logo
In race to attract data centers, states forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to tech companies

In race to attract data centers, states forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue to tech companies

CNBC4 hours ago

In 2019, the Indiana legislature passed a bill that would offer eligible data centers significant sales tax exemptions. The legislation said facilities packed with state-of-the-art servers could avoid the state's 7% tax when purchasing equipment and power.
The measure was a boon for large tech companies that have been rapidly building out data centers and was heavily backed by a trade association representing the industry.
Similar tax incentives have been passed elsewhere. Today nearly all states that have sales taxes offer data centers exemptions on computers, wires, air-conditioning units and, in some cases, even the energy required to keep it all running.
Demand for data center capacity was already soaring at the time of the Indiana legislation but has picked up exponentially since then due to the artificial intelligence boom sparked by the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT in 2022. Data center investment is now projected to reach $1 trillion by 2027, according to professional services network PwC.
In the race to attract large data centers, states are forfeiting hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue, according to a CNBC analysis. Among the beneficiaries of these exemptions are tech giants such as Amazon, Meta and Google, which all have market caps of over $1 trillion.
Tax breaks have long been a tool states use to compete for businesses. However, watchdog groups said that for data centers the tradeoffs are iffy, because the facilities don't tend to create large numbers of jobs, while the amount of electricity required can be immense.
The growing number of tax breaks has sparked a debate about whether massive corporations should be receiving these generous incentives.
A CNBC analysis determined that 42 states provide full or partial sales tax exemptions to data centers or have no state sales tax at all. Of those, 37 have passed legislation specifically granting sales tax exemptions for data centers, and 16 of those states have granted nearly $6 billion in exemptions over the past five years. The other 21 states that offer similar breaks are not included in the $6 billion total because they do not publicly report how much they have awarded in tax breaks. Eight other states that have sales tax don't give exemptions to data centers.
Only Illinois, Nevada, Missouri and Washington itemize how much companies are getting by recipient. For instance, CNBC found that one Microsoft data center in Illinois received more than $38 million in data center sales tax exemptions but created just 20 permanent jobs. In Washington, the tech giant secured $333 million in sales tax exemptions for its data centers between 2015 and 2023.
Microsoft declined to comment on the tax incentives and job creation tied to its data centers in the two states.
But other states don't publicly disclose this type of granular data. For example, Virginia has an estimated lump-sum exemption of more than $730 million for fiscal year 2024, but the state doesn't offer a detailed breakdown of how much each company received.
It's also not always clear which companies are asking for tax breaks. In 2023, a limited liability company named Hatchworks applied for Indiana's sales tax exemption. After the award was granted, a state filing showed Hatchworks is a subsidiary of Google.
A Google spokesperson told CNBC that using a third-party LLC until project details are finalized is standard practice in economic development projects across industries.
Greg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, a nonprofit research group that tracks corporate subsidies and advocates for transparency and accountability in economic development, has spent more than a decade examining the impact of exemptions nationwide. He said the clear winners are the Big Tech companies.
"There was a giant transfer of wealth from taxpayers to shareholders," LeRoy told CNBC. "Some states, like Virginia, are headed toward billion-dollar annual losses."
Northern Virginia, which is known as the world's data center capital, has examined the economic impact of the data center sales tax exemptions. A 2024 study by the Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee, or JLARC, showed that, on average, the state generated 48 cents in new state revenue for every dollar it did not collect in sales tax between fiscal years 2014 and 2023. Most of this revenue came from personal and corporate income taxes as well as from sales tax on nonexempt purchases, JLARC said.
But that 48 cents is also better than what the state sees from other industries with sales tax exemptions intended to boost economic activity, which, on average, brought in just 17 cents per dollar, according to JLARC. One reason the data center exemption performs better is because it requires companies to create jobs and most other exemptions don't, JLARC said.
The Virginia Economic Development Partnership, the state's economic development authority, declined to comment for this story, referring CNBC to the 2024 JLARC report. In that report, the state classified the exemption as a "moderate economic benefit" when compared with other incentives and said that "like most economic development incentives, the data center exemption does not pay for itself," considering the lost revenue.
