I first saw classy Tom Lynagh play aged 8. Australia must stick with him
Yet when we assess: how did it go for the 22-year-old No10, who was making his first start for Australia and playing behind a retreating pack and off a scrum half with whom he had never stepped on the field before? I think that's not really a question, is it? It's an answer. How else could it have gone?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Original Atlanta Hawks team owner Tom Cousins dies at the age of 93
Former NBA owner Tom Cousins died on Tuesday at the age of 93, it was announced. Cousins was the original owner of the Atlanta Falcons, playing a pivotal role in bringing the franchise to Georgia. The team announced his passing in a heartfelt statement, hailing Cousins for his transformative impact on the city's sporting community. 'The Atlanta Hawks extend our heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of Tom Cousins, a visionary builder of communities, unmatched philanthropist, and a former Hawks owner who had an enduring impact on the city's sports landscape and the geographic footprint that now makes up our thriving Downtown Atlanta region,' the Hawks said. 'Developed by Cousins, the original home of the Hawks – the Omni Coliseum – shaped fans, memories and downtown for a quarter of a century.' Cousins, along with former Georgia Governor Carl Sanders, purchased the team in 1968, relocating the franchise to Atlanta from St. Louis. The move helped cement Atlanta as a major metropolitan sports hub of the southeast of the United States. 'We are grateful for his legacy and the countless lives he impacted,' the Hawks' statement added.
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Super League expansion may put vital partnership with Sky Sports in jeopardy
Super League's long-term partnership with Sky Sports that bankrolls the sport could be jeopardised by plans to expand the competition to 14 teams next season. The existing 12 Super League clubs voted in favour of expansion earlier this week following the recommendations of a strategic review led by the Rugby Football League chair, Nigel Wood, but the Guardian has learned that the plan has yet to be endorsed by their broadcast partner. Under the terms of the current deal, Sky broadcasts every Super League game live, but it is understood that the cost of televising an extra game across 27 rounds next year would be around £500,000. The Guardian has been told Sky is reluctant to pick up the additional cost for matches it did not buy in a tender process that concluded almost two years ago, and has no intention of increasing its rights fees to support two extra clubs. Sky's three-year deal to provide exclusive live coverage of Super League enters its final 12 months next season, and while there is no suggestion of the broadcaster terminating that contract, senior sources have indicated that the expansion could affect negotiations over future deals. RL Commercial officials are understood to have been locked in discussions with Sky since the vote on Monday about what expansion means for the existing contract, and have yet to receive the reassurances they are looking for. Sky has been Super League's broadcast partner since the competition launched in 1996 and around 170 games will be shown live this season, but the value of the contract has dropped significantly in recent years. Officials who were present at the meeting at Headingley that approved expansion have privately admitted that one of their big concerns was how the broadcaster would react to the decision, as well as how the extra games will be financed. Super League clubs are receiving a total of £21.5m from Sky this year compared to £40m in 2021. The comparison with other sports is also alarming, with their £21.5m rights fee less than Sky pays to televise just three Premier League games, while the broadcaster is investing around £20m a year in the Women's Super League from next season in rights fees and production costs. Sky's declining financial backing for rugby league is a major concern for the sport as it prepares to enter the final year of its TV deal, particularly given the limited interest from elsewhere and how reliant rugby league is on its income from the Sky Sports contract. TNT Sports made a speculative offer for the current rights, but it has since spent £200m on a new five-year deal for Premiership Rugby so may not bid again. IMG, the sports marketing agency that manages the grading process which determines Super League membership, are currently leading a tender process for the next broadcast cycle beginning in 2027. Sky declined to comment, but one source at the broadcaster said that rugby league was fighting for its future. In another complication, Sky also broadcasts Australia's National Rugby League, which has held talks about buying a 33% stake in Super League but made clear it sees it as a 10-team competition. Sources in Australia have indicated expansion to 14 teams effectively kills any hope of direct investment into Super League in the near future. With no additional TV money forthcoming following expansion, the Super League clubs have also yet to decide how the extra two teams will be funded next season. A number of clubs are understood to have argued strongly that they will not accept a cut in their own central payments from the Sky deal. Some Championship clubs vying for promotion as part of expansion plans have indicated they would be willing to enter the competition with no central distribution for one season in 2026. Such a move would expose newly promoted clubs to potential financial risk, as well as raise further concerns about the Super League's competitiveness. Financially-troubled Salford were thrashed 82-0 by St Helens at the start of the season, and have conceded 50 points on two more occasions. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion As reported by The Guardian, Hull FC and Hull KR voted against expansion in a meeting at Headingley on Monday, while Wigan abstained amid confusion over the criteria to be used by the RFL panel who will select the two extra teams for next season's competition.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It was so amateurish in 1997, English players had to face Australia after third Lions Test
