New powers to tackle hostile state threats after Iran spying charges
Yvette Cooper addressed MPs on a 'series of grave wider issues' for national security on Monday as the defendants were charged with spying offences in relation to Iran.
The Home Office will introduce new laws that will allow the UK to proscribe state-based groups such as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and create criminal offences, following recommendations by terror watchdog Jonathan Hall KC.
'The Iranian regime poses an unacceptable threat to our domestic security which cannot continue,' Ms Cooper said.
'But we need to go further in strengthening our powers to address national security threats.
'We will draw up new powers, modelled on counter-terrorism powers, in a series of areas to tackle those state threats.'
Ms Cooper said the new legislation will cover state-based threats rather than terrorist organisations, which would be tougher than the current National Security Act.
In a review of terrorism and state threat legislation published on Monday, Mr Hall concluded that the Terrorism Act 2000 was never intended to regulate the behaviour of state actors, and said looking at that law as a way to proscribe state bodies is 'quite simply shopping in the wrong department'.
Instead, he recommended for a notice to be issued against state actors or private entities acting as foreign intelligence services under the National Security Act 2023 as a way to 'name and shame' on the international stage.
He said: 'It is also a threat to that entity, putting it on notice that its operations, and its minions and influence networks, are at greater risk of executive action, by way of arrest and prosecution, or deportation, or other forms of disruption, from UK authorities.'
Mr Hall also recommended further criminal offences for anyone who invites support or displays signage of a foreign intelligence service subject to the notice.
Other suggestions he made – including for police to be given stop and search powers at locations which are a known state threat target, set up cordons and seize passports, similar to in terrorism cases – are also being reviewed by the Government.
But shadow home secretary Chris Philp pressed in the Commons as to why the IRGC had not already been proscribed, while Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice urged for the Home Secretary not to 'kick the can down the road'.
But Ms Cooper replied that Mr Hall found legal difficulties in using current laws to do so, adding: 'It's important that any legislation we apply is actually effective and doesn't unravel.'
The move comes as Tehran's ambassador to the UK was summoned to the Foreign Office after the three Iranian nationals were charged with spying offences.
Mostafa Sepahvand, 39, Farhad Javadi Manesh, 44, and Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 55, were remanded in custody at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Saturday charged with offences under the National Security Act.
They are all charged with engaging in conduct likely to assist the Iranian foreign intelligence service between August 14 2024 and February 16 2025.
On Monday, a Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office spokesman said: 'Today, upon instruction from the Foreign Secretary, the ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Kingdom was summoned to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.
'The UK Government is clear that protecting national security remains our top priority and Iran must be held accountable for its actions.'
On Sunday, Iran summoned the British charge d'affaires in protest at what officials described as the 'illegal and unjustified' detention of the country's nationals.
Iran's state-run news agency IRNA reported that Tehran said the detention was a violation of international law and politically motivated.
The three men all arrived in the UK by irregular means, including by small boats and a lorry, between 2016 and 2022, Westminster Magistrates' Court heard.
Sepahvand is also charged with engaging in surveillance, reconnaissance and open-source research, intending to commit acts, namely serious violence against a person in the UK.
Manesh and Noori are further charged with engaging in surveillance and reconnaissance, with the intention that acts, namely serious violence against a person in the UK, would be committed by others.
