Apartment sizes Q&A: What are the planned changes in restrictions?
Minister for Housing
James Browne
will bring a memo to Cabinet outlining the changes, which are aimed at reducing the cost per unit and
increasing the supply of apartments
in urban areas.
What are the current restrictions on apartment sizes and the mix of units in a development?
The number of one-bedroom apartments or studios within any apartment scheme is currently restricted to 50 per cent, with no more than 25 per cent of the entire scheme allowed to be studios.
The minimum floor area for a studio (one person) is 37sq m; 45sq m for a one-bed (two people) unit, 63sq m for a two-bed (three people) unit, 73sq m for a two-bed (four people) and 90sq m for a three-bed (five people) apartment.
READ MORE
There is also a requirement for more than 50 per cent of the units in any one scheme to exceed these minimum floor areas by 10 per cent.
How will these change?
First of all, there will be no restriction on the mix of apartment type within one scheme.
In terms of floor area, the minimum size of a studio apartment will be reduced to 32sq m while a new standard for a three-bedroom, four-person apartment of 76sq m will be introduced. The other units will not change.
The requirement for over 50 per cent of units any one scheme to to exceed these minimum floor areas by 10 per cent will change too, with that requirement reduced to 25 per cent of all units.
Any other changes besides size?
Yes – fewer windows and lifts and less private open space. The current guidelines stipulate that 33 per cent of apartments in urban areas and 50 per cent in suburban areas must be 'dual aspect'.
What does dual aspect mean you might ask? A dual-aspect dwelling is defined as one with openable windows on two external walls, which may be either on opposite sides of a dwelling or on adjacent sides of a dwelling where the external walls of a dwelling wrap around the corner of a building.
Under the new guidelines, just 25 per cent of apartments in any scheme – urban or suburban – will have to be dual aspect.
In terms of lifts, the current guidelines limit the number of units that can be provided per lift core to a maximum of 12 units. The new guidelines remove any limitation on the number of units per lift and stair core per floor, subject to compliance with building regulations.
There will be no change to the sizes of balconies or private open spaces, but the number of them may be reduced where a communal open space is provided instead or where the value of that private space is negligible due to noise pollution.
Some local authorities require communal spaces in their development plans, based on the size of the development. The new guidelines stipulate that these spaces will not be required on a mandatory threshold basis.
When will these new guidelines be enforced?
Local planning authorities will receive a circular letter when the guidelines are issued, and they will apply to all planning decisions made on applications lodged after the 2025 guidelines come into force.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
16 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Fianna Fáil MEPs still to pick a side ahead of no-confidence motion in European Commission president
Fianna Fáil MEPs have come under pressure for suggesting they might support a motion of no-confidence in European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen . The no-confidence vote was tabled by a far-right Romanian MEP and 74 others, predominantly from right-wing populist and nationalist parties. On Thursday, Members of the European Parliament will vote on the proposed motion of no-confidence in Ms von der Leyen, the head of the EU 's executive arm that proposes laws. The effort is widely expected to fall far short of the required two-thirds majority needed to censure the commission. If the motion was successful, it would likely force Ms von der Leyen and her team of EU commissioners, including former Fianna Fáil minister Michael McGrath , to resign. READ MORE Fianna Fáil's four MEPs, Barry Andrews, Billy Kelleher, Cynthia Ní Mhurchú and Barry Cowen, have yet to declare what way they will vote. Fianna Fáil have been weighing up the possibility of supporting the motion or abstaining in the vote. The no-confidence vote centres on the 'Pfizergate' controversy, where the commission faced criticism for refusing to release text messages exchanged between Ms von der Leyen and the chief executive of Pfizer, during negotiations to secure supplies of Covid-19 vaccines at the height of the pandemic. Copies of the texts had been sought in access-to-information requests made by the New York Times, which later took the commission to court for blocking the release of the texts. Speaking in the European Parliament on Monday, Ms von der Leyen said the motion was supported by extreme political movements, 'from anti-vaxxers to Putin apologists'. Defending her role at the top of the EU executive during the pandemic, Ms von der Leyen said it was 'no secret' that she was in contact with senior figures in companies producing Covid-19 vaccines. 'Every single contract negotiated was examined in detail in the capitals before being signed by each of the 27 member states. There were no secrets, no hidden clauses,' she told a sitting of MEPs in Strasbourg. 'The implication that these contacts were somehow inappropriate or against the European interest is, by any measure, simply wrong.' The motion was an attempt to spin 'debunked conspiracies' and try to rewrite the history of how Europe 'successfully overcame a global pandemic together', she said. The EU executive needed to be in a strong position during ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, the German politician said. Sinn Féin's two MEPs, Lynn Boylan and Kathleen Funchion, said they would vote against Ms von der Leyen, due to the failure of the EU to hold Israel to account for its conduct during its invasion of Gaza, among other things. Fine Gael's four MEPs will oppose the motion, which they said had been 'tabled by far-right members of the European Parliament in a bid to destabilise the EU for political gain'. Iratxe García, a senior Spanish MEP who leads the centre-left Socialist and Democrats (S&D), the second largest grouping in the parliament, said its members would not support the motion, as it refused to work with the far right. The motion has divided some right-wing populists, with hard right Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's party opposing the effort to bring down the commission leadership. Nicola Procaccini, an MEP from Ms Meloni's Brothers of Italy party, said the move was a mistake. 