Gov. Kay Ivey points to education gains, economic growth in State of the State address
Alander Rocha and Anna Barrett
Alabama Reflector
AI-assisted summary
Ivey advocated for legislative action on public safety, workforce participation, and expanding school choice options.
She endorsed stricter penalties for gun crimes, including a ban on Glock switches, and increased support for law enforcement.
Ivey's address also touched upon immigration concerns, parental leave for state employees