All in on ETFs? Experts share how to diversify your portfolio — without overdoing it
Financial experts say allocating an entire portfolio to ETFs can be a viable strategy, but it's important for investors to know what holdings are in the funds they're buying.
When looking at portfolio diversification for ETF-focused investors, Jonathan Rivard, general principal at Edward Jones, said it's important to consider the individual's time horizon and risk appetite.
'You could absolutely be 100 per cent invested in ETFs. But you want to know what's in the ETF and what the allocation looks like. Some ETFs will be balanced; they'll have a mix of stocks and bonds in them. Some will be sector products,' Rivard said.
'The important thing comes down to understanding what does this basket hold? And if I own multiple ETFs, what does it look like across multiple ETFs in terms of asset allocation?'
Prerna Mathews, Mackenzie Investments' vice-president of ETF product strategy, said there are a few key points to keep in mind regarding diversification, notably, it is important to think beyond just diversifying by geography.
'So (if) you're starting with the core Canadian, U.S., international exposure, don't stop there. Think about how fixed income plays a role in your portfolio, real assets, there are thematic products, and there are alternative ETFs. There are a lot of different drivers of return that can be added to a portfolio available in ETF form,' she said.
Another consideration is buying ETFs with different investment styles, she said, which may include combining traditional index ETFs with others that are actively managed or have low volatility.
Time horizon is also an important consideration, where those with a longer investment horizon may want to focus on growth, she said, taking on more risk with higher equity exposure.
Regarding fixed income, Mathews said to be aware of the differences between short- and longer-term yields, adding that most investors will likely not have exposure to every duration of fixed income and should know the relevant trade-offs.
'In some cases, you can get a very attractive yield at the short end of the curve without taking on significant risk as you would on the long end,' she said.
'Really understanding the trade-off there and likely having some short-term fixed income in the portfolio would be viable. But aggregate bonds over a 30-year time period are generally a good place to be.'
Mathews said there is also a growing number of investors opting for an asset allocation ETF. She said this type of ETF is essentially eight to 12 ETFs 'all packaged up in one,' and has served as a core holding for those looking for a 'set it and forget it' investment.
Despite the benefits of diversification, Mathews said there are dangers to being overly diversified.
This might occur for someone investing in Canadian equities through an ETF but also buying into an asset allocation ETF, Mathews said. In that case, the investor may end up with more Canadian equity exposure than anticipated.
Similarly, with the TSX financials sector representing around 30 per cent of the overall index, an investor with a TSX-focused ETF and a Canadian banks-focused ETF could end up with too much exposure to Canadian bank stocks.
'There is a risk of having too much product in your portfolio. Sometimes that can creep up on us when we're not doing a full look through to what each ETF might be investing in,' she said.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025.
Daniel Johnson, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Source: Toronto FC close to acquiring playmaker Djordje Mihailovic from Colorado
TORONTO – Toronto FC is close to acquiring attacking midfielder Djordje Mihailovic from the Colorado Rapids in a cash deal, according to a source. The transfer is not yet finalized, according to the source granted anonymity because they are not authorized to comment on the negotiations. TFC, without a designated player since buying out the contracts of Italians Lorenzo Insigne and Federico Bernardeschi in early July, has been looking for some star power. And Toronto, which sits 12th in the Eastern Conference at 5-13-6, needs help in attack. With 25 goals in 24 games, it ranks 26th in the league on offence. Canadian international Theo Corbeanu leads the team with five goals while Honduran Deybi Flores, a defensive-minded midfielder, tops the team with two assists. The 26-year-old Mihailovic has nine goals and seven assists in 24 regular-season outings for Colorado this season. He is making $1.775 million (all figures in U.S. dollars) with the Rapids this season, a bargain compared to the $15.4 million Toronto was paying Insigne and the $6.295 million Bernardeschi was earning. Toronto marks the fifth career team for Mihailovic and his second in Canada. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. He spent the 2021 and '22 seasons with CF Montreal, playing 61 regular-season games, including 57 starts. In 2021, he recorded 16 assists, erasing the previous club record of 13 set by Ignacio Piatti in 2018. Montreal had acquired Mihailovic from the Chicago Fire in exchange for $800,000 in general allocation money. Signed as a homegrown player from the Fire academy in January 2017, he played 73 regular-season games for the Fire, including 45 starts, with seven goals and 15 assists. After the 2022 MLS season, Mihailovic joined AZ Alkmaar in the Netherlands. He had two goals and two assists in 36 appearances across all competitions for the Dutch side before leaving to join Colorado in January 2024, signing on as a designated player on a four-year contract through 2027 with a club option through 2028. Mihailovic has one goal in 11 appearances for the U.S., scoring against Panama in a January 2019 friendly. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 4, 2025.
