Judge blocks key provisions of Trump's bid to punish Democratic-linked law firm
President Donald Trump's retaliation against a prominent Democratic-linked law firm is likely unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell blocked the Trump administration from enforcing central provisions of an executive order that seeks to punish the law firm, Perkins Coie, by barring its attorneys from interacting with federal agencies or even entering federal buildings.
Howell said the 'retaliatory animus' of Trump's order is 'clear on its face' and appears to violate constitutional restrictions on 'viewpoint discrimination.' The executive order, which Trump issued last week, 'runs head on into the wall of First Amendment protections,' the judge concluded.
Perkins Coie, which is based in Seattle, has often represented Democratic politicians and causes, including Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. Trump has long targeted the firm as a political and legal adversary for its role in commissioning the anti-Trump dossier compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele in 2016. That dossier, whose salacious allegations against Trump were never confirmed by federal investigators, helped fuel the long-running probe of his 2016 campaign's interactions with Russia.
The executive order, if allowed to take effect, would hamstring the firm's ability to represent clients who have business with the federal government. The firm claims that Trump's directive has already led clients to abandon the firm and is likely to prompt federal officials to cancel or deny meetings on a wide array of pending matters.
Howell noted that the order would harm not only the firm's 1,200 lawyers — most of whom had nothing to do with the Russia probe — but its 2,500 non-lawyer employees, from IT staff to secretaries.
The judge said Trump's order was also flawed because it was issued without any notice to the firm or due process to challenge his determination.
'This may be amusing in 'Alice in Wonderland' where the Queen of Hearts yells, 'Off with their heads!' at annoying subjects … and announces a sentence before a verdict,' Howell said, 'but this cannot be the reality we are living under.'
The executive order also stripped security clearances from lawyers at the firm, but the firm has not challenged that provision. Under Supreme Court precedent, the president has nearly unfettered discretion to grant or remove security clearances.
Dane Butswinkas, a lawyer representing Perkins Coie, described the president's order as 'like a tsunami waiting to hit the firm.'
'It truly is life-threatening. ... It will spell the end of the law firm,' he said.
Howell's ruling is a temporary restraining order, meaning it blocks key provisions of the executive order while litigation continues. In emphatic remarks from the bench following an emergency hearing Wednesday, Howell expressed grave concern that Trump's order would intimidate other law firms, discouraging them from taking on causes or people at odds with the administration.
'I am sure that many in the legal profession are watching in horror at what Perkins Coie is going through here,' said the judge, an appointee of President Barack Obama. 'The order casts a chilling harm of blizzard proportions across the legal profession.'
The hearing featured an unusual appearance by the Justice Department's chief of staff and acting No. 3 official, Chad Mizelle, who argued in defense of Trump's order. Mizelle said Trump has largely unchecked authority to single out individuals or organizations as threatening to government interests.
'The president of the United States … is authorized under the Constitution to find certain individuals and certain companies are not trustworthy with the nations' secrets,' Mizelle said.
Mizelle said Perkins Coie was raising the alarm about a series of potential consequences that have not yet materialized and might never come to pass once agencies issue guidance interpreting Trump's order.
'What they're complaining about is a series of bogeymen,' Mizelle said. 'None of those ghosts are real. The bogeymen are not real.'
Howell's ruling is the first legal brushback to Trump for his recent orders targeting law firms he perceives as hostile to his interests. Last month, Trump pulled security clearances for lawyers at the prominent firm Covington & Burling after learning that several of its attorneys had agreed to represent former special counsel Jack Smith, who criminally prosecuted Trump.
