Activist Fahmi Reza Calls Out Government Over Travel Ban Confusion: 'I'll See You In Court'
Travelling abroad for any reason can be an exciting experience, but discovering that you are barred from leaving the country while passing through immigration is undoubtedly a nightmare. That's exactly what happened to political street artist and activist Fahmi Reza recently.
Known for portraying Malaysia's 6th Prime Minister, Najib Razak, as a clown, the 48-year-old was reportedly scheduled to fly to Singapore over the weekend. However, he was informed that he had been blacklisted from both overseas and domestic travel to Sabah, and was therefore unable to leave the country. Here's the full story:
According to Fahmi Reza, via an Instagram Story, immigration officers informed him that Bukit Aman had not granted clearance for him to leave the country. When he asked for the reason behind the restriction, they advised him to contact the Bukit Aman police station directly. 'Last week I was blacklisted from entering Sabah and now, I can't travel overseas,' he said on Instagram.
His posts quickly went viral, with netizens calling on the government and authorities to provide an explanation for the travel ban imposed on the artist. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim caught wind of the situation and instructed the police to look into the matter, while denying that the government had imposed any restrictions on Fahmi's movement.
Following the PM's statement, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain clarified that Fahmi is only on the police movement monitoring list due to his involvement in an investigation, but he is not officially barred from leaving the country. As such, the instructions given by immigration officers were incorrect.
Although both the government and police have clarified the issue, the activist remains dissatisfied with the explanation. Fahmi responded by pointing out that not a single government official or agency had taken responsibility for the incident, which he claimed resulted in losses of both time and money. 'You keep saying there is 'no official ban'. But in reality, I was still blocked and denied my right to travel,' he said in a statement on Instagram.
He concluded his post by stating that he intends to take the case to court. 'This time, it's the people's turn to drag those in power to court. You always tell me to 'use the right channel', don't you? Fine — see you in court,' he wrote. At the time of writing, neither the government nor the police have responded to Fahmi's desire to sue them.
Sources: Instagram, NST, TheStar, MalayMail
What's your Reaction?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
MCMC data collection: No personal info involved, say minister and telcos
SHAH ALAM – The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC)'s collection of mobile phone data (MPD) has drawn public attention in recent days, following reports about requests for call data from telecommunications companies. Both the commission and major telcos have since issued statements clarifying that no personally identifiable information (PII) is being accessed or shared. The initiative, part of a government-approved effort to strengthen evidence-based policymaking, aims to produce official statistics that will support planning in both the ICT and tourism sectors. All submitted data is anonymised and complies fully with the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA). According to MCMC, the MPD is used solely to generate indicators such as mobile broadband subscription rates and domestic visitor movements. The data is not intended to track individual behaviour. "No individual subscriber can be identified through the data collected," MCMC reiterated in its June 6 statement. Telecommunications companies either process the data internally and submit aggregated outputs to MCMC, or, if lacking in-house capability, anonymise it before submission for processing by the commission. No individual subscriber can be identified from the data collected. The initiative follows international best practices and is modelled on similar projects in countries such as Indonesia and Brazil. Concerns arose after a report revealed a directive requesting call data for all mobile phone calls made between January and March 2025, prompting public concern over privacy. Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil later clarified that the data collected does not include personal identifiers. Instead, it is intended to improve telecommunications services, bridge the digital divide and inform infrastructure planning. "It does not contain any personal information but focuses on trends," he said on June 8. The data helps assess service quality, user engagement, and penetration at sub-district and regional levels. The Statistics Department (DOSM), various ministries and international partners have been involved in related workshops since 2023. The MPD initiative contributes to the government's broader Coverage of Populated Areas (COPA) policy, which shifts focus from general to more detailed, location-specific data. This refined understanding is expected to enhance planning and policy decisions to better meet public needs. Fahmi confirmed that the data collection agreement was reached through mutual understanding between MCMC and telcos, with involvement from DOSM. Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil clarified that the data collected does not include personal identifiers. Photo by Bernama He emphasised that telcos will not provide any data containing personal information, only anonymised datasets, processed internally wherever possible, will be submitted. Telecommunication providers involved, U Mobile, Telekom Malaysia (TM), CelcomDigi, YTL Communications and Maxis have each issued statements reaffirming their commitment to data privacy and regulatory compliance. U Mobile stated that protecting customer data is a top priority, with strict policies ensuring any shared data is anonymised, aggregated, and compliant with applicable laws. The company confirmed that no PII is ever shared or processed and reiterated its support for the initiative while upholding the highest data governance standards. "No personally identifiable information has been shared or processed," U Mobile said in a statement. TM similarly confirmed that the MPD submitted to MCMC is fully anonymised, handled under strict governance and security protocols, and in full compliance with internal policies and national laws. It stressed its ongoing commitment to safeguarding customer data with integrity. "TM remains fully committed to safeguarding the safety and privacy of customer data with responsibility and integrity," it noted. CelcomDigi also reported close collaboration with MCMC in support of the government's initiative, noting that it processes requested data within its own secure environment. "When required, CelcomDigi will process requested data within our own secure environments and provide a limited sample on relevant fields comprising anonymised and aggregated output to the commission," it said. YTL Communications confirmed compliance with MCMC's directive to submit mobile network usage records for Q1 2025. The company ensured all data was anonymised before submission and affirmed that customer privacy remains its highest priority. Maxis also confirmed that at no stage is there any access to, processing of, or sharing of PII. All data had been anonymised and processed in aggregate form within a secure environment, in full compliance with the PDPA. "All data is anonymised by Maxis and processed in an aggregated manner within a secure environment, in full compliance with the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA)," Maxis said in a statement. The MPD initiative supports the government's Coverage of Populated Areas (COPA) policy, which aimed to enhance the accuracy and granularity of connectivity data. Fahmi also said these improvements would ultimately ensure that planning and policy decisions are better aligned with real public needs.
Sinar Daily
an hour ago
- Sinar Daily
'See you in court': Fahmi Reza's fight over travel ban - What we know so far
SHAH ALAM - Activist and graphic designer Fahmi Reza has publicly disputed official explanations after being stopped from boarding a flight at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA), fuelling a public debate over whether his freedom of movement was improperly restricted. Here's what is known so far: The controversy began on June 7, when Fahmi posted on Facebook and Instagram claiming that he had been barred from leaving Malaysia while trying to board a flight to Singapore. An immigration officer reportedly told him that he was blacklisted. Fahmi also pointed out that he had recently been barred from entering Sabah. His post went viral, drawing public scrutiny and media coverage. In response, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim instructed Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay to investigate the matter. The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) issued a statement affirming that the government respects individual freedoms 'as long as they do not compromise national security or violate existing laws' and requested further clarification from the police. Later the same day, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain issued a statement clarifying that no official travel ban had been imposed on Fahmi Reza. Razarudin explained that Fahmi's name was on an internal police movement monitoring list due to ongoing investigations but that this list does not impose any legal restriction on travel. 'It must be emphasised that this list does not imply any restrictions but is part of the standard monitoring procedures implemented by the authorities,' the statement read. Razarudin added that a procedural error occurred during Fahmi's airport clearance process, resulting in an erroneous movement restriction order being triggered. 