged insolvency, and establish jurisprudential guardrails to protect bona fide commercial decisions from post-resolution uncertainty, Mr. Khetan said. While challenges persist, including process delays and recovery rates below expectations, the Code's foundational structure remains sound. As implementation matures and jurisprudence evolves, the IBC is well-positioned to overcome these hurdles and fully realise its transformative potential in India's financial ecosystem, IBBI Chairman Ravi Mital said in the recent quarterly newsletter. Does the SC verdict on Bhushan Steel pose a challenge to IBC? The recent developments in the Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. case have reignited concerns around the finality of resolution outcomes and the predictability of the framework. While the decision upholds compliance standards, its timing and implications highlight the need for judicial clarity and faster adjudication to sustain investor confidence in the process in the long term, India Ratings said. By questioning a transaction that had been closed and operational for years, it risks unsettling the core principle of commercial certainty. If resolution applicants fear judicial reversals even after significant investment, they may hesitate to bid, undermining the IBC's very purpose. The Bhushan verdict thus underscores the need for legal sanctity once a resolution plan is approved and implemented, Mr. Khetan said. The IBC is not merely a piece of economic legislation, it is the backbone of India's credit ecosystem. Its future lies in striking a fine balance between judicial oversight and economic pragmatism. As India aspires to become a $5 trillion economy, robust and predictable insolvency mechanisms are indispensable. The Code must remain nimble, continually evolving to meet emerging realities while ensuring that commercial wisdom is not second-guessed endlessly, he said. Almost 78% of the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cases have exceeded 270 days, post-admission by the NCLT, as on March 31, 2025, ratings agency ICRA said. A sustained momentum would be needed to minimise haircuts for lenders, which remain high at 67%, it said. Nevertheless, some of the recent judgments reinforce the need for timely and transparent resolution, thereby putting greater onus on the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and NCLT. However, such rulings may also impact investor confidence in stressed assets setting precedents that the decision made by the CoC and the NCLT may be challenged and overturned by the judicial system, thus impacting the effectiveness of the resolution process, ICRA said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fintech entry cleared: Flipkart gets RBI nod for lending licence; plans for NBFC rollout still under wraps
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now has received a lending licence from the Reserve Bank of India, paving the way for direct financing to customers, though the ecommerce firm is yet to disclose operational details. The Walmart-backed company confirmed on Thursday that it had secured a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) licence from the RBI, with sources indicating the approval came in March, PTI reported. While Flipkart acknowledged the development, it did not offer details on how or when the NBFC arm would be operationalised. According to sources, the licence could enable the company to offer credit services such as EMIs or instalment-based financing directly to consumers on its platform. However, specifics of product rollout remain unconfirmed. Walmart currently owns over 80% of Flipkart, having acquired a majority stake in the company in 2018. The development comes shortly after Flipkart, which is preparing for a public listing, announced in April that it plans to shift its holding company from Singapore to India. The move, Flipkart said, aligns its structure with core Indian operations and reflects long-term commitment to the domestic market. "We are inspired by the Government of India's strong vision and proactive initiatives in fostering a thriving business environment and ease of doing business, which have significantly shaped our journey," a Flipkart spokesperson said in April. "This move represents a natural evolution, aligning our holding structure with our core operations, the vast potential of the Indian economy and our technology and innovation-driven capabilities to foster digital transformation in India. "
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Flipkart secures NBFC license from RBI—becomes first Indian e-comm player to offer direct lending
Flipkart has received a lending licence from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Walmart-backed ecommerce company confirmed on Thursday. The nod came in March this year, according to sources. When contacted about the grant of the NBFC licence, Flipkart confirmed the development but did not divulge any details. The move could pave the way for Flipkart to offer loans directly to customers, sources said noting the specific instances in which the customers at times choose the EMI model or instalment mode to pay for products they choose. However, the company's specific plans on this, now with the NBFC licence, could not be immediately ascertained. Walmart currently holds over 80 per cent stake in Flipkart. It had bought a majority stake in the ecommerce platform back in 2018. In April this year, IPO-bound Flipkart had shared its intention to relocate its holding company from Singapore to India, a strategic decision that the homegrown e-commerce firm said reflects "deep and unwavering commitment to India and its remarkable growth". "We are inspired by the Government of India's strong vision and proactive initiatives in fostering a thriving business environment and ease of doing business, which have significantly shaped our journey. This move represents a natural evolution, aligning our holding structure with our core operations, the vast potential of the Indian economy and our technology and innovation-driven capabilities to foster digital transformation in India," a Flipkart spokesperson had said in April.
