Snap to launch AI-powered AR glasses in 2026
Why it matters: Snapchat still makes most of its money from advertising on its mobile app, but CEO Evan Spiegel believes the future of connection, and its business, will live beyond the smartphone and in the real world.
"The tiny smartphone limited our imagination. It forced us to look down at a screen instead of up at the world. It required our fingers to hold, swipe and tap when we really wanted to live hands-free," he said Tuesday at the Augmented World Expo 2025 in Long Beach, California.
"It kept content confined to a small 2D rectangle, when we really wanted to experience life in all of its three-dimensional splendor."
Catch up quick: The new AR glasses are leaps and bounds more sophisticated than Snapchat's first iteration of consumer wearables, called Spectacles.
Spectacles, which were first launched in 2016, allowed users to take pictures and video with their glasses and add AR overlays onto that content. But those features weren't powered by AI tools, which can now deliver more complex and engaging experiences.
Snap released its fifth generation of Spectacles for developers in 2024. It's since leveraged the creativity and brain power of thousands of developers to help create experiences that will eventually power the version of Specs launching next year.
How it works: Specs will leverage AI to help enhance the consumer experience far beyond creating and capturing content.
The new glasses allow users to share games and experiences with friends, stream content and set up virtual work stations.
They will also leverage AI recommendations and tools to help users with tasks such as figuring out how to change a tire or position a pool cue.
Zoom out: Snap has long prioritized its relationship with the developer community as a way of expanding its creative tools, especially around AR.
Using Snap's existing AR tools, over 400,000 developers have built more than 4 million Snapchat Lenses, or AR overlays, that can be positioned on top of photos or videos taken by users.
Snapchat users currently use AR Lenses in the Snapchat camera 8 billion times per day, according to the company.
With the launch of Specs, Snap said it will also roll out new tools specifically for developers building location-based experiences.
The big picture: Snap's smartphone experience has paved the way for its 3D spatial computing efforts.
Its Snap Map, which now has more than 400 million monthly active users, will eventually become a critical part of its wearables strategy.
In its announcement Tuesday, Snap said it's partnering with Niantic Spatial to bring their visual positioning system to its developer Lens Studio and Specs to build a shared, AI-powered map of the world.
The bottom line: Spiegel believes the hardware space has been slow to elevate and enhance the advancements of sophisticated AI software, and he wants Snap to be the company that bridges that gap.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Budget office says GOP's ‘big beautiful bill' will make rich richer, poor poorer
The Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' will make the poorest Americans even poorer, while padding the wallets of the highest earners the most, according to a new analysis released Monday by Congress's budget arm. The assessment, conducted by the Congressional Budget Office at the request of top Democrats, found that the top 10 percent of earners in the country will see an average boost of $13,600 per year over the next decade as a direct result of provisions in the law, while the bottom 10 percent will see an average annual decrease of $1,200. The report challenges the arguments made by President Trump and other Republicans that the massive domestic policy package would benefit workers at all levels of wealth and income. And it's given fuel to the attacks from Democrats that the legislation was, all along, designed to help the wealthiest people at the expense of the working poor. 'They just confirmed Trump is enriching his billionaire friends at the expense of American families,' Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), the senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee, posted Monday on X after the CBO report was released. 'It is the largest transfer of wealth from working Americans to the ultra-rich in history.' Enacted last month, the 'big, beautiful bill' was a compilation of virtually all of the major domestic policy items Trump had promised on his way to a presidential victory in November. It features an extension of the sweeping tax cuts Republicans had adopted in 2017, during Trump's first term, which were slated to expire at the end of the year, and provides a big boost in spending for border security, the military and domestic energy production. A portion of those new federal costs were offset by steep cuts in federal programs, including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), previously known as food stamps, which benefit lower-income people. The law also puts new limits on ObamaCare subsidies and adopts new caps on federal student loans, which also affect lower-income people disproportionately. The CBO's analysis aims to gauge the cumulative effect of the various components of the law, as applied to households at differing income levels. Most workers will benefit from the law to some degree, largely due to the extension of the 2017 tax cuts, CBO found. High earners benefit the most — $13,600 for the top 10 percent, $3,200 for the next 10 percent below them — because they make the most money and tend not to receive benefits from the federal programs set to be cut. The 20 percent of workers in the middle of the income spectrum will also see a bump: between $800 and $1,200 per year over the next decade, CBO estimated. The lowest earners, however, will see a reduction in overall resources under the new law, largely because the cuts in federal programs like Medicaid and SNAP will eclipse any benefits, including the tax cuts, elsewhere in the bill. That negative trend is expected to hit those in the bottom 20 percent of earners, CBO said, resulting in a $1,200 reduction for the lowest 10 percent of incomes, and a $400 reduction for the 10 percent directly above them. Republicans have dismissed the CBO's projections in the past, arguing that they fail to take into account the broad economic boost provided by the tax cuts — a 'dynamic' benefit the Republicans say benefits people of all income levels.
