How to complete Missing Princess quest in DDLV
Disney Dreamlight Valley's Missing Princess quest sends players to a critical search through enchanting biomes. The goal is to uncover the whereabouts of Aurora. With the scattered Aurora diary pages and the cryptic clues, the mission needs sharp exploration skills.
Flynn Rider holds the first clue, but uncovering the lost diary pages of Aurora scattered across the Valley is the key. Here is the guide revealing all the essential steps for solving the mystery and progressing in the story.
Start the quest by speaking to
Flynn
Rider
The first move is quite simple—tracking Flynn Rider. He is the last known person who saw Aurora before she vanished. To find him, first head to the Vale. Talk with Flynn near the Vale, and it will kick off the quest officially.
The Missing Princess Quest Guide in Disney Dreamlight Valley
Flynn remembers all the crucial details about the lost diary pages of Aurora and will give you 3 specific locations for investigation. He will point to areas including a waterfall in The Bind, a water source in Elysian Fields and beanstalk near the castle of Maleficent. Every place here holds a story piece of Aurora.
Ensure not to delay. Grab the Royal Shovel and get moving as soon as you complete the initial conversation.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Track down lost diary pages of Aurora
The Missing Princess Quest Guide in Disney Dreamlight Valley
The clues of Flynn will lead you to 3 distinct locations in the Valley. The use of a shovel is important to recover every page. For your first journey to The Bind, head west till you spot a prominent waterfall. There, search the ground near the base. A sparkling dig spot here marks the first diary page of Aurora. Dig up.
Next, you must travel to The Beanstalk Marshes. It is near the imposing castle of Maleficent. Ensure to look carefully in the top left area around giant beanstalk roots.
You will find another sparkling spot. Use your shovel there.
At last, make your way to Mythopia's The Elysian Fields. Keep the focus on searching around a central water feature, quite particularly checking the top right corner near the pool's edge. As you spot the final sparkling dig spot, unearth Aurora's last diary page.
As you get all three shimmering pages within your inventory, the mission is now complete. The entries hold some vital clues about the situation of Aurora.
What is the next step?
With all three diary pages now recovered, the final task is quite straightforward. Ensure to locate Flynn Rider once again. He will be found anywhere in Valley. Ensure to return the pages to him. Then, discuss all your findings. It's a crucial conversation that officially wraps up the Missing Princess quest.
The success you gain will unlock the next chapter within the story of Aurora—'A Hero of Ink and Paper' quest. Be prepared for some more enchanting discoveries as the tale goes on!
Catch Manika Batra's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 3. Watch Here!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ankita Lokhande ‘talks' to her glass of water and ‘charges' it for her beauty, calls it ‘magic water': ‘I give energy to that water'
Ankita Lokhande, who is best known for appearing in the television show Pavitra Rishta, recently shared that she starts her day with 'magic water' where she 'charges' her drinking water with verbal positive affirmations. Ankita shared that while she otherwise consumes things like saffron, turmeric in the morning, she ends her morning routine with a glass of 'magic water.' While narrating her routine to Rubina Dilaik on her YouTube channel, Ankita shared that this 'magic water' has healing properties as she consumes it after talking to it. 'I do magic water, that's what I believe in. I have a silver glass in which I have kesar water. I go out in the sun, on my balcony, I put my hand on top of that glass and I give energy to that water. I talk about positive things and then I drink it. That's how I start my day. It's amazing. You have to do nothing, just talk to that water, give thanks to the universe. It's such an amazing feeling. No matter what is going on in your life, this heals it all,' she shared. Ankita shared that after consuming 'magic water', she takes a shower and spends half an hour reading religious texts. While she reads those, she has some water around her as she 'charges' it and later, she consumes it through the day. 'After I take a shower, for half an hour, it's just me and my god. It's like a daily routine where I read Rama Raksha Stotra, Hanuman Chalisa, Sankatmochan and Bajarang Baan. I keep water around here as well. I charge that water too. I pour that water in my bottle and drink it all day long,' she shared. ALSO READ | Ranbir Kapoor and Yash's Ramayana budget revealed: Both parts cost Rs 4,000 crore; more expensive than Jurassic World Rebirth and Superman Ankita shared that this water gives her 'energy' as she talks to it before consuming it. 'It gives me energy. It takes care of my beauty, my hair, my eyes, my skin, my energy, each and every body part, all my organs. I talk about it when I charge that water and give thanks. I think being grateful is the biggest blessing,' she said. Ankita Lokhande is currently a part of Laughter Chefs on Colors TV.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Javed Akhtar says it was a risk to cast Amitabh Bachchan for ‘Zanjeer', recalls how him and Salim Khan fought to get their deserved pay: ‘A super-duper hit film with a super-duper flop actor'
Amitabh Bachchan had seen a list of flops before he did 'Zanjeer' which completely changed the game for him. The film written by Salim-Javed ( Salim Khan , Javed Akhtar ), was followed by a string of other movies which were also penned by them, eventually making giving Bachchan his 'Angry Young Man' image. No wonder, the documentary on Salim Javed's life which released recently was titled 'Angry Young Men'. Despite 'Zanjeer' success, it wasn't easy for Salim Javed. They didn't have any work for nine months. In a recent interview, Javed Akhtar opened up on it. He said during a chat with Anu Singh Choudhary for JLF International, 'You know, our first film was Andaz. Second was Haathi Mere Saathi. Third was Seeta Aur Geeta. Fourth was Zanjeer, a super-duper hit film with a super-duper flop actor. Yes. We decided that now, enough is enough. We had given four hits in a row.' Talking about casting Bachchan in the film, he added, 'Zanjeer was a major hit. He gave a great performance. But he always gave great performances, even in those films which didn't run. He was good. That's why we took him. We were not even liking him. We could see that he was a volcano of talent, just not getting good scripts.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ทองคำกำลังทะยานขึ้นในปี 2025 — นักเทรดแนวหน้าเริ่มคว้าโอกาสกันแล้ว IC Markets อ่านเพิ่มเติม Undo He added how situations are never ideal but one has to fight for it. Javed recalled, 'You know, when we came into the film industry, writers were never mentioned on posters or banners. They were very poorly paid. There was no credit, no money. We fought. One after another, we gave films which were very good, and then we fought.' They fought for getting more money for their work which they deserved. 'We said, 'No, these are our terms and conditions. If you cannot pay us that much, if you cannot accept our terms and conditions, we will not work.' We fought. Maybe it is not very easy for everybody to fight the way we did, but at least, as a group, as a whole community of writers, you can stand up and say, 'That much, and no more.' Nobody will give you anything on a platter. Nobody gave us anything on a platter. We fought for it.' He added, 'So we decided that we will take X amount. I remember the amount. But I also remember, in the subject department… After four hit films, for nine months we could not sign a single film, because nobody was willing to pay. They would laugh in my face. 'Kitna bola?' I had bought a second-hand Ambassador for ₹13,000. That was sold again, because there was no work. But after nine months, we took that price. Again, we decided on a price. And we fought to get it. So, nothing comes easily. Don't complain. Situations have never been ideal for anybody.'