CBC
5 minutes ago
- CBC
What to expect ahead of Canada, Mexico trade talks
Canada's foreign affairs and finance ministers will be in Mexico City this week to strengthen economic ties with government officials. José Díaz-Briseño, a correspondent for Reforma, says he predicts parties will engage in general dialogue about trade issues, including diversification and addressing 'irritants' to the Canadian-Mexican relationship.
Globe and Mail
13 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
No Pain, No 100,000% Gain
Since David Gardner's initial Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) recommendation on April 15, 2005, a passive S&P 500 index investor could have enjoyed a 726% return simply by reinvesting dividends. But that 2005 rec, now Stock Advisor 's all-time top performer, leaves the market in the dust with a return of 107,479% as of this writing. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » That is not a typo. Nvidia is the first Stock Advisor pick to grow more than 1,000 times in value! While it's easy to highlight a winner, the real challenge was having the patience to hold Nvidia shares through every bout of uncertainty over the years. What lessons could we learn from the most successful outlier in our flagship service? Quite a few. Despite its impressive returns, holding onto Nvidia wasn't a walk in the park. Let's explore what it truly takes to achieve a 1,000x return. At a Glance The Good The Bad The Ugly The Foolish Bottom Line The Good A Stock That Has Doubled 10 Times The Rule of 72 is a simple way to estimate how long it takes for an investment to double. If a stock grows 9% a year, roughly the historical return of the stock market, it would take eight years (72 / 9) to double an investment. Now, imagine your favorite stocks are horses running a race around a track. Each time they complete a lap, they double in value. Knowing that the stock market as a whole might take nearly a decade to double, which horses would you bet on? In this race, the horses don't stop running, and you can choose to back those clearly leading the pack -- including Nvidia, which has now finished 10 laps of doubling since 2005, with 9 of those laps taking 2.5 years or less. Lap Multiple Achieved Month Started Months to Complete 1 2x April 2005 9 2 4x Jan. 2006 17 3 8x June 2007 109 4 16x July 2016 5 5 32x Dec. 2016 13 6 64x Jan. 2018 30 7 128x July 2020 13 8 256x Aug. 2021 22 9 512x June 2023 9 10 1,024x March 2024 16 Many investors might have hesitated to buy Nvidia, waiting for a pullback after seeing it double time and again. However, those who waited often found themselves still sidelined, missing out on its phenomenal growth. Anchoring to past prices is common, but in this endless race, wouldn't you prefer to back the horse consistently lapping the field? As David Gardner wisely notes, five harmful words for investors are, "I guess I missed it." The next doubling for Nvidia would require another $4 trillion in value, a feat that might not seem as far-fetched in the future. Excluding PetroChina 's brief brush with a trillion-dollar valuation in 2007, Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) founded the trillion-dollar club in August 2018 before reaching the $2 trillion and $3 trillion thresholds in 2020 and 2023, respectively. Nvidia broke the $4 trillion barrier earlier in July, with Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) joining on Wednesday. There's no guarantee that Nvidia will ever get to $8 trillion or $16 trillion -- let alone get there first -- but it does have the inside lane. More Years of Doubling Than Down Years One fun stat I've stumbled upon while following Nvidia comes courtesy of a website listing calendar-year returns as well as pre-split pricing (which I'll mention again later). Including the partial year of its 1999 IPO, Nvidia has enjoyed 10 calendar years with gains of 100% or more, while the stock fell by any amount in only 7 years so far. 1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2016, 2020, 2021, 2023, 2024 2002, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2018, 2022 Nvidia isn't unique in this category -- Shopify (NASDAQ: SHOP) and The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD) share the same distinction of having more years of 100% gains than of losses for now -- but it's noteworthy. The Winner Outweighing All the Losers Stock Advisor members have access to our complete scorecard, where each recommendation is tracked against the S&P 500 from the time it's selected until it's sold (or held through today). With two stock picks each month since 2002, we've seen hundreds of winners and losers along the way. Data Source: The Motley Fool. Returns as of July 29, 2025. Graphic: Rik Silverman. This graphic illustrates the returns of all 562 Stock Advisor recommendations relative to their S&P 500 