
I was disappeared under Argentina's dictatorship. I know how autocracy begins
Like so many others, I watched the video of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish student at Tufts University, as she was surrounded by men dressed in black, some wearing masks. They carried guns. One grabbed her by the collar. The men surrounded her, and one handcuffed her. You can hear her short shrieks of fear.
She must have been terrified. I know I was when, as a 19-year-old student, I was kidnapped off the streets of Buenos Aires by members of an irregular taskforce. I know what it feels like and I know what it portends.
My kidnapping occurred in 1977. One year earlier, I was in bed when my mother came to my door with a portable radio broadcasting a military march. Later, I saw tanks rolling down the streets. It was the saddest thing I'd ever seen. An authoritarian military junta had overthrown the government. Its mission, it said, was to restore order – just as, in the US today, the theme offered for public consumption is one of restoration, taking us back to a supposedly better time.
In those years, the Argentine state became a terrorist: it chose the systematic violation of rights to supposedly protect a society with western, Christian values from leftist and communist 'terrorists'.
I and my fellow activists were not terrorists. We were leafleting, attending rallies, painting walls with our slogans. I had joined a group of like-minded idealists. But the government sought to neutralize us: if we weren't going to go away, we would be 'disappeared' – as I was, and as Öztürk was supposed to be. The authoritarian government targeted not only dissidents, but the media, the legal establishment and the intellectual elites, especially those who taught at universities, which were denounced as hotbeds of leftist thought.
Condemnations by Donald Trump echo almost verbatim. To an authoritarian regime, dissent is a threat. Now, in the US, it is foreigners being cast as enemies of the state. Öztürk's apparent infraction was that she was a foreign student who co-wrote an op-ed in her student newspaper denouncing Israeli military action in Gaza as a 'genocide.'
Like Öztürk, I was treated as an enemy of the state. I became one of the disappeared.
In Argentina, the institutional checks on power were systematically destroyed. The legislature was abolished, the judiciary cowed or co-opted. In the US, Republican majorities in the legislature have voluntarily given up their independence, but the result is the same. The chief executive acts with impunity. Having tamed the legislative branch, Trump has moved on to the judiciary. He demands loyalty, denounces 'activist' judges and calls for their impeachment. Judges and their family members have been doxed, their images and personal information circulated online. In April, the Judicial Conference of the United States officially requested an increase in funding for security.
In this climate, judges have and must continue to uphold the rule of law even as they do so at great personal risk. After a six week ordeal, Öztürk was finally released by order of a brave federal court judge. She has been returned to her community and upon her release she stated: 'I have faith in the American system of justice.' For this system to continue, judges must be protected.
This small victory is just a beginning; so many others remain incarcerated. It took nearly two years to secure my release and even then, it was not through the power of the courts. During those years, the Argentine military acted with omnipotence and impunity. They were convinced that they would never be brought to justice for their crimes, because no one ever had been before.
But with the return of democracy, the constitutional government took the members of the juntas to trial and I was called to testify. It was a historic moment, and a collective catharsis for the victims. Several of the former commanders in chief received severe sentences. Government accountability in Argentina began only after the fall of the regime. During the reign of the junta, there had been a total collapse of the judiciary.
Forty years have passed since then, and under the government of Javier Milei, the Argentine state vindicates the dictatorship and justifies state terrorism. Still, the courts in Argentina today are a critical bulwark against a return to the horrors of the past. In the US, too, the courts are critical to prevent a descent into totalitarian horrors. In the camp in which I spent most of my time in captivity, 90% of the prisoners were murdered by being thrown out of a plane, alive. (I spent 20 years of my life bringing the pilots of those planes to justice.)
In the 1980s, after I was kept as a desaparecida in two clandestine detention centers, enduring torture during my captivity, I found refuge in New York. It was there that I was able to pronounce the word 'disappeared' for the first time and to denounce the horrors still being denied by the military junta without looking at the door of my house in terror, waiting for armed men to burst in to kidnap me. I worked in the office of an immigration attorney as an interpreter and paralegal and was in contact with migrants from all over the world who arrived in search of tranquility and freedom.
Some had fled their countries for their lives, like me. I had a special empathy with them, and I found it repulsive to hear they were labeled 'illegal'. I listened to stories of immigration service operations in factories or on public roads and received distressing calls in the office from relatives who did not know what had happened to their family members. They reminded me of the desperation of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, who were unsuccessfully searching for their loved ones in Argentina. Today, I still have blood ties to the US. And I am fearful for the country. I have seen how autocracy begins and I see signs of it everywhere.
Sign up to Fighting Back
Big thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency. From our opinion desk.
after newsletter promotion
How is it possible to fight against this dystopian reality? How could honest citizens halt cruelty? Is it feasible to hold accountable government officials who violate basic rights?
