After 22 Years on the Run for Broadcasting the Truth, Falun Gong Practitioner Dies in Exile
Wang Zhanhai, a Falun Gong practitioner from northern China, died on May 10, 2024, after 22 years of exile, according to news published this month by
Wang was forced into hiding after participating in a covert broadcast that exposed the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) persecution of Falun Gong.
In January 2001, the CCP
Since the CCP's nationwide persecution of Falun Gong began in 1999, practitioners have risked imprisonment and death to counter the state's defamatory narrative. Their efforts include
On Feb. 16, 2002, Wang and six other Falun Gong practitioners in Anshan City, Liaoning Province, tapped into the local cable network at 7 p.m. to air a documentary called '
This was one of the first television network interception efforts recorded by Minghui.
Exposing the CCP Hoax
The attempt to bring this information to the public came at a steep cost.
Related Stories
5/5/2025
4/29/2025
Police located the group during the operation and opened fire, shooting practitioner Xu Zhaobin in the leg and face.
Wang managed to escape, fled his hometown, and remained in hiding for the next 22 years. The other six were captured in the next several weeks. All received severe punishment.
File photo: Zhang Li.
Courtesy of Minghui
Zhang Li, arrested on March 3, 2002, was interrogated and tortured in the First Detention Center of Anshan City. She died on Aug. 27 in the same year after being denied medical treatment despite being in critical condition. Witnesses described her body as 'scored with bloody knife wounds.' She was 40.
The remaining five—Wei Zhiyi, Shen Hailong, Xu Zhaobin, Li Guihong, and He Xiaoqiu—were
Wang's Fight for Justice
In 2015, while still in hiding, Wang filed a criminal complaint against Jiang. He accused the former CCP leader of 'throwing hundreds of millions of kind-hearted people and their families into turmoil and devastating basic human conscience and the moral foundation essential for a stable and sustainable society.'
Wang wrote that Falun Gong had improved his health and helped him become a better person. But once the persecution began, he endured constant harassment, including from local police, factory supervisors, and others. He was stalked, pressured to renounce his beliefs, fined, and forced to resign from his job.
Wang said he and his fellow practitioners then decided to do something to raise the public awareness of the persecution. In addition to handing out flyers, they thought of a better way to let more people know about the truth: intercepting the local cable system.
After the 2002 broadcast, he was listed as a fugitive.
'The police tapped my home phone, harassed my family, and even revoked my wife's small subsidy—leaving her and our child in deep financial trouble,' Wang wrote. 'They tried to bribe my friends to find me. During holidays, officers staked out my parents' house. Everyone in my family lived under unbearable pressure.'
Unable to work or go out, Wang lived in constant fear. He couldn't care for his elderly parents or support his family, he said. He described the toll as 'unimaginable' in terms of physical, emotional, and financial stress.
His health declined in the years that followed before his death last year. Due to China's tight censorship, his death was only confirmed and reported by Minghui on May 6, 2025.
Wang Zhanhai.
Courtesy of Minghui
Speaking Out for All of Humanity
Wang Zhiyuan, president and spokesperson of the World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFG), said Falun Gong practitioners risk their lives not just for their own sake, but 'for the people, the society, and the nation.'
He told The Epoch Times on Thursday that practitioners outside China are also speaking out—not only on behalf of those suffering inside the country, but also 'to defend freedom and truth for all humanity.'
Bypassing the Firewall
Falun Gong—also known as Falun Dafa—is a spiritual discipline based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and forbearance. Introduced by Mr. Li Hongzhi in 1992, it grew rapidly due to its health and moral benefits, attracting at least 70 million followers by the late 1990s.
Fearing Falun Gong's popularity, the CCP launched a sweeping nationwide suppression in 1999. State media and propaganda arms were mobilized to discredit the practice.
Despite extreme surveillance, including the deployment of more than
The 2022 documentary '
Promotional materials for the documentary "Eternal Spring" are on display at the Film Forum in New York, on Oct. 14, 2022.
Chung I Ho/The Epoch Times
Inspired by their counterparts in China, Falun Gong practitioners overseas helped develop anti-censorship tools such as FreeGate, UltraSurf, and Dynaweb. These tools bypass the regime's 'Golden Shield,' also known as the Great Firewall, which monitors and censors internet access in China.