Since his inauguration to a second term in January, Trump has also revoked the security clearances of scores of former officials, including President Joe Biden, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken and more than 50 former intelligence officials who signed a letter arguing that reports about the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop bore the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation operation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
22 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's appeals court nominee responds to allegation he suggested DOJ say ‘f— you' to courts: ‘I'm not anybody's henchman'
Justice Department official Emil Bove pushed back Wednesday against claims that he's President Trump's 'henchman' or 'enforcer' during a contentious Senate hearing on his nomination to serve a lifetime appointment on a federal appeals court. Bove, who served as Trump's personal lawyer during his criminal cases last year, has faced criticism from Democrats over his role in the dismissal of federal prosecutors who worked on Capitol riot cases; request for corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams to be dropped; and allegations from a whistleblower that he suggested administration officials should defy court orders. 'I respect this process, and I'm here today to address some of your questions about those decisions, but I want to be clear about one thing up front, there is a wildly inaccurate caricature of me in the mainstream media,' Bove said in his testimony. Advertisement 'I am not anybody's henchman. I'm not an enforcer. I'm a lawyer from a small town who never expected to be in an arena like this,' the senior DOJ official added. 3 Bove was nominated by Trump to serve as a judge on the third circuit appeals court earlier this year. Getty Images One day before Bove's confirmation hearing for the judicial post on the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which oversees district courts in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, fired former DOJ official Erez Reuveni alleged that the nominee told federal prosecutors that the Trump administration may not abide by court orders that would impede its mass deportation plans. Advertisement Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) brought up the whistleblower complaint during his questioning, and repeatedly used the expletive Reuveni claims Bove used during a March 14 meeting discussing Trump's yet-to-be signed proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act. 'In the complaint, it says, 'Bove stated the DOJ would need to consider telling the courts, f— you and ignoring any such court order.' Did you say anything of that kind in the meeting?' Schiff asked the judicial nominee. Bove responded: 'Senator, I have no recollection of saying anything of that kind.' 'Wouldn't you recall, Mr. Bove, if you said or suggested during a meeting with Justice Department lawyers that maybe they should consider telling the court 'f— you'? It seems to me that would be something you'd remember … Unless that's the kind of thing you say frequently,' Schiff pressed. Advertisement 'Well, I've certainly said things encouraging litigators at the department to fight hard for valid positions that we have to take in defense of our clients,' Bove shot back. 3 Bove served as Trump's defense team during his criminal cases last year. Getty Images 3 A whistleblower has accused Bove of informing DOJ officials that they may have to defy court orders regarding the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants. via REUTERS 'Have you frequently suggested that they say, 'f— you' and ignore court orders? Is that also something you frequently do so that you might not remember doing it on this occasion?' the senator continued. Advertisement Bove asserted that he 'did not suggest that there would be any need to consider, ignoring court orders,' noting that during the meeting Reuveni describes in his complaint, 'There were no court orders to discuss.' 'Well, did you suggest telling the courts 'f— you' in any manner?' Schiff responded. Bove answered: 'I don't recall.'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mobileye (MBLY) Rebounds 11.55% on Israel-Iran Ceasefire
Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ:MBLY) is one of the . Mobileye Global jumped by 11.55 percent on Monday following President Donald Trump's announcement that Israel and Iran have agreed on a ceasefire. The announcement boosted Mobileye Global Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MBLY) share prices, as a company based in Israel that is heavily affected by the conflict. 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED,' Trump wrote on social media. A driverless vehicle navigating city traffic, equipped with ADAS and safety features. As a form of support to its employees, Mobileye Global Inc. (NASDAQ:MBLY) said it has offered financial aid for babysitting services, and food and equipment deliveries, specifically for reservists, their spouses, and spouses of essential workers affected in Israel. While we acknowledge the potential of MBLY as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

32 minutes ago
EU leaders meet to discuss tougher Russia sanctions, US tariffs and Middle East
BRUSSELS -- The heads of the European Union's 27 member nations will meet Thursday in Brussels to discuss tougher sanctions on Russia, ways to prevent painful new U.S. tariffs, and how to make their voices heard in the Middle East conflicts. Most of the leaders will arrive from a brief but intense NATO summit where they pledged a big boost in defense spending, and papered over some of their differences with U.S. President Donald Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will join the EU summit by videoconference, after meeting Trump on Wednesday. U.S.-led NATO downgraded Ukraine from a top priority to a side player this week, but Russia's war in Ukraine remains of paramount concern for the EU. Members will be discussing an 18th round of sanctions against Russia and whether to maintain a price cap on Russian oil, measures that some nations oppose because it could raise energy prices. Meanwhile, Trump's threatened tariffs are weighing on the EU, which negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries. He lashed out at Spain on Wednesday for not spending more on defense and suggested yet more tariffs. France's president called Trump to task for starting a trade war with longtime allies. European leaders are also concerned about fallout from the wars in the Middle East, and the EU is pushing to revive diplomatic negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program. EU members have internal disagreements to overcome. They are divided over what to do about European policy toward Israel because of its conduct in Gaza. And left-leaning parties are attacking European Commissioner Ursula von Der Leyen's pivot away from the EU's climate leadership in favor of military investment. Defense and security are likely to top the agenda. The summit will end with a statement of conclusions that will set the agenda for the bloc for the next four months and can be seen as a bellwether for political sentiment in Europe on major regional and global issues.