Immigrants being sent to detention facilities abroad, the White House considering suspending habeas corpus, the repression of protests by the military in the streets of LA – all are serious threats to US democracy. But resistance in other cities and lawsuits filed to block deployment of troops seem to be a shield against the prevalence of these authoritarian measures. Responsible and accurate independent media coverage both in the country and abroad, the creation and strengthening of civil rights advocacy organizations such as the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, and proposals to include basic human rights protections in the US constitution, as done in post-dictatorial Argentina in 1994, could be a way of ensuring freedom for upcoming generations.
What gives me hope are the expressions of individual and collective rebellion, both in the US and Argentina. Judges who make decisions that question and even penalize the abuses of political power are necessary. But judges cannot uphold our democracy on their own.
We need members of Congress who vote against dangerous reforms and budget cuts; human rights organizations that make institutional violence visible; journalists who – at the risk of losing their jobs – communicate the truth; and broad collective action of ordinary citizens who through their demonstrations repudiate the government and take to the streets to show that the flame of freedom is still alive. We must raise our voices against authoritarianism. It is our moral duty to overcome the reign of fear. Immigrants and dissidents are on the frontline. Judges are a critical backstop. We must work to protect them all.
Miriam Lewin is a leading Argentine journalist and survivor of the dictatorship. She is the author of six books, including Iosi, the Remorseful Spy forthcoming in English in July 2025 (Seven Stories Press). A seven episode podcast about Miriam Lewin's experience as a prisoner of the state and her fight for justice is titled The Burden: Avenger
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
47 signs from the anti-Trump 'No Kings' protests
Signs spotted across the U.S. on Saturday as tens of thousands demonstrate against President Trump.


The Guardian
9 hours ago
- The Guardian
I was disappeared under Argentina's dictatorship. I know how autocracy begins
Like so many others, I watched the video of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish student at Tufts University, as she was surrounded by men dressed in black, some wearing masks. They carried guns. One grabbed her by the collar. The men surrounded her, and one handcuffed her. You can hear her short shrieks of fear. She must have been terrified. I know I was when, as a 19-year-old student, I was kidnapped off the streets of Buenos Aires by members of an irregular taskforce. I know what it feels like and I know what it portends. My kidnapping occurred in 1977. One year earlier, I was in bed when my mother came to my door with a portable radio broadcasting a military march. Later, I saw tanks rolling down the streets. It was the saddest thing I'd ever seen. An authoritarian military junta had overthrown the government. Its mission, it said, was to restore order – just as, in the US today, the theme offered for public consumption is one of restoration, taking us back to a supposedly better time. In those years, the Argentine state became a terrorist: it chose the systematic violation of rights to supposedly protect a society with western, Christian values from leftist and communist 'terrorists'. I and my fellow activists were not terrorists. We were leafleting, attending rallies, painting walls with our slogans. I had joined a group of like-minded idealists. But the government sought to neutralize us: if we weren't going to go away, we would be 'disappeared' – as I was, and as Öztürk was supposed to be. The authoritarian government targeted not only dissidents, but the media, the legal establishment and the intellectual elites, especially those who taught at universities, which were denounced as hotbeds of leftist thought. Condemnations by Donald Trump echo almost verbatim. To an authoritarian regime, dissent is a threat. Now, in the US, it is foreigners being cast as enemies of the state. Öztürk's apparent infraction was that she was a foreign student who co-wrote an op-ed in her student newspaper denouncing Israeli military action in Gaza as a 'genocide.' Like Öztürk, I was treated as an enemy of the state. I became one of the disappeared. In Argentina, the institutional checks on power were systematically destroyed. The legislature was abolished, the judiciary cowed or co-opted. In the US, Republican majorities in the legislature have voluntarily given up their independence, but the result is the same. The chief executive acts with impunity. Having tamed the legislative branch, Trump has moved on to the judiciary. He demands loyalty, denounces 'activist' judges and calls for their impeachment. Judges and their family members have been doxed, their images and personal information circulated online. In April, the Judicial Conference of the United States officially requested an increase in funding for security. In this climate, judges have and must continue to uphold the rule of law even as they do so at great personal risk. After a six week ordeal, Öztürk was finally released by order of a brave federal court judge. She has been returned to her community and upon her release she stated: 'I have faith in the American system of justice.' For this system to continue, judges must be protected. This small victory is just a beginning; so many others remain incarcerated. It took nearly two years to secure my release and even then, it was not through the power of the courts. During those years, the Argentine military acted with omnipotence and impunity. They were convinced that they would never be brought to justice for their crimes, because no one ever had been before. But with the return of democracy, the constitutional government took the members of the juntas to trial and I was called to testify. It was a historic moment, and a collective catharsis for the victims. Several of the former commanders in chief received severe sentences. Government accountability in Argentina began only after the fall of the regime. During the reign of the junta, there had been a total collapse of the judiciary. Forty years have passed since then, and under the government of Javier Milei, the Argentine state vindicates the dictatorship and justifies state terrorism. Still, the courts in Argentina today are a critical bulwark against a return to the horrors