LeRoy calls it a losing proposition for taxpayers.
"When tax breaks don't pay for themselves, only two things can happen: Either public services are reduced in quality, or everybody's taxes go up in other ways if you're going to try to keep things the same in terms of quality of public services," he said.
Steve DelBianco, CEO of tech trade association NetChoice, said some tax revenue is better than none.
"The state decided, let's exempt equipment purchases in order to attract more data centers," said DelBianco, whose organization has represented Big Tech companies in Indiana and lobbied on their behalf nationwide. "And when it did so, it still got half of it, the sales tax that it thought it was giving up."
When lobbying on behalf of companies such as Meta, Google and Amazon for sales tax exemptions, DelBianco has said that data centers are a key driver of economic growth.
Between 2021 and 2023, Northern Virginia benefited from 50,700 jobs and $7.2 billion in contributions to the economy, according to the 2024 JLARC report. During that same period, the rest of the state generated 12,100 jobs and contributed $1.3 billion to the economy, JLARC said.
Between fiscal year 2014 and 2023, incentives for data centers provided more financial benefit than all other economic development incentives combined, the JLARC study said. It said most of this growth came from the construction phase of data centers.
Former U.S. Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va., was a member of the Virginia legislature and the lead lawmaker behind its data center sales tax exemption when the legislation passed in 2012. She now serves as an advisor to NetChoice.
In her 2019 Indiana state legislative testimony, Comstock said she viewed the exemptions as a crucial strategy for attracting investments, creating jobs and generating local tax revenue.
In Indiana, consumer watchdog group Citizens Action Coalition said it has been monitoring the sales tax exemptions granted to data centers. Ben Inskeep, the group's program director, said Indiana offers some of the country's most generous subsidies, including a sales tax exemption on energy and equipment for up to 50 years for data centers that invest more than $750 million.
Inskeep said that when the sales tax exemption was passed in 2019, lawmakers didn't anticipate that Big Tech companies would be building out large data centers, thus receiving billions of dollars in tax breaks. He said the facilities create very few permanent jobs.
A 2017 report from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it looked at financial data of "10 major enterprises and service providers that own 244 large data centers across 16 states." It found that during the construction phase, data centers on average employ 1,688 workers. But once they're up and running, they provide only 157 permanent jobs.
By comparison, a 2020 study by two economics professors evaluating state and local business incentives found that aerospace and automobile manufacturers that received firm-specific exemptions between 2002 and 2017 promised more than 2,700 jobs. However, unlike the data center figures, which reflect actual employment averages, the aerospace and automobile job numbers were based on company projections tied to incentive agreements.
"While we find some evidence of direct employment gains from attracting a firm, we do not find strong evidence that firm-specific tax incentives increase broader economic growth at the state and local level," the study's authors wrote.
Then there's the power. The Virginia audit found the data center industry is projected to drive an "immense increase in energy demand." The study predicted that the power demand in Virginia will double in the next 10 years, mainly due to the data center industry.
The report said one of Virginia's smaller data centers used the same amount of energy as 4,500 homes and that the largest new data centers use more energy than most industrial consumers.
While data centers in the state are currently paying the full cost of service, the strain on resources is likely to increase the costs paid by other customers, the report said.
CNBC contacted Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI and Oracle for comment.
Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft all said they work with utility companies to ensure they cover the costs of growth required to meet their data center needs.
Amazon, Google and Microsoft said they also invest in carbon-free and sustainable energy sources — such as wind, solar and nuclear power.
An Amazon spokesperson said incentives play a key role in attracting data centers and require companies to meet strict investment and job creation benchmarks.
Amazon also said it contributed $460 million in property taxes and fees for its data centers in three Virginia counties in 2023 and has invested more than $75 billion in the state since 2011.
Apple, OpenAI and Oracle did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sister Managed Schizophrenia for Years, Until AI Told Her Diagnosis Was Wrong
Sister Managed Schizophrenia for Years, Until AI Told Her Diagnosis Was Wrong