Atlantic
12 hours ago
- Atlantic
The One Screen-Time Rule All Parents Should Enforce
As a mom, my news feed is flooded with cautionary tales about all the ways technology will ruin my kids—and all the ways I must protect them. Social-media bans. Screen-time limits. The 'Wait Until 8th' pledge. Analog technology. Read their texts. But wait, give them privacy! Add in the eye-roll-inducing reminder that 'every kid is different,' and the guidance will suck the joy out of parenting faster than your kid can download TikTok. My children are young, but already I see the way my toddler signs more after watching an episode of Ms. Rachel, and the eager look in my 5-year-old's eyes when he asks for my phone to watch videos of komodo dragons. At this stage, their digital curiosity feels mostly harmless. But I know that soon we'll be debating whether they can download Snapchat and Instagram, not whether they can watch another episode of Wild Kratts on PBS Kids, and I dread the thought of having to navigate the thicket of advice. So I listened up when the psychologist Jonathan Haidt, the author of The Anxious Generation, told me during a recent interview that there's one tech rule he 'really' regrets not following with his kids: no screens in the bedroom, ever. Immediately, I was drawn to the simplicity. There were no apps to download, no timers to set, nothing to buy. And I was comforted by how widely endorsed the guidance is. The psychologist Lisa Damour, who specializes in adolescent development, has told parents that if they implement only one tech rule, this should be it. Michael Rich, a pediatrician and the founder of Boston Children's Hospital's Digital Wellness Lab, told me that he 'strongly' recommends the same. It seemed like a holy grail—the rule to follow if you can follow only one rule. Some of the reasons for the guidance are obvious. For years, experts, including those at the American Academy of Pediatrics, have urged parents to wrestle kids' screens out of their room in the evening. As many people well know, using screens at night delays bedtime, shortens sleep duration, and worsens sleep quality; phones can disrupt rest just by being in the same room, Lauren Hale, a professor studying sleep at Stony Brook Medicine, told me. The impacts of insufficient sleep can be wide ranging, including poor cognitive performance, worse academic outcomes, and lowered immune function. And crucially, 'anything that undermines sleep is going to undermine adolescent mental health,' Damour told me. Not getting enough sleep is a significant risk factor for suicidal thoughts and self-harm. The promise of protecting my kids' mental health would have been enough to convince me to declare their bedrooms screen-free zones. But, experts told me, the benefits extend even further. For one, unlike so many other rules, keeping screens out of bedrooms doesn't just impose temporary restrictions that kids will likely ignore as soon as they get an ounce of freedom. It can also help them develop a healthy relationship with technology—one that they'll carry with them as they get older. Rich called this 'future-proofing' your kid. To some extent, Damour told me, adults will naturally become more responsible with technology as they get older and develop better impulse control. But before that time comes, this rule can keep teens from doing things online they may regret. When kids can use their devices only in communal areas such as the kitchen and the living room, there's the obvious plus that parents can keep an eye on what they're doing. Kristina Wright, a mom and writer who lives near Richmond, Virginia, told me that when her teenage son live-games with friends in common areas while she works from home, she can easily ask him about any unfamiliar voices. But a more profound mental shift happens in kids' brains, Damour said. In such a public space, it's a lot harder to forget that anything they do on their computer or phone can become, well, public. Compare that with how many tend to make choices alone in the middle of the night, when 'their impulses are strong and their brakes are weak,' Damour said, and the difference is striking. In addition to facilitating better decision making, using screens around family can be a reminder that many of the best uses of these devices are the most social ones. Scrolling next to Mom and Dad on the couch, kids might feel more inclined to invite parents into their digital life, which, for many kids, is no different from their real life. Rich said that kids often tell him they want their parents to pay more attention to them. They might actually enjoy showing off the TikTok dance they learned, or explaining what rizz means (even if they cringe when their parents try to say it). Conversations like these can create richer family relationships and help counteract smartphones' isolating nature. Along the way, parents might learn about what their kids are into and the world they're growing up in. And at the very least, Damour said, kids won't get a chance to develop the habit of holing up in their bedroom with their phone and never coming out. No other solution to the kids-and-tech conundrum that I've heard of seems likely to be nearly this effective. The 'Wait Until 8th' pledge is great—until phones come and risk tanking kids' sleep and judgment just as they're starting high school. WiFi shutoffs, parental controls, social-media bans, and other restrictions can help fill the gap, but many kids will figure out ways to flout the rules. If your kid uses their phone alone in their room at night, would you even know about their secret finsta? Although it's true that they could break the no-tech-in-bedrooms rule by sneaking their phone in when parents aren't looking, that type of rule-breaking is easier to guard against by keeping devices in parents' rooms or even in lockboxes. Sure, forbidding screens entirely or reverting to '90s tech might promise to solve all our worries, but in a society that's growing more reliant on technology, not everyone wants to limit their kid in that way. And if kids don't have experience using tech, they won't have any opportunities to practice using it responsibly. Parents ready to ban phones from the bedroom would do well to first invest in an old-fashioned alarm clock or radio to make sure their kids don't miss those functions on their phone. Even more important, parents may want to consider following the rule themselves too, Andrea Davis, a mom in Hood River, Oregon, who coaches families on how to navigate technology, told me. Leading by example is much easier. Otherwise, putting the rule into practice is simple. Davis has a charging station in her home office; her kids are responsible for plugging their devices in before bedtime. Hale told me it doesn't matter where you stash your screens, so long as you 'routinize it to make it part of the family plan.' Over time, if kids prove themselves responsible, parents might consider exceptions. Sometimes it's easier for teens to do their homework on a laptop in their bedroom. As kids get older (or in moments when dueling FaceTimes in the living room grow too chaotic), parents might let their children take calls with trusted friends alone in their bedroom. But it is crucial to establish a firm boundary from the start—preferably right when devices are doled out. That's when, as Damour told me, kids are so excited 'that they will very happily agree to all sorts of parameters.' To be clear, I'm not suggesting that parents who opt in to this rule forget about all the others. I certainly won't. Still, for those who don't know where to start, this may be a good first step. I'm sure my sons will grumble about it. But I'm holding on to hope that later on, maybe, just maybe, they'll thank me.
Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Two More States Look To Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. South Carolina and Tennessee are looking to join a throng of states that have placed restrictions on what can be bought using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Why It Matters Since the Trump administration began in January, 12 U.S. states have previously moved to ban unhealthy foods and drinks from being bought using SNAP benefits. Such rule changes, known as waivers, need to be approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees the program. Supporters of restricting SNAP purchases argue that removing unhealthy foods from the program will lead to better health outcomes, and the push to limit what can be bought has been spearheaded by the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement. However, critics contend it dictates how low-income Americans eat and ignores broader issues around access to affordable, nutritious food. If the waiver requests are approved in Tennessee and South Carolina, it could impact nearly 1.3 million SNAP recipients across both states. Stock image/file photo: A person carrying a basket of groceries in a store. Stock image/file photo: A person carrying a basket of groceries in a store. GETTY Tennessee On August 8, Governor Bill Lee announced he would seek a waiver from the USDA to eliminate sugary foods and drinks from being bought using SNAP benefits. The waiver would exclude items listing sugar, corn syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, or a similar caloric alternative as the primary (first) ingredient, as well as carbonated sweetened beverages in which carbonated water and sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, or a similar caloric alternative are the first two ingredients. "Tennessee is leading the nation in creating innovative solutions to enhance quality of life, and I'm proud to continue our legacy of responsible fiscal stewardship while also delivering nutritious food choices for hard-working families," he said in a press release. "I'm grateful to the Trump Administration for its leadership to Make America Healthy Again, and thank our grocery retailers, convenience stores, food producers, and beverage manufacturers for working to ensure that healthier choices reach every community across our state." However, Lee also plans to expand benefit rules in other areas. Plans include allowing SNAP recipients to purchase hot prepared chicken, "including rotisserie and non-fried, non-breaded items like grilled chicken tenders – offering convenient, healthy meal solutions." South Carolina South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster is also looking to limit SNAP purchases, although it is currently unclear exactly what foods will be limited. "America is getting healthy, and South Carolina will do her part," McMaster posted on X, on August 6. "In the next few days, I will issue an executive order directing the Department of Social Services to place common-sense limits on purchases made using SNAP benefits, formerly known as "food stamps." America is getting healthy, and South Carolina will do her part. In the next few days, I will issue an executive order directing the Department of Social Services to place common-sense limits on purchases made using SNAP benefits, formerly known as 'food stamps.' — Gov. Henry McMaster (@henrymcmaster) August 6, 2025 Like Tennessee, this will need to be done via a waiver request to the USDA. Newsweek has contacted McMaster's office via email for an update. SNAP Restrictions Across The U.S. So far this year, 12 states have had waivers approved that limit what SNAP users can buy. These are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. Beginning in 2026, these new waivers - each with their own rules - will prohibit certain foods from being purchased with electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards, which are reloaded monthly for use at participating grocery stores nationwide. Their decisions have been welcomed by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins. "It is incredible to see so many states take action at this critical moment in our nation's history and do something to begin to address chronic health problems," Rollins said in a press release issued on August 4. "President Trump has changed the status quo, and the entire cabinet is taking action to Make America Healthy Again. At USDA, we play a key role in supporting Americans who fall on hard times, and that commitment does not change. Rather, these state waivers promote healthier options for families in need," What Happens Next Each of the currently approved waivers will go into effect at various points in 2026, meaning there will be no immediate changes for SNAP beneficiaries across the impacted states for now.
