Police guarding Parliament think new security fence is ‘dangerous', says author
House Of Cards author Lord Dobbs said officers had warned the tall metal barrier 'cuts off sightlines' to potential attackers.
Peers heard the railings were recently erected as part of moves to improve security along the historic site's western boundary, separating Old Palace Yard from Abingdon Street.
Lord Dobbs, a former Conservative Party deputy chairman and chief of staff, also raised the 'saga' over the new front door at a main entrance to the House of Lords, that cost nearly £10 million and does not work.
He questioned what lessons could be learned from the expensive debacle for the long-delayed restoration of the Palace of Westminster, which is forecast to cost billions of pounds.
Referring to the new security barrier, Lord Dobbs said: 'Why is it that every policeman and custodian that one asks says that the fence which has just been erected is dangerous, as it cuts off sightlines for those who might be wishing harm on this place?'
Responding, Lords senior deputy speaker Lord Gardiner of Kimble said both the fencing and door were introduced as security measures, highlighting the 2017 Westminster terror attack, which claimed the lives of unarmed officer Pc Keith Palmer and four others.
He told peers: 'The backdrop is a security imperative.'
Lord Gardiner added: 'What has happened to our front door is entirely unacceptable.
'This has not been a project that anyone should be proud of, but we need to enhance our security, for reasons that many of us regret but which are necessary in the world in which we live.'
On the planned revamp of Parliament, he said it was important to learn lessons from other countries.
He told peers: 'That is why we are in dialogue with the Austrians, the Dutch and the Canadians, where they have had experience of renovation of parliaments, and, in our own country, with Buckingham Palace and Manchester Town Hall.'
The Metropolitan Police has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Reform would dominate UK election if held imminently: polling
A new YouGov megapoll indicates Reform UK would become Britain's largest party if a general election were held tomorrow, with Nigel Farage potentially forming a minority government. The poll projects Reform UK would secure 271 seats, a significant increase from their current five, while Labour would see a dramatic collapse from 403 to 178 seats. The Conservative party is predicted to fall to fourth place with only 46 seats, behind the Liberal Democrats, marking their worst election performance on record. Several prominent Labour cabinet ministers, including Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper, would lose their seats, and Reform would dominate multiple regions across England and Wales. The poll attributes Reform's surge to Labour's plummeting popularity, with 194 Labour-held seats potentially turning to Reform, amid internal party rebellions over proposed welfare cuts and recent policy U-turns.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Parliamentary schedule for Thursday June 26
We will be covering the House of Commons and House of Lords throughout the day. All timings approximate and subject to business. House of Commons:0930 Transport questions1030 Business questions to Commons Leader Lucy Powell1130 Supply and Appropriation (Main Estimates) (No. 2) Bill: second and third readingGeneral debate on armed forces dayAn adjournment debate on potential merits of floating solar panels Westminster Hall:1330 Select committee statement from Joint Committee on human rights1350 IVF egg donation in young women1510 Funding of the BBC World Service House of Lords:1100 Oral questions1150 Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill – committee stage (day one)
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Council tenants keep social housing for life – even if they earn £100k
A Labour-run local authority has brought back lifetime tenancies for council house residents after a botched Tory crackdown. Westminster City Council has announced it is bringing back lifetime contracts for all its new and existing tenants, and scrapping fixed-term five-year tenancies. It means council house residents will have an automatic right to keep their home regardless of how much they go on to earn. Lifetime tenancies, also known as secure housing placements, are offered as the default by almost all local authorities after the previous Conservative government's bid to scrap them in 2015 was shelved. The town hall said the move would tackle 'housing insecurity' and develop stronger communities in the central London borough. But critics warned that people who go on to become 'high earners' would be able to continuing to live in taxpayer-subsidised homes permanently. Although councils usually conduct income checks on housing applicants, they are typically allowed to earn more after being approved for a property. Westminster's new policy recommends providers offer accommodation for life following a 12-month introductory period, replacing five-year fixed-term tenancies. After the death of a council house tenant, a property can be passed down to the council by their spouse, child or another member of the family. Paul Swaddle, the Conservative leader of Westminster council's opposition, warned that the move 'risks turning council homes into a permanent asset for the few, rather than a vital safety net for those who need them'. However, campaigners welcomed the revelation as a 'positive step'. Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at Shelter, said: 'Once a family moves into a social home, they should have the peace of mind that they can plan for their future without having to worry about their housing situation changing suddenly.' Council house tenants will be given a lifetime guarantee that they can remain in a property, so long as they meet the conditions of their tenancy agreement, such as meeting rent payments and not engaging in anti-social behaviour. Cllr Swaddle said: 'Westminster has some of the longest housing waiting lists in the country. 'We should be helping those most in need [and] not creating a system where high earners can hold onto council homes for life, regardless of changing circumstances while others wait for years in temporary accommodation.' In 2012, a coalition government gave local authorities the discretion to not offer lifetime tenancies. However, take-up among councils was low. The Conservatives went further by trying to scrap them altogether in 2015, but eventually shelved the plans. It remains the predominant form of council housing today. Lifetime tenancies made up 89.9pc of new council lettings in the year ending March 2024, according to official figures. Meanwhile, the borough – which Labour won control of for the first time in 2022 – is embarking on a radical shake-up of its housing policy. Residents who are second home owners were recently hit with double council tax, while owners of long-term empty properties must now pay 300pc higher tax bills. An average Band D property in Westminster currently pays £1,017 a year in council tax. Separately, the council is lobbying ministers for greater powers to take possession of properties that have been empty for six months or longer and use them as council housing. Local authorities must currently wait two years before they can begin the legal process of possessing an empty property. Adam Hug, the leader of Westminster City Council, said: 'We're giving our residents the long-term security they deserve. 'A safe, stable home is the foundation for building a stronger community – and this change ensures tenants can plan for their futures with peace of mind. 'There will be no changes to rent, tenancy rights or the services residents receive and the council will work with tenants to ensure a smooth transition.'