Author and China expert Ethan Gutmann praised the movement,
More Support Needed
Prominent Chinese dissident Yuan Hongbing, now based in Australia, called the CCP 'the most evil authoritarian regime in human history.' In an interview with The Epoch Times on Thursday, he warned that the spread of communist totalitarianism poses a threat to global civilization.
'For years, Falun Gong practitioners have carried out tireless and courageous truth-clarification efforts,' Yuan said. 'What they are doing is tearing through the CCP's ideological iron curtain, allowing free thought and ideals to flow into China like a spring breeze. This is an immensely meaningful movement to save the hearts and minds of the Chinese people.'
He also pointed to a rise in the CCP's overseas suppression of Falun Gong, with the communist regime spreading false information and employing legal tactics to target the group.
'It's hate-driven persecution from a dictatorship,' he said, urging the international community to respond with strong countermeasures.
On May 5, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the
WOIPFG's Wang Zhiyuan expressed appreciation to the United States for passing the bill, and he called on Western democracies to stand by the U.S. in support of Falun Gong.
'We need real action—not just symbolic support or oral sanctions,' he said. 'Only concrete steps can stop the persecution and dismantle the CCP.'
Luo Ya, Mary Hong, and Joan Delaney contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Dutch Defense Minister Warns of Escalating Chinese Spy Operations
Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans warned Saturday that Chinese cyber espionage targeting the Netherlands is intensifying, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) particularly focused on stealing advanced semiconductor technology. 'The semiconductor industry, which we are technologically leading—or technology advanced, of course—to get that intellectual property, that's interesting to China,' Brekelmans told Reuters on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore on May 30.
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration's move against Chinese students is an overreach, experts say
Advertisement In announcing the move late Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave few specifics, offering only that the U.S. government would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Related : How that vaguely defined standard will be enforced is not yet clear, but the directive is part of a broad campaign by the Trump administration to force major changes in American higher education. College campuses, administration officials say, are in crisis, and only the federal government is willing and able to fix the problems. Senior White House adviser Stephen Miller on Friday outlined what the administration viewed as a threat to its interests. 'We're not going to be awarding visas to individuals who have a risk of being engaged in any form of malign conduct in the United States, which of course would include espionage, theft of trade secrets, theft of technology or other actions that would degrade the security of our industrial base,' he said. Advertisement Some 277,000 students from China attended school in the United States last year, second only to the number of students from India. Federal authorities have long grappled with the challenge of trying to prevent individuals from within that large group from stealthily siphoning critical technology or expertise to Chinese companies or government officials. Milonovich said that U.S. officials had long worried about the risks posed by some Chinese students but that the administration's most recent push would ultimately harm the advancement of U.S. technology. Some students arrive in the United States with preexisting affiliations with Chinese government and intelligence agencies, while 'many others are contacted, recruited or co-opted while they are in the U.S. studying,' he said. Related : Authorities say that is what happened when Yanqing Ye came to study science at Boston University. Ye, according to an indictment unsealed in 2020, was a lieutenant in the Chinese army before she arrived in the United States, and as a student in Boston, she continued to carry out assignments for her Chinese superior officers, sending American documents and information to China. Still, Milonovich added, given that the United States employs 'tremendous numbers' of scientific and technological experts originally from China or other foreign countries, 'we need this continued pipeline of intellect and skill.' Peter Zeidenberg, a lawyer who has defended college professors accused or suspected of economic espionage, said that the administration had yet to articulate the national security danger it is trying to avoid, but that it had already succeeded in scaring talented people away from the United States. Advertisement 'This is a self-defeating and self-destructive strategy, if you can call it a strategy,' he said. 'These students fill our labs and they perform all the research. They're some of the smartest, most talented scientists in America and I have no idea how these labs are going to operate without them.' Related : FBI officials have long argued that China is engaged in a relentless and far-reaching effort to steal as much scientific expertise as it can from the United States, to benefit Chinese companies and markets. National security officials say that while much of that suspicious activity occurs in the business world, a great deal also goes on among college researchers. To counter that threat, federal agents have for years delivered classified briefings to select college officials, and broader warnings to colleges generally. While those efforts have produced a significant number of tips and criminal cases, they also have elicited some controversy and distrust between educators and investigators. In 2018, the FBI director, Christopher Wray, faulted what he called the 'naivete' of some college administrators toward the danger posed by Chinese students, teachers, and researchers. 