Cousin of infamous fraudster 'Crazy Eddie' out to bring down Trump nemesis NY AG Letitia James
Sam Antar, who kept the books for his cousin, "Crazy Eddie" Antar, while he built a New York-area consumer electronics empire, helped his late relative skim cash and inflate the value of their company before leaving investors high and dry in the late 1980s. He says he knows every trick in the fraud book and smells a rat in James' real estate filings.
"I don't know how the wheels of justice will turn and, to be frank, I don't care as long as I'm right," said Antar, who has made his findings public. "If they fail to convict her, it's their humiliation and their embarrassment."
Antar pleaded guilty to multiple felonies, cooperating with prosecutors to help convict his cousin, whose chain's ads featured a maniacal pitchman pledging, "Our prices are insane!" While Eddie Antar fled to Israel, was extradited back to the U.S. and served time before dying in 2016, Sam Antar reinvented himself as a fraud expert for government agencies and law firms. He runs a website where he posts about his various investigations.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Antar said he worked alone and was the first to unearth documentation of James' alleged mortgage fraud and posted it to his White Collar Fraud website weeks ago.
He said the strength of his findings, backed by his renowned reputation in the field of uncovering white-collar fraud for the government, eventually led to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) picking up the case and sending a criminal referral to the Justice Department.
"It's not the Trump administration at war with Tish James, it's me bringing her to accountability and justice," Antar told Fox News Digital. "I'm not the Trump administration. I was investigating Tish James because that is what I do."
"I took all kinds of risks doing it, from retaliation, to libel, to reputational risk. But I stand by everything."
Antar said his findings were all uncovered independently by him and that he is not working for the government by looking into James. Fox News Digital asked the FHFA and the White House to corroborate his claims but did not receive a response.
"Everything that I've done is thoroughly documented," said Antar, who said he's a Democrat. "This is not bullying. This is not the Trump administration at war. Trump has his own agenda. I don't care. I am not Donald Trump. All I did was, I did my forensic accounting and I thoroughly documented everything that I did."
Antar's investigations uncovered documents stretching back as far as 1983, which he said indicate James may have been misrepresenting her financial situation for decades in order to nail sweetheart loans from lenders.
The FHFA accuses James of falsifying records to meet certain lending requirements and score favorable loan terms.
James, 66, denies the allegations and claims Trump is behind the move, calling it a "revenge tour" for the $454 million civil fraud lawsuit she successfully spearheaded against him last year. Trump and the Trump Organization are currently appealing.
In Trump's civil fraud case, the then-presidential candidate was accused of financial misrepresentation and providing false statements about his real estate, the same types of crimes James is being accused of by the FHFA.
Antar told Fox News Digital that he started digging into James' records months ago after he looked into the costs of her private flight travel as attorney general.
Property in Sterling Street, Norfolk, VA
In the criminal referral letter sent to the Justice Department, FHFA Director William Pult cited a property in Virginia that James allegedly claimed as her principal residence in 2023 despite being a public office holder in New York at that same time. She bought the property around the time the Trump trial was getting underway.
The FHFA said primary residence mortgages receive more favorable loan terms, including lower interest rates, compared to secondary residence mortgages.
In her mortgage documents, James reaffirmed this would be her primary residence, Antar said.
"She gave her relative power of attorney and declared, in a notarized document, that she intended to make the property her primary residence," Antar said. "If that's true, she'd be disqualified from holding office in New York. Neither she nor the relative filed for a homestead exemption, yet the mortgage was issued under the condition that both would live there. That's how she got favorable terms."
A building permit issued on James' New York property on July 15, 2024, lists that property as the "JAMES RESIDENCE" and states "Remain Occupied," according to the FHFA letter.
James' office told Fox News Digital that she has been clear that she is not using the Virginia home as her primary residence because she lives in New York.
In a letter to the Justice Department this week, James' lawyers told Attorney General Pam Bondi that while the power-of-attorney form "mistakenly stated the property to be Ms. James' principal residence," Pult "absolutely ignored" an all-caps statement to the mortgage loan broker two weeks prior that the property "WILL NOT be my primary residence" but would rather be the primary residence of her niece.