benchmark. David's April 2005 Nvidia selection leads with more than 106,000 percentage points of outperformance above the market's 726% return in the same period. Not all underperformers lost value; some, like FedEx 's (NYSE: FDX) 403% gain since 2003, underwhelmed compared to the S&P's 959% over the same time frame. One standout like Nvidia can outweigh all the underperformers in Stock Advisor 's storied history. David's 2009 Nvidia rerecommendation, along with two long-standing Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) recommendations, further highlights this point. But it gets better: The gain on the initial rec since April 15, 2025 -- the compounding just after the 20th anniversary -- nearly makes up for the hundreds of losing stock picks over the years. Nvidia exemplifies the Foolish principle of holding winners and not selling too early. Yet its journey wasn't always smooth. A stock that seems today to be taking a long victory lap once appeared to be slowly circling the drain. The Bad The Stock That Plummeted 85% Imagine a stock falling 80%. It might invoke thoughts of high-growth investments facing challenges or an unfavorable interest rate climate, perhaps echoing bad memories of 2021 or 2022. If you remember the 2000s, you might recall that something big happened in the market before the end of the decade. The first Nvidia rec quintupled by 2007 only to lose all those gains in mere months. Data Source: Yahoo Finance. Returns as of July 29, 2025. Graphic: Rik Silverman. If it needs to be repeated, this is a chapter in the greatest stock story of the last 20 years. The 85% plummet was the steepest for Nvidia shares since 2005, but seeing it trade significantly below previous highs was common for shareholders over the last 20-odd years. On average, Nvidia spent its time on our scorecard 34% below its then-highs. If we count days on which the stock closed more than 20% below its historic high price, Nvidia was in its own bear market more than 59% of the time! Let that marinate for a moment. We all wish for a time machine so we could go back and buy Nvidia stock decades in the past. But if you had owned shares at that time, would you honestly have held through to today? After all, the discomfort wasn't limited to the sharp pangs of these low points. There was also a dull pain that lasted for years. The Lost Decade On October 17, 2007, Nvidia closed at an all-time high. The next day, shares declined, and the record high was not reset until May 15, 2016. There's a reason the Fool encourages investors to hold stocks for five years or more. Periods of volatility or apparent mispricing can persist much longer than most investors (and all traders) are willing to wait. Could you sit on your hands while a stock was 85% underwater after six months or 50% in the red after the better part of a decade, waiting like a good Foolish investor should? And after all of those years waiting to break even, would you cut ties as soon as shares rose in spring 2016 back to prices of more than eight years earlier? If that sounds like something you might have done, I have some bad news. Guess which Fool rec was the best-performing stock in the entire S&P 500 in 2016? That would be Nvidia, of course, the dog many investors sold along the way. It gained 227% that year, before David recommended it for a third time in January 2017. The Ugly Holding Leads to Portfolio Concentration Nothing is quite as unpleasant as several years of dismal returns, but what differentiates Foolish investing outcomes is often a willingness to sit in your own discomfort and build the long-term-investor mindset when the short run looks bleak. That involves challenging conventional wisdom. I suspect most investors wouldn't believe the following: A large cap worth $40 billion in 2016 could grow 100x in the next nine years. A mega cap worth $400 billion in 2022 could grow 10x in just three years. An investor who sold at the 2007 peak and who successfully avoided the 85% drop would have missed out on 17,660% gains if they stayed on the sidelines. An investor who locked in gains by selling half their position when Nvidia first doubled and stayed in with "house money" has now given up 54,689% of the gains they could have earned. The greatest mistake we make as investors is selling our winners too early. The opportunity cost of those mistakes compounds over time as well, but that doesn't mean you should never sell. While the pullback in Nvidia's stock price during the great financial crisis was much deeper from prior highs than any drop since, relatively smaller recent drawdowns had much larger dollar impacts for anyone who has held many years. The 37% pullback between January and April meant that the earliest Nvidia rec dropped from being a 910-bagger to a 574-bagger, temporarily losing 336 times an original investment. We know now that Nvidia went