Supreme Court to hear on August 3 pleas seeking transparency in NEET-PG Exam evaluation process
A bench comprising justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria briefly heard pleas on the issues.
One of the pleas, filed through lawyer Tanvi Dubey, challenges the opaque nature of the evaluation system and seeks multiple directions to the National Board of Examinations (NBE), the authority responsible for conducting NEET-PG.
The plea sought the release of question papers and answer keys to candidates, and the disclosure of correct and incorrect questions as assessed.
It also sought a direction for revaluation or rechecking in cases of score discrepancies.
The plea also sought a direction to enable candidates to challenge disputed questions or answers and the institution of transparent evaluation mechanisms for current and future NEET-PG examinations.
The plea alleged a lack of transparency and said it undermined the credibility of such a crucial examination and adversely impacted the rights of candidates.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After 12-year wait, hundreds set to become primary teachers in UP
After a legal battle spanning over 8 years and a wait of 12 years, hundreds of unemployed candidates are finally set to be appointed as assistant teachers in government-run upper primary schools across Uttar Pradesh. A teacher teaching students at a government-run upper primary school in Prayagraj. (HT file) The case concerns the long-delayed recruitment of 29,334 assistant teachers for mathematics and science subjects, which began in July 2013. Although over 22,000 candidates were initially selected, the state government abruptly halted the process midway. Since then, hundreds of affected candidates have pursued legal recourse—first through the Allahabad high court and eventually the Supreme Court. Now, more than 1,700 remaining vacancies under this recruitment drive are expected to be filled, according to officials from the state's basic education department. Following a Supreme Court's directive on January 29, 2025, deputy secretary (basic education) Anand Kumar Singh issued instructions on July 19 to the director general (school education), Kanchan Verma, to proceed with the selection of eligible petitioning candidates in accordance with established norms. A copy of the order, obtained by Hindustan Times, directs officials to complete the recruitment process as per the Supreme Court's ruling and within the stipulated timeline. 'In compliance with the Supreme Court's order, action will be taken to appoint candidates against the remaining vacancies under the 29,334 assistant teacher recruitment drive. The process has already begun,' confirmed Surendra Kumar Tiwari, secretary, Basic Education Council, Uttar Pradesh. On January 29, the Supreme Court had directed the basic education department to appoint all candidates who had secured marks above the minimum cutoff and had filed petitions before December 31, 2019. The recruitment process began on July 11, 2013. After seven rounds of counselling were completed by February 2015, an eighth round was held for candidates who had scored up to 82 marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test, with appointment letters issued in January and February 2016. Later, in November 2016, a final opportunity was extended to candidates who had undergone counselling but missed joining earlier. However, the process was halted on March 23, 2017, following a change in government. In response, the affected candidates approached the Allahabad high court, which ordered that the recruitment process be completed within two months. The state government filed a special appeal and a review petition in the Allahabad high court, but both were dismissed. When appointments still did not take place, candidates filed contempt petitions. Subsequently, in May 2019, the government filed a special appeal in the Supreme Court. 'I never lost hope' Alok Chaudhary, 35, from Aligarh's Heerpur village is one of the many candidates who endured a long legal battle. Coming from a farming family, Alok completed his B Ed in 2011. At 23, he cleared the assistant teacher recruitment exam in 2013. 'However, what followed was a long and trying struggle,' he recalled. 'I had to take a loan just to fill in the application form. The prolonged litigation meant frequent travel from my village to Prayagraj and Delhi for court hearings. With no money, I often had to travel in the general compartment, but the hope never died,' he shared. 'I survived by working alongside my father on the farm. Without a job, marriage was out of the question. Now, after all these years, I am finally looking forward to starting the life I had dreamed of—beginning my career as a teacher and settling down,' he said. 'I can now support my family' Manoj Kumar Patel, 37 from Jhunsi area of Prayagraj cleared the recruitment exam at 25. 'However, what followed was a gruelling struggle,' he recalled. 'I staged protests alongside fellow candidates, met officials and petitioned them repeatedly, consulted lawyers, and pursued the matter in court,' he shared. During this time, Manoj worked as an outsourced employee at a bank to make ends meet. 'Now, I am hopeful that I can finally support my family, live with dignity, and build a career doing what I've always dreamed of—teaching children and shaping their futures,' he said with a smile.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
