Madras High Court judges to visit Coimbatore forests where steel wire rope fences are proposed for human-elephant conflict prevention
Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy would be visiting the stretch, and other places where elephant movement could be spotted in Mettupalayam region, along with amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji and M. Santhanaraman on September 5 and 6, 2025.
The judges have asked Special Government Pleader (forests) T. Seenivasan too to join them in the inspection besides making arrangements for it in coordination with the district forest officials. Activist S. Muralidharan had objected to the erection of the steel wire rope fencing near the forests.
However, defending the government's decision to erect the fencing, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden (PCCF-cum-CWC) Rakesh Kumar Dogra told the court that that though it was proposed to put up the fence for a distance of 30 km, financial sanction was accorded only for 10 km.
Deaths and compensation
'Coimbatore forest division was spread over 693.48 sqkm and shared a boundary with habitations for a length of about 350 km where it was vulnerable to HEC. Elephants had strayed out 9,710 times in this division in the past three years and 147 deaths had occurred during 2011-2022,' the officer said.
He also stated that the government had to pay a compensation of ₹11.35 crore to the families of the dead. He added traditional methods of digging elephant proof trenches and erecting solar fences had proved to be ineffective with the pachyderms that indulge in crop raiding and house breaking in the area.
'Hence, it was decided that elephant proof steel wire rope fencing could be done on a pilot basis in Thondamuthur. Accordingly, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin made the announcement on November 6, 2024 and a Government Order sanctioning ₹5 crore was issued on February 4, 2025,' he said.
Amici curiae's objection
On their part, the amici curiae filed a note before the Division Bench objecting to the proposal to erect the steel wire rope fencing since the area marked an abrupt shift from forest to private lands. They said, the terrain was slopy and there was no buffer zone for elephants to navigate.
'The steep slopes and the fence together will lock the area with no other solution for the elephants but to circumnavigate the hills or try to force themselves through the fence. In both cases, the risk of mortality will be increased,' the amici curiae said by relying upon certain studies undertaken in the area.
'As the fence covers 10 km, elephants coming into the private from the adjacent forests will be prevented from accessing the forests on the other side and it may lead to more conflict. Closing forests completely will solve problems locally but shift the conflict elsewhere,' they added.
The lawyers also said: 'A scientific study must be undertaken to understand the impacts before fencing... The Forest Department is in the process of notifying elephant corridors across Tamil Nadu. Until the corridors in Coimbatore region are consolidated and notified, the fencing may be held off.'
After perusing the PCCF-cum-CWC's counter affidavit as well as the note submitted by the amici curiae, the judges wrote: 'We are of the view that personal inspection is required in the matter. Accordingly, we propose to visit Mettupalayam and other places where the proposed fencing is to be erected along with the learned Special Government Pleader and learned amici curiae.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court judges to visit Coimbatore forests where steel wire rope fences are proposed for human-elephant conflict prevention
Two judges of the Madras High Court have decided to conduct a personal inspection of the 10-kilometre long stretch, at Thondamuthur in Coimbatore district, where the Tamil Nadu government had proposed to erect a steel wire rope fencing to prevent Human-Elephant Conflicts (HEC). Justices N. Sathish Kumar and D. Bharatha Chakravarthy would be visiting the stretch, and other places where elephant movement could be spotted in Mettupalayam region, along with amici curiae T. Mohan, Chevanan Mohan, Rahul Balaji and M. Santhanaraman on September 5 and 6, 2025. The judges have asked Special Government Pleader (forests) T. Seenivasan too to join them in the inspection besides making arrangements for it in coordination with the district forest officials. Activist S. Muralidharan had objected to the erection of the steel wire rope fencing near the forests. However, defending the government's decision to erect the fencing, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden (PCCF-cum-CWC) Rakesh Kumar Dogra told the court that that though it was proposed to put up the fence for a distance of 30 km, financial sanction was accorded only for 10 km. Deaths and compensation 'Coimbatore forest division was spread over 693.48 sqkm and shared a boundary with habitations for a length of about 350 km where it was vulnerable to HEC. Elephants had strayed out 9,710 times in this division in the past three years and 147 deaths had occurred during 2011-2022,' the officer said. He also stated that the government had to pay a compensation of ₹11.35 crore to the families of the dead. He added traditional methods of digging elephant proof trenches and erecting solar fences had proved to be ineffective with the pachyderms that indulge in crop raiding and house breaking in the area. 'Hence, it was decided that elephant proof steel wire rope fencing could be done on a pilot basis in Thondamuthur. Accordingly, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin made the announcement on November 6, 2024 and a Government Order sanctioning ₹5 crore was issued on February 4, 2025,' he said. Amici curiae's objection On their part, the amici curiae filed a note before the Division Bench objecting to the proposal to erect the steel wire rope fencing since the area marked an abrupt shift from forest to private lands. They said, the terrain was slopy and there was no buffer zone for elephants to navigate. 'The steep slopes and the fence together will lock the area with no other solution for the elephants but to circumnavigate the hills or try to force themselves through the fence. In both cases, the risk of mortality will be increased,' the amici curiae said by relying upon certain studies undertaken in the area. 'As the fence covers 10 km, elephants coming into the private from the adjacent forests will be prevented from accessing the forests on the other side and it may lead to more conflict. Closing forests completely will solve problems locally but shift the conflict elsewhere,' they added. The lawyers also said: 'A scientific study must be undertaken to understand the impacts before fencing... The Forest Department is in the process of notifying elephant corridors across Tamil Nadu. Until the corridors in Coimbatore region are consolidated and notified, the fencing may be held off.' After perusing the PCCF-cum-CWC's counter affidavit as well as the note submitted by the amici curiae, the judges wrote: 'We are of the view that personal inspection is required in the matter. Accordingly, we propose to visit Mettupalayam and other places where the proposed fencing is to be erected along with the learned Special Government Pleader and learned amici curiae.'
