logo
Things to know about the Trump administration order on car and pickup fuel economy

Things to know about the Trump administration order on car and pickup fuel economy

Independent29-01-2025
Hours after being sworn in as the new U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Sean Duffy took aim at the main way the federal government regulates miles per gallon for cars and pickup trucks — also a principal way that it regulates air pollution and addresses climate change. Duffy ordered the federal agency in charge of the fuel economy standards to reverse them as soon as possible. The standards have been in place since the 1970s oil energy crisis and were intended to conserve fuel and save consumers money at the gas pump.
Here are five reasons why the Trump administration's action matters.
What is the Trump administration doing exactly?
Duffy ordered his chief of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to "propose the recission or replacement of any fuel economy standards" necessary to bring the rules into line with Trump's priority of promoting oil and biofuel.
The order came in a DOT memorandum Tuesday night. Duffy said the rules need to better align with the administration's overarching agenda because 'the existing CAFE standards promulgated by NHTSA are contrary to Administration policy.'
What does this mean for consumers and the climate?
Duffy says eliminating the rules will increase Americans ' access to the full range of gasoline vehicles they need and can afford.
Others disagree. 'This will raise consumer's costs at the pump, increase tailpipe pollution and jeopardize U.S. automakers' future, and no one voted for any of it. The only beneficiaries will be oil executives and China's auto industry, which will be happy to sell electric vehicles around the world with little U.S. competition,' said Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign.
In recent years, automakers have been producing gasoline cars that get significantly better mileage, which lowers the cost of driving and means lower sales for oil companies — both refineries and producers.
Transportation was the largest contributor to U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2022, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Every atom of carbon pumped into a car's gas tank comes out the tailpipe and many combine with oxygen to make carbon dioxide which holds onto extra heat for more than a century.
Why does Trump want to repeal fuel efficiency rules?
Duffy's action aligns with a number of President Trump's promises, notably to end an 'electric vehicle mandate' — referring to former President Joe Biden's target for 50% of new car sales to be electric by 2030.
Duffy wrote 'These fuel economy standards are set as such aggressive levels that automakers cannot, as a practical matter, satisfy the standards without rapidly shifting production away from internal-combustion-engine vehicles to alternative electric technologies.'
The new Secretary said 'artificially high' standards force car manufacturers to phase out gasoline-powered vehicles, make cars more expensive for buyers and are 'destroying consumer choice at the dealership.'
There is no requirement for automakers to produce or consumers to purchase electric vehicles. The fuel economy standards work in sync with EPA limits on carbon dioxide from vehicle tailpipes to address climate change, which Trump also rejects.
Duffy said CAFE rules are supposed to establish realistic rules for fleets 'that run on combustible liquid fuels like gasoline and diesel fuel.' He also cited the nation's vast oil reserves, biofuel feedstocks and refining capacity as reason to establish lower standards.
Trump has issued a series of orders including an energy emergency declaration, and has said the U.S. will 'drill, baby, drill.'
What's the idea behind American fuel economy standards?
CAFE, or Corporate Average Fuel Economy, rules date back to oil shocks Americans suffered in 1974 and 1980. The first ones went into effect in 1978. They are intended to help drivers use less fuel. They do this by requiring automakers' fleets to meet average mile-per-gallon targets that initially increased with each model year, until progress stalled in the 1980s.
Americans then saw no appreciable improvement in miles per gallon for around two decades. In recent years, automakers have offered car-buyers plenty of internal combustion engine — meaning gasoline-powered — cars with much better mileage, and that is largely due to increasingly stringent standards.
What were the latest fuel economy rules going to do?
The latest standards set under the Biden administration required automakers to average about 38 miles per gallon of gas by 2031. That's in real-world driving.
Every model year from 2027 to 2031, the rules are supposed to increased fuel economy 2% per year for passenger cars, while SUVs and other light trucks are set to increase by 2% a year from 2029 to 2031. An earlier proposal had even higher requirements.
The standards aligned with tighter Biden-era EPA limits on pollution from passenger and commercial vehicles, and the former president's broader support for incentivizing electric vehicle manufacturing and purchases.
The Biden administration said when it made the rules they would save almost 70 billion gallons of gasoline through 2050.
___
Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate solutions reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.
___
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani is making his messaging for the mayoral race clear: Me vs Trump
NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani is making his messaging for the mayoral race clear: Me vs Trump

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

NYC candidate Zohran Mamdani is making his messaging for the mayoral race clear: Me vs Trump

