Greece to create new marine reserves to protect underwater wildlife
The new protected areas -- in the Ionian Sea and in the Southern Cyclades in the Aegean Sea -- would be "among the largest marine protected areas in the entire Mediterranean", he said in a video message in English.
The prime minister said that the "hugely damaging practice of bottom trawling" by commercial fishing boats would be banned within the new marine reserves and in all Greece's marine protected areas by 2030, making it the first country in Europe to take such a significant step in preservation.
Fishing is generally allowed in protected marine areas worldwide, even by trawlers which scrape the seabed with a huge funnel-shaped net, to devastating effect.
Mitsotakis said that he had "made a promise to honour (Greece's) unique marine heritage" at last month's UN Oceans Conference in southern France, "and to protect it for generations to come".
"Today I am delivering on that promise with the establishment of two new marine national parks... because when we protect our ocean, we protect our own future."
Greece is located in the eastern Mediterranean and has around 13,600 kilometres (8,450 miles) of coastline and hundreds of islands.
Greece, Brazil and Spain all used the UN conference in Nice, to announce new protected marine reserves and measures to ban bottom trawling, in order to better protect marine wildlife.
Mitsotakis said that the size of the new Greek marine reserves "will enable us to achieve the goal of protecting 30 percent of our territorial waters by 2030".
He said that the government would work with "local communities, local fishermen, scientists (and) global partners (to) make these parks examples of what is possible".
- The oceans are 'life itself' -
In May, Athens banned bottom trawling in the waters of the Fournoi Korseon island chain in the Aegean to protect recently discovered coral reefs that are exceptionally rich in marine wildlife.
Neighbouring Turkey, whose western coast is close to the Aegean islands, responded to Monday's announcement by criticising such "unilateral action".
"International maritime law encourages cooperation between the coastal states of these seas, including on environmental issues," the foreign ministry in Ankara said.
It said that Turkey was willing to cooperate with Greece and would soon announce its own plans to protect maritime areas.
Greece and Turkey, both members of NATO, have historical disputes over maritime boundaries in the Aegean Sea.
They signed an agreement in 2023 aimed at easing tensions.
Mitsotakis said that "Ocean", a new documentary by British natural history broadcaster Sir David Attenborough, had inspired Greece to accelerate efforts to protect life below the waves.
"Ocean", which features spectacular footage of undersea habitats and marine life, emphasises the importance of healthy seas for tackling climate change and the current sweeping loss of wild species across the planet.
Mitsotakis said "Ocean" showed that the sea was "not just beautiful scenery".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Lamola calls for more countries to ‘urgently' recognise Palestinian statehood at UN conference
The international legal and multilateral system has been turned into a blunt tool, says Lamola. International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has urged more countries to 'urgently' recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations (UN) conference this week that was devoted to a two-state solution. Speaking at the high-level conference in New York on Tuesday, 29 July 2025, Lamola said the recognition of Palestinian statehood was 'fundamental to restoring the credibility of the two-state solution'. 'Global attention is on this conference. There is an expectation that we will deliver an effective response to the destruction of an entire population and a peaceful path for preserving the prospect of a viable Palestinian state existing side by side with the state of Israel in peace and security. This expectation is not misplaced, and it could not be higher. 'Eighty years since the founding of the UN, this is a matter that has plagued our collective conscience. The solution lies with a tangible recommitment from all of us to the values that bind us,' said Lamola. South Africa is anti-war and prefers dialogue over violence. Global attention is on this Conference. There is an expectation that we will deliver an effective response to the destruction of an entire population and a peaceful path for preserving the prospect of a viable… — Minister: International Relations and Cooperation (@RonaldLamola) July 29, 2025 Lamola was among dozens of high-level representatives who gathered at the UN this week to promote a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The UN General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025, after it adopted a resolution related to the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel's policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran. Both Israel and the US have boycotted the three-day meeting, chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. In a statement issued on Monday, the US State Department called the conference a 'publicity stunt' that 'will prolong the war'. The high-level meeting is taking place against the backdrop of the ever-worsening humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, as starvation grips the region as a result of Israel's restrictions on aid. On Tuesday, the leading international authority on hunger crises said that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' was unfolding in Gaza, and called for an urgent ceasefire to 'alleviate the catastrophic suffering of people' in the region. 'Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths. The latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' read the alert from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC). 🚨 #GazaStrip Alert The worst-case scenario of #Famine is rapidly unfolding in the #GazaStrip amid relentless conflict, displacements, and extremely limited humanitarian access. 📄 Read more: @TheIPCinfo #FoodInsecurity #Malnutrition — The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (@theIPCinfo) July 29, 2025 'This conference takes place at a time when we are witnessing the destruction of Gaza and its people in real time, in a brazen and wanton act of genocide in full view of the world,' said Lamola. 'South Africa continues to condemn the horrific events of 7 October 2023 where innocent Israeli citizens were killed. Despite this challenging context, in which the international legal and multilateral system has been paralysed and turned into a blunt tool, the focus today on a real path to lasting peace must prevail. 'The might is right doctrine can no longer be justified. It has led to perpetual insecurity and it justifies an attempt to eradicate the Palestinian people through killing and starvation,' he said. Lamola added that South Africa hoped the conference would 'plot a real path forward, based on concrete actions, for the creation of a Palestinian state existing peacefully and side by side with the state of Israel, along the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital'. Recognition of a Palestinian state The UN conference, which began on Monday, came days after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise the state of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September. Macron made the announcement in a surprise statement on X, following months of hints and hesitations over potential French recognition of a Palestinian state, according to a report from The New York Times. Speaking to delegates in New York, Lamola welcomed France's intention to recognise Palestinian statehood as 'an important step towards achieving a two-state solution'. At the opening of the talks on Monday, French Foreign Affairs Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said France was ready to fully recognise the state of Palestine at a time when the two-state solution is 'more threatened than ever'. 'Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative,' he said. According to a report from The Guardian, Barrot said that the UN conference would also serve as a platform for other European countries to recognise Palestinian statehood. On Tuesday afternoon, the UK followed France, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing that Britain would recognise the state of Palestine in September if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas. My statement on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and our plan for peace including the recognition of a Palestinian State. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 29, 2025 Speaking at the UN on Tuesday, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK intended to recognise the state of Palestine when the UN General Assembly gathered in September. 'We will do this unless the Israeli government acts to end the appalling situation in Gaza, ends its military campaign and commits to a long-term sustainable peace based on a two-state solution,' he said. DM