James' attorney, Abbe Lowell, said emails showed the mortgage broker understood this.
Property in Brooklyn, NY
In 2001, James purchased a property in Brooklyn with its certificate of occupancy listing the property as having five units, but James, the FHFA said, consistently misrepresented the same property as having four units in both building permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications.
This enabled James to get a lower mortgage interest rate, known as a conforming loan, since conforming loans are only available on four-unit or fewer structures.
She also netted mortgage assistance through the Home Affordable Modification Program, a government-run program that provides homeowners at risk of foreclosure with reduced monthly mortgage payments and recipients had to have properties with four dwellings or fewer, the referral states.
James' lawyers told Bondi that the residence "has four floors and, for as long as Ms. James has lived there, the property has always functioned as a four-person residence."
The certificate of occupancy for the property listed online still shows the 2001 version, listed as five units. The DOB told Fox News Digital that that document is the most recent certificate of occupancy they have on file for that building.
James' office told Fox News that James has been clear in her filings that the property is a four-unit dwelling and that the previous owner listed the property as a five-unit before she purchased it in 2001.
Mortgages with father listed as her husband
Meanwhile, James, who never married, is also accused of saying her father was her husband to obtain two mortgages in Queens as a married couple. The documents allegedly show that the property James purchased with her father had both parties listed as "husband and wife" in 1983 and 2000.
"While this was a long time ago, it raises serious concerns about the validity of Ms. James representations on mortgage applications," Pulte wrote.
Lowell, who accused the FHFA of "cherry-picking," writes the deed lists her father "and Letitia James, his daughter.'"
"As I have set forth, the exhibits Director Pulte included with his letter are notable for the fact that he omitted numerous other records (some of which we have included) which refute the allegations of impropriety, and make clear that a mistake on one line had no significance," Lowell wrote.
"If there is anything that you believe I have not addressed in the real facts and documents provided, please let me know. Otherwise, we would expect a quick response confirming that this referral matter has been closed by the Department."
Antar, meanwhile, continues to back his findings.
"I documented everything that I did," he said. "And I stand by everything I did. I did this on my own time, my own dime."
READ THE CRIMINAL REFERRAL BELOW. APP USERS CLICK HERE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
On Holding AG (ONON): I'm Double Minded About The Stock, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON) is an athletic apparel retailer whose stock has lost 18% year-to-date on the back of investor concerns about the broader retail industry. The shares dipped by 8% last week after Tapestry warned that it expected tariffs to hit its profits. Cramer discussed the movement in On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON)'s shares and warned that he might have been too bullish about the firm previously. Here is what he said: 'A lot of the apparel stocks are down off of Tapestry. I've got to tell you, I mean Ralph Lauren is too. But the one that I've been watching is On Holding. I thought On Holding had a good quarter. I've been either disabused of that notion or perhaps I've been too bullish about these guys. If ONON is not doing as well, then you have to start thinking about Nike again. ' Mbuso Sydwell Nkosi/ Here are his previous comments about On Holding AG (NYSE:ONON): 'One of my favorite companies is On Holding. Now it has been stuck in a holding pattern. They reported very good numbers today, the stock was initially up seven, now it's down. There's a substantial short position, the shorts have been winning in this battle. I think Roger Federer in the end wins. But it is a very contested group.' While we acknowledge the potential of ONON as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer Says Reports Of Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s 'Death' Are Overblown
We recently published . Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Giuseppe Costantino/ Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s shares have reversed tack recently as the firm appears to have smoothed over its friction with the Trump administration. The firm announced a $100 billion additional investment in the US earlier this month, and the shares have gained 13.8% since then. Cramer discussed Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL)'s shares adding 30 dollars to their value in ten days: 'Well we've got a lot of exciting things that people are talking about. About the release perhaps of new AI powered products. Uh, smart home push, including robots. Life like version of Siri, well that would certainly be helpful. Smart speaker with display and home security camera. I don't know, home security is something that people want but the main thing here is that if we get robots and they're not from Musk, they're from Apple, I think we'd be very interested in that. While we acknowledge the potential of AAPL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street bosses want junior bankers to come clean about PE jobs. It won't be easy.