The trio will next appear for a preliminary hearing at the Old Bailey on June 6.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves must do more than hope for the best when it comes to paying for Labour's spending
R achel Reeves has an unenviable task as she puts the final touches to the government -wide spending review she will unveil on Wednesday. It will be a defining moment for the Labour government as she sets out departmental spending limits up to the next general election. The headlines garnered in the run-up to the chancellor 's big day are misleading. We have been promised £15.6bn for local transport projects, mainly in the North and Midlands; £4.5bn a year for schools; £22.5bn a year for science and tech, and £187m to bring digital skills and AI learning into classrooms and communities. While all are worthy, the government is playing a rather cynical game. Some of its pre-announcements stem from the extra £113bn of capital spending for which Ms Reeves created room last October by sensibly changing her fiscal rules so investment projects do not count towards her target to balance revenue and spending by 2029-30. However, her determination to stick to her fiscal rules to prevent a wobble on the financial markets means that Wednesday's statement will impose a squeeze on day-to-day budgets. Although overall spending will rise by an average of 1.2 per cent a year on top of inflation, big increases for health and defence will mean real-terms cuts for other budgets, possibly including the Home Office (which funds the police), housing and local government. So there has been a bruising round of negotiations between the Treasury and ministers such as Angela Rayner, who is responsible for housing and councils, and Yvette Cooper, the home secretary. During a media round on Sunday, Peter Kyle, the science secretary, did not rule out real-terms cuts to the police and housing. While the squeeze will technically be less severe than the austerity over which George Osborne presided from 2010, the danger for Labour is that it will feel like austerity 2.0 for many voters. Labour backbenchers are well aware of this and, after the party's poor results in last month's local elections in England, have pushed ministers into a U-turn on Ms Reeves's disastrous decision to means-test the pensioners' winter fuel allowance and extracted a promise from Sir Keir Starmer of more measures to combat child poverty, possibly by easing the two-child limit on benefits. There could also be a tweak to the £5bn of cuts to disability and sickness benefits hurriedly announced in March. The government must prioritise the fight against child poverty; without intervention by ministers, it would rise significantly over the five-year parliament, which would be an indictment of Labour. Ms Reeves must find a way to make good her promise in her article for The Independent last week to ensure ' every young person can fulfil their potential '. Admittedly, that will not be easy, given all the conflicting pressures on her to spend more. Although Wednesday's statement will not be a Budget, Ms Reeves should do more than rattle off a list of spending commitments without making clear where the money will come from. There is already a risk of doing so on defence. The strategic defence review unveiled last week is based on the government's ambition to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP in the next parliament but it has not yet allocated the funds to go beyond a rise from 2.3 per cent to 2.5 per cent by 2027. The UK will come under pressure to commit to 3.5 per cent at a Nato summit later this month. Ms Reeves should also provide clarity on which pensioners will receive winter fuel payments in the coming winter. The about-turn has been slow and messy, to the consternation of Labour MPs. In responding to such pressures, the chancellor and prime minister have cited the economy's 0.7 per cent growth in the first quarter of this year but there is no guarantee that will be maintained. They should not lose sight of the need to balance higher spending with genuine public sector reform. There will be a limit to how much can be achieved through 'efficiency savings'. The suspicion is that, in spending more on defence, winter fuel payments and child poverty, Sir Keir and Ms Reeves are willing the ends without providing the means. They should level with the public about how their sums will add up. For now, they may be tempted to adopt a Micawberish approach in the hope that the fiscal picture improves by Ms Reeves's second Budget in the autumn. Again, that is far from certain: more holes might be blown in her headroom against her rules by an uncertain global economic outlook in the age of Trump 2.0 and the Office for Budget Responsibility downgrading its optimistic forecasts for productivity growth. Unless she changed her rules to allow more borrowing, the chancellor would then have to implement tax rises or spending cuts or a combination of both. When things might get even worse, the chancellor needs more than a strategy of hoping for the best.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Albanian drug dealer who illegally sneaked back into Britain weeks after being deported succeeds in remaining in the UK by judge
An Albanian drug dealer who sneaked back into Britain just weeks after being deported has succeed to remain in the UK - even after committing more crimes on his return. Stiljano Ziu has been allowed to stay in the UK despite the asylum court hearing he committed a 'flagrant' breach of immigration laws, having already been deported from the country once. Ziu was jailed for producing cannabis just months after entering Britain illegally, it was heard. He then 'took advantage of the early release scheme' by agreeing to deportation in exchange for finishing his sentence early. He then entered the UK again illegally just weeks later. During his second illegal stint in the UK, which is still ongoing, Ziu committed more drugs offences and was recently jailed for four and a half years. A crown court judge previously said of Ziu that he came to the UK 'prepared to do any activity, legal or illegal', the asylum court heard. However, after a long and complicated legal process he has won his fight to remain in the UK after the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the Upper Tribunal ruled in his favour. Ziu won his appeal due to his marriage to a Greek woman in the UK after entering the country for the second time. The Home Office had refused to give him a residence card after his marriage. Ziu won his case after the asylum court heard he was not a 'present threat'. Ziu may still face deportation as a result of his recent drugs conviction, Upper Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins said. The Upper Tribunal heard Ziu first entered the UK unlawfully in 2017 or 2018 and by November 2018 was convicted of producing cannabis charges and was jailed for nine months. He was released from his prison sentence early, on the basis he agreed to be deported in December 2018. However he was already back in early 2019. 