The Lions' victory, pipping Australia at the post, in Saturday's second Test in Melbourne was just magnificent. I have exchanged a couple of texts with Andy Farrell this week. The dream lives on! What the Lions are; it just gets better... The tourists this week will aim for the first 3-0 whitewash of the professional era and are seeking to complete the first unbeaten tour on foreign soil since I was part of the playing squad in South Africa in 1974 – although, we did win 3-0 in a four-Test series – and the first Test clean sweep since 1927 in Argentina. Farrell and his coaches have made clear their ambition to go and win the series 3-0. They will not rest on their laurels with the series in the bag and, if achieved, it would be very special to this group of players and coaches. For the Lions, winning the series is always the No 1 priority. The uniqueness of Lions tours is that each one has its own characteristics; in terms of the context before travelling and how the journey then evolves. No two tours are ever the same; each one is different. Every tour is a different challenge. Sometimes, it is impossible to recognise that unless you have been in it. Everything is quite personal to the specific playing group and it reflects their approach. This year, the Lions have not had the same calibre of opposition coming right through the tour but, as Australia nearly proved in the second Test, if the tourists are not on their game, they will not win the third Test. They have to go to Sydney with a renewed focus of intent. That was how we approached it in 1997. Even though we lost that third Test in Johannesburg, there was a real ambition to go and win the series 3-0. Even if we had been able to celebrate for a week, we wouldn't have. We celebrated well on the night of the second Test in Durban. Some of the players spent most of the night on the braais (barbecues) in the car park with the South Africans. Some slept on the beach so they only got back to the hotel for breakfast. They had a good celebration. But one of the reasons why comparisons between Lions tours is difficult is that the scheduling is so different. Even with hindsight, I would not change much about that week. We had given the Test XV as much rest and recovery as possible, but the injuries meant that there were players who would be playing two games in that final week. With one training day under our belts, four days later we were in the Test arena once again, for the third Test. In the end South Africa's desperation not to lose every Test gave them the edge, but there was huge satisfaction for all of us in the Lions' group when Martin Johnson raised the Test trophy above his head at the end of the game. And could you have imagined me telling Johnno that he needed a rest ahead of that third Test? I would not have been able to stop him from playing – he would have put a jersey on no matter what. It's so different to how it works now. Player welfare and recovery has moved on for the better but one challenge that Farrell has had has been, with fewer matches and less preparation time, allowing combinations and partnerships from different nations to mature and grow. He has had to do what we did but at ultra-speed. Players need time to grow in a Lions environment; to build relationships – on and off the field – and that takes time. It shows what a good job Farrell has done, in building that core togetherness, which is critical to Lions success. Another issue that hovered in the background of the final week in South Africa was the fact that after the third Test a good number of England players had to be on a plane on the Sunday morning to fly to Australia for a Test against the Wallabies. An incredible request from the Rugby Football Union. That's how amateurish some of the thinking was at the time. Our players had given everything in that Test series. Tim Stimpson, Nick Beal, John Bentley, Mike Catt, Matt Dawson, Graham Rowntree, Mark Regan, Nigel Redman, Shaw, Richard Hill, Lawrence Dallaglio and Tim Rodber – all Lions and a week later they were starting for England in Sydney. Interestingly, the bookmakers had strong odds on a 3-0 Test win for South Africa. Amazingly, the initial contracts for the players said that they'd only get a bonus for winning all three Tests. Fran Cotton, the tour manager, managed to persuade the committee men that the challenge was to win the series and that's where the value was. The committee structures of rugby still at that time still had an amateur viewpoint. Thankfully, Fran succeeded. Andrew Goodman, one of Farrell's assistant coaches, this week cited the 1974 tour as the last time a side went through a Test series unbeaten and how the current crop were hoping to replicate that. That tour was so different – as is the sport – to anything the players have to take on now, but we never really spoke about a clean sweep in 1974. The third Test was the hardest game of rugby I ever played in my life, but the whole thing on that tour was that no one wanted to be wearing the jersey in the first losing team on that trip. That was the intention the whole way through, and over the four Tests there were only two changes to the starting XV, something that stayed with me; the Lions' environment is made by the non-Test players, they are special Lions indeed. While comparisons are futile, that is one parallel which the Lions can channel in Sydney this weekend. To go nine games unbeaten in Australia would be an achievement of which we could all be proud.
