As USAID stops foreign aid, Rubio says future US assistance will be limited
FILE PHOTO: A security guard is stationed in the former offices of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), where black tape covers the signage on the windows, in the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 24, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Agency for International Development will on Tuesday officially stop implementing foreign aid, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, adding that America's assistance in the future will be targeted and limited.
In a statement marking the transfer of USAID to the State Department as part of President Donald Trump's unprecedented push to shrink the federal government, Rubio said the U.S. was abandoning what he called a charity-based model and would focus on empowering countries to grow sustainably.
"We will favor those nations that have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to help themselves and will target our resources to areas where they can have a multiplier effect and catalyze durable private sector, including American companies, and global investment," the top U.S. diplomat wrote.
This new model, he wrote, would prioritize trade over aid and investment over assistance, adding it would put Washington in a stronger place to counter Beijing.
The Trump administration has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office, saying it wants to ensure U.S. taxpayer money goes only to programs that are aligned with Trump's "America First" policies.
The cutbacks have effectively shut down USAID, leading to the firing of thousands of its employees and contractors. That jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and has thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos.
According to research published in The Lancet medical journal, deep funding cuts to USAID and its dismantling could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Seniors can claim $800 SG60 vouchers from July 1; adults to get $600 in vouchers from July 22
Singapore NSman, 30, dies in hospital after collapsing outside Maju Camp
Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance
Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend
Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26
Singapore Trial opens for 3 women who allegedly organised procession outside Istana
Business Do not overcommit to a single solution in a multi-polar world, says ex-foreign minister George Yeo
Singapore 1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore
Human rights experts and advocates have warned against the cuts. USAID funding has had a crucial role in improving global health, primarily directed toward low- and middle-income countries, particularly African nations, according to the study.
Reuters reported on Tuesday that the administration canceled a major contract to supply emergency kits for rape survivors in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo as violence surged there this year, leaving thousands without access to life-saving medication, the United Nations and aid groups said.
INVESTMENT AND TRADE DEALS
USAID was established in 1961 by Democratic President John F. Kennedy at the height of the Cold War with the aim of better coordinating foreign assistance, already a key platform of U.S. foreign policy in countering Soviet influence.
Washington has been the world's largest humanitarian aid donor, amounting to at least 38% of all contributions recorded by the United Nations. It disbursed $61 billion in foreign assistance last year, just over half of that via USAID, according to government data.
Among the programs affected by the cuts is the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the world's leading HIV/AIDS initiative.
Sub-Saharan Africa remains the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic. Trump's cuts have restricted the availability of drugs that millions of Africans have taken to prevent infection - particularly vulnerable communities such as gay men and sex workers - as aid groups and public health systems in Africa strove to roll back the disease.
Trump has said the U.S. pays disproportionately for foreign aid and he wants other countries to shoulder more of the burden.
A senior State Department official briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity described the USAID model as "failed engagement" that did not reduce the dependency of foreign countries on the United States, and he said other nations will need to step up.
"We want to see more investment from our partners, co-investment," the official said. "We want to see trade deals, compacts, agreements to work together on stuff."
The shuttering of USAID drew a rare rebuke from former presidents George Bush and Barack Obama who joined a closed video conference event with the USAID community, the Associated Press reported on Monday.
"Gutting USAID is a travesty and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world," Obama was quoted as saying. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Codelco says worker dead, several injured after 'seismic event' at El Teniente mine
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: The logo of Codelco, the world's largest copper producer, is seen at their headquarters in downtown Santiago, Chile March 29, 2018. REUTERS/Ivan Alvarado/File Photo Chilean copper miner Codelco said on Thursday that one worker died at the Andesita project of its El Teniente mine after what it called a 'seismic event' around 5:30 p.m. local time. The company said in a statement it was looking for another five workers, and that nine workers had various injuries but were out of serious risk. Codelco said it immediately suspended activities in the affected area and started an investigation to determine the cause of the incident. El Teniente is the world's largest underground copper deposit and Codelco's flagship mine. REUTERS
Straits Times
15 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘Clinton Plan' e-mails were likely made by Russian spies, new documents show
Evidence that undermines the theory that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame US President Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election has been declassified. WASHINGTON – The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame Mr Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on J uly 31 shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported e-mail from July 27, 2016, that said Mrs Clinton had approved a campaign proposal to tie Mr Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private e-mail server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported e-mails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, Mr John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the e-mails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent weeks concerning the Russia investigation. The wave has come as the administration is seeking to change the subject from its broken promise to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Even as the releases shed more light on a seismic political period nearly a decade ago, Mr Trump and his allies have wildly overstated what the documents show, accusing former President Barack Obama of 'treason'. The release of the annex was no exception. