Texas weighs fining schools for using students' preferred pronouns
Texas public schools could face fines if teachers use preferred pronouns for students, or 'assist' with 'social transitioning' their gender, if a new bill in the legislature passes.
The bill would force school districts to ban teachers from helping students to change their pronouns, clothing or hairstyles to deviate from their biological sex, according to a draft of the proposed legislation.
'We must make it unmistakably clear: Schools are not places for secret agendas or social experiments on our kids,' said Republican Texas Rep. Nathan Schatzline.
Instagram/Rep Nate Schatzline
Republican state Rep. Nathan Schatzline, who is spearheading the bill, said during a Texas House Public Education Committee hearing Tuesday that the measure would prevent children from going down a path that he believes leads to 'irreversible harm.'
Advertisement
'We must make it unmistakably clear: Schools are not places for secret agendas or social experiments on our kids,' Schatzline said.
'This bill simply bans the most harmful aspects of teaching gender identity to children, the social transitioning of our most vulnerable.'
Schatzline said he believes that 'gender-affirming care' only affirms 'confusion' and 'not truth.'
Advertisement
'In some cases, teachers have been encouraged to withhold information from moms and dads. This is not compassion, it's deception and it's anti-parental rights and it's perpetuation of mental illness,' he said.
The bill aims to keep gender issues out of schools and up to parents, according to Schatzline.
LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – stock.adobe.com
A north Texas couple testified to the committee that they learned over email that their adopted teenage daughter's teachers were calling her 'Apollo,' according to The Dallas Morning News. They said their daughter has special needs and isn't transitioning or knows what it means to do so.
They argued she merely liked to be called 'Apollo' at school, but that the school should have told them.
Advertisement
'Look, this is just simply giving the facts to a child,' Schatzline said. 'If a child goes home and a parent wants to say that they are not the biological sex that they were born into, that's the parent's right to do so.'
'We do not believe that teachers or counselors should be forced into doing that at the same time inside the classroom,' he added.
Critics say if the bill is made law, it will further isolate kids who identify as LGBTQ.
Advertisement
One activist claimed the language in the bill could even punish teachers for calling kids by nicknames. Mandy Giles, the founder of Parents of Trans Youth, told lawmakers that her legal name is Amanda — and many of them have a preferred nickname they ask people to use.
'You'd probably be pretty offended if someone just said, 'No, I'm not going to do that,'' she said, according to the Dallas Morning News.
'Or worse, 'I'd like to, but if I did, my employer would lose a huge amount of money and I'd probably be fired.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Immigration raids confirmed in Orange County, congressman says ICE is ‘inciting fear'
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids took place in Orange County on Monday, officials confirmed. 'We are aware of ongoing immigration enforcement activity in the Santa Ana Civic Center area,' announced the Santa Ana Unified School District in an X post Monday evening. 'We do not condone actions that disrupt our community or separate families.' The Santa Ana Police Department and city officials also issued a joint statement on Instagram, acknowledging the ICE activity and stating that they are aware the news causes 'fear and uncertainty' for community members. L.A. Protests: Live Updates A spokesperson for the police department told KTLA that they were made aware of the ICE activity in their city because of 'social media posts.' SAPD, similar to most other police departments in Southern California, has reinstated its policy of not participating in immigration enforcement efforts. Although federal or law enforcement officials have not revealed the specifics of the ICE raids, Rep. Lou Correa (D-Orange County) said he received reports that individuals in his district were being arrested for 'doing nothing but standing outside and being profiled.' Upon landing in Washington, D.C. on Monday, Rep. Correa issued a statement about the raids, saying, 'It's unacceptable, and shocking, that this is happening in my hometown of Santa Ana.' 'It appears agents are picking up hard-working, law-abiding taxpayers. Why?' read Rep. Correa's press release, which also shared that the congressman would be immediately returning to O.C. 'Yesterday, everything was good and boring in Santa Ana. Everyone was going to church and going to the grocery store—it was a beautiful day. Today ICE is coming in to raid and disrupt our neighborhood? These are the parents whose children went to school with my kids. They take care of our elderly, mow our lawns, and are a part of the fourth largest economy in the world. This is inciting fear in our community,' continued the release. Rep. Correa also urged those who resist 'unjust, illegal activity' to do so peacefully, referring to the lessons taught by Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Glendale terminates 'divisive' detainee holding contract with ICE 'You don't take on a tank or an M16 by walking into it—you do it in a smart, legal, and safe way. Our future depends on a strategic, effective response. One that protects our kids, their future, and their rights.' The congressman concluded his statement by asking the federal government to use restraint and 'common sense' to adhere to the Constitution and provide everyone with due process. In a Monday evening press conference with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, she shared these values, saying, 'Stop the raids, and give the power back to our Governor.' SAUSD offered resources to the community, advising individuals to contact their local school or visit if they or someone they know needs support or information. 'We stand with our community – today and always.' The city of Santa Ana also provided resources, saying, 'If you or someone you know has questions or concerns, contact your local Congressional office and visit the City's Know Your Rights webpage at for resources and information.' Rep. Correa also encouraged anyone with questions about their legal rights to reach out to his office. For more resource information, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge blocks Trump order cutting federal funds to LGBTQ nonprofits