Newsweek

time20 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Sister Managed Schizophrenia for Years, Until AI Told Her Diagnosis Was Wrong

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Many people looking for quick, cheap help with their mental health are turning to artificial intelligence (AI), but ChatGPT may even be exacerbating issues for vulnerable users, according to a report from Futurism. The report details alarming interactions between the AI chatbot and people with serious psychiatric conditions, including one particularly concerning case involved a woman with schizophrenia who had been stable on medication for years. 'Best friend' The woman's sister told Futurism that the woman began relying on ChatGPT, which allegedly told her she was not schizophrenic. The advice of the AI led her to stop taking her prescribed medication and she began referring to the AI as her "best friend." "She's stopped her meds and is sending 'therapy-speak' aggressive messages to my mother that have been clearly written with AI," the sister told Futurism. She added that the woman uses ChatGPT to reference side effects, even ones she wasn't actually experiencing. Stock image: Woman surrounded by blurred people representing schizophrenia. Stock image: Woman surrounded by blurred people representing schizophrenia. Photo by Tero Vesalainen / Getty Images In an emailed statement to Newsweek, an OpenAI spokesperson said, "we have to approach these interactions with care," as AI becomes a bigger part of modern life. "We know that ChatGPT can feel more responsive and personal than prior technologies, especially for vulnerable individuals, and that means the stakes are higher," the spokesperson said. 'Our models encourage users to seek help' OpenAI is working to better understand and reduce ways ChatGPT might unintentionally "reinforce or amplify" existing, negative behavior, the spokesperson continued. "When users discuss sensitive topics involving self-harm and suicide, our models are designed to encourage users to seek help from licensed professionals or loved ones, and in some cases, proactively surface links to crisis hotlines and resources." OpenAI is apparently "actively deepening" its research into the emotional impact of AI, the spokesperson added. "Following our early studies in collaboration with MIT Media Lab, we're developing ways to scientifically measure how ChatGPT's behavior might affect people emotionally, and listening closely to what people are experiencing. "We're doing this so we can continue refining how our models identify and respond appropriately in sensitive conversations, and we'll continue updating the behavior of our models based on what we learn." A Recurring Problem Some users have found comfort from ChatGPT. One user told Newsweek in August 2024 that they use it for therapy, "when I keep ruminating on a problem and can't seem to find a solution." Another user said he talks to ChatGPT for company ever since his wife died, noting that "it doesn't fix the pain. But it absorbs it. It listens when no one else is awake. It remembers. It responds with words that don't sound empty." However, chatbots are increasingly linked to mental health deterioration among some users who engage them for emotional or existential discussions. A report from The New York Times found that some users have developed delusional beliefs after prolonged use of generative AI systems, particularly when the bots validate speculative or paranoid thinking. In several cases, chatbots affirmed users' perceptions of alternate realities, spiritual awakenings or conspiratorial narratives, occasionally offering advice that undermines mental health. Researchers have found that AI can exhibit manipulative or sycophantic behavior in ways that appear personalized, especially during extended interactions. Some models affirm signs of psychosis more than half the time when prompted. Mental health experts warn that while most users are unaffected, a subset may be highly vulnerable to the chatbot's responsive but uncritical feedback, leading to emotional isolation or harmful decisions. Despite known risks, there are currently no standardized safeguards requiring companies to detect or interrupt these escalating interactions. Reddit Reacts Redditors on the r/Futurology subreddit agreed that ChatGPT users need to be careful. "The trap these people are falling into is not understanding that chatbots are designed to come across as nonjudgmental and caring, which makes their advice worth considering," one user commented. "I don't even think its possible to get ChatGPT to vehemently disagree with you on something." One individual, meanwhile, saw an opportunity for dark humor: "Man. Judgement Day is a lot more lowkey than we thought it would be," they quipped. If you or someone you know is considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by dialing 988, text "988" to the Crisis Text Line at 741741 or go to

What Lt. Col. Boz and Big Tech's Enlisted Execs Will Do in the Army
What Lt. Col. Boz and Big Tech's Enlisted Execs Will Do in the Army