'The use of nontraditional collectors, especially in the academic setting -- whether it's professors, scientists, students -- we see in almost every field office that the FBI has around the country,' he said. That year, the Justice Department began what it called the China Initiative, to crack down on trade secret theft, including at universities. Most of the criminal cases that emerged from the initiative focused on professors rather than students. Yet not all of those indictments won convictions in court, and critics accused federal prosecutors and agents of casting a cynical eye at people of Chinese descent. In the face of such criticism, the Biden administration shuttered the initiative in 2022, though it continued to investigate possible crimes by Chinese academics. Advertisement The security concerns around Chinese students did not disappear, and in fact go back decades. In 1998, a congressional report warned that the FBI 'has inadequate resources in light of the extensive numbers' of visitors from China, including 'students, diplomats, business representatives and others who may be involved in intelligence and military-related technology transfer operations in the United States.' Current and former officials have said that the resources to monitor and investigate possible student spies only face further strain given the administration's focus on immigration. It has pressed hundreds of FBI agents into duty backing up Department of Homeland Security agents seeking to apprehend and deport immigrants living in the country illegally. This article originally appeared in
Fox News
7 hours ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Why do elite universities take in students tied to foreign foes? Money, of course
For centuries, the traditional role of elite universities like Harvard has been to train the next generation of leaders in every field of endeavor, to hold before them an open door to power and influence. So why on Earth are we holding that door open to communist Chinese nationals? I had a good friend in high school, sharp as a tack, double legacy at Yale, graduated Harvard Law and by 30 she was at the State Department. The joke was, "Don't piss off Becca, she can pick up the phone and have you killed." The point here is that, for better or worse, and it's often the latter, graduates of top schools are meant to create a class of people who lead the country, who lead its industries and sciences, who stay at the Princeton Club in midtown, and wear their college ties. A top American degree opens up a world of the powerful that most Americans don't even know exists, much less ever interact with. Yet thousands and thousands of communist Chinese nationals are invited to this table every year. Why? There may have been a time when this influx of foreign students could be seen as exerting informational power around the globe, the idea being these students will go home and spread the gospel of democracy, free markets, and blue jeans. But let's not kid ourselves, these scions of Chinese Communist Party members who pay their way at Harvard aren't going home and creating movements for democracy in Beijing, not if they want to make it to grad school alive and well. In fact, we are the decided losers in this informational power exchange, as not just the Chinese, but Qataris, and 10,000 Iranian students for good measure, bring ideas and attitudes that undermine American foreign policy to the doorstep of the very people who will implement it. This brings us back to the question: Why are we doing this? Why are we training our foes and giving them access to the inner corridors of American power, and I'm sure nobody will be shocked that the answer is money. Foreign interests lavish our top universities with gifts like a rich guy who got caught cheating on his wife. In just the last five years, the Harvard Crimson reports $151 million from foreign governments and over a billion from foreign donors flowed to Cambridge. For hundreds of years, Harvard had educated the nation's great industrialists, financiers, and business magnates who kept the coffers of its endowment, still at a robust $52 billion, overflowing. But the blue-blood spigot is running dry. No, the non-binary womyns studies majors at the Harvard Divinity School are not going to be donating a new football stadium anytime soon. For that, these institutions have learned to rely on foreign money, and we all know that money ain't free. The money buys influence, it buys some say in how our nation conducts itself. During COVID, with a few notable exceptions, our country's entire healthcare apparatus just nodded along slavishly to every lie China and its mouthpiece the World Health Organization uttered. Why do you think that happened? It happened because China pays for research. It happened because China infiltrates the highest levels of our society, and sadly, they have become quite expert at it. Secretary of State Marco Rubio is obviously right to insist that we vigorously investigate any student from any nation that is a political or ideological foe of the United States, and frankly, any association with the Chinese Communist Party should be a dealbreaker. The first Harvard graduate to become the president of the United States was John Adams, who once famously wrote of his revolutionary adventures, "I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy." But today, it is our sons and daughters losing opportunities to study mathematics and philosophy to people from countries that hate America, and it is also those countries which stand the most to gain in terms of politics and war. American universities need to be American universities, not cosmopolitan, non-affiliated islands of corrupt foreign influence, and if the Harvards of the world can't be that, then places like conservative Hillsdale College or the University of Austin may well need to replace them. If Harvard and other storied elite universities want to return to serving the mission of helping America to be great, it would be welcome. But in the meantime, we don't have to give them taxpayer money, and we don't have to let them invite our enemies into the inner circle of American power.