'This motion is doomed to fail and we know it, without even getting close to the level of votes needed,' he said. The proposal was one 'big political show' from the far-right to undermine democracy, according to Bas Eickhout, the co-leader of the European Greens.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the shortage of teachers: education is being compromised
At first glance, it appears to be a paradox: despite record numbers of qualified teachers working across the country, schools report increasingly severe challenges in filling vacancies. Almost all primary schools, for example, had to employ unqualified individuals without teaching qualifications as substitutes in the past year. At second level, one in five schools say they were forced to drop subjects due to teacher shortages. On Monday came confirmation of the scale of the issue : more than 1,800 teaching posts were left vacant across schools last March, according to Department of Education data, up from around 1,600 last November. Yet, 79,000 qualified teachers were employed during the past academic year – the highest number on record. The pipeline of teaching graduates continues to be strong, with 3,700 newly qualified teachers registered last year. Teaching remains an attractive career choice, with high demand among CAO applicants for both primary and post-primary education courses. So what is going on? At its heart, the teacher shortage is not just a workforce problem – it is a housing problem. It is no coincidence that most of the schools reporting serious recruitment difficulties are located in the capital and commuter belt areas, where accommodation is both scarce and prohibitively expensive. Young teachers, particularly those newly qualified and on the lower end of pay scales, are increasingly priced out of living near where they are needed most. In response, Minister for Education Helen McEntee has extended temporary measures aimed at boosting teacher supply. These include allowing teachers to provide additional substitution cover and lifting restrictions for job-sharing teachers. Further measures are planned, such as faster access to permanent contracts for young teachers. While helpful, these are sticking plasters. They do not address the deeper issue: a chronic lack of affordable housing. READ MORE The programme for government has pledged to build more affordable homes and to earmark cost-rental units for key public sector workers, including teachers. In theory, this would allow young professionals to live closer to their work. Progress, however, has been sluggish. The State missed its target for delivery of social housing delivery last year by nearly 20 per cent. While the number of cost-rental units doubled to over 1,200 last year, it remains a drop in the ocean. Ultimately, teacher shortages will persist unless the Government takes decisive action to increase the supply of affordable housing. When children's education is compromised – through cancelled classes, lost subjects and a lack of qualified staff – the cost is borne by the next generation. We must do better by our pupils. They deserve experienced teachers, consistent support and the full breadth of educational opportunity.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Paschal Donohoe's Eurogroup presidency: an important role - but don't forget the day job
Paschal Donohoe's re-election as president of the Eurogroup reflects a strong performance in the role over his previous two terms and the confidence of his euro zone colleagues Donohoe successfully campaigned for a third term and before the vote was even taken other candidates had thrown in the towel. France and Germany supported Donohoe, along with enough other ministers to give him a majority. Chairing the Eurogroup, an informal but important gathering of the 20 finance ministers from euro zone countries, is effectively an exercise in consensus-building, as countries try to move key issues forward, mostly for decision by the European Council. Reflecting the need to broker compromises between the major players, the job has never been held by one of the biggest member states – the previous incumbents were from Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Portugal. Donohoe chaired the group through the turbulence of Covid-19, the outbreak of the Ukraine war and the cost-of-living crisis, all of which inevitably took some focus off longer-term projects, such as creating a fully-functioning capital markets and banking union. These strategic developments are likely to be a key focus of Donohoe's third term. The Eurogroup also has an important role in the proposed digital euro – a project which has yet to grab the public's imagination. And it will remain a key sounding board for countries as they negotiate the fall-out from Trump's tariffs. READ MORE It is undoubtedly of value to Ireland to have a senior figure in such a central role, particularly given the access granted to the president of the Eurogroup to other vital gathering, such as those of the G7. This will, for example, have helped Donohoe plot a way for Ireland through the OECD corporate tax process, though unfortunately this deal is now in danger of collapse. That said, Donohoe also had a vital role to play at home, with tense budget negotiations ahead and uncertainty over the outlook for the public finances. He must, in other words, also continue to focus on the day job.
