Baku Seeking to Diffuse Tensions between Israel, Türkiye in Syria
Azerbaijan's top foreign policy adviser Hikmet Hajiyev told AFP that Baku has hosted more than three rounds of talks between Türkiye and Israel, who are both operating in Syria to reduce what they see as security threats.
'Azerbaijan is making diplomatic efforts for an agreement,' Hajiyev told Turkish journalists in Baku on a visit organized by the Istanbul-based Global Journalism Council. 'Both Türkiye and Israel trust us.'
The overthrow of Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad sparked security concerns in Israel.
It has since staged hundreds of strikes deep inside Syria, the latest on Friday, to allegedly stop advanced weapons falling into the hands of Syria's extremists and to protect the Druze minority.
Israel has accused Ankara of seeking to turn Syria into a Turkish protectorate, raising fears of a confrontation.
In Azerbaijan, President Ilham Aliyev is considered a close ally of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He has consistently aligned himself with Ankara's positions on key international matters, including the Syrian issue.
Azerbaijan also enjoys good relations with Israel, which is very reliant on Azerbaijani oil, and is a major arms supplier to Baku.
And now Baku, which has established contacts with Syria's new rulers, is pushing quiet diplomacy by facilitating technical talks between Türkiye and Israel.
'We are successful if the two parties agree on a common model that respects each other's concerns,' Farid Shafiyev, chairman of the Baku-based Center for Analysis of International Relations, told AFP.
'Syria, and especially its northern territories, is the Turkish security concern,' he said.
Türkiye wants to control northern Syria but also to 'have a stronger presence' around the Palmyra and T4 airbases to ensure security around Damascus, he added.
In facilitating Türkiye-Israel dialogue on Syria, Azerbaijan is playing a 'strategic role,' said Zaur Mammadov, chairman of Baku Political Scientists Club.
'(It) reflects Azerbaijan's growing influence as a mediator... among regional actors,' he said.
Azerbaijan fought two wars with arch-foe Armenia for control of the disputed Karabakh region -- one in the 1990s and another in 2020 -- before it managed to seize the entire area in a 24-hour offensive in September 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
‘Trump can stop the war in Gaza,' says former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert
In this episode of Global News Today, presented by Tom Burges Watson, we bring you the latest on Gaza where Israel has issued new evacuation orders ahead of a planned military offensive. Thousands of Palestinians are fleeing Gaza City as the Israeli army is set to intensify operations, prompting growing international concern over the humanitarian situation on the ground. We examine the unfolding crisis with on-the-ground reporting, satellite imagery, and firsthand accounts from civilians and aid workers caught in the crossfire. As the pressure mounts, the United Nations warns of a worsening catastrophe, with limited access to food, water, and medical care for those unable to flee. We feature an exclusive interview with a former Israeli prime minister who shares insight on Israel's military strategy, the objectives behind the latest planned offensive, and the broader political implications for the region.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Netanyahu's plan to reoccupy Gaza is a deadly delusion
Benjamin Netanyahu is once again playing with fire — only this time it threatens not just Gaza, but Israel itself, the broader region, and what remains of a fragile international order. The Israeli leader's reckless scheme to reoccupy Gaza is not merely shortsighted; it is criminal in intent, catastrophic in consequence, and dripping with the arrogance of a man who believes he can bend history to his will. Let us be clear: The idea of reoccupying Gaza is not about security. It is not about peace. It is about one thing and one thing only: Netanyahu's desperate bid to cling to power, evade accountability for his corruption charges, and present himself to the Israeli public as a strongman at a time when his leadership is defined by chaos, failure, and bloodshed. Gaza, once again, is being used as a pawn in his political survival game. Netanyahu sells the illusion that sending Israeli tanks back into Gaza will somehow bring security to Israel. But history has already written the verdict: Occupation breeds resistance. The decades-long suffocation of Gaza has done nothing but radicalize new generations who see no horizon, no dignity, no life worth living under perpetual siege. Does Netanyahu truly believe that by reoccupying Gaza, by tightening the noose around 2 million people, he will extinguish their will to resist? On the contrary, he will ignite a firestorm of resistance