logo
Request to unseal Epstein grand jury files 'likely to disappoint'

Request to unseal Epstein grand jury files 'likely to disappoint'

9 News21-07-2025
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here A US Justice Department request to unseal grand jury transcripts in the prosecution of chronic sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend is unlikely to produce much, if anything, to satisfy the public's appetite for new revelations about the financier's crimes, former federal prosecutors say. Attorney Sarah Krissoff, an assistant US attorney in Manhattan from 2008 to 2021, called the request in the prosecutions of Epstein and imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell 'a distraction'. "The president is trying to present himself as if he's doing something here and it really is nothing," Krissoff told The Associated Press in a weekend interview. Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody in August 2019. (AP) Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche made the request on Friday, asking judges to unseal transcripts from grand jury proceedings that resulted in indictments against Epstein and Maxwell, saying 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration'. The request came as the administration sought to contain the firestorm that followed its announcement that it would not be releasing additional files from the Epstein probe despite previously promising that it would. Epstein killed himself at age 66 in his federal jail cell in August 2019, a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, while Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence imposed after her December 2021 sex trafficking conviction for luring girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Krissoff and Joshua Naftalis, a Manhattan federal prosecutor for 11 years before entering private practice in 2023, said grand jury presentations are purposely brief. Naftalis said Southern District prosecutors present just enough to a grand jury to get an indictment but 'it's not going to be everything the FBI and investigators have figured out about Maxwell and Epstein'. 'People want the entire file from however long. That's just not what this is,' he said, estimating that the transcripts, at most, probably amount to a few hundred pages. 'It's not going to be much,' Krissoff said, estimating the length at as little as 60 pages 'because the Southern District of New York's practice is to put as little information as possible into the grand jury'. 'They basically spoon feed the indictment to the grand jury. That's what we're going to see,' she said. 'I just think it's not going to be that interesting. ... I don't think it's going to be anything new.' Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. (Nine) Both ex-prosecutors said that grand jury witnesses in Manhattan are usually federal agents summarising their witness interviews. That practice might conflict with the public perception of some state and federal grand jury proceedings, where witnesses likely to testify at a trial are brought before grand juries during lengthy proceedings prior to indictments or when grand juries are used as an investigatory tool. In Manhattan, federal prosecutors 'are trying to get a particular result so they present the case very narrowly and inform the grand jury what they want them to do,' Krissoff said. Krissoff predicted that judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases will reject the government's request. With Maxwell, a petition is before the US Supreme Court so appeals have not been exhausted. With Epstein, the charges are related to the Maxwell case and the anonymity of scores of victims who have not gone public is at stake, although Blanche requested that victim identities be protected. 'This is not a 50-, 60-, 80-year-old case,' Krissoff noted. 'There's still someone in custody.' She said citing 'public intrigue, interest and excitement' about a case was likely not enough to convince a judge to release the transcripts despite a 1997 ruling by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals that said judges have wide discretion and that public interest alone can justify releasing grand jury information. Krissoff called it 'mind-blowingly strange' that Washington Justice Department officials are increasingly directly filing requests and arguments in the Southern District of New York, where the prosecutor's office has long been labelled the "Sovereign District of New York" for its independence from outside influence. 'To have the attorney general and deputy attorney general meddling in an SDNY case is unheard of,' she said. Cheryl Bader, a former federal prosecutor and Fordham Law School criminal law professor, said judges who presided over the Epstein and Maxwell cases may take weeks or months to rule. 'Especially here where the case involved witnesses or victims of sexual abuse, many of which are underage, the judge is going to be very cautious about what the judge releases,' she said. Donald Trump is under pressure over his long friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. (AP) Bader said she didn't see the government's quest aimed at satisfying the public's desire to explore conspiracy theories 'trumping – pardon the pun – the well-established notions of protecting the secrecy of the grand jury process'. 'I'm sure that all the line prosecutors who really sort of appreciate the secrecy and special relationship they have with the grand jury are not happy that DOJ is asking the court to release these transcripts,' she added. Mitchell Epner, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice, called Trump's comments and influence in the Epstein matter 'unprecedented' and 'extraordinarily unusual' because he is a sitting president. He said it was not surprising that some former prosecutors are alarmed that the request to unseal the grand jury materials came two days after the firing of Manhattan Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey, who worked on the Epstein and Maxwell cases. 'If federal prosecutors have to worry about the professional consequences of refusing to go along with the political or personal agenda of powerful people, then we are in a very different place than I've understood the federal Department of Justice to be in over the last 30 years of my career,' he said. Krissoff said the uncertain environment that has current prosecutors feeling unsettled is shared by government employees she speaks with at other agencies as part of her work in private practice. 'The thing I hear most often is this is a strange time. Things aren't working the way we're used to them working,' she said. Readers seeking support can contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or beyond blue on 1300 22 4636. World
Jeffrey Epstein
USA
Donald Trump CONTACT US
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem
From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem

Sydney Morning Herald

timea few seconds ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem

The existence of a so-called Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' matters, of course. As do the political implications of the long-running saga of the paedophile financier, whose death by suicide in 2019 turbocharged the conspiracies already swirling about a secretive cabal of the wealthy and powerful, and the lengths they would go to protect their secrets. Given that the men rumoured to have been 'gifted' vulnerable girls trafficked by Epstein were friends or associates, rather than paying clients, one might assume that Epstein knew better than to keep such a list anywhere other than in his own head. The obsessive focus on this list, along with a trove of court and other documents relating to the criminal investigation against Epstein, diverts attention away from what should trouble us most: Why Epstein got such a kick out of abusing underage girls, and why he got away with it for decades. In this post-Me Too era it's worth examining whether Epstein is a particularly egregious case of a much broader phenomenon. The profile of Epstein's victims, of which there are said to be more than 1000, is familiar to us already, should we care to look. A vulnerable young woman, sometimes from a troubled background, sometimes in need of cash, aspires to make something of her life. In awe of the obscene wealth, status, clout or celebrity of a powerful, older male who, implausibly at first, suggests friendship. He might explicitly offer to use his influence, or such assistance might be implied. Favours are sought, then they are compelled. There is a kind of implicit blackmail, only sometimes articulated, about what might happen should she try to break free or, heaven forbid, alert others to what she has been led to believe she has been complicit in, and guilty of. Does this remind you of Harvey Weinstein, that other notorious case recently back in the courts? What about 'Diddy' Combs, convicted this month of 'transportation to engage in prostitution' during more than a decade of abuse of several women including young singer Cassie Ventura, whom he started dating when she was 19 years old (he was 37)? Then there's fellow Grammy-winning rapper R. Kelly, serving concurrent 20- and 30-year prison sentences for child sex abuse, sex trafficking and racketeering. Among Kelly's many victims was deceased pop star Aaliyah, whom Kelly illegally married when she was 15 years old. Mohamed al-Fayed. Russell Brand (allegedly). Neil Gaiman (allegedly). Bill Cosby. Jimmy Savile. Rolf Harris. Larry Nassar. Loading Groupies and gold-diggers have been around forever, and all of these men could have potentially leveraged their wealth, power or status to have their pick of such women in an entirely consensual fashion, as unpalatable as that may be to some. So why is it that the more influence a man accrues, the seemingly higher the likelihood he will become an abuser? And why do many of these men seem to get off on targeting vulnerable women in particular? There is no single typology of a paedophile or sex abuser, but the research on the nexus between sex and power does provide clues. Studies have demonstrated that feelings of power enhance pre-existing sociopathic tendencies, and that 'men who associate sex with power are more likely to use power to get sex '. Men who hold misogynistic or dehumanising views of women have also been shown to be more likely to perpetrate sexual violence. A combination of both 'high levels of power motivation' and 'strong power-sex associations' is considered a predictive factor for aggressive sexual behaviour. This brings us to that other high-profile guy recently convicted of sexual assault, who also has a lengthy history of misogynistic, dehumanising and allegedly abusive behaviour toward women: Donald J. Trump. The president's infamous 'grab 'em by the pussy' and the remark preceding it, 'when you're a star, they let you do it', suggests that, like the other wealthy and influential men I've mentioned, he strongly associates sex with power.

From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem
From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem

The Age

timea few seconds ago

  • The Age

From Epstein to Trump, rich and powerful men have a vulnerable-women problem

The existence of a so-called Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' matters, of course. As do the political implications of the long-running saga of the paedophile financier, whose death by suicide in 2019 turbocharged the conspiracies already swirling about a secretive cabal of the wealthy and powerful, and the lengths they would go to protect their secrets. Given that the men rumoured to have been 'gifted' vulnerable girls trafficked by Epstein were friends or associates, rather than paying clients, one might assume that Epstein knew better than to keep such a list anywhere other than in his own head. The obsessive focus on this list, along with a trove of court and other documents relating to the criminal investigation against Epstein, diverts attention away from what should trouble us most: Why Epstein got such a kick out of abusing underage girls, and why he got away with it for decades. In this post-Me Too era it's worth examining whether Epstein is a particularly egregious case of a much broader phenomenon. The profile of Epstein's victims, of which there are said to be more than 1000, is familiar to us already, should we care to look. A vulnerable young woman, sometimes from a troubled background, sometimes in need of cash, aspires to make something of her life. In awe of the obscene wealth, status, clout or celebrity of a powerful, older male who, implausibly at first, suggests friendship. He might explicitly offer to use his influence, or such assistance might be implied. Favours are sought, then they are compelled. There is a kind of implicit blackmail, only sometimes articulated, about what might happen should she try to break free or, heaven forbid, alert others to what she has been led to believe she has been complicit in, and guilty of. Does this remind you of Harvey Weinstein, that other notorious case recently back in the courts? What about 'Diddy' Combs, convicted this month of 'transportation to engage in prostitution' during more than a decade of abuse of several women including young singer Cassie Ventura, whom he started dating when she was 19 years old (he was 37)? Then there's fellow Grammy-winning rapper R. Kelly, serving concurrent 20- and 30-year prison sentences for child sex abuse, sex trafficking and racketeering. Among Kelly's many victims was deceased pop star Aaliyah, whom Kelly illegally married when she was 15 years old. Mohamed al-Fayed. Russell Brand (allegedly). Neil Gaiman (allegedly). Bill Cosby. Jimmy Savile. Rolf Harris. Larry Nassar. Loading Groupies and gold-diggers have been around forever, and all of these men could have potentially leveraged their wealth, power or status to have their pick of such women in an entirely consensual fashion, as unpalatable as that may be to some. So why is it that the more influence a man accrues, the seemingly higher the likelihood he will become an abuser? And why do many of these men seem to get off on targeting vulnerable women in particular? There is no single typology of a paedophile or sex abuser, but the research on the nexus between sex and power does provide clues. Studies have demonstrated that feelings of power enhance pre-existing sociopathic tendencies, and that 'men who associate sex with power are more likely to use power to get sex '. Men who hold misogynistic or dehumanising views of women have also been shown to be more likely to perpetrate sexual violence. A combination of both 'high levels of power motivation' and 'strong power-sex associations' is considered a predictive factor for aggressive sexual behaviour. This brings us to that other high-profile guy recently convicted of sexual assault, who also has a lengthy history of misogynistic, dehumanising and allegedly abusive behaviour toward women: Donald J. Trump. The president's infamous 'grab 'em by the pussy' and the remark preceding it, 'when you're a star, they let you do it', suggests that, like the other wealthy and influential men I've mentioned, he strongly associates sex with power.

Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK
Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK

7NEWS

time2 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Princess Catherine expected to lead US President Donald Trump's welcome to the UK

Princess Catherine is expected to lead the welcome when US President Donald Trump returns to the UK in September for an official state visit. Trump on Tuesday concluded a four-day private trip to Scotland — which drew crowds of protestors — during which he visited his two Scottish golf courses and opened a new one bearing his name. He also met with UK Prime Minster Sir Keir Starmer who at a February meeting of the leaders in Washington had extended an 'unprecedented' invitation from King Charles for an official state visit. Traditionally, second-term presidents are not offered a state visit and have instead been invited for tea or lunch with the monarch. From September 17-19, Trump will be involved in a series of formal meetings with Starmer and government officials but it is the royal ceremonial events that are likely to draw the most attention. While King Charles III will play a key role, royal watchers anticipate Princess Catherine will be the face of this historic engagement. 'At the heart of the hugely important state visit will be King Charles and another key royal,' online independent royal news source Royal Central said. 'For the Princess of Wales is expected to play a major part in this historic event. 'There's every expectation that William and Kate will lead on welcoming the American delegation as well as participating in various aspects of the visit.' When French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte touched down in London on July 8, it was the Prince and Princess of Wales, William and Catherine, who welcomed the dignitaries. At a state banquet held for the French president, the princess was front and centre. Catherine wore Queen Mary's Lover's Knot tiara — her first tiara-wearing moment since revealing her cancer diagnosis in March 2024 and stepping back from royal duties while she underwent treatment. She wore a dark red Givenchy evening gown designed by Sarah Burton, who also designed her wedding dress. Trump's first official state visit to the UK was in June 2019, about two years into his first presidential term. Alongside first lady Melania Trump, he met then-queen Elizabeth II after arriving in the gardens of Buckingham Palace via helicopter. This was followed by a visit to Westminster Abbey, and later a state banquet with then-prime minister Theresa May in attendance. When extending the invitation for a second state visit, Starmer said: 'This is really special. This has never happened before. Unprecedented. 'I think that just symbolises the strength of the relationship between us. 'I think the last state visit was a tremendous success. His Majesty the King wants to make this even better than that. So, this is ... truly historic.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store