of the past. In the US, too, the courts are critical to prevent a descent into totalitarian horrors. In the camp in which I spent most of my time in captivity, 90% of the prisoners were murdered by being thrown out of a plane, alive. (I spent 20 years of my life bringing the pilots of those planes to justice.) In the 1980s, after I was kept as a desaparecida in two clandestine detention centers, enduring torture during my captivity, I found refuge in New York. It was there that I was able to pronounce the word 'disappeared' for the first time and to denounce the horrors still being denied by the military junta without looking at the door of my house in terror, waiting for armed men to burst in to kidnap me. I worked in the office of an immigration attorney as an interpreter and paralegal and was in contact with migrants from all over the world who arrived in search of tranquility and freedom. Some had fled their countries for their lives, like me. I had a special empathy with them, and I found it repulsive to hear they were labeled 'illegal'. I listened to stories of immigration service operations in factories or on public roads and received distressing calls in the office from relatives who did not know what had happened to their family members. They reminded me of the desperation of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, who were unsuccessfully searching for their loved ones in Argentina. Today, I still have blood ties to the US. And I am fearful for the country. I have seen how autocracy begins and I see signs of it everywhere. Sign up to Fighting Back Big thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency. From our opinion desk. after newsletter promotion How is it possible to fight against this dystopian reality? How could honest citizens halt cruelty? Is it feasible to hold accountable government officials who violate basic rights? Immigrants being sent to detention facilities abroad, the White House considering suspending habeas corpus, the repression of protests by the military in the streets of LA – all are serious threats to US democracy. But resistance in other cities and lawsuits filed to block deployment of troops seem to be a shield against the prevalence of these authoritarian measures. Responsible and accurate independent media coverage both in the country and abroad, the creation and strengthening of civil rights advocacy organizations such as the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, and proposals to include basic human rights protections in the US constitution, as done in post-dictatorial Argentina in 1994, could be a way of ensuring freedom for upcoming generations. What gives me hope are the expressions of individual and collective rebellion, both in the US and Argentina. Judges who make decisions that question and even penalize the abuses of political power are necessary. But judges cannot uphold our democracy on their own. We need members of Congress who vote against dangerous reforms and budget cuts; human rights organizations that make institutional violence visible; journalists who – at the risk of losing their jobs – communicate the truth; and broad collective action of ordinary citizens who through their demonstrations repudiate the government and take to the streets to show that the flame of freedom is still alive. We must raise our voices against authoritarianism. It is our moral duty to overcome the reign of fear. Immigrants and dissidents are on the frontline. Judges are a critical backstop. We must work to protect them all. Miriam Lewin is a leading Argentine journalist and survivor of the dictatorship. She is the author of six books, including Iosi, the Remorseful Spy forthcoming in English in July 2025 (Seven Stories Press). A seven episode podcast about Miriam Lewin's experience as a prisoner of the state and her fight for justice is titled The Burden: Avenger


Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Drug-addled migrant can stay in UK after judge rules he would ‘struggle mentally'
A drug-addled migrant who has racked up 42 convictions in Britain cannot be deported to Uganda after a judge ruled he 'struggles mentally'. The 44-year-old man, named as MW, would also struggle to deal with his diabetes and opioid addiction, the judge said. The man was initially granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, having lived here since the age of six. But he grew up to have a prolific criminal career, which saw him serve two years and three months in a Young Offenders Institute for robbery and possessing a blade in March 1999. In December 2001 he was jailed for two months for fraud, and in December 2008 he was sentenced to three years and six months for actual bodily harm and robbery. He also served an 18-month term in May 2017 for supply of cocaine and heroin. As a result, the Home Office decided to deport him. In response he launched a human rights claim, saying that he was gay and would be persecuted in Uganda. Second protection claim That was refused on May 7 2019, prompting an appeal to the First-tier Immigration Tribunal. While that appeal was pending, he submitted a second protection claim which was also refused on June 28 2023. His appeal was expanded to include a challenge to this second refusal. Even while these appeals were ongoing the man, who has fathered four children here, was convicted again and awaiting sentence for another burglary. The First-tier Tribunal heard the case on Nov 28 2024 and issued its decision on Jan 8 2025. The judge found that MW could not claim refugee status and humanitarian protection because he was a 'danger to the community' and that he had not shown he would be at risk in Uganda. However, the judge allowed his human rights appeal, finding that he met the exception to the public interest in deportation under UK law, which applies to foreign criminals sentenced to less than four years. The judgment said: 'The main concern with regard to the appellant relocating to Uganda is the length of time which he has been away from the country coupled with his vulnerability as an individual suffering from PTSD with a history of drug and alcohol abuse and the lack of support in Uganda. 'I find that it is more likely than not that the appellant would struggle mentally on his return to Uganda, that he would have a real lack of emotional support to assist him in reintegrating and that his mental health will impact on his ability to find employment, accommodation and forge links in Uganda.' The Home Office was granted permission to appeal this decision but another judge finally dismissed this appeal, meaning the man can stay.