'The matter is being reviewed with appropriate steps to be taken to refine existing procedures,' he said. He also reaffirmed that the police remained committed to respecting the freedom of movement of all Malaysians. According to the police, Fahmi is free to travel in and out of Malaysia, subject to existing immigration regulations. However, Fahmi rejected the explanation and published a new statement on social media on June 8, responding directly to Anwar's and the IGP's statements. Fahmi responded directly to Anwar and the IGP in a new statement on social media on June 8. Photo: Fahmi's Facebook account. In an open letter addressed to the Madani Government, Fahmi wrote: "I have read Anwar Ibrahim's response blaming the police and the police blaming Immigration, saying 'no official restrictions' and that 'confusion occurred during the clearance process.'' "Do you know what I don't see? I don't see anyone in the government taking responsibility for the mistake that caused my right to freedom of movement to be blocked." "You can say 'no official restriction' easily. But in reality, I was blocked yesterday. I was not allowed to leave the country. I was denied my rights as a citizen." He went on to criticise what he sees as a lack of accountability, writing: 'I'm just an ordinary citizen. You blocked me, caused trouble, wasted my time and money and then wash your hands of it.' Fahmi ended his statement with a clear warning that he intends to take legal action: 'This time, it's the people's turn to take the authorities to court. The government and authorities are not immune. The people must be brave to fight back. You always tell us to 'use the right channels', right? Okay, we'll see you in court.' Malaysians on social media also weighed in on the issue. Instagram user @ urged, 'Please sue the government, we need it to happen.' Another user, @hizapizza, voiced support by saying, 'Yes, we have your back. The government is meant to serve the people, not the other way around.' @yixian_ong added, 'You are the check and balance we yearned for. It is unfortunate that it comes at such a cost. Power to the people!' Meanwhile, @syedddsolehin remarked, 'It does not matter whether it is Pakatan Harapan (PH) or Perikatan Nasional (PN) in power. We, the citizens, stay the same, left to accept whatever decisions are made on our behalf.'
![[UPDATED] KL Tower tussle: Court dismisses contempt bid by ex-operator](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FMahkamah-New_1749442799.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] KL Tower tussle: Court dismisses contempt bid by ex-operator](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] KL Tower tussle: Court dismisses contempt bid by ex-operator
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court today dismissed a legal bid by Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd (MKLSB) and former KL Tower operator Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd to start contempt proceedings against Communication Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and several others. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain made the ruling after finding that the applicants had failed to establish a prima facie case of contempt against the respondents. The two companies filed contempt proceedings against eight individuals for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings. The eight are – Federal Land Commissioner Datuk Muhammad Azmi Mohd Zain; Dang Wangi police chief Assistant Commissioner Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman; Lim Seong Hai Capital Berhad (LSH) chairman Tan Sri Lim Keng Cheng; LSH chief executive Khairil Faizal Othman; Communications Ministry secretary-general Datuk Mohamad Fauzi Md Isa; administrative services division secretary Harun Ali; and senior division secretary (management) Mazlan Abd Mutalib. The court also found no merit in the plaintiff's claim that the authorities had wrongfully entered its property after the contract with the government ended on March 31, regardless of how forceful the actions were. "This court is not satisfied that a prima facie case has been established to warrant leave for contempt proceedings to be granted," she said. Roz Mawar awarded RM15,000 in cost to Fahmi and RM10,000 in cost to the other respondents. Meanwhile, the court also dismissed the plaintiffs' application for an interim injunction to stop Fahmi and the government from granting the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, ruling that the matter had become academic. On March 27, the plaintiffs filed a RM1 billion suit against Fahmi and the new KL Tower concessionaire following the termination of the management agreement. In a statement, MKLSB managing director Datuk Abdul Hamid Shaikh said the injunction aims to maintain the current status quo until the dispute is fully resolved in court. He said that in 2022, Hydroshoppe was invited by the Communications Ministry to become a strategic partner in revitalising MKLSB's operations and ensuring the tower's continued management and maintenance. Abdul Hamid claimed that despite multiple attempts to resolve the matter amicably, the ministry and the new concessionaire have refused to acknowledge the 2022 agreement, leaving MKLSB and Hydroshoppe facing financial and operational uncertainty. He claimed that outstanding payments amounting to RM25 million for maintenance and operational services remain unpaid, and have added further financial strain, MKLSB has managed and maintained KL Tower for nearly 30 years.