on to greater heights within months, but a concentrated position without any allocation guardrails would have become a major risk. You have more flexibility to set your own sleep number and trim overweight positions than the Stock Advisor team has on our scorecard. It's possible that we could someday keep Nvidia as a high-conviction buy recommendation while at the same time closing one or two of the active recs as a reminder of prudent portfolio management rather than as a statement of near-term outlooks or overvaluation. The Thesis Had to Evolve In the 1990s, our Chief Rule Breaker actually rooted against Nvidia, seeing it as a rival to his preferred video game graphics card company, 3Dfx. By 2005, Nvidia had acquired 3Dfx, and David's investment thesis focused on Nvidia's growth potential with Microsoft's Xbox and Motorola (NYSE: MSI) cellphones. Cloud computing and data centers, now Nvidia's largest business segment, were nonexistent. Cryptocurrency mining hadn't been invented yet, and artificial intelligence was absent from the original vision. Even CEO Jensen Huang's enduring leadership wasn't part of David's initial analysis. While some investment theses remain straightforward -- perhaps selling more shoes or opening more coffee shops -- the biggest winners have a quality we call optionality. You might foresee that an online bookseller like Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) could become "the everything store" or that Netflix could pivot from mailed DVDs to video streaming. It's crucial to look ahead, acknowledging that successful investments might differ greatly from their original business models. But reevaluating your understanding of your investments is easier said than done, and it might take some extra homework to stay comfortable holding onto developing winners. The Penny Stock That Wasn't Nvidia's 2005 cost basis on our scorecard is just $0.16, at least until it's adjusted further lower due to dividends or future stock splits. One of the biggest mistakes new investors often make is to see data like this and presume the only place to hunt for multibaggers is among penny stocks. The reason for that misdirection is stock splits. Nvidia has never traded in penny-stock territory since 2005 due to four splits: April 2006: 2-for-1 split September 2007: 3-for-2 split July 2021: 4-for-1 split June 2024: 10-for-1 split If you followed the April 2005 recommendation, an investment of less than $20 per share would now translate to 120 shares for every 1 held since then. Without these splits, that single share would today be worth above $21,000. Nvidia would have the same market cap but far fewer shares outstanding. While fractional shares weren't available back then, today's investors can buy partial shares of many companies through their broker for as little as $5. For the same dollar amount invested, I'd rather own a fraction of a strong business like Nvidia than thousands of shares of a failing one trading over the counter for pennies. The Foolish Bottom Line Nvidia has been a mainstay on Stock Advisor 's Foundational Stocks list since 2022 and is likely to remain a Fool favorite for years to come. If you don't own shares directly, know that almost $8 out of every $100 invested in an S&P index fund is tied to Nvidia, its largest weight today. And those who have followed our recommendation for years might own more than enough already, which shifts the question of whether to buy to when to pare down an oversize position in the years ahead. (That's how I'm thinking through the 70x gains on the first block of shares I bought in 2017.) As I wrote above, there's no guarantee Nvidia will continue to be the market darling it has been for so long. But if there's one idea I would take to the bank -- one premise I'm nearly certain about -- it's that Nvidia isn't done teaching Fools lessons about long-term thinking that will pay dividends across all the other investments we consider on our investing journeys. If you haven't held Nvidia since 2005, it's not too late to collect a small slice of one of the highest-quality businesses in the world. And if you have... take that victory lap. You've earned it. Further Reading A Motley Fool Co-Founder's Roller-Coaster Nvidia Story by David Gardner, 1/29/2024 * When Hunting for Outliers Makes All the Difference by Loren Horst, 8/25/2023 * The Best Problem to Have by Loren Horst, 3/10/2020 * The Agony of High Returns by Morgan Housel, 2/9/2016 David's Top Pick: Nvidia by David Gardner, 4/15/2005 *Accessible to Motley Fool Stock Advisor members. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Loren Horst has positions in Amazon, Nvidia, Shopify, and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Booking Holdings, FedEx, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia, Shopify, and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