As he heads into November's general election for New York City mayor, Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani has a warning: If he loses, the next mayor could be in Donald Trump's pocket. Mamdani has launched a 'five boroughs against Trump' tour to draw attention to the president's agenda and how the administration's impact has already been felt throughout the city — from threats to food stamps and healthcare to immigration raids and courthouse arrests. 'There is no borough that will be free from Donald Trump's cruelty,' Mamdani told supporters in Manhattan Monday. But he's also using the tour to tie his opponents — former Governor Andrew Cuomo, current mayor Eric Adams, and Republican challenger Curtis Sliwa — to the president. The race for the Democratic primary saw Mamdani relentlessly focus his campaign around affordability, including no-cost childcare, freezing rent in tens of thousands of rent-controlled apartment units, boosting taxes on corporations and the wealthiest residents to fund free buses, and creating city-owned grocery stores in one of the country's most expensive places to live. That platform remains at the center of his campaign, but Mamdani is ringing alarm bells about the future of the city under the Trump administration with an ill-equipped mayor at the helm — or, worse, one that works in concert with the president. 'We see far too many parallels between Donald Trump and Andrew Cuomo, far too many stories that make clear that both administrations have been characterized by corruption, by a sense of impunity,' Mamdani told reporters Monday at the offices of the 1199SEIU labor union, which had endorsed Cuomo in the primary but is now backing Mamdani. 'We know a fraud when we see one,' he said. Cuomo, who resigned from the governor's office under a cloud of sexual misconduct allegations, conceded to Mamdani in the Democratic primary after losing by nearly 13 points. Then, he entered the general election as an independent, arguing that he faced off against Trump as governor and can do it again as New York City mayor. 'Trump will flatten him like a pancake,' Cuomo recently wrote on X. 'There's only one person in this race who can stand up to Trump: the one who already has, successfully and effectively.' Trump and Cuomo spoke directly about the mayor's race on a recent phone call, according to The New York Times. Both Trump and Cuomo have denied speaking to one another, though the president has been briefed by allies about how best to keep Mamdani out of the race. Mamdani said the call is 'disqualifying' and a 'betrayal of New Yorkers.' 'While housing experts are ringing the alarm, Andrew Cuomo is ringing Donald Trump's cell,' Mamdani told supporters in Brooklyn Tuesday. In a recent meeting with New York business leaders, Cuomo also said he was not 'personally' looking for a fight with the president and said their relationship was more like a 'dysfunctional marriage.' Adams, meanwhile, has avoided speaking out against the president after the Department of Justice dropped federal corruption charges against him in an apparent effort to win his support for the president's anti-immigration agenda. The current mayor has said he is not beholden to anyone, including the president, while insisting he can develop a working relationship with Trump for the city's benefit. Sliwa, the longshot Republican candidate taking another stab at the mayor's race after losing in 2021, has even urged the president to stay out of the race. 'Every day it's Trump versus Zohran Mamdani, it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' Sliwa said in a recent radio interview. 'Every day that Cuomo and Adams talks about you, 'you drop out, you job out,' it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' he said. 'The fact is that the president has three candidates in this race,' Mamdani recently told WNYC. 'One that he's directly been in touch with, another that he bailed out of legal trouble and now functionally controls, and the final one literally being a member of the same Republican Party.' Mamdani, a 33-year-old Ugandan-born Democratic socialist, would be the city's first-ever Muslim and Indian American mayor, if elected. He has faced a wave of racist and Islamophobic attacks since securing the Democratic primary, including from Republican members of Congress and the White House. Trump has repeatedly questioned Mamdani's citizenship, falsely branded him a communist, threatened to arrest and deport him, and suggested his administration would 'run' New York City should he win in November. 'I'm not getting involved,' Trump told reporters during a Cabinet meeting last month. 'But I can tell you this. I used to say we will not ever be a socialist country. Well, I'll say it again. We're not gonna have it,' he continued. 'If a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same. But we have tremendous power at the White House to run places where we have to.' While Mamdani touts endorsements from former Cuomo backers and other prominent New York Democrats on his latest tour, the latest Siena Research Institute poll shows the Democratic nominee in the lead with 44 percent of the vote, followed by Cuomo at 25 percent. Sliwa is at 12 percent and Adams is in single digits with 7 percent, the poll found. Mamdani has picked up key endorsements from progressive powerhouses Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, as well as prominent New York Democratic officials like state Attorney General Letitia James and U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler — all of whom are targets of the president and his party. But he has not received any full-throated endorsements from New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, as national Democrats fear Mamdani's democratic socialist agenda could be a liability for moderates in a high-stakes race to take back control of Congress in 2026. 'Every seat matters, every race matters, and who is mayor of New York is crucial,' Nadler said. 'New York City needs a leader who won't give Trump an inch, who won't flinch or bargain away our rights.' If elected, Mamdani's fight with the White House would 'be delivered forcefully, rhetorically, through conversations, both public and private,' including staffing up the city's legal departments with dozens of attorneys to push back against Trump threats to send in federal troops, he said. He also argues that his election would also serve as its own signal that the city is fighting back against Trump with 'a governance that is actually characterized by competence and by compassion.'

Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says
Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Russia has won war in Ukraine, Hungary's Orban says

BUDAPEST, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Russia has won the war in Ukraine, right-wing Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Tuesday ahead of a summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Friday. In power since 2010, Orban has been criticised by some European leaders for his government's ties with Russia and opposition to military aid for Ukraine, while his cabinet is struggling to revive the economy from an inflation shock. Orban, who has maintained close ties with Putin even after Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, became the only European Union leader on Monday not to endorse a joint statement saying Ukraine should have the freedom to decide its future. "We are talking now as if this were an open-ended war situation, but it is not. The Ukrainians have lost the war. Russia has won this war," Orban told the 'Patriot' YouTube channel in an interview. "The only question is when and under what circumstances will the West, who are behind the Ukrainians, admit that this has happened and what will result from all this." Hungary, which gets most of its energy from Russia, has refused to send weapons to Ukraine, with Orban also strongly opposing Ukraine's EU membership, saying it would wreak havoc on Hungarian farmers and the wider economy. Orban said Europe had missed an opportunity to negotiate with Putin under former U.S. President Joe Biden's administration and now was at risk of its future being decided without its involvement. "If you are not at the negotiating table, you are on the menu," Orban said, adding that he partly opposed the EU's joint statement on Ukraine as it made Europe look "ridiculous and pathetic." "When two leaders sit down to negotiate with each other, the Americans and the Russians ... and you're not invited there, you don't rush for the phone, you don't run around, you don't shout in from the outside."

Russians flee to shelter amid fears of 'imminent Ukraine nuclear strike'
Russians flee to shelter amid fears of 'imminent Ukraine nuclear strike'

Metro

time41 minutes ago

  • Metro

Russians flee to shelter amid fears of 'imminent Ukraine nuclear strike'

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Bus passengers in Moscow were ordered to take cover in bomb shelters over warnings of a 'nuclear bombardment' from Ukraine. A video filmed in Russia's capital earlier today captured the moment an alert was broadcast over the bus intercom system. The announcement said: 'Attention, attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment. 'I repeat! Attention, attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment! 'Everyone to the shelters! Attention! Attention! Ukraine is threatening us with a nuclear bombardment!' But transport officials in Moscow say the alert was broadcast by hackers, who have not yet been identified. The video was filmed on board a 191 service to Grachevskaya station which is run by the Transavtoliz company, which operates hundreds of services. It's not yet known how many bus intercoms were hacked and played the fake warning. Authorities rushed to reassure passengers that they did not need to go to a bomb shelter, and that the threat was false. A Moscow transport spokesman said: 'Audio messages that did not correspond to reality were played in the buses. 'Currently, specialists are checking the network infrastructure and eliminating the consequences of unauthorised access.' Unlike Russia, Ukraine does not have any nuclear weapons, having given up its arsenal in the 1990s as part of the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. The memorandum saw Ukraine give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for guarantees from Russia, the US and the UK to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and borders. It comes as US president Donald Trump prepares to meet with Russian president Vladimir Putin to discuss the ongoing war with Ukraine and try to negotiate an end to the conflict. More Trending They will not be meeting alongside Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, despite Trump's comments suggesting otherwise. Relations between the US and Russian presidents are fraught, with a Putin stooge warning Trump has made 'another step towards war with Russia' and Trump responding by moving US nuclear submarines. Ukraine stepped up its strikes against Russia this year, causing chaos at Moscow's airports and destroying warplanes. But with the death toll of both soldiers and civilians creeping higher, Mr Zelensky is still calling for a ceasefire in order to bring about a 'just peace'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Meet Britain's Doomsday preppers stockpiling for World War Three MORE: Trump should give Putin a gift in Alaska – then an order MORE: Putin red-faced after new Russian navy boat sinks during final building work

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store