Exclusive-US considers adjusting port fee plan for Chinese vessels after pushback, sources say
By Jonathan Saul and Renee Maltezou
LONDON/ATHENS (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration is considering softening its proposed fee on China-linked ships visiting U.S. ports after a flood of negative feedback from industries that said the idea could be economically devastating, according to six sources.
Among the changes under consideration are delayed implementation and new fee structures designed to reduce the overall cost to visiting Chinese vessels, according to the six sources with knowledge of the matter.
The sources asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.
The White House and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), the government department involved in the drafting the proposal, did not respond to requests for comment.
Not all of the agency's proposed multimillion-dollar fees for Chinese-built ships to dock at U.S. ports will be implemented and may not be cumulative, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told a U.S. Senate Finance Committee hearing on Tuesday.
The USTR has proposed that fees that could top $3 million per U.S. port call for China-built or linked vessels. The USTR's proposal came after it completed an investigation into China's maritime sector and development plans that began in April 2024.
Trump's administration argues that fees would curb China's growing commercial and military dominance on the high seas and promote the U.S. domestic maritime industry.
But representatives from numerous industries, from coal to agriculture, argued during public hearings last month that the fee proposal could make it impossible to ship everything from coal to soybeans to market because of the prevalence of Chinese-linked vessels in the existing global shipping fleet, and the time it would take to replace them.
The administration was also thinking about changes to the fees to make them less onerous and reduce their impact on U.S. businesses, all six of the sources said.
Among options the administration was considering is charging a fee that is adjusted based on the number of Chinese-built ships in a company's fleet, one source said. That would mean lower fees for those companies with fewer ships built in China.
The administration was also mulling a charge based on the tonnage of unloaded vessels rather than a flat fee, two of the sources said. This would mean lower fees for smaller ships, rather than flat fees for all vessels. That might ease the burden on ship owners with smaller vessels involved in niche trades such as transporting grains or other commodities.
The USTR had formulated the fee proposal with larger container ships that transport retail goods in mind, the sources said. The impact on commodities flows had not been fully considered, they said.
"The most impacted sectors are container shipping and car carriers, given their consolidated nature, and high proportion of payable fees under the proposed framework," Jefferies analyst Omar Nokta wrote in an April 2 note.
"However, all shipping segments would be affected, given the level of disruption likely to take place as operators shift vessels to minimize exposure to U.S. fees."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oracle (ORCL) Rallies 8% on Q4 Beat, Cloud Outlook Tops 70% Growth for FY26
Oracle (ORCL, Financials) shares jumped 8% in after-hours trading Wednesday after the company topped Wall Street's fiscal Q4 expectations and issued robust guidance for accelerated cloud growth. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 8 Warning Signs with ORCL. For the quarter ended May 31, Oracle posted adjusted earnings of $1.70 per share, beating the $1.64 consensus. Revenue rose 11% year over year to $15.9 billion, above the expected $15.59 billion. Net income increased to $3.43 billion from $3.14 billion a year earlier. Catz guided for 12%14% top-line growth in Q1, with adjusted EPS between $1.46 and $1.50both in line with LSEG forecasts. Catz said Oracle's cloud infrastructure revenue will grow over 70% in fiscal 2026, up from 50% in fiscal 2025. She also forecast more than $67 billion in total revenue for FY26, above the $65.2 billion analyst consensus. Looking further ahead, she said Oracle could exceed its previous $104 billion projection for FY29. Cloud services and license support revenue reached $11.7 billion in Q4, ahead of StreetAccount's $11.59 billion estimate. License revenue from both cloud and on-premises totaled $2.01 billion, also above expectations. Oracle highlighted several strategic wins during the quarter, including a cloud and AI health-care partnership with Cleveland Clinic and UAE-based G42, new deals with IBM, and infrastructure migration by Chinese retailer Temu. Capex surged past $21 billion in FY25 and is projected to exceed $25 billion in FY26. Larry Ellison said customer demand is so high that Oracle received a bulk order for all available cloud capacity. We never got an order like that before, Ellison said. The demand right now seems almost insatiable. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
German defence minister: not considering sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine
BERLIN (Reuters) -German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday that Germany is not considering delivering Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine despite Kyiv's repeated requests. Although Germany is one of Ukraine's main military backers, Berlin has never supplied Taurus missiles, which have a range in excess of 300 miles (480 km). Answering a journalist's question during his fifth visit to Kyiv since the start of the war, Pistorius said, "Since you asked me whether we are considering this, my answer is no." In the same news conference, the minister said his country's military support for Ukraine had reached 7 billion euros ($8.12 billion) this year and a further 1.9 billion euros were pending parliamentary approval. ($1 = 0.8621 euros) (Writing by Friederike HeineEditing by Madeline Chambers)