President Donald Trump's war on 'DEI' — programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion — suffered a setback Monday in a Bay Area federal court, where a judge blocked attempts to cut off federal funding to nine nonprofits serving the LGBTQ community unless they changed their practices and their vocabulary. 'These provisions seek to strip funding from programs that serve historically disenfranchised populations,' U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of Oakland said in a ruling requiring continued funding of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, San Francisco AIDS Foundation and other organizations across the country while the case continues. It does not apply to other groups affected by Trump's orders. Those orders require federally funded programs to halt any 'equity-related grants or contracts' and 'programs promoting DEI,' apparently barring any aid to racial, ethnic or gender minorities. Another provision orders them to cut off funding for programs that 'promote gender ideology.' That would mean denying 'the very existence of transgender people,' Joe Hollendoner, executive director of the Los Angeles LGBT Center, said in a filing with the court. 'While the Executive requires some degree of freedom to implement its political agenda, it is still bound by the Constitution,' Tigar, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said in his ruling. That means the administration 'cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities or suppress ideas that it does not like,' he said. A lawyer for the nonprofits, Jose Abrigo of Lambda Legal, said the ruling halts Trump administration orders 'that seek to erase transgender people from public life, dismantle DEI efforts, and silence nonprofits delivering life-saving services.' 'These policies threatened to erase access to lifesaving HIV and health services for transgender, nonbinary, and queer people across the country,' said Dr. Tyler TerMeer, chief executive officer of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. 'The Court's action gives us the fuel to keep fighting.' Trump's Justice Department argued that transgender advocacy groups, and not the administration, were the ones violating civil rights by allowing people who were born male to compete with female athletes, use women's restrooms and identify themselves as female. Trump is entitled to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies with (his) policy priorities,' Justice Department attorney Pardis Ghelbi said in a filing asking Tigar to dismiss the lawsuit. But the judge said Monday that the administration's explicit goals — including the denial of transgender people's existence — were 'facially discriminatory' and 'not a legitimate government interest.' Trump's orders require federally funded organizations 'who provide specialized services to transgender persons to remove references to those persons — as well as the characteristics that caused those persons to need the services in the first place,' Tigar said. 'It is as difficult to imagine how this would work as it is to imagine a pediatrician not acknowledging the existence of children, or a gerontologist denying the existence of the elderly.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Milwaukee County Judge Dugan case, prosecutors urge court not to dismiss
The Brief The Trump administration is opposing the dismissal of charges against Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan. Dugan is accused of helping a man evade immigration agents in her courthouse. DOJ attorneys argue dropping the charges would set a dangerous precedent, implying judges are above the law. MILWAUKEE - A federal motion has been filed in response to Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan's request to dismiss the case against her. And after reading through the 25-page motion, federal prosecutors say Dugan is not above the law. The indictment against Dugan alleges she helped an undocumented man who was wanted on a federal warrant avoid arrest by I.C.E. agents. SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News Click to open this PDF in a new window. In Dugan's motion for dismissal, she asked the court to dismiss the indictment based on judicial immunity. But today (June 9), federal prosecutors came back saying her request was unprecedented and quote "would, in essence, say that judges are above the law." Dugan faces a July 21 trial in the case that escalated a clash between Trump's administration and opponents over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump critics contend that Dugan's arrest went too far and that the administration is trying to make an example out of her to discourage judicial opposition to the crackdown. The backstory Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country illegally. She could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her attorneys say she's innocent. They filed a motion last month to dismiss the case, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. They also maintain that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. The other side Justice Department attorneys responded in a court filing Monday, saying dismissing the charges against the judge on the grounds that she is immune would be unprecedented and would ignore "well-established law that has long permitted judges to be prosecuted for crimes they commit." "Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond," Justice Department attorneys argued. "Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement." Dugan's attorney, Craig Mastantuono, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. In her motion to dismiss, Dugan argued that her conduct amounted to directing people's movement in and around her courtroom, and that she enjoys legal immunity for official acts she performs as a judge. She also accused the federal government of violating Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Dugan's case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge, who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed. The backstory According to prosecutors, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz illegally reentered the U.S. after being deported in 2013. He was charged in March with misdemeanor domestic violence in Milwaukee County and was in Dugan's courtroom for a hearing in that case on April 18. Dugan's clerk alerted her that immigration agents were in the courthouse looking to arrest Flores-Ruiz, prosecutors allege in court documents. According to an affidavit, Dugan became visibly angry at the agents' arrival and called the situation "absurd." After discussing the warrant for Flores-Ruiz's arrest with the agents, Dugan demanded that they speak with the chief judge and led them away from the courtroom. She then returned to the courtroom, was heard saying something to the effect of "wait, come with me," and then showed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a back door, the affidavit says. The immigration agents eventually detained Flores-Ruiz outside the building following a foot chase. Dugan, 66, was arrested by the FBI on April 25 at the courthouse. A grand jury indicted Dugan on May 13 and she pleaded not guilty on May 15. FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android What we know A legal defense fund created by Dugan supporters to help pay for her high-profile defense attorneys has raised more than $137,000 in three weeks from more than 2,800 donors. Her legal team includes former U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic and former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement. Both were appointed by Republican presidents. She has also hired prominent attorneys in Milwaukee and Madison. "This is an impressive show of support for the defense fund, highlighting that the public believes in protecting a fair and independent judiciary," former Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske, the fund's trustee, said Monday. "The fund will continue to raise grassroots donations and uphold strict guidelines to ensure transparency and accountability." Dugan is not required to list the donor names until she submits her annual financial disclosure form, which is due in April. Numerous people are prohibited from donating, including Milwaukee County residents; attorneys who practice in the county; lobbyists; judges; parties with pending matters before any Milwaukee County judge; and county employees. The Source FOX6 has done significant reporting on the arrest and charges filed against Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan. FOX6 produced this story with information from the federal motion, with contributions from the Associated Press.
