"Not Unduly Worried": Minister On US Tariff Threat Over Russian Oil
Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri on Thursday said India has diversified its sources for buying oil in the global market, due to which the government is not "unduly worried" over any US crackdown on Russia's oil exports.
Speaking at the Urja Varta 2025, the minister said India currently buys oil from 40 nations, as compared to 27 countries in 2007, and the global market is well-supplied.
"There is a lot of oil available in the market. Iran and Venezuela are currently under sanctions. But are they going to be under sanctions forever? Many countries, including Brazil, Canada and others, are ramping up output. I am not unduly worried about supplies as of now. We have diversified our sources," Puri said.
The minister's statement came against the backdrop of US President Donald Trump announcing that secondary sanctions would be imposed on countries buying Russian oil.
On July 15, Trump had threatened to impose serious trade restrictions on Russia unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days. Trump said US tariffs on Russian exports would be increased to 100 per cent, while also threatening to impose secondary sanctions on countries such as India and China that buy oil from Russia.
On Trump's threats, Puri said, "I have heard these threats. Some statements are made to ensure two disputants settle an issue."
Puri further stated that India's oil purchases from Moscow had played an important role in stabilising prices in the global market.
He said crude oil prices could have skyrocketed to $130 per barrel in the absence of India-Russia oil trade when the Ukraine war began in 2022.
Prior to the Russia-Ukraine war, India used to buy a mere 0.2 per cent of its crude imports from Moscow. This, today, stands close to 40 per cent.
The minister said that Russian crude was always under a price cap of $60 per barrel but never under sanctions. India continues to stay firm on its stance of not buying crude oil from a country which is under sanctions, said Puri.
"Russia is one of the largest crude producers with over nine million barrels/day. Imagine the chaos if this oil, amounting to about 10 per cent of the global oil supply of around 97 million, vanished from the market. It would have forced the world to reduce its consumption, and since the consumers would be chasing reduced supplies, the prices would've spiralled to over $120-130," Puri said earlier this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump reignites feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calls him ‘nasty person'
US President Donald Trump, on Monday (July 27), took a swipe at London Mayor Sadiq Khan, calling him a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' during a news conference in Scotland. On being asked by a reporter if he would come to London in September for a state visit, Trump said, 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job.' 'The Mayor of London… a nasty person,' he said, reigniting his feud with Khan. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, visibly caught off guard, interjected, describing Khan as his 'friend'. 'He's a friend of mine, actually,' he said. Despite Starmer's defence, Trump remained critical, stating, 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' 🚨🎥 WATCH: Donald Trump says Sadiq Khan is a 'nasty person' who has done a 'terrible job' as London Mayor Starmer: 'He's a friend of mine actually' — Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) July 28, 2025 Khan's response to Trump's jibe In a statement issued later on Monday (July 28), a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world'. 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger, not weaker; richer, not poorer. Perhaps these are the reasons why a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship under his Presidency,' the spokesperson further added. Trump and Khan have had a turbulent past with the two indulging in war of words on several occasions. In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election in November 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of his ethnicity and religion. 'It's personal, let's be frank. If I wasn't this colour skin, if I wasn't a practising Muslim, he wouldn't have come for me,' he said. The London mayor, during Trump's first term, called out the US president over his stance on immigration and travel ban targeting Muslim-majority nations. In return, the US president accused Khan of doing a 'very bad job on terrorism', calling him 'very dumb' and a 'stone cold loser'. (With inputs from agencies)
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Panneerselvam shifts stance, condemns BJP over Samagra Shiksha funds controversy