WIRED

time37 minutes ago

  • WIRED

What Lt. Col. Boz and Big Tech's Enlisted Execs Will Do in the Army

Jun 20, 2025 10:26 AM Meta CTO Andrew "Boz" Bosworth and leaders from OpenAI and Palantir have joined a detachment intended to make the US Armed Forces "force leaner, smarter, and more lethal." OpenAI's product head, Kevin Weil, and Meta's chief technology officer, Andrew 'Boz' Bosworth. Photo-Illustration:When I read a tweet about four noted Silicon Valley executives being inducted into a special detachment of the United States Army Reserve, including Meta CTO Andrew 'Boz' Bosworth, I questioned its veracity. It's very hard to discern truth from satire in 2025, in part because of social media sites owned by Bosworth's company. But it indeed was true. According to an official press release, they're in the Army now, specifically Detachment 201: the Executive Innovation Corps. Boz is now Lieutenant Colonel Bosworth. The other newly commissioned officers include Kevin Weil, OpenAI's head of product; Bob McGrew, a former OpenAI head of research now advising Mira Murati's company Thinking Machines Lab; and Shyam Sankar, the CTO of Palantir. These middle-aged tech execs were sworn into their posts wearing camo fatigues, as if they just wandered off some Army base in Kandahar, to join a corps that is named after an HTTP status code. (Colonel David Butler, communications adviser to the Army chief of staff, told me their dress uniforms weren't ready yet.) Detachment 201, wrote the Army in a press release, is part of a military-wide transformation initiative that 'aims to make the force leaner, smarter, and more lethal.' The Army's Executive Innovation Corps (EIC) commissioning ceremony in Conmy Hall, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, Va., June 13, 2025. Photograph: Leroy Council/DVIDS Don't blame Donald Trump for this. The program has been in the works for over a year, the brainchild of Brynt Parmeter, the Pentagon's first chief talent management officer. Parmeter, a former combat soldier who headed veteran support at Walmart before joining the Department of Defense in 2023, had been pondering how to bring experienced technologists into service to update an insufficiently tech-savvy militia when he met Sankar at a conference early last year. The idea, he says, was to create 'an Oppenheimer-like situation' where senior executives could serve right away, while keeping their current jobs. Both men collaborated on a plan to bring in people like, well, Sankar, who has been a vocal cheerleader of the Valley's recent embrace of the military, proclaiming that the US is in an 'undeclared state of emergency' that requires a tech-led military rehaul. When the Wall Street Journal wrote about the forthcoming program last October, Sankar vowed to be 'first in line.' In a sign that it's no longer taboo in the Valley to face the fact that its creations go hand in hand with boosting deadly force in the military, the program was fast-tracked and is now in operation. 'Ten years ago this probably would have gotten me canceled,' Weil told me. 'It's a much better state of the world where people look at this and go, 'Oh, wow, this is important. Freedom is not free.'' This is an essay from the latest edition of Steven Levy's Plaintext newsletter. SIGN UP for Plaintext to read the whole thing, and tap Steven's unique insights and unmatched contacts for the long view on tech. The four new officers are full members of the Army Reserve. Unlike other reservists, however, they will not be required to undergo basic training, though they will undergo less immersive fitness and shooting training after induction. They will also have the flexibility to spend some of the approximately 120 annual hours working remotely, a perk not offered to other reservists. The Army also says that these men will not be sent to battle, so they will not be risking their lives in potential theaters of war in Iran, Greenland, or downtown Los Angeles, California. Their mission is to use their undeniable expertise to school their colleagues and superiors in the military on how to utilize cutting-edge technologies for efficiency and deadly force. One might assume the Army would have done an extensive study of the specific talents required for this pilot program and pulled those people from an open call for the best candidates. That did not happen. Sankar helped recruit the other three future officers—all male, which by intention or coincidence seems to satisfy the anti-DEI bent of today's military—and they all accepted. According to Butler, 'Lieutenant Colonel Sankar said 'I want to wear the uniform. And I have three other guys willing to go with me.'' Weil confirms that he joined after a request from Sankar. (Parmeter said to me that since this is a pilot program with an unknown outcome, a closed process was appropriate.) Clearly, the four new officers genuinely want to serve their country. Weil, who I've known for years, told me that when Sankar explained the program, 'I was just like, 'Yes, I want to help—that sounds amazing.'' But during a wave of widespread unease over privileges of tech elite—did you see those disgusting billionaire bros on that show Mountainhead ?