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explained: Why critics say new Superman movie is 'anti-Israel' — decoding the politics of James Gunn film
TL;DR Superman sparks backlash: The new Superman film is accused of portraying Israel negatively through allegorical storytelling. Fictional war, real parallels: Viewers say the fictional conflict between Boravia and Jarhanpur mirrors the Israel–Gaza war. Filmmakers deny intent: Director James Gunn insists no real-world countries were referenced—but critics aren't convinced. Social media erupts: Posts praising the film's perceived pro-Palestinian message have gone viral, fueling debate. The Allegory at the Centre of the Controversy James Gunn's much-anticipated Superman reboot is drawing unexpected fire—not for its plot, but for its perceived politics. The film introduces a fictional border conflict between two countries: Boravia, a wealthy, militarised state supported by the US, and Jarhanpur, a poorer neighbouring nation whose civilians face repeated airstrikes and forced displacement. To many critics and viewers, the imagery is unmistakable: Boravia resembles Israel; Jarhanpur, Palestine. The moral framing of the conflict—military might versus civilian suffering—has ignited a firestorm online, especially as the film arrives amid ongoing real-world violence in Gaza. What Audiences Are Saying Across social media, audiences have called the film 'openly anti-Israel,' with posts like: 'Y'all were not kidding about how anti-Israel and pro-Palestine that Superman movie was… they were not slick with it AT ALL.' Others have praised the film for 'taking a stand' in what they see as a David vs Goliath morality tale. In particular, the film's refugee camp scenes and its depiction of white-suited Boravian soldiers firing on fleeing civilians has led to fierce comparisons with IDF footage from Gaza. Arab media outlets from Dawn to The New Arab have amplified these readings, while pro-Israel commentators have condemned the film as 'propaganda in a cape.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Benefits of Trading Bitcoin CFDs IC Markets Learn More Undo What the Filmmakers Say Director James Gunn has flatly denied that the film has any direct real-world allegory. In an interview earlier this month, he said: 'When I wrote this the Middle Eastern conflict wasn't happening. So I tried to do little things to move it away from that, but it doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East. ... It really is fictional.' Gunn says the film is about Superman's struggle to remain moral in a morally grey world, not a political commentary on the Middle East. His defenders argue the film's real theme is immigration, not occupation. But critics argue that intent doesn't matter when the imagery is this pointed. Moses, Jesus and Ubermensch In the past, Superman has been widely compared to both Moses and Jesus, with his origin story echoing Moses as a baby sent away from a dying world to be raised by strangers, and his life on Earth reflecting Christ-like motifs—an only son sent by a father, performing miracles, sacrificing himself, and symbolically resurrecting. At the same time, some have interpreted Superman through a Nietzschean lens, casting him as a kind of Übermensch—a being who transcends human limitations. Yet this comparison remains contested: while he possesses godlike powers, Superman doesn't forge new values like Nietzsche's ideal but instead adheres to a strict moral code rooted in traditional human ethics. This tension—between godhood and goodness, destiny and choice—has kept Superman hovering between myth, morality, and modern philosophy for nearly a century. Why This Matters The Superman controversy underscores a broader cultural war over art and politics—especially in Hollywood, where creators are increasingly accused of embedding political messages into superhero narratives. To Israel's supporters, the film is part of a creeping normalisation of anti-Israel sentiment in Western culture. To critics of Israel's actions in Gaza, the film merely reflects what journalists and humanitarian organisations have been documenting for months. FAQ Is the film explicitly about Israel and Palestine? No. The movie features fictional countries—Boravia and Jarhanpur—and makes no direct reference to Israel or Gaza. Why do people think it is about Israel? The visual parallels are striking: a powerful, Western-backed nation using overwhelming force on a neighbouring population with fewer resources, often civilians. The timing of the release, during the Gaza war, amplified those associations. Has there been backlash? Yes. Pro-Israel groups have criticised the film, while many Arab and pro-Palestinian voices have praised it for supposedly taking a moral stand. Is this unusual for superhero films? Increasingly less so. Modern superhero films often grapple with real-world issues—immigration, surveillance, civil liberties—but allegories about active geopolitical conflicts remain controversial. Final Word Whether it was intentional or not, Superman has entered the Israel–Palestine debate through the back door of allegory. And like all superhero stories, this one too is being read less as fantasy—and more as a mirror to the world outside the screen.