fiercer than ever before. The Israeli military may occupy land, but it cannot occupy hearts. And the more brutal the occupation, the deeper the rage, the stronger the determination, the longer the conflict burns. Security built on the graves of starving children and bombed-out families is not security; it is barbarism masquerading as defense. What makes Netanyahu's plan especially vile is his willingness to weaponize humanitarian suffering. Gaza today is already enduring famine conditions. Children are wasting away as food and medicine are deliberately withheld. Hospitals are reduced to rubble. Entire neighborhoods are flattened. And still, Netanyahu talks of 'managing' Gaza, as though human beings can be managed like cattle. What he proposes is not management; it is subjugation. It is the calculated use of hunger, displacement, and despair to force a population into submission. It is collective punishment on a scale that meets every definition of a war crime. Justice will never emerge from the barrel of an occupying tank. Hani Hazaimeh The Israeli leader dares to cloak his scheme in the language of 'stability.' But whose stability? Certainly not Gaza's. Not the region's. It is only the stability of his grip on power that he seeks. The tragedy is not Netanyahu alone. It is the silence — or, worse, the complicity — of the so-called international community. Washington mumbles about 'restraint,' but continues to bankroll the very bombs raining down on Gaza. Europe, forever haunted by its own guilt, lectures about 'two states,' while rewarding Israel with trade deals and diplomatic cover. A reoccupation of Gaza would be the match that lights this regional powder keg. Israel may think itself powerful, but no army, however advanced, can withstand the cumulative fury of millions pushed to desperation. What Netanyahu offers is not a vision but a nightmare. He would reduce Gaza to an open-air prison policed directly by the Israeli army, stripped of any semblance of autonomy, permanently dependent on Israel's whims for survival. He would condemn generations of Palestinians to lives of humiliation and despair, and in so doing, guarantee that Israelis themselves would never know peace. Because peace is not built on domination. It is built on justice. And justice will never emerge from the barrel of an occupying tank. The world must not allow this scheme to succeed. To reoccupy Gaza would be not only a moral abomination but also a strategic disaster that ensures endless conflict. Those who claim to stand for human rights must prove it now, by cutting the weapons shipments, conditioning aid, holding Israel accountable in international courts, and refusing to normalize relations with a government that tramples every principle of humanity. And for the Israeli people, the question is this: How long will you allow one man's delusions to drag your nation into perpetual war? Netanyahu does not act for your security. He acts for himself. The blood that will be spilled — Palestinian and Israeli alike — will stain his hands, but history will not forget the silence of those who allowed him to carry on. Netanyahu's plan is not just a policy, it is a declaration of perpetual war. It is an attempt to suffocate a people into nonexistence. And it is a gamble that will fail, as every attempt to crush the Palestinian spirit has failed before. But the cost of his failure will not be borne by him alone. It will be borne by the starving children of Gaza, the grieving families of Israel, and the stability of an entire region already teetering on the edge. This is the hour of reckoning. Netanyahu's delusions must be confronted with clarity, courage, and unyielding resistance — political, legal, and moral. The world has a choice: to stand by as Gaza is dragged back into the abyss of occupation, or to draw a line and say, enough. For the sake of justice, peace, and our shared humanity — enough. • Hani Hazaimeh is a senior editor based in Amman. X: @hanihazaimeh
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
UN warns situation in Syria remains fragile amid shaky ceasefire
NEW YORK CITY: The UN's special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, told the Security Council on Thursday that the situation in the country remains 'deeply fragile,' with a ceasefire in Sweida under growing strain and political tensions on the rise. He urged the international community to renew its efforts to protect civilians, ensure accountability, and support a Syrian-led political process that is capable of delivering lasting peace. Marking the anniversary of the 2013 chemical weapons attack in Ghouta, carried out by the forces of former President Bashar Assad, Pedersen described the occasion as 'a painful reminder of the suffering endured by Syrian civilians, and of the grave abuses and violations of international law that must never be repeated.' He urged council members to help Syria 'emerge from a dark past toward a brighter future.' The July 19 ceasefire agreement in Sweida has so far prevented a return to open conflict following a spike in violence, Pedersen said, but he warned that the peace remains tenuous. 