—special arrangements for well-off digital achievers seems tone-deaf. My big question is whether these men could have provided the same assistance from the private sector. Parmeter and Butler both cited precedent of cases where top executives were directly commissioned, including a top railway executive in 1917, the head of a gas and electric company in 1944, and the General Motors Company president in 1942. But those were full-time roles during world wars. Parmeter also reminded me that many currently serving reservists are already in the tech industry, including, he claimed, some generals at Google(!). Presumably none of them, however, began their military careers as senior officers, and they presumably do not receive special dispensation to perform some of their service from home. Another program, the Defense Digital Service, gives tech workers a chance to lend expertise to the Pentagon full time for up to two years. What's more, Parmeter conceded that the military already has a trusted adviser program, where civilians could work part or full time on projects. "That's obviously still going on, and that's something that is useful,' he says. 'But in this case, we wanted to go beyond that.' The Army says that there is no conflict of interest in having these privately employed officers provide advice on high-tech subjects. They will have no say in what contracts the Army makes with the private sector. The expertise they offer, however, seems inseparable from the sectors of AI, VR, and data mining at the center of their companies' business models. Maybe it's just bad timing, but the month before Bosworth was sworn in, Meta announced a deal with Anduril, a defense contractor co-founded by former fired employee Palmer Luckey, to pursue military contracts. Around the time Lt Col Weil raised a hand beside Boz, OpenAI announced a $200 million defense contract: it's also working with Anduril to develop an air defense system. Sankar's employer Palantir has billions of dollars worth of government deals, including a $759 million Army contract for advanced AI systems. (Thinking Machines Lab, which McGrew advises, is still in semi-stealth, so there's no news of its plans for military contracts.) Also, while these soldiers are serving in a personal capacity, their employers will undoubtedly benefit from the inside-the-perimeter knowledge that they will gather while simultaneously working on military contracts. Lieutenant Kevin Weil, OpenAI's head of product and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy A. George Photograph: Leroy Council/DVIDS OK, so what will they do ? Parmeter provides a hypothetical scenario: the commander of the Indo-Pacific region is figuring out how to address threats in the Far East over the next five to 10 years. They might ask Detachment 201 to tell them how the future state of machine learning and AI would affect security in that context. Or, the new officers might operate more tactically, advising how soldiers could use new tools to understand battlefield conditions. This kind of sounds like… consulting. Weil argues, however, that advice coming from an actual officer would be more seriously heeded: 'There's nothing wrong with being a contractor,' he says. 'But if we're off supporting an exercise somewhere, it's different that we're wearing the same uniform, having taken the same oath.' A more serious consequence might come from these men having dual loyalty when setting policy at their private companies. Companies like Meta, Open AI, and Thinking Machines Lab are helping create superintelligence that could profoundly impact the world. OpenAI is among those companies that prohibit their models from being used to harm others, and that includes developing weapons. But the mission of the US military is exactly the opposite. Working inside the Army, these recruits are explicitly charged with making the technologies more lethal—in fact, in a hearing this very week, Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll told Senators that the Army Transformation Initiative, which involves Detachment 201, will eliminate programs that do not contribute to lethality. Who will these officers be serving when they make those determinations? (Weil emphatically tells me that his service is a personal matter, and in any case there are plenty of uses for AI in the military that don't involve killing.) When I brought this issue up to Parmeter, he said that when determining the direction of future AI at their companies, the officers' wider perspective would be a plus. Then again, Parmeter did mention Oppenheimer, who created the atom bomb. Bottom line: Sankar, Bosworth, Weil, and McGrew are soldiers now, even if critics are already accusing them of being rich tech bros cosplaying the real thing. Considering the optics, they would do well to avoid any chest-thumping. Weil displayed humility when I spoke to him. But an op-ed Sankar wrote in the Free Press to explain his motives hit a sour note. Though much of it set out the benefits of a private tech industry in sync with the military, and his family's inspiring American immigrant story (which might not have happened under current Trump policies), he veered into self-aggrandizement. 