Satellite images suggest tsunami damage at Russian nuclear submarine base
The Rybachiy base, which houses most of Moscow 's Pacific Fleet nuclear submarines, was affected by the 8.8 magnitude earthquake and subsequent wave on 30 July.
Images from an Umbra Space satellite reveal a section of a pier at the base is bent and likely detached from its moorings.
No submarines were believed to be docked at the base, and experts suggest the limited damage is unlikely to impact military operations.
Watch the video in full above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mysterious change in Pacific to 'lock' US in megadrought that'll send food prices soaring for DECADES
A troubling shift in the Pacific Ocean has trapped the US in a megadrought, with scientists warning it could drive devastating wildfires, food shortages, and soaring prices for decades. Researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder have found that a natural Pacific climate cycle, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), is stuck in a 'negative' phase, bringing dangerously dry conditions to much of the US West Coast. The PDO acts like a slow-moving seesaw, swinging ocean surface temperatures between warmer and cooler phases every 20 to 30 years. Its current negative phase cools waters along North America's west coast and warms the central Pacific, a combination that disrupts rainfall patterns, intensifies drought, and fuels heat. Unlike regular droughts that can last months or a few years, a megadrought can linger for decades or more, with extreme dryness and little rainfall drying up the soil, rivers, and local reservoirs. The current megadrought, ongoing since around 2000, has impacted Southwestern states like California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado, and parts of Oregon, Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma. The extreme dryness has already lasted more than two decades, but researchers discovered the PDO shows no signs of changing to a 'positive' phase of wet weather because of a new factor impacting the planet: man-made greenhouse emissions. The extreme conditions in the Southwest are predicted to bring even more devastating fires to several states before the end of 2025 and for years to come. California, the nation's top agricultural state, produces over a third of America's vegetables and two-thirds of its fruits and nuts, including almonds, lettuce, and tomatoes. Severe water shortages since 2021 have forced farmers to leave hundreds of thousands of acres unplanted. Arizona, Nevada, and Utah, key dairy and meat producers, are also facing shrinking herds and reduced milk production. All of this leads to small crop yields, higher food prices, livestock struggling to provide enough milk for cheese and butter, and food insecurity for those unable to afford their everyday groceries. The study's findings, published in the journal Nature, challenged the long-held belief that the PDO's regular shifts were only driven by natural processes, such as ocean currents and atmospheric patterns. This new research showed that human-induced changes to the planet now account for more than half (53%) of the variations in the PDO dating back to 1950. Researchers found that the impact of man-made climate change has altered the PDO, essentially locking it into a permanent 'negative' trend since the 1980s, gradually drying out these key regions for food production. Human activities, particularly the emission of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels in cars, factories, and power plants, have trapped heat and warmed the central Pacific more than what naturally occurs every few decades. The dire conditions have also fueled massive wildfires throughout several states from Texas to California, including January's blaze in Los Angeles that destroyed more than 50,000 acres of land and over 16,000 homes. Firefighters have been battling more wildfires throughout the western US as dry conditions have lingered for decades Specifically, high levels of aerosols in the atmosphere before the 1980s fueled a 'positive phase' along the West Coast. During this time, the central Pacific was cooler, and the waters along North America's coast were warmer, often bringing wetter weather to the western US. Aerosols, tiny particles coming from industrial activities like burning coal and manufacturing from the 50s to the 80s, are still a form of human pollution, but they reflect sunlight into space, cooling the Pacific. As the world cut back on this form of pollution, other emissions like carbon dioxide drastically warmed the planet and locked the PDO into a 'negative' trend of dry weather. Study author Jeremy Klavans from the University of Colorado said: 'Climate models taken at face value didn't have the answer for us.' 'They told us it was bad luck,' he told New Scientist. To prove that the phenomenon was man-made and not an unusually long cycle of natural dryness, the scientists used a massive collection of 572 climate model simulations on the PDO. These simulations included various external factors like greenhouse gas emissions, aerosol pollution, volcanic eruptions, and solar changes, covering the period from 1950 to 2014. Researchers were even able to adjust for the impact of El Niño and La Niña events, which can affect the PDO over shorter windows of time. The results of these simulations continued to show that rising greenhouse gas emissions, combined with less aerosol pollution, could keep wetter weather away from the West Coast far beyond what naturally occurs without climate change. Pedro DiNezio, also from the University of Colorado, said: 'We looked into the future, and models make it persist for at least a few more decades.' 'As long as the northern hemisphere continues to warm, the PDO will be stuck in this negative phase,' the study author warned. The ongoing drought could lead to more devastating fires along the West Coast later this year. Meteorologists have forecasted that California could see up to 1.5 million acres of land burn before the end of 2025.
Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
NASA reveals how much astronauts really get paid
It's the job that puts the average 9–5 to shame. But while being an astronaut is a career many dream of, you might wonder how well it pays. Compared to office workers – who may complain about their commute – these highly–trained individuals are regularly launched into space at 17,500mph. While Earth-based employees might not rate their office canteen or grumble about the lack of toilets in the workplace, astronauts live off dehydrated food packets and must use specially–designed bathrooms. There's also the constant battle against weightlessness, and many experience muscle loss during missions. So you'd be forgiven for thinking that astronauts get paid a hefty wage for their daredevil profession. However, one NASA employee has revealed it's not the most lucrative career. When asked about how much she got paid Nicole Stott (pictured), a retired astronaut, engineer and aquanaut, gave a blunt three–word response. 'Not a lot', she replied, when asked by LAD Bible. 'Government civil servant. You don't become an astronaut to get paid a lot of money.' Throughout her career, Ms Stott flew on two expeditions and spent over 100 days in space. She launched the STS–128 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in 2009 and spent three months there. She was the 10th woman to perform a spacewalk and the first person to operate the ISS robotic arm to capture a free–flying cargo vehicle. According to NASA, the annual salary for astronauts is $152,258 (£112,347) per year, but this can vary depending on education and experience level. Earlier this year, it emerged that NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore - who were stuck on the ISS for nine months - would likely receive a tiny payout for the inconvenience. Former NASA astronaut Cady Coleman told the Washingtonian that astronauts only receive their basic salary without overtime benefits for 'incidentals' - a small amount they are 'legally obligated to pay you'. 'For me it was around $4 (£2.95) a day,' she said. Ms Coleman received approximately $636 (£469) in incidental pay for her 159-day mission between 2010 and 2011. Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore, with salaries ranging between $125,133 (£92,293) and $162,672 (£119,980) per year, could earn little more than $1,000 (£737) in 'incidental' cash on top of their basic salary, based on those figures. Meanwhile Neil Armstrong was paid a salary of $27,401 (£20,209) and was the highest paid of those aboard the Apollo 11 flight in 1969, according to the Boston Herald. To become an astronaut they must go through extensive training. Positions are highly competitive with only a few available to those who have the right experience and meet NASA's physical and mental qualifications. NASA selects a new astronaut class typically once every two years, selecting around 0.08 per cent of all applicants into their training program. Ms Stott also answered other questions about her job– including whether or not it's possible to have sexual intercourse in space. In response, the former astronaut said: 'Probably. I don't think there's anything that would physically prevent you from having sexual intercourse in space.' 'I don't know that anybody has while they were there, I did not. And but just like, you know, I think about floating and swimming in a pool, you can have sexual intercourse there. And if somebody wants to have sexual intercourse in space, I think they'll figure out how to have sexual intercourse in space.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
NASA astronaut reveals exactly how much they get PAID in blunt three–word statement
It's the job that puts the average 9–5 to shame. But while being an astronaut is a career many dream of, you might wonder how well it pays. Compared to office workers – who may complain about their commute – these highly–trained individuals are regularly launched into space at 17,500mph. While Earth-based employees might not rate their office canteen or grumble about the lack of toilets in the workplace, astronauts live off dehydrated food packets and must use specially–designed bathrooms. There's also the constant battle against weightlessness, and many experience muscle loss during missions. So you'd be forgiven for thinking that astronauts get paid a hefty wage for their daredevil profession. However, one NASA employee has revealed it's not the most lucrative career. When asked about how much she got paid Nicole Stott, a retired astronaut, engineer and aquanaut, gave a blunt three–word response. 'Not a lot', she replied, when asked by LAD Bible. 'Government civil servant. You don't become an astronaut to get paid a lot of money.' Throughout her career, Ms Stott flew on two expeditions and spent over 100 days in space. She launched the STS–128 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in 2009 and spent three months there. She was the 10th woman to perform a spacewalk and the first person to operate the ISS robotic arm to capture a free–flying cargo vehicle. According to NASA, the annual salary for astronauts is $152,258 (£112,347) per year, but this can vary depending on education and experience level. Earlier this year, it emerged that NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore - who were stuck on the ISS for nine months - would likely receive a tiny payout for the inconvenience. Former NASA astronaut Cady Coleman told the Washingtonian that astronauts only receive their basic salary without overtime benefits for 'incidentals' - a small amount they are 'legally obligated to pay you'. 'For me it was around $4 (£2.95) a day,' she said. Ms Coleman received approximately $636 (£469) in incidental pay for her 159-day mission between 2010 and 2011. Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore, with salaries ranging between $125,133 (£92,293) and $162,672 (£119,980) per year, could earn little more than $1,000 (£737) in 'incidental' cash on top of their basic salary, based on those figures. Meanwhile Neil Armstrong was paid a salary of $27,401 (£20,209) and was the highest paid of those aboard the Apollo 11 flight in 1969, according to the Boston Herald. To become an astronaut they must go through extensive training. Positions are highly competitive with only a few available to those who have the right experience and meet NASA's physical and mental qualifications. NASA selects a new astronaut class typically once every two years, selecting around 0.08 per cent of all applicants into their training program. Ms Stott also answered other questions about her job– including whether or not it's possible to have sex in space. In response, the former astronaut said: 'Probably. I don't think there's anything that would physically prevent you from having sex in space. 'I don't know that anybody has while they were there, I did not. And but just like, you know, I think about floating and swimming in a pool, you can have sex there. 'And if somebody wants to have sex in space, I think they'll figure out how to have sex in space.' HOW DO ASTRONAUTS EAT IN SPACE AND HOW IS FOOD STORED? Astronauts eat three meals a day: breakfast, lunch and dinner. Calorie requirements differ for astronauts. For instance, a small woman would require only about 1,900 calories a day, while a large man would require about 3,200 calories. An astronaut can choose from many types of foods such as fruits, nuts, peanut butter, chicken, beef, seafood, candy, brownies, etc. Available drinks include coffee, tea, orange juice, fruit punches and lemonade. No alcohol is allowed to be consumed on the space station. Condiments, such as ketchup, mustard and mayonnaise, are provided. Salt and pepper are available but only in a liquid form because astronauts can't sprinkle salt and pepper on their food in space. The salt and pepper would simply float away. There is a danger they could clog air vents, contaminate equipment or get stuck in an astronaut's eyes, mouth or nose. Preparation varies with the food type. Some foods can be eaten in their natural forms, such as brownies and fruit. Other foods require adding water, such as macaroni and cheese or spaghetti. An oven is provided in the space station to heat foods to the proper temperature. There are no refrigerators in space, so space food must be stored and prepared properly to avoid spoilage, especially on longer missions.