Hans India
4 hours ago
- Hans India
Madras High Court Judge to view 'Manushi' amid row over 37 cuts by censor board
Chennai: In an unusual step, the Madras High Court will directly review the Tamil film 'Manushi' following a bitter standoff between its makers and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, hearing a petition filed by the film's producer C. Vetri Maaran, on Tuesday ordered a private screening of the film on August 24 in Chennai to determine whether the censor board was justified in demanding 37 cuts. The film, produced by Vetri Maaran's Grassroot Film Company and directed by Gopi Nainar, known for his earlier work 'Aramm', stars Andrea Jeremiah in the lead role. It depicts the custodial torture of a woman suspected of being a terrorist, a subject that has already drawn attention since the release of its trailer by actor Vijay Sethupathi in April 2024. Trouble began in September 2024 when both the examining and reviewing committees of the CBFC refused to grant a censor certificate. They objected to the film because it portrayed the State in a "negative light" and claimed it blurred the lines between "leftist communism" and "mainstream communism". The rejection was challenged by Vetri Maaran in June this year, when he filed a writ petition alleging that the CBFC had acted without transparency by neither providing him an opportunity to defend the film nor spelling out specific objections. He further requested the constitution of an expert panel, including human rights activists, to re-examine the film. The High Court, while hearing that earlier petition, recorded the CBFC's submission that it had reviewed the film again and listed objectionable sequences. The petition was disposed of in June, with the court granting the producer liberty to pursue the matter further in law. However, Vetri Maaran returned to court with a fresh petition, arguing that the board's objections were excessive and arbitrary. He pointed out that even simple dialogues, such as the colloquial insult "saniyan", had been flagged for removal, which he argued violated the CBFC's guidelines. Responding to these claims, Justice Venkatesh remarked that the only way forward was to personally watch the film along with the censor board members to verify the validity of the objections. He directed that the screening be held at a private theatre on Dr. D.G.S. Dhinakaran Salai (formerly Greenways Road) and asked senior central government panel counsel A. Kumaraguru to ensure the attendance of CBFC officials. The High Court's decision to step into the censor dispute sets the stage for an extraordinary judicial review of 'Manushi'. The outcome of this screening will not only decide the film's release but could also influence wider debates on censorship and creative freedom in Indian cinema.
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Failure to prove victim's age, Pocso convict jailed for 20 years freed
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has acquitted a man who was sentenced to 20 years of imprisonment under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act after finding that the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age and the charge of penetrative sexual assault. The verdict to acquit and free the man was pronounced by Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan recently while allowing the appeal filed by him against the order of the principal special court for Pocso cases, Coimbatore, which sentenced him to five years of imprisonment for kidnapping and 20 years under Section 5 (1) r/w 6 of the Pocso Act for penetrative sexual offence, along with Rs 20,000 fine, on January 23, 2023. The prosecution's case was that the man had entered the victim's home on August 19, 2020, and forcibly had sexual relations with her when her parents had gone out. Later, he had allegedly kidnapped her to his grandparents' house where he committed the offence of penetrative sexual assault. However, the man had challenged the prosecution's case stating that him and the girl had been in love for some years and he visited her home only after she invited him. She had gone with him to his grandparents' house only because her parents had attempted to marry her off to her 40-year-old maternal uncle who was already married, he added. Further, he said that she was not a minor as she was a second-year undergraduate when the alleged offence occurred. The victim too had deposed the same before the trial court. However, the trial court went with the submissions of the prosecution and punished him. Justice Ilanthiraiyan noted that there is no evidence to show the man had committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim as the doctor, who examined her, opined that 'there was no definite technical and physical evidence suggestive of reasoned forcible sexual intercourse'. It was not a forcible but a consented one, the judge stated. The judge held that the prosecution failed to prove the victim's age — stated to be 17 years, nine months and 12 days when the incident occurred — beyond any doubt to attract the offences under the Pocso Act.
