Dispute over boat trips to Skellig Michael resolved, court told
Mr Justice Garrett Simons was told on Tuesday that the parties had reached a settlement and a hearing date for the main case in the dispute next month could be vacated.
Earlier this month the judge granted an application by the Office of Public Works (OPW) to lift an automatic suspension on landing at the Unesco heritage site and former monastic island which was also used as a film location for the Star Wars films , The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi.
It meant boat trips to the island off the Kerry coast could begin for the summer 2025 season immediately.
READ MORE
Annual landing permits issued by the OPW for mid-May to September were automatically suspended when two unsuccessful bidders for the licences brought a High Court challenge to the decision.
The OPW then had to apply to the court asking that the stay be lifted pending hearing of the substantive challenge.
The unsuccessful bidders, Atlantic Endeavour Ltd and SMBT Ltd trading as Skellig Michael Boat Trips, disagreed with the OPW interpretation of the legal effect of the automatic suspension.
They contended that there are a number of mechanisms open whereby landing permits might legitimately be granted to the successful tenderers for the balance of the 2025 season, while preserving their own right to challenge the allocation of landing permits for the 2026 and subsequent seasons.
Mr Justice Simons, following a hearing, ordered the stay be lifted.
He said his judgment entailed no finding whatsoever on whether the outcome of the tender process allows the OPW to confine the right to land passengers to the 15 successful tenderers for a five-year period.
The proper interpretation of the request for tender and associated documentation, and the legal consequences of the tender process, remain open for debate at the trial of the action, he said.
On Tuesday, David Dodd BL, for Atlantic and SMBT, said the matter had been resolved and a hearing date for July could be vacated. He said his clients were very happy with the outcome especially in light of the judge's decision earlier this month.
The OPW had agreed to pay his side's costs.
The judge struck out the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Former Fianna Fáil councillor ‘recklessly' failed to disclose son's interest in lands, ethics watchdog finds
A former Fianna Fáil councillor who failed to disclose his son's interest in lands before a vote that would 'significantly increase' their value, contravened ethics rules and 'acted recklessly', the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo) has found. Tommy Reilly, who was a councillor in Meath for almost three decades, was the subject of a complaint received in March 2022 over 'acts and omissions' concerning lands at Liscarton in Navan . Those lands were owned by his son, Ciarán Reilly, and had increased in value from €500,000 to some €4.2 million, at which they were marketed for sale in 2020 following the rezoning for housing and the granting of planning permission. Ciarán Reilly purchased the lands in 2016, telling the commission during a hearing in June that while he had not initially purchased the lands as an investment for development, he later formed the view that they may be an investment opportunity. READ MORE He told the commission he did not discuss the Liscarton lands with his father until June or July 2017, when he inquired about the proposed rezoning and development plan process. He held the interest in the lands through his company RABS, the director of which ultimately became his brother, Tomás Reilly. Tommy Reilly attended several meetings concerning the lands between July 2016 and July 2017 while a councillor, according to the Sipo report published on Tuesday. He told the commission he did not learn of his son's beneficial interest in the lands until July 2017, about two weeks before the special planning meeting, saying he did not generally discuss his son's business interests with him. After questions from his son regarding making a submission, Mr Reilly said he told him it was too late to make one, and that he 'could have nothing to do with it'. The commission said it was not persuaded by the evidence provided by Mr Reilly and his two sons and found itself 'unable to rely on it'. Mr Reilly said he spoke to a council official before the special planning meeting in July 2017. He said he proceeded to declare that he had a conflict of interest, which was recorded in the minutes, and excused himself from the vote. However, he did not disclose the nature of his interest or the fact of his sons' interest. Mr Reilly told the commission that in 30 years, he had never seen anyone do that at a meeting. He added that three years after the meeting, in September 2020, he wrote to the council's ethics registrar, disclosing the nature of the conflict of interest. A review carried out by then chief executive of the council, Jackie Maguire, found 'there was compliance with the spirit but not the letter' of the Ethical Framework for Councillors and that he had 'inadvertently breached' the framework. The commission said Mr Reilly's failure to disclose his son's interest in the lands at the special planning meeting was a contravention that was 'committed recklessly' and was a 'serious matter'. Noting that the vote at the special planning meeting was likely to 'significantly increase' the value of the land owned by his son, the commission said Mr Reilly 'acted recklessly' in not declaring his son's interest. 'As a long-standing councillor of 21 years' service at the time, and with all the experience that entails, the commission finds that he should have known better and, if he was in doubt, should have sought specific advice beforehand,' it said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Crash, part two: austerity bites and Cowen's Morning Ireland humiliation
In part two of a three-part series on Brian Cowen's ill-fated 2008-2011 government, Pat Leahy and Hugh Linehan continue the story. After the fateful 2008 decision to bail out Ireland's banks, Cowen and his Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan spent the next year struggling to shore up Ireland's worsening finances. Throughout 2009 and 2010 the mood in the country darkened as recession bit. Spending cuts and tax rises were introduced in a series of hair-shirt budgets. As a result, confidence in the government was already on the floor when Cowen made an infamous appearance on Morning Ireland in September 2009. But what did Cowen actually say in the interview, and what impact did it have?
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Traffic-light' dashboard lets PwC in UK monitor office attendance
PwC has stepped up the monitoring of its UK employees' office attendance with a dashboard that allows senior partners to track pass swipes and WiFi connections, sparking concern from some staff. The increased scrutiny has triggered unease among some staff over how they are tracked, two people at the firm told the Financial Times. One senior staff member said they had 'lost count' of the number of colleagues at the accounting and consulting firm who had raised concerns. Another person said employees had sought more transparency as the firm began 'pushing hard' to increase attendance. PwC told its UK staff last September that it would monitor their office attendance like it did billable hours and require them to work in the office or at a client site at least three days a week. READ MORE Staff who breach the policy can face formal sanctions, with their performance evaluations and bonuses potentially affected, according to guidance for staff seen by the FT. [ Working from home 'trending upwards' despite moves to bring workers back to the office Opens in new window ] Staff show up as 'amber' on the dashboard, which first went live for supervisors in April, if they dip below 60 per cent office attendance, and 'red' if they fall below 40 per cent, according to the guidance. Attendance data can be accessed by business unit leaders and chief financial, administrative and people officers. Staff can also access their own data via the dashboard. The system traces laptop WiFi connections to check whether employees are working at client sites on the days they say they are, the policy documents state. The firm also cross-references this information with data from HR platform Workday and employees' time sheets. Staff who are unable to meet the in-office quota for reasons including sickness or family issues can seek allowances, said a person close to the firm. PwC's rival EY early last year started using swipe card data to monitor office entries, while Deloitte has maintained a more flexible policy. PwC UK's chief people officer, Phillippa O'Connor, told staff in a video in December that she was aware of concerns over whether monitoring workers' office attendance was consistent with the firm's mantra of 'trust' and 'empowerment', according to a transcript seen by the FT. Monitoring attendance 'aims to address persistent and deliberate non-compliance', O'Connor added in the video. 'It is not designed to penalise anyone for the occasional times when life events and unforeseen circumstances mean you aren't able to come to the office as planned.' PwC said there were 'clear benefits to in-person work' that have been 'borne out since adjusting our approach to hybrid working', adding: 'Our approach is consistent with other businesses and is recognised and accepted by the vast majority of our people.' 'We always listen to feedback and are committed to regular, clear and transparent communications about expectations,' the firm said, adding that it remains 'committed to flexibility', including early Friday finishes for six weeks over summer. 'Our dashboard ensures our people have easy access to their attendance data, so they can manage and plan their time in a way that works for them, our teams and our clients.' - Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
