Latest news with #N.V.Anjaria
The Hindu
5 days ago
- Politics
- The Hindu
Scientifically assess crop cultivation and yield to determine required number of procurement centres, Karnataka High Court directs govt.
Taking note of the fact that the traditional harvest seasons have changed owing to climatic variations, the High Court of Karnataka has directed the State government to conduct a scientific study in every district to assess the nature of crops cultivated and estimated quantity of foodgrains likely to be brought by farmers to procurement centres, prior to determining the number and location of such centres. Petition of farmers A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria (as he then was) and Justice K.V. Aravind issued the directions while disposing of a PIL petition filed by Raitha Sena Karnataka of Navalgund taluk in Dharwad district. Though the Bench did not accept the petitioner's request for keeping open the procurement centres on a permanent basis on all the 365 days of the year, it found it necessary to direct the government to open additional centres and beyond the traditional harvest seasons as both the Centre and State government had admitted that there has been a considerable change in traditional harvest seasons due to geographical and climatic changes. If the procurement centres are found to be insufficient when procurement of agricultural produce at Minimum Support Price (MSP) commences, the Bench said, the Deputy Commissioner of the district concerned should ensure that adequate additional centres are established and made operational within the procurement period to meet the demand. The number of required procurement centres has to be determined by the district MSP task force, chaired by the Deputy Commissioner of the respective district, the Bench said. Beyond traditional season In view of the fact that crop harvesting now extends beyond the traditional harvesting seasons, and in order to ensure that farmers are adequately remunerated through the MSP mechanism and are not compelled to resort to distress sale through middlemen, the State government should establish at least one procurement centre in each taluk for a period of two months beyond the procurement period fixed by the Government of India, the Bench said. However, the Bench made it clear that depending on the geographical conditions and the quantity of foodgrains produced in a particular region, the State government will have the discretion to keep procurement centres open beyond the period prescribed in this order, as may be necessary to ensure that the objectives of the MSP scheme are effectively achieved.
The Hindu
5 days ago
- Politics
- The Hindu
Karnataka High Court issues series of directions to government for regular maintenance of drinking water facilities across State
The High Court of Karnataka has issued a series of directions to the State government for proper maintenance of drinking water infrastructure, including storage tanks, pipelines, and reverse osmosis (RO) plants, while asking it [the government] to come out with a comprehensive standard operating procedure (SOP) by incorporating its directions. A Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria (as he then was) and Justice K.V. Aravind issued the directions while disposing of a PIL petition filed by Ramesh Naik L., a Tumakuru-based advocate. Though the petitioner had brought to the notice of the court the issue of contaminated drinking water supplied in Tumakuru district, the Bench found it necessary to expand the scope for the entire State, as similar failures and deficiencies in the supply of pure drinking water persist across Karnataka. Even if the infrastructure is in place, the failure to maintain it, thereby depriving individuals of access to pure drinking water, amounts to a failure on the part of the State to discharge its constitutional obligations as the State has a fundamental duty to supply drinking water fit for human consumption, the Bench said. Maintain records Stating that water treatment/purification plants, and underground and overhead storage tanks should be as per the standard scientific norms, the Bench said that the government should maintain detailed records of scheduled maintenance activities and nature of maintenance, and systematically preserve these records for production before the court as and when necessary. Pointing out that dereliction of duty by authorities in maintaining drinking water pipelines is nothing short of a criminal act of endangering public health, the Bench said the government should formulate a comprehensive road map for inspection, maintenance, and replacement of pipes in a periodic and scientific manner and should preserve records of such inspections. RO plants As RO plants have been installed in areas where source of drinking water is borewells, the Bench directed the government to issue comprehensive guidelines prescribing the intervals at which maintenance of RO plants should be conducted, as they require sophisticated maintenance, including cleaning and replacement of filters. While directing the authorities to preserve records of maintenance of RO plants, the Bench said that the total amount collected from RO plants, and expenditure incurred for maintenance, replacement of filters and other components should be systematically recorded and maintained as water through RO plants are dispensed on payment of nominal amount by users. Meanwhile, the Bench directed the government to make all non-functional RO plants across the in working condition within one month. The panchayat development officers in rural areas and a designated officer of local bodies in urban areas should witness maintenance of ROs along with an elected representative of panchayat or local body in rural areas and with a headmaster of nearby government schools in urban areas, the court said, while making it clear that deputy commissioners of the respective districts would be held accountable for implementation of these directions.
