Stop treating road fatalities as isolated cases, says Wee [WATCH]
This, he said, includes following through with the implementation of mandatory GPS tracking and corporate liability enforcement.
Wee said many fatal accidents stem from systemic practices, such as pressuring drivers to speed or exceed legal working hours.
"Discipline starts from the top. You must punish the company, not just the driver.
"If you force drivers to speed or make extra trips, then these are the consequences," he said.
He noted that the mandatory GPS tracking for commercial vehicles had been delayed due to industry resistance and was later derailed during the Covid-19 pandemic.
"Some companies appealed in the early stages. Then Covid-19 came, and everything stopped — mostly due to the cost of bouncing back from the pandemic.
"But we cannot keep delaying. If this is a real threat, then we must act to save lives."
Wee also urged authorities to fully enforce corporate liability laws to crack down on companies that incentivise dangerous driving habits in pursuit of profit.
"Other countries already do this. If a company pushes a driver beyond limits and something happens, they are held liable."
He pointed out that in countries like the United Kingdom, drivers often refuse to exceed legal driving hours — not out of fear, but because corporate policy enforces safety.
Blaming drivers alone for deadly road crashes, he said, is a short-sighted approach that ignores systemic failures in regulation and enforcement.
He added that a "whole-of-nation" strategy is needed — including better inter-agency coordination, long-term staffing at transport authorities, and a renewed commitment to the proven "3E" model —engineering, enforcement, and education.
"You cannot just pick one, like speeding, and ignore the rest. Speed contributes to fatalities.
"But what about the roads? What about driver education? What about how we enforce the rules?" he said.
On whether the government should reinstate the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) or strengthen the existing Land Public Transport Agency (APAD), now under the Transport Ministry, Wee noted: "That is the government's prerogative."
"What's important is having the proper structure — because as far as I know, it's still operating under a contractual setup.
"When your future is uncertain, you don't attract committed professionals. That's the biggest issue."
He said regular inter-agency meetings, such as those hosted by the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (Miros), are essential, but follow-through has been lacking.
"Miros calls for meetings, they give input. But do we act on it?"
He said rebuilding a culture of road safety is not just about punishment.
"It's about planning safer roads, educating drivers, and enforcing rules consistently.
"That's how we change attitudes."
Following two fatal heavy vehicle collisions in recent weeks, Transport Minister Anthony Loke yesterday (June 12) revealed that the bus operator involved in the crash that claimed 15 university students' lives failed all seven mandatory safety requirements under the Road Transport Department's Safety Audit and Inspection Report (JISA).
The audit found the company had no appointed safety officer, failed to monitor driver speed via GPS, and did not enforce the eight-hour driving limit.
Meanwhile, the ministry also published the preliminary report of a separate incident involving a fatal crash between a lorry and a Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) truck.The truck, said the report, was overloaded by more than 70 per cent.
The report said the excessive weight increased the vehicle's kinetic energy, heightening both the impact of the collision and the risk of severe injury.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
35 minutes ago
- The Star
A guide to fixing the US jobs data problem
President Donald Trump started a firestorm over the reliability of US economic data when he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following the agency's July non-farm payrolls report. The report wiped 258,000 jobs that were previously counted in May and June, the largest downward revision in decades outside of the Covid pandemic. A miss that big was guaranteed to draw scrutiny. The BLS's jobs and inflation data are arguably the most important numbers the government compiles because the US Federal Reserve (Fed) relies on them to conduct monetary policy. The Fed has long been criticised for reacting too slowly to economic developments, an inevitable consequence of relying on lagging government data. Now the Fed and BLS are likely to face even more pressure to catch up. The timing and reliability of economic data have real world consequences. The Fed held short-term interest rates steady at its July meeting, but it most likely would have lowered them if the BLS had delivered a more accurate payroll count in May and June. The bond market certainly thinks so: The two-year Treasury yield, which reliably anticipates the Fed's interest rate moves, shaved 0.25 percentage points immediately following the jobs report in anticipation of a rate cut. But the problem is much bigger than a single person atop the BLS. Most of the data the agency compiles is based on voluntary surveys. They take a lot of time to collect, and response rates have been declining for years. The response rate of the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (Jolts) was down to just 35% for the March report. BLS said it recognises its data quality issues and is using new tools to gather information, such as video and