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from 'a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency'. And Mr Kash Patel, the FBI director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed 'evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax'. In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Clinton approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr Durham concluded that the e-mail from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Mr Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 e-mail, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did 'not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,' he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the 'Clinton Plan intelligence,' as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US government's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited. 'Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,' Mr Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins. Mr Durham's report also mentioned that Mrs Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation. But Mr Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the e-mail he called the 'Clinton Plan intelligence' was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation. The annex shows that the person who supposedly sent the July 27 e-mail, Mr Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundations network, told Mr Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it. The network is the philanthropic arm of liberal financier George Soros, who has been made out to be a villain by Russian state media and by some American conservatives. The annex also cited a purported e-mail from July 25, 2016, also attributed to Mr Benardo. Referring to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the message claimed that a Clinton adviser was proposing a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump,' adding, 'Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' That message identified the adviser as 'Julie,' while the July 27 one said 'Julia'. An accompanying Russian intelligence memo identified the aide as Ms Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at the Centre for a New American Security. But the trove of Russian files contained two different versions of the July 25 message – one that somehow had an additional sentence. And Mr Benardo denied sending it, telling Mr Durham's team that he did not know who 'Julie' was and would not use a phrase like 'pour more oil into the fire'. Ms Smith informed Mr Durham in 2021 that she had no memory of proposing anything to campaign leadership about attacking Mr Trump over Russia, although she 'recalled conversations with others in the campaign expressing their genuine concerns that the DNC hack was a threat to the electoral system, and that Trump and his advisers appeared to have troubling ties to Russia'. The annex also shows that Mr Durham obtained e-mails from several liberal-leaning think tanks mentioned in the Russian memos and did not find copies of the messages supposedly written by Mr Benardo. The think tanks included the Open Society Foundations, the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Centre for a New American Security. But Mr Durham found other 'e-mails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage' to those messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cyber expert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, in the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr Benardo. Mr Durham also obtained text messages from Ms Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the FBI had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although they did not mention Mr Trump. And he obtained a July 27 e-mail from Ms Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticising Mr Trump's denunciations of the Nato alliance as reckless and too friendly to Russia. Mr Durham wrote that it would have been logical for someone to conclude that she played a role in efforts by the Clinton campaign to tie Mr Trump to Russia. Her July 25 texts and July 27 email could be seen as support for the idea that such a plan existed, he added. But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key e-mails, the annex shows. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,' it says. The Russian intelligence memos first came to public attention in 2017 after The New York Times and The Washington Post explored the decision by Mr James Comey, then the FBI director, to violate Justice Department procedure. In publicly addressing the investigation into Mrs Clinton, he sharply criticised her use of a private e-mail server but said no charges could be brought over it. Mr Comey later told Congress and an inspector general that he decided to be the face of the decision, rather than allowing Justice Department officials to do so, as is typical, in part because of something in the Russian memos. A Dutch spy agency had hacked the memos from a Russian spy agency's server in 2016 and gave copies to the US government. Two of the memos described purported communications in January 2016 and March 2016 involving a top Democratic Party leader, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, one with Mr Benardo and the other with a different official at the Open Society Foundations. The memos indicated that the attorney general at the time, Ms Loretta E. Lynch, was pressuring the FBI about the e-mail inquiry and sharing confidential information about it with the Clinton campaign. But Mr Comey and other officials also said they believed that the memos described fake e-mails, in part because the January one also said that Mr Comey himself was trying to help Republicans win the election. In 2017, Mr Benardo and Mr Wasserman Schultz said that they had never even met, let alone communicated about Mrs Clinton's e-mails. The Trump administration has also declassified and released a report by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that summarised unflattering claims about Mrs Clinton from the Russian memos without flagging suspicions that the trove contained misinformation. After the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, Mr Robert Mueller, issued his final report, the attorney general at the time, Mr Bill Barr, assigned Mr Durham to hunt for evidence proving Mr Trump's conspiracy theory that the investigation had stemmed from a deep-state plot against him. In 2020, as The New York Times has reported, after Mr Durham failed to find evidence of intelligence abuses, he shifted to instead trying to find a basis to blame the Clinton campaign for the fact that Mr Trump's campaign had come under suspicion of colluding with Russia. Mr Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Mr Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false about his ties to Russia, but he nevertheless used court filings and his final report to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in outside efforts to scrutinise possible ties between Mr Trump and Russia, both of which ended in quick acquittals. NYTIMES
AsiaOne
15 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump administration refers Harvard to Justice Department in civil rights probe, World News
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's administration has sent a letter to Harvard University saying it has referred the university to the US Justice Department to address allegations of "Harvard's antisemitic discrimination." In late June, the Trump administration said an investigation had concluded Harvard violated federal civil rights law for failing to address harassment of Jewish and Israeli students. Critics, rights experts and some faculty said such probes are a pretext to assert federal control over schools and threaten academic freedom and free speech. Harvard has been embroiled in talks and a legal fight with the Trump administration, seeking the restoration of billions of dollars of frozen federal funds for medical research and other programmes. It sued the Trump administration earlier this year. "The parties' several months' engagement has been fruitless," said the letter dated Wednesday from the US Department of Health and Human Services to Harvard's leadership. "OCR (Office for Civil Rights) therefore has no choice but to refer the matter to DOJ to initiate appropriate proceedings to address Harvard's antisemitic discrimination." Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities allowed antisemitism during last year's pro-Palestinian protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the Trump administration wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Campus protesters demanded an end to US backing for Israel and a commitment that their universities will cease investing in weapons makers and companies that support Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. Harvard had no immediate comment on Wednesday's letter. The university has said it aims to combat discrimination. Reports released in April by Harvard's antisemitism and Islamophobia task forces found fear and bigotry faced by Jewish, Muslim and Arab students. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. Last week, Columbia University agreed to pay over US$220 million (S$285 million) to resolve federal probes. The New York Times has reported Harvard was open to spending up to US$500 million to end its dispute with the government. [[nid:720454]]