FM calls OGE delay 'unpardonable', urges action on five key tax priorities
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, on the 166th Income Tax Day on Thursday, sharply criticised delays in the issuance of Orders Giving Effect (OGEs), calling them 'unpardonable,' and urged the income tax department to act decisively on five priority areas identified during a high-level review in June 2025. OGE refers to the implementation of appellate or court decisions by tax officers. It ensures that the outcomes—such as refunds, reassessments, or adjustments—are formally carried out based on the ruling. 'After all the decisions are taken, the delay in OGE issuance is just not explainable. But we have a category—would you believe it? You have a category of OGE issuance delay. Why pray? The decisions are all done. You just have to issue the OGE. Unpardonable,' she said, addressing senior officials. Reinforcing the need for accountability, she said that good policies alone are not enough. What matters, actually, is timely execution. Referring to the progress made in redrafting the Income Tax Act, she added, 'For a group or the CBDT, which is able to reduce five lakh words of the 1961 Act within a matter of three months to give me a draft bill which is half the size of that earlier 1961 Act… you're able to do that, but you can't issue OGEs? What's going on?' Recalling the key action points from the June 2025 review, Sitharaman said: 'I would recall five of them (including the issue of OGE), which I would think are important for all of us to re-look at—not because things have changed from then to now, June 2025 to now, but to refresh ourselves that these were things which all of us spoke about together.' The first, she said, is to 'accelerate disposal of disputed tax demands pending before the faceless appellate authorities and ensure timely resolution of litigation backlog.' Second, departments must 'identify and withdraw departmental appeals falling below the revised monetary threshold announced during the Union Budget 2024–2025 within the next three months.' The Union Budget 2024–25 raised the monetary thresholds for filing departmental appeals in tax-related cases, setting the new limits at ₹60 lakh for tribunals, ₹2 crore for High Courts, and ₹5 crore for the Supreme Court. These enhanced limits apply to disputes under Direct Taxes, as well as legacy cases in Excise and Service Tax. The third priority is to 'ensure timely processing of tax refunds and proactive and timely resolution of taxpayer grievances,' said the Minister. Fourth, departments must 'analyse the grievances and devise strategies not only to resolve the existing pendency but also to address the challenges that are causing the grievances in the first place.' And fifth, Sitharaman said, is to 'undertake region-wise performance reviews to help identify factors hindering performance and streamline operations through indicators such as grievance disposal and orders giving effect issuance.' Calling the Income Tax Day 'the moment when we reaffirm the unsaid social contract between the state and the taxpayer,' Sitharaman said this contract must not be allowed to 'fray at the edges' or 'become loose, become diluted.' She urged officials to raise the benchmark and ensure that the reform process is matched by efficient delivery on the ground. In addition, the Finance Minister lauded the drafting of the new Income Tax Bill as the first-ever comprehensive review of the Income Tax Act since 1961. She said that several members of the select committee of the Lok Sabha had informally appreciated the drafting of the IT Bill 2025. She expressed hope that 'Parliament actually looks at the good work done… we will welcome the suggestions by honourable members and… expect with enough engagement, discussion, and debate in the House… this bill… passes through Parliament's scrutiny.'
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Varsha Gaikwad clarifies stand after criticism over remarks on 11/7 blasts acquittals
Mumbai: A day after Congress city president and MP Varsha Gaikwad was criticised by Muslim leaders for calling the acquittals of the 11/7 blasts accused "disheartening and unfortunate", she clarified her stand. In a video clip, Gaikwad said: "Do not put your words in my mouth. I am a follower of Baba Saheb Ambedkar and follow the Constitution written by him. I asked the govt how the 11/7 accused, who lost their 19 years in jail, will be compensated. I also asked the govt what it is doing to catch the real culprits and how justice will be done to the families who lost their loved ones." Several community leaders slammed Gaikwad for her social media post, requesting the state govt to challenge the High Court verdict in the Supreme Court. Leaders said that Gaikwad won her Lok Sabha seat because Muslims overwhelmingly supported her.