web-scraping. It's not just BLS. Survey-based data has a lot of people scratching their heads lately. Polls turned out to be less predictive during last year's presidential election than betting platforms such as Polymarket. Consumer sentiment surveys have also been a less reliable barometer of the economy than market-based gauges such as bond yields and stock valuations, which continue to signal a mostly stable economy despite gloomy sentiment. That shouldn't be surprising. Market-based data leverages technology to reach many more participants than antiquated surveys, giving it greater depth, speed and accuracy. I suspect the central bank would agree. The St Louis Fed compared job postings from hiring platform Indeed with job openings in Jolts reports. The overlapping data tracked closely, except that Indeed's data were less volatile and more frequently available. If I were a policymaker relying on jobs data, I know which one I'd prefer. The federal government can do a lot to modernise jobs-related data collection. It can require public companies to report material changes to their headcount, if any, on a weekly basis. Businesses keep track of their number of employees in real time, so it shouldn't be burdensome for them to do, and it would improve the speed and reliability of the jobs data tremendously. Roughly a third of US workers are employed by a public company, about the same percentage as represented in the BLS's jobs survey. The government can further broaden the data set to include employees of privately held businesses by leveraging tax withholding information. Most US workers are employees, which usually means their employer withholds taxes from their paycheck at least twice a month and remits it to the Internal Revenue Service, giving the service a current count of payrolls. It's not a new idea. The Bureau of Economic Analysis contemplated using tax withholding data to estimate wages and salaries nearly two decades ago but ran into obstacles around extrapolating income from withholding. Simply counting payrolls, however, would be much simpler and certainly more comprehensive, reliable and timely than the survey data the BLS currently collects. Payroll processor ADP already does it with its National Employment Report, although it only covers the 25 million workers within its reach, or roughly 20% of the workforce. Monthly changes in ADP's report have been highly correlated with changes in BLS' numbers since 2010. By the way, a robust payroll database would also allow the government to deliver targeted stimulus directly to workers when needed. During the pandemic, workers were meant to receive assistance through the Paycheck Protection Programme, but much of the money was pocketed by business owners, creditors and suppliers instead. Using withholding data to pay workers directly would have been more secure and effective – and can be the next time. If Trump wants government data to be more 'fair and accurate', as he claimed in the wake of the July jobs report, his administration will have to marshal a broader vision than merely replacing the head of a single federal agency. A good start would be for BLS and other government agencies to coordinate efforts to transition from surveys to real-time market data. — Bloomberg Nir Kaissar is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering markets. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Sarawak seeks Mardi's help to boost rice production
KUCHING: Sarawak is seeking assistance from the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (Mardi) for the supply of rice seeds to boost production, according to Premier Tan Sri Abang Johari Openg. The state aims to expand its padi planting areas to become one of the country's top rice producers. Sarawak plans to plant 14,000 hectares of padi, projected to produce 240,000 tonnes of rice to achieve self-sufficiency. "If Mardi can assist Sarawak by providing more seeds, we will be able to expand our padi planting areas. If we can plant an additional 14,000 hectares, we will be able to produce about 500,000 tonnes of rice," he said during the opening of the National Padi Conference on Tuesday (Aug 12) night. Abang Johari noted that any excess rice produced by Sarawak could be shared with the rest of Malaysia, reducing the nation's dependence on rice imports. He also mentioned that Sarawak would collaborate with Mardi and other agencies on rice research to improve yield per hectare. A study by Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) in Gedong increased rice yield from 1.2 tonnes per hectare to eight tonnes per hectare using new seeds and methods, including the Internet of Things (IoT) and machinery. "The study found that rice could be harvested five times in 24 months. I believe this can succeed in other padi planting areas and increase farmers' income," he added. Boosting padi production is part of Sarawak's post-Covid development strategy to ensure food security for the state and nation. "We need to develop the agriculture sector with new technologies. Ultimately, we want to become a net food exporter," Abang Johari said. Earlier, Deputy Agriculture and Food Security Minister Datuk Seri Arthur Joseph Kurup highlighted Sarawak's potential in padi production. He said increasing Sarawak's self-sufficiency in rice is crucial for both state needs and national food security. To support these efforts, the ministry has allocated RM230 million for the padi industry in Sarawak, including developing new rice planting areas in Tanjung Bijat, Stumbin, Gran, Entulang, and Seduku under the 11th Malaysia Plan.