Big banks are cracking down on entry-level workers with covert private equity jobs. Citing conflicts of interest, they are asking junior bankers to disclose future-dated job. Experts warn that this approach could encourage secrecy and undermine retention. Big banks are cracking down on junior bankers with covert private equity jobs — but experts warn that their approach may drive secrecy further underground. To guard against private equity firms poaching junior talent, investment banks are requiring analysts to disclose in writing if they've accepted future-dated jobs. While each bank's policy is different, juniors who confess to having a PE job may be terminated, moved to another team or division, or taken off certain deals — consequences that could encourage ambitious young bankers to clam up and undermine banks' efforts to retain them. "These are smart people. Their cognitive calculus is always working," said Maurice "Mo" Cayer, an organizational psychologist and lecturer at the University of New Haven. Young bankers facing termination for accepting PE jobs might think, "If I get caught, I'll lose my job. Well, I'll lose my job anyway," Cayer added. The banks declined to comment. Redeployment could also backfire if the moves are viewed as demotions. "As long as they're still doing the job they were hired for and they're not relocating them to a different geography or a different vertical, that's okay," said Kate Morgan, founder and CEO of Boston Human Capital Partners, a talent acquisition and HR consulting firm. Anything short of that could result in bankers playing it safe, she said. Even bankers who stay on the M&A track may have reason to worry, said Anthony Keizner, cofounder of Wall Street recruiting firm Odyssey Search Partners. "The bigger thing that the bankers are worried about is if you tell them you're leaving, then you're less likely to be considered for the most high-profile deals, and it could affect the way you're rated, and it could affect your bonus," he said. Meanwhile, the attestations don't seem to be deterring young bankers from their buyside ambitions, according to Keizner, whose recruiting firm has surveyed about 1,100 first-year bankers in the past few weeks. In describing the early findings, he said many of them are concerned about the situation and "unsure how to proceed" — but only "a tiny proportion" said they're planning to not participate in PE recruiting because of policy changes at their banks. Questioning conflicts Banks have said the attestations are necessary to protect against conflicts of interest that can arise as a result of private equity recruiting tactics, which seek to hire junior bankers for jobs that won't start for two years, after they have been trained by the banks. That means a junior banker could be assigned to work on a deal involving a future employer. The people who spoke to Business Insider, however, questioned the ambiguity of this argument. "What does it mean to avoid conflicts?" Keizner said, adding, "Say you accept a role at PE firm X. Does it mean you can't work on something related to PE firm Y? Or can you not work on a deal for a company where PE firm X has a portfolio company that's competitive to it?" "Just because you've accepted a role at the PE firm in 18 months' time, it's not like you're privy to their deal pipeline or you've got the team on speed dial," he added. Morgan also warned that prioritizing hard-to-control compliance issues could hurt retention. "They're going to always feel like the banks are now gatekeeping their ambition," she said of junior bankers. "They are sort of saying, 'we don't trust you,'" she added of the banks. A New York-based private equity employee who was previously an investment banker agreed that banks are sending the message that "analysts owe the firm their underlying loyalty." "To me personally, it wouldn't mean anything," she said, adding, "People will continue to recruit regardless." For now, banks don't have much to worry about because private equity recruiting has largely stalled. "I don't think any of the participants nor firms know exactly where this is all headed," Keizner said, adding. "Everyone is watching and waiting to see how the pieces will come together." When and if it resumes, the attestations could prevent some young bankers from participating, said Cayer. "There are a lot of good Boy Scouts," he said, adding, "They've studied hard. They're conscientious people." "If the bankers won't show up because they're too scared or being seriously restricted from doing so — well that would be a big problem. That really would put a stick in the spokes of the system. But my sense is that we are not at that stage," Keizner said. "I think the bankers will still want to interview. The PE firms still want to hire," he added. "Yes, it's going a little later, but certainly based on what we've seen so far, it's going to continue happening." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