'He returned within weeks in clear breach of the deportation order', the tribunal was told. 'There can be no clearer case of abuse of immigration laws. 'He took advantage of the early release scheme and had no intention of remaining in Albania. 'He had the resources, means and contacts to return illegally.' His presence in the UK went unnoticed until December 2020 when he applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Greek woman exercising treaty rights in the UK. He had met her upon his return and married her in April 2021. 'He is still benefitting from his illegal entry and worked illegally too', it was heard. The Home Office refused Ziu's request, leading to his case at the asylum court. During court hearings it had to be determined whether the Home Office had showed that Ziu presented a 'present threat'. At one hearing in 2022, the Home Office accepted that there was 'not a present serious threat in relation to a propensity to re-offend'. At a 2023 hearing, Ziu won the first stage of his appeal. The judge in 2023 criticised Ziu's 'flagrant and serious breach of UK immigration laws' but said the Home Office had not shown he was a 'present threat' of re-offending. The decision led to the Home Office appealing it at the Upper Tribunal. Before the Upper Tribunal hearing, Ziu wrote a letter stating that in November 2024 he was jailed for four and a half years for conspiring to supply class B drugs. The offending happened between January 2020 and June 2022. At the Upper Tribunal hearing, it was ruled that the Home Office had not successfully challenged the 2023 decision that Ziu was not a risk of re-offending. But, Judge Perkins admitted 'it may be that this case has been an academic exercise' because Ziu may now face deportation due to his recent conviction. Judge Perkins said: 'Putting everything together we are satisfied that the judge [in 2023] made a decision that was open to her and gave lawful reasons. 'We therefore dismiss the Secretary of State's appeal. 'What happens next is of course a matter for the Secretary of State. 'However, [Ziu] must understand that his recent conviction has resulted in a sentence that may require his deportation from the United Kingdom and that is something the Secretary of State will consider. 'Nevertheless... we find that the Secretary of State has failed to show that the [2023] tribunal erred in law and we dismiss the Secretary of State's appeal.'
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Police must 'do their bit' on funding, minister warns
The science and technology secretary has urged police to "do their bit" to "embrace change" as the Home Office and the Treasury continue negotiations over this week's Spending to the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Peter Kyle said "every part of society was struggling" and the chancellor was facing pressure from all sectors including doctors and universities to increase funding. He said the review would boost spending for schools and scientific research but declined to rule out a squeeze on Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said he was concerned about police numbers being cut and urged the government to protect their budget. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out on Wednesday how much money each government department will get to spend for the next three this week, she warned not every government department will "get everything they want" and said there were "good things I've had to say no to". The BBC has been told that Home Office ministers do not believe there is enough money to recruit the additional police officers Labour promised in its manifesto. Asked about police funding, Kyle said the government had already provided an additional £1bn to the police. "We are delivering investment in the police," he said. "We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do to do their bit for change as well.""Money is part of how we change our country for the better. And reform – modernisation, using technology, doing things in the way that people would expect our public services to be doing in the 2020s – is the other part."Last month, five police chiefs, including Sir Mark Rowley, head of the Metropolitan Police, said years of cuts had left forces working with "outdated" technology and warned further cuts would "bake in structural inefficiencies". Also appearing on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Philp said he was "very concerned that police numbers may fall". Asked how the Conservatives would find money to protect police funding, he said there were "all kinds of areas where Labour is essentially splurging money".He criticised the government for its spending on environmental projects and public sector pay rises. He also said his party would "go further on welfare reform" and pointed to its plans to cut £12bn from the welfare budget. Richard Tice, Reform UK's deputy leader, told the programme his party wanted the government and councils to "stop wasting money". Reeves's position on ruling out borrowing to fund day-to-day spending and raising taxes again has led to speculation there will be spending squeezes in the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said "relatively modest" growth rates mean "sharp trade-offs are unavoidable".Kyle said Reeves was delivering the Spending Review at a difficult time saying: "Right across our society, our economy, our public services, we get the stresses that people are under."We are the fastest growing economy in the G7 but we know that people aren't feeling it in their pockets yet."That's why what you are already hearing about the Spending Review is, that we are going to increase per pupil funding in schools to the highest it's ever been and we're going to have the largest ever increase in R&D [research and development] as a government in our history."As first reported in The Observer, the Spending Review will see schools get an additional £4.5bn to help fund pay rises for teachers and money for special needs provision.