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Libyan coast guards train in Greece under plan to stem migrant flows
Libyan coast guard officers have started training on the Greek island of Crete as part of a plan to strengthen cooperation and help the two countries stem a surge in migrant arrivals, Greek sources said on Wednesday. Relations between Greece and Libya have been strained by a maritime boundary agreement signed in 2019 between the Tripoli-based Libyan government and Turkey, Greece's long-standing foe. A tender Greece launched this year to develop hydrocarbon resources off Crete revived the tensions, while a spike in migrant flows from North Africa to Europe has prompted Athens to deploy frigates off Libya and pass legislation banning migrants arriving from Libya by sea from requesting asylum. The division of Libya by factional conflict into eastern and western sections for more than a decade has further complicated relations. Greece said it is determined to continue talking to the Tripoli-based government and a parallel administration based in Benghazi to the east. Coast guard officers from eastern Libya have been training in Greece, including in areas such as patrolling and search and rescue operations. Coast guard officers from western Libya are also expected to participate in the training, the sources said. As part of efforts to improve relations, Athens last week invited Libya's internationally recognised government in Tripoli to start talks on demarcating exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean Sea. Missions from the countries are expected to hold talks on maritime zones in the coming months, the Greek sources said.
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
ICJ: Every country obligated by climate and other international laws to stop global warming
Sea levels are rising as a result of global warming. Photo: File Legal history was made on 23 July when the International Court of Justice (ICJ) released its advisory opinion on the The ICJ is the UN's main judicial body and is often referred to as the World Court. It has a dual role: first, to settle disputes between member states brought before it in accordance with international law and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorised organs and bodies of the UN. In the advisory opinion the 15 judges of the ICJ unanimously called for greater responsibility in climate protection and commented on the following questions: What obligations do states have under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions for states and for present and future generations? What legal consequences arise from these obligations for states that have caused significant damage through their actions or omissions? The judges unanimously determined that UN member states are obliged to do their utmost to slow down global warming. I do not wish to judge whether this decision comes too early or too late, but so far it has not been possible to curb global greenhouse gas emissions, which is why the UN warned in a report last year that current climate policy would lead to warming of more than 3°C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The ICJ has presented a non-binding decision, the details of which certainly need to be evaluated more closely. The ICJ is of the opinion, among other things, that climate protection agreements and customary international law impose binding obligations on the contracting states to ensure the protection of the climate system and other parts of the environment from greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans. It is important to mention that, in examining its arguments, the ICJ relies primarily on the reports of the The ICJ called on wealthy states to better fulfil their international obligations to curb environmental pollution, as they otherwise risk having to pay compensation to nations severely affected by climate change. It rejected arguments that governments are only bound by climate agreements such as the Although the court's opinion is not binding, it carries legal and political weight in that it can at least influence future climate litigation. For example, it pointed out the possibility that large emitters could be sued more successfully in the future, which will undoubtedly be viewed critically in wealthier regions of the world. According to the ICJ, remedial measures also include restitution — such as the reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure and the restoration of ecosystems — as well as financial compensation. The court is of the opinion that central human rights treaties, as well as the human rights recognised under customary international law, are part of the directly relevant applicable law. Furthermore, the court considers that the principle of sustainable development, which concerns the 'need to reconcile economic development with the protection of the environment', guides the interpretation of certain treaties and the establishment of rules of customary international law. This principle gives rise to the obligation to prevent significant environmental damage and to strive for a fairer distribution of the burdens of climate change obligations, including for future generations, taking into account the historical and current contributions of states. So, under international law, every country must do its best to stop global warming from exceeding the 1.5°C mark. According to the ICJ, this legal obligation arises not only from the Paris Agreement, but also from human rights, maritime law and the customary international law obligation to prevent transboundary damage. The ICJ's clarification advocates for greater coherence in international law, placing the protection of the climate system on the basis of stricter due diligence obligations. The ICJ's opinion is in line with recent statements by other international courts. These include the opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 2025, the opinion of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights on the climate lawsuit brought by the association KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz against Switzerland in 2024. According to international law, the ICJ states that the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is essential for the enjoyment of other human rights. Of course, this perception could be limited by the fact that the United States, historically the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, wants to reverse its climate responsibility. In any case, the ICJ opinion is likely to change a lot in terms of the upcoming climate negotiations in Brazil in November 2025 and new climate lawsuits. UN secretary general António Guterres already sees the ICJ opinion as a victory for the planet. According to him, states must act against fossil fuels. If they fail to prevent climate damage, they could be ordered to pay reparations. But it will probably not be quite that simple. There are still some tough legal hurdles to overcome. In addition, the fight against climate change must be taken up by society as a whole and across all disciplines, including politics and economics, not only by international law. Nevertheless, the ICJ has elevated the discussion to another level. Oliver C Ruppel is professor at the Faculty of Law at Stellenbosch University, where he also heads the Development and the Rule of Law Programme, which is under the Stellenbosch Climate School. Ruppel is a member of the World Commission on Environmental Law of the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which was involved in the proceedings before the International Court of Justice that concluded last week.