India Today
5 days ago
- Politics
- India Today
30 May 2025: Supreme Court at Full Strength, First Woman Navy ADC, Arshad Warsi Banned
India Today Podcasts Desk UPDATED: May 30, 2025 20:25 IST On News at 7 with Prateek Lidhoo, we bring you the top headlines from Friday, 30 May 2025. The Supreme Court of India has regained its full strength of 34 judges with the swearing-in of Justices N.V. Anjaria, Vijay Bishnoi, and Atul S. Chandurkar. In a historic first, Lieutenant Commander Yashasvi Solanki of the Indian Navy has been appointed as Aide-de-Camp to the President, marking a major milestone for women in the armed forces. In West Bengal, nearly 50 jobless teachers were detained during a protest against the state's directive to retake recruitment exams. Meanwhile, actor Arshad Warsi, along with his wife and brother, has been barred from trading by SEBI for one year in connection with a stock manipulation case involving Sadhna Broadcast Ltd. Lastly, the FSSAI has issued a warning to food companies against using the term "100%" in advertisements, calling it misleading and non-compliant with food safety regulations. Stay tuned to News at 7 for your daily dose of news, only on India Today Podcasts. Produced by Prateek Lidhoo Sound mix by Aman Pal
United News of India
6 days ago
- Politics
- United News of India
Three new judges appointed to the Supreme Court; Oath ceremony on May 30
New Delhi, May 29 (UNI) In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India is set to regain its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges with the appointment of three new judges, including two serving chief justices of high courts. The oath of office will be administered by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, tomorrow, May 30, at the Supreme Court premises. The newly-appointed judges are Justice N.V. Anjaria, Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, Justice Vijay Bishnoi, Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, and Justice A.S. Chandurkar, senior judge of the Bombay High Court. Their elevation was formally announced by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal via a post on X (formerly Twitter), stating: 'In accordance with Article 124 of the Constitution, the President of India has appointed three distinguished judges to the Supreme Court.' With these appointments, the Supreme Court will temporarily function at its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges (including the Chief Justice). However, this complete bench will be short-lived, as Justice Bela M. Trivedi is scheduled to demit office upon her retirement on June 9, 2025. Justice N.V. Anjaria: Known for his judicial acumen and administrative efficiency, he served as a judge of the Gujarat High Court before being elevated as Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. His tenure has been marked by progressive rulings and a focus on reducing case pendency. Justice Vijay Bishnoi: Originally a judge of the Rajasthan High Court, he was appointed Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court in 2024. His elevation brings representation from the northeastern region and adds to the Supreme Court's regional diversity. Justice A.S. Chandurkar: A seasoned judge from the Bombay High Court with wide-ranging experience in civil, constitutional, and administrative law, Justice Chandurkar is regarded for his clarity in judgments and deep legal scholarship. This round of appointments is seen as significant not just for restoring numerical strength but also for their timing, coming ahead of Justice Trivedi's retirement and multiple high court transfers and pending vacancies. The elevation of two high court chief justices signals a continuation of the practice of promoting senior high court judges who have demonstrated administrative and judicial leadership. With 29 high court recommendations still pending with the government, judicial appointments remain a key area of focus in the coming months, both in terms of filling vacancies and ensuring representation across regions and communities. UNI SNG RN
Hans India
26-05-2025
- Politics
- Hans India
Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 3 judges to the top court
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, on Monday forwarded its recommendations to the Centre in relation to the appointment of three judges to the top court. Reportedly, the names of Justice N.V. Anjaria, the incumbent Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court; Justice Vijay Bishnoi, presently functioning as Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court; and Justice Atul S. Chandurkar of the Bombay High Court have been cleared by the apex court Collegium. At present, the Supreme Court is functioning at a strength of 31 judges, 3 short of its sanctioned strength of 34 judges. Further, another vacancy would soon arise on the retirement of Justice Bela M. Trivedi on June 9. Justice Anjaria was elevated as Additional Judge of the Gujarat High Court in November 2011, and in September 2023, he was confirmed as a permanent Judge. He took oath as the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court on February 25 last year. Justice Bishnoi, the present Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, was appointed as Additional Judge of the Rajasthan High Court in January 2013 and took oath as a permanent Judge of the Rajasthan High Court in January 2015. Born on April 7, 1965, Justice Chandurkar was elevated as an Additional Judge of the Bombay High Court in June 2013. As per the existing Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), the CJI, along with the four senior-most SC judges, commonly known as the Collegium, forwards its recommendation to the Centre to fill up the vacancies in the top court. After receipt of the proposal, the Union Minister of Law and Justice will put up the recommendation to the Prime Minister, who will advise the President in the matter of appointment. As soon as the warrant of appointment is signed by the President, the Department of Justice will announce the appointment and issue the necessary notification in the official gazette.