In a shift from his usual position towards the Union government, the ADMK Workers' Rights Retrieval Committee coordinator and former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) condemned the BJP-led Centre for not releasing funds to the State under the Samagra Shiksha scheme for 2024-25. 'Citing this [the non-acceptance of the State government to the Union government's conditions] as the reason for not providing the funds will not only affect the education of students, but also teachers. This action of the Central government is against the Right to Education Act and federalism,' Mr. Panneerselvam said in a statement, adding that the non-acceptance was a matter between the two governments. The ADMK Workers' Rights Retrieval Committee leader urged the Centre to release around ₹2,151.59 crore to the State under the scheme. From ally to 'uncertain' partner Ever since Mr. Panneerselvam rebelled against the AIADMK's former interim general secretary V.K. Sasikala in February 2017, he had been known as a staunch ally of the BJP. When he and the present general secretary of the party Edappadi K. Palaniswami came together six months later, he had publicly credited Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the reunion. In 2019, when Mr. Modi filed his nomination papers in Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency, Mr. Panneerselvam was among those who were there to greet him. Five years later, the former Chief Minister, who held the portfolio of Finance in the State government for about 10 years, contested as an Independent in the Ramaathapuram Lok Sabha seat unsuccessfully as part of the BJP-led alliance. But the AIADMK had faced the election only with the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK) and SDPI. After the Dravidian major revived its alliance with the national party in April this year, Mr. Panneerselvam's position became uncertain in view of a 'hands-off' approach of the BJP towards him, as Union Minister for Home Affairs Amit Shah made it clear that 'we will not interfere in the internal affairs of the AIADMK,' when asked about the former Chief Minister's space in the alliance. The former Chief Minister had sought an audience with the Prime Minister during his latest trip to Tamil Nadu but no meeting took place between the two leaders, even though Mr. Palaniswami, along with his colleagues, met Mr. Modi at the Tiruchi airport on Saturday (July 26) night. On Mr. Panneerselvam's further course of action, Panruti S. Ramachandran, former Minister who has been an advisor to the former Chief Minister's camp, told The Hindu on Tuesday afternoon that 'when there is no place for him in the alliance, there is no point in continuing there.' Would the BJP not approach Mr. Panneerselvam again and take him back into its fold? 'There is no possibility, because Mr. Palaniswami is there in the alliance,' replied Mr. Ramachandran, adding that 'there is no way out for him [the Committee coordinator] than finding his own way.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India overtakes China to become world's top smartphone maker for the US
India has overtaken China to become the leading exporter of smartphone devices sold in the United States, driven by Apple Inc's decision to scale up iPhone assembly in the country. Shipments from India accounted for 44 per cent of the US market in the quarter ending June 2025, according to data from Canalys. Vietnam, home to most of Samsung Electronics Co's production, ranked second. In contrast, China's share of estimated shipments plummeted from over 60 per cent a year ago to just 25 per cent. Apple's India manufacturing push The shift is a result of Apple increasing its manufacturing capacity in India, alongside broader efforts by smartphone makers to 'frontload device inventories amid tariff concerns,' Canalys researchers wrote. The number of smartphones manufactured in India more than tripled compared to the same period last year. Although Apple's iPhone shipments to the US fell by 11 per cent, this decline was attributed to earlier-than-usual bulk shipments. India-made iPhone output rises to $22 bn Apple assembled iPhones worth $22 billion in India in the 12 months ending March, marking a nearly 60 per cent rise from the previous year. Most of these devices were produced at Foxconn Technology Group's facility. Tata Group's electronics arm, which recently acquired Wistron Corp and oversees Pegatron Corp's operations, has also become a major supplier. Trump seeks manufacturing jobs in US Apple and other technology companies have been gradually moving production away from China to reduce risks associated with tariffs and rising geopolitical tensions. India and Vietnam have become prominent alternatives in this strategy. This shift has drawn criticism from US President Donald Trump, who has been urging firms to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Despite its global diversification, Apple continues to manufacture most of its iPhones in China and has no smartphone production in the US. However, the company has committed to hiring more domestically and investing $500 billion in the US over the next four years. China disrupts Apple's India expansion efforts Apple's shift towards India has not gone unnoticed by Chinese authorities. The Chinese government has reportedly taken steps to undermine Apple's competitive advantage abroad. Around a year ago, it delayed approvals for machinery Apple needed to import for iPhone production in India. In a more recent move, Chinese Customs indefinitely withheld machines required for retrofitting assembly lines to manufacture the forthcoming iPhone 17. Additionally, Beijing pressured Foxconn to withdraw over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians from its facilities in India. These experts were initially deployed to assist with technology transfer and worker training.