'We are still seeing dangerous hostilities and skirmishes on the margins of Sweida and violence could resume at any moment,' he said. 'Absent more tangible and binding measures, including to build confidence, the ceasefire risks remaining fragile — an interim truce rather than the foundation for lasting stability.' He welcomed the creation by the US, Jordan and Syrian authorities of a trilateral working group to support the truce. However, he cautioned that 'a month of relative military calm belies a worsening political climate, with escalatory and zero-sum rhetoric hardening among many.' He also condemned ongoing Israeli ground operations in southwestern Syria, despite a pause in airstrikes. 'Such actions are unacceptable,' Pedersen said. 'We must insist on full respect for Syria's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity.' The humanitarian cost of unrest, he added, remains severe, with more than 186,000 people displaced in Sweida, Daraa and rural Damascus. Access to affected areas is limited as a result of insecurity and road closures, and widespread damage to infrastructure compounds the suffering. Referring to reports of abuses during fighting in Sweida last month, including a video that appeared to show the execution of an unarmed man in a hospital, Pedersen said it was 'essential' that the conclusions of a fact-finding committee's investigation into such violations 'are made fully public and that all perpetrators — regardless of affiliation — are held responsible.' He called on all sides to combat divisive rhetoric and build a shared national vision, adding: 'Security forces must demonstrate that they are acting solely to protect all Syrians and do not constitute a threat.' To avoid future violence, Pedersen stressed the need for comprehensive reforms of the security sector, including disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of armed factions. He praised efforts by the new Syrian authorities to counter Daesh and Al-Qaeda but emphasized that 'continued vigilance' remains critical. On the political front, Pedersen noted a decree that was issued on Wednesday for indirect elections to appoint two-thirds of the 210 members of an interim People's Assembly. The remaining 70 will be appointed by the president. For this process to succeed, he said, it must be transparent, inclusive and allow the participation of all major groups within Syrian society, not only 'trusted individuals,' and include the 'equal and visible' representation of women. 'Anything less,' he warned, 'would entrench skepticism, aggravate the forces pulling Syria apart, and impede reconciliation.' He called for dialogue with all communities, including those critical of the interim authorities. Pedersen also voiced concern about stalled efforts to implement the March 10 agreement between the interim government and the Syrian Democratic Forces for the integration of the latter into state institutions, citing in particular recent flare-ups of violence in Aleppo. 'We hope that reported further contacts between interim authority officials and SDF representatives can be cemented into real compromise,' he said. He also underscored the role of civil society in the political transition process, and the important need for women to play a significant part. 'Syrian women continue to stress the necessity of meaningful political participation,' Pedersen said, while acknowledging the risks and pressures they face. Tom Fletcher, the UN's humanitarian chief, echoed Pedersen's concerns and warned that 'the humanitarian crisis is not over.' He said 16 million Syrians remain in need of support, a situation he described as 'dire.' UN teams are managing to provide life-saving aid to about 3.5 million people a month, despite funding shortfalls and access challenges, he revealed. 'Our humanitarian appeal for 2025 is only 14 percent funded,' Fletcher said, warning that budget cuts could reduce humanitarian staffing levels by 40 percent. Already, he noted, '16 percent of health facilities have suspended or reduced capacity.' He welcomed recent sanctions-relief measures announced by the US, EU and UK, but said it will take time to feel the full effects of this. 'We need investment in longer-term support for development and reconstruction that will allow the people of Syria to reduce, and ultimately end, reliance on humanitarian aid,' he said. 'With funding and access, we aim to no longer be needed.' Fletcher concluded his remarks with a direct appeal to members of the Security Council: 'The people of Syria do not need us to be commentators and problem-observers. They need us to move with genuine urgency, generosity and purpose.'
