
Trump affirms his commitment to Nato's Article 5 pledge for mutual defence
But on Wednesday, the US president said he stood with that promise.
'That's why I'm here,' Mr Trump said as he met with Dick Schoof, the prime minister of the Netherlands. 'Why would I be here?'
Meanwhile, the alliance on Wednesday enacted one of the Republican president's chief priorities: a pledge by Nato member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defence.
'I've been asking them to go up to 5% for a number of years,' Mr Trump said earlier on Wednesday as he met with Mark Rutte, the alliance's secretary general.
'I think that's going to be very big news.'
The 32 leaders endorsed a final summit statement saying: 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.'
Spain had already officially announced that it cannot meet the target, and others have voiced reservations, but the investment pledge includes a review of spending in 2029 to monitor progress and reassess the security threat posed by Russia.
The boost in spending follows years of Mr Trump's complaints that other countries were not paying their fair share as part of an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union.
Most Nato countries, with the key exception of Spain, appeared motivated to bolster their own defences not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Mr Trump.
🆕 NATO Allies have agreed to invest 5% of their GDP annually in defence.
A substantial commitment in response to significant threats to our security#NATOsummit pic.twitter.com/eFgwH3pfrR
— NATO (@NATO) June 25, 2025
As a candidate in 2016, Mr Trump suggested that as president he would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defence guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the Nato treaty.
In March this year, he expressed uncertainty that Nato would come to the United States' defence if needed, though the alliance did just that after the September 11 2001 attacks.
On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition'.
'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Mr Trump said.
'But I'm committed to being their friends.'
He signalled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he was at the summit.
New Hampshire senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, who travelled to The Hague and met with several foreign leaders at the summit, said other countries raised 'understandable questions' about the US commitment to the alliance, 'certainly given President Trump's past statements'.
'We were very strong and reassuring everyone that we are committed to Nato, we are committed to Article 5, we are committed to maintaining troops on the Eastern flank,' said Ms Shaheen, who represented the US Senate with Democratic senator Chris Coons of Delaware.
Mr Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire – although on Monday, he said the ceasefire was 'very good'.
After Mr Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, reported that a US intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear programme had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated', as Mr Trump had said.
But on Wednesday morning, Mr Trump and other senior cabinet officials vigorously pushed back on the assessment, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the administration was launching an investigation into who disclosed those findings to reporters.
'That hit ended the war,' Mr Trump said.
Drawing comparisons to the atomic bombings from the US during the Second World War, he added: 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war.'
The White House has not said which other world leaders Mr Trump would meet with one on one while in The Hague, but the US president said during his meeting with Mr Rutte that he will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky later on Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Poland scrambles war planes as Russia unleashes hypersonic missile barrage and strikes Ukrainian city near NATO border - as Kremlin calls West's peace talks 'a road to no-where'
Poland said on Thursday that warplanes have been scrambled to protect its airspace as Russia staged its biggest hypersonic missile barrage on Ukraine since Putin met Trump last Friday. The Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces said on X: 'In connection with the activity of long-range aviation of the Russian Federation, conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory... aircraft of the Polish Air Force and allied aviation are operating in Polish airspace.' Russian attacks on western Ukraine killed one person and wounded multiple others, officials in the country said Thursday as diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war grind on. Moscow and Kyiv have kept up their aerial attacks on each other as world leaders including US President Donald Trump push for a ceasefire. 'One person was killed and two were wounded as a result of the combined UAV and cruise missile strike in Lviv,' said Maksym Kozytskyi, head of the regional military administration. 'Dozens of residential buildings were damaged,' he added in a Telegram post. Russian fire also wounded 12 people in the city of Mukachevo, near the border with Hungary and Slovakia, the city council said. 'Five patients are being treated in the hospital, and one more was transferred to the regional hospital,' the council wrote on Facebook. In Lutsk, Mayor Igor Polishchuk reported 'an enemy attack that was conducted by UAVs and missiles'. 'As of this moment there are no injuries or fatalities,' he said. Meanwhile, Russia's defence ministry said it destroyed '49 Ukrainian aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles' across multiple regions. The ministry did not detail any casualties or damage. The latest cross-border fire follows Trump's flurry of diplomacy this month aimed at ending the war. The US president


The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
ODNI to slash costs by 40% as part of big intelligence agency overhaul
The move is expected to save taxpayers over $700 million annually and better enable ODNI to focus on "fulfilling its critical role of serving as the central hub for intelligence integration, strategic guidance, and oversight over the Intelligence Community," said the late afternoon news release. "Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence," Gabbard said in the release. "ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the U.S. Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers." Intel agency long a focus of Trump's ire The ODNI was established in April 2005 after the blue ribbon 9/11 Commission exposed systemic failures across the intelligence community. Its purpose was to integrate intelligence from - and provide oversight over - all of the various intel elements of the U.S. government, including the CIA, the eavesdropping National Security Agency and several military intelligence agencies. Trump has frequently attacked the agency as politicized against him, and has vowed, along with Gabbard, to downsize and restructure it. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, sponsored legislation June 27 to cap the ODNI staff at 650, down from what he said was about 1,600, to eliminate certain reporting requirements and to transfer some key counterintelligence and counterproliferation responsibilities back to the CIA. The ODNI news release said ODNI 2.0 will eliminate redundant missions, functions and personnel, and make "critical investments in areas that support the President's national intelligence priorities." It will also expose what President Donald Trump and Gabbard have called the politicization and weaponization of intelligence, and hold "bad actors accountable." Going after those involved in 'Russia Hoax' That effort expands on a campaign that Gabbard already has launched to investigate Democrats in the Obama and Biden administrations that she claims falsified intelligence to concoct a false "Russia Hoax" about Trump complicity in the Kremlin's interference in the 2016 election. Multiple investigations and reports, including a bipartisan effort by the Senate Intelligence Committee, have found that Russia did indeed meddle in the 2016 election to help Trump defeat his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. One key target of the new overhaul is the ODNI's efforts to call out Russia for continued interference in U.S. elections, including the 2024 president campaign, through its multi-agency Foreign Malign Influence Center or FMIC. Refocusing FMIC's mission will save American taxpayers at least $7 million per year, according to an ODNI 2.0 fact sheet released by the spy agency. It did not provide details of what that refocus will entail, or a similar plan to overhaul the ODNI's National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center (NCBC) and its Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center (CTIIC). "ODNI's hyper-focus on election-related work notably began in 2017, immediately following the publication of the manufactured Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) falsely alleging Putin 'aspired' to help President Trump win the 2016 election," the fact sheet said. 'No confidence' Gabbard is right person to conduct ODNI overhaul Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, acknowledged in a statement that there is broad, bipartisan agreement that the ODNI "is in need of thoughtful reform." The current Intelligence Authorization Act directs Gabbard to submit a plan to Congress outlining her proposed changes, Warner said, "and we will carefully review her proposals and conduct rigorous oversight to ensure any reforms strengthen, not weaken, our national security." "But given Director Gabbard's track record of politicizing intelligence - including her decision just yesterday to revoke security clearances from career national security officials - I have no confidence that she is the right person to carry out this weighty responsibility," Warner said. Gabbard announced Aug. 19 that Trump had directed her office to revoke security clearances from 37 former intelligence officials for "politicizing and manipulating intelligence." Most were affiliated with the Biden and Obama administrations or signatories to public protests of Trump's policies. Warner and other Democrats have also criticized Gabbard for forming a task force that amounts to nothing less than a "witch hunt" for officers and analysts within the 18 U.S. intelligence agencies it deems disloyal to Trump. Cotton, the committee chair, called ODNI 2.0 "an important step to return the department to its original size, scope and mission." "I look forward to working with @DNIGabbard to implement these reforms and ensuring the IC focuses on its core mission: stealing secrets from our adversaries," Cotton said in a post on X. This story has been updated to include additional information. Josh Meyer is USA TODAY's Domestic Security Correspondent. You can reach him by email at jmeyer@ Follow him on X at @JoshMeyerDC and Bluesky at @


The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
US will vet immigrants for 'anti-Americanism' and 'moral character'
The changes, which don't specifically define what constitutes "anti-American activity," build on the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on people entering the country - including through legal avenues. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said in a statement. Civil rights advocates say the new guidance are subject to interpretation and risk turning immigration officers into "thought police." According to the new guidance, USCIS will expand its use of social media vetting for certain immigration benefits, as officers search for evidence of "anti-American" or antisemitic content. Effective immediately, it applies to people applying for a student or worker visa, or a green card. Separately, USCIS said Aug. 15 that it will put citizenship applicants through "a holistic assessment" of behavior, including judging their "adherence to societal norms and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character." David Bier, director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the criteria for determining "anti-American ideologies" and "good moral character" are vague and risk further bogging down an already overburdened legal immigration system. "We don't really know how it will be enforced," he told USA TODAY, adding that, for the Trump administration, "the goal is to slow down immigration and reduce the number of people coming in by any means necessary." Robert McCaw, government affairs director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said he sees an anti-Palestinian bias in the new rules that amount to "ideological tests." "Immigrants should not have to choose between their immigration status and their conscience," he said. The Trump administration has sought to deport multiple student protesters who support Palestinian rights amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, calling some demonstrations antisemitic. USCIS reviews hundreds of thousands of applications for work permits, legal permanent residency cards and naturalization each year. The agency already collects applicants' biometrics and makes an exhaustive review of their eligibility, including screening out applicants with ties to terrorism. Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the right-leaning Center for Immigration Studies, said immigration officers have typically checked for ties to terrorism in their applications reviews. "Immigration officers probably have always been able to deny on that basis of anti-American ideology or activities," Jacobs, a former USCIS counsel, said. "But what they're doing here is they're being explicit about it."