New Straits Times
17 hours ago
- New Straits Times
13MP: The case for a value-based economics and human development
OSCAR Wilde once famously said that "A fool is someone who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing". In the economics profession nowadays, where the neoclassical paradigm dominates, prices are seen as the ultimate measure of value. Under the neoclassical school of thought, value no longer determines prices, but prices determine value. This is explained through the concept known as marginalism. For instance, the neoclassical theory says that price is basically the proxy of how people measure their utility. And as things become scarcer, people are more willing to pay for them, reflecting a higher marginal utility and thus higher value. Accordingly, neoclassical theory, which emerged in the late 19th century and gained prominence since the 1980s, managed to shift the discourse of value in the field of economics to merely focus on consumer preferences. To put it another way, the production boundary has become malleable than other economic traditions that preceded it, like Classicals (where value comes from labour), Physiocrats (where farming is seen as productive activity and thus where value is derived), and Mercantilists (where value originates from trade). The implications of neoclassical thinking are indeed enormous to society at large. Just look at what happened during the Covid-19 pandemic. Those who are seen as most productive and valuable workers, such as in the care economy, are paid less. Activities, which are not calculated on a gross domestic product (GDP) basis, are seen as less productive compared with the ones which are included in the GDP, as they are seen as having "economic value", so to speak. After all, the maid is paid for her work in the house. But if she is married, her work at the house is eventually unpaid. Another implication would be on how the GDP number can be easily manipulated. The GDP number can be increased on paper, like building a bridge to nowhere. But what value does it create to society at large? Even if building something, like a factory, may give benefits to society by producing garments for the people, what value will it have in terms of the environment? This is how I see the 13th Malaysia Plan blueprint, which was tabled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim recently. Perhaps this is what it meant by "Melakar Semula Pembangunan" (Redesigning Development), particularly at the more conceptual level of it, that is, to put back the discussion of value back in its proper place in development economics. Thus, when it comes to the main sectors prioritised, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), or the Digital Economy, the equal value emphasised is also being put on inclusivity and sustainability. Conceivably, one of the significant strategies under the 13MP on value creation would be the "Made by Malaysia" approach. Simply put, we must create our value in economic activities such as intellectual property or innovation, regardless of whether it is produced domestically or anywhere else. This is a great shift from the "Made in Malaysia" approach, where, for example, in the semiconductor industry, many companies which produce in Malaysia are not our own companies. How should value be created when automation and digitalisation are disrupting the labour market? This is where, under the 13MP, reforms in the education system, such as the focus on the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and STEM education, play a crucial role. The concentration on new areas of economic growth, that is, of high-growth, high-value (HGHV), expresses the need for Malaysia, moving forward, not merely obsessing itself on the rate of economic growth per se, but its quality and above all else, its direction. The value created in the economy eventually must be proportionately distributed without harming the environment. This is basically how common justice is manifested in the process of economic growth. It is also worth mentioning that under the 13MP, the government is committed to shifting from race-based solutions to need-based approaches. Among areas being focused on are Islamic finance, halal industry, tourism industry, Green economy (sustainable development), Orange economy (creative industry), Blue economy (ocean resources economy), and the Silver economy (aging society economic activities), and how they are integrated with the Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSME) industry players. In his speech, Anwar also quoted a well-known world economist, Professor Amartya Sen, who in his book entitled Development as Freedom, highlighted that, "Economic Growth cannot be sensibly treated as an end in itself. "Development has to be more concerned with enhancing the lives we lead and the freedoms we enjoy". Sen, the 1998 Nobel laureate in economics, argues that the "capability to function" is what matters when it comes to development. Thus, Sen is viewed as one of the scholars in economics who is associated with the notion that economic development is human development - the very core of development - must directly address the very core needs of humans, like poverty eradication, health and education improvement, and their freedom to realise their full potential as human – which defines many of the measures in the 13MP document. What is left is twofold: The buy-in from the people and the effective execution by the government. For these two to materialise, all stakeholders must work together with a clear sense of direction and purpose towards the same destination of Malaysia - that is, high-income and developed in our own way by the year 2030 or earlier.