'None of these men need to pad their résumé,' he wrote of his Detachment 201 blood brothers and, by implication, himself. 'None have free time between fatherhood, demanding day jobs, and a dozen other demands. But all feel called to serve.' Forgive me for thinking that their sacrifices rank in the bottom rung of what the vast majority of soldiers experience. In our conversation,Weil, again, was humble about becoming an instant senior officer, a rank given to reflect his achievements in private life. 'I'm still a little bit sensitive to the title, because there's so many people that have given their lives or spent their lives dedicated to this,' he told me. 'So I want to earn the title.' I have no idea how their Army-mates will regard them, but all who hold lower ranks, including life-long soldiers and veterans of combat, will be required to salute the Detachment 201 lieutenant colonels on sight. According to Butler, these overnight officers haven't yet mastered the art of crisply returning those salutes. 'They've got a bit of work to do,' he told me. Weil is correct when he says that a decade ago, Silicon Valley would have condemned him for accepting his post. He was working for Facebook as Instagram's head of product during the time that Luckey was tossed out of the company for supporting Donald Trump and lavishingly expressing his fondness for the military. In my book Facebook: The Inside Story I describe how in 2016 Palmer Luckey alienated Mark Zuckerberg and the Facebook workforce—by acting like Zuckerberg would act in 2025. All is copesetic now as the two are partners in developing VR technology for today's military. Luckey was a political conservative, supporting the right wing with the same enthusiasm he devoted to fast food, cosplay photos with his girlfriend, and soldering artisanal computer peripherals. He was a huge admirer of the military. [Brendan] Iribe [cofounder of Oculus] remembers that he once got a call saying Luckey had driven a tank on the Facebook campus. The police had been called. The vehicle was Luckey's Humvee, repurposed from military service with toy machine guns attached to the postings. [The orange-colored guns were clearly not operational.] To Facebook's workers though, it might as well have been a nuclear bomb. Luckey defused the situation and wound up posing for pictures with the cops, but the incident was a black mark on his record. 'Here at Facebook, you can't drive Humvees with guns—military vehicles—onto the lot and have the police show up,' says Iribe. 'That's not what we're focused on here.' Madhu on Bluesky asks, 'If all of us adopted AI to write our medical clinic notes, how will that impact our carbon footprint?' Thanks for the question, Madhu. You are correct in implying that AI large language models consume considerable electricity. Writing medical clinic notes probably isn't the biggest worry, though. The actual numbers are fuzzy, maybe intentionally. But according to Nature, for a chatbot to find something, it consumes 23 to 30 times the energy of a Google search. And it's going to get worse. For instance, consider AI agents, which nearly everyone agrees are the next step for LLMs. I recently learned that compared to simple prompts and outputs, tasks where LLMs essentially query the world to fulfill and verify people's requests have jaw-droppingly higher power demands. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has estimated that reasoning-based agentic AI will require 100 times the computation, and thus the power consumption, of the current paradigm. As you suspect, this will not be great for the environment. Submit your questions in the comments below, or send an email to mail@ Write ASK LEVY in the subject line. End Times Chronicle In a 'Bible Prophecy Update,' Christian commentator Greg Laurie cited 'super signs' in the Middle East that the Last Days may be on track and advised readers to prepare. Last but Not Least How activists helped Elon Musk pay the price for DOGE-ing the government. Visiting the United States or returning from a trip abroad? Here's how to protect your information at the border when you return. A bulked-up visit to the Steroid Olympics. Former WIRED editor Megan Greenwell talks about her book on private equity. She's not a fan. Don't miss future subscriber-only editions of this column. Subscribe to WIRED (50% off for Plaintext readers) today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store