Fast Company
30 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How China's monopoly on rare earth minerals gives it an edge in trade talks
Critical minerals as a trade issue Responding to ever higher tariffs and other controls on advanced technology, China told exporters of certain key rare earths and other critical minerals to obtain licenses for every shipment abroad. Approvals can take weeks, leading to supply chain disruptions in the U.S. and other countries. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that China would make it easier for American industry to obtain much-needed needed magnets and rare earth minerals, clearing the way for talks to continue between the world's two biggest economies. In return, Trump said, the U.S. will stop efforts to revoke the visas of Chinese nationals on U.S. college campuses. But details remain scarce. Beijing has not confirmed what the negotiators agreed to, and Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump himself have yet to sign off on it. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said Saturday it had approved a 'certain number' of export licenses for rare earth products, apparently acknowledging Trump's personal request to Xi during a phone call last week. And on Wednesday, the Ganzhou-based rare-earth conglomerate JL MAG Rare-Earth Co. confirmed it had obtained some export licenses for shipments to destinations including the U.S., Europe and Southeast Asia. Experts say, however, Beijing is unlikely to do away with the permit system enabling it to control access to those valuable resources. 'I think what the Chinese have proven is they have now created an entire export control regime for rare earths,' said Daniel Kritenbrink, a partner at The Asia Group consultancy. 'They can turn that spigot on and off at will.' The only scenario in which China might deregulate its critical minerals export is if the U.S. fully removes tariffs imposed on Chinese goods as part of the trade war, said Wang Yiwei, a professor of international affairs at Renmin University, echoing the Chinese government's earlier stance. 'Without that,' he said, 'it will be difficult to blame China for continuing to strengthen its export controls.' An industry built over decades with government support In 1992, Deng Xiaoping, the leader who launched China's ascent as the world's biggest manufacturing power, famously said 'the Middle East has oil, China has rare earths,' signaling a desire to leverage access to the key minerals. Several generations later, Beijing has made its rich reserves of rare earths, a group of 17 minerals that are abundant in the earth's crust but hard, expensive and environmentally polluting to process, a key element of China's economic security. In 2019, during a visit to a rare earth processing plant in Ganzhou, Xi described rare earths as a 'vital strategic resource.' China today has an essential monopoly over 'heavy rare earths,' used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles. The country also produces around 80% of the world's tungsten, gallium and antimony, and 60% of the world's germanium — all minerals used in the making of semiconductors, among other advanced technologies. The risks of dependency on Chinese suppliers first came into focus in 2010, when Beijing suspended rare earths exports to Japan due to a territorial dispute. The ban was lifted after about two months, but as a precaution, Japan invested in rare earths processing plants in other countries and began stockpiling the materials. Beijing's across-the-board requirement for export licenses for some critical minerals has put pressure on world electronics manufacturers and automakers. Some auto parts makers in Europe have shut down production lines due to delays in supply deliveries, according to the European Association of Automotive Suppliers. In the U.S., Tesla CEO Elon Musk said a shortage of rare earths is affecting his company's work on humanoid robots. China's critical minerals resources are dwindling In the drab industrial hub of Ganzhou, cradled by the scenic Dayu Mountains, the U.S.-China trade war is still a distant stressor. Miners and small mineral traders interviewed by The Associated Press said they are more concerned about depleting the mountains' once-abundant resources. Zhong, a tungsten factory manager in Ganzhou who would only give his last name, worked his way up to manager from a miner, but he's unsure there is a future for him and others in the industry. 'I find growing difficulties to source tungsten these days,' he said, adding that smaller mines and trading companies are slowly disappearing as the resources are dwindling. Tungsten is an ultra-hard metal used in armor-piercing ammunition, nuclear reactors and semiconductors. At least five tungsten mines have closed in the area in recent years, according to state media. Remaining reserves are deeper and harder to extract and process after decades of exploitation, said Li Shangkui, chairman of the Ganzhou-based Jiangxi Yuean Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Processing factories in Ganzhou now routinely source materials from other provinces or other countries. Zhong's plant imports some raw materials from places like Africa and Cambodia. Major state-owned and private companies in Ganzhou are also ramping up investments abroad. Tungsten producer Ganzhou Haisheng, for instance, announced last year a $25 million investment in a new tungsten plant in Thailand. Whatever the challenges in procuring raw materials, China likely will seek to maintain its dominance in critical minerals, said Fabian Villalobos, an engineer and critical minerals expert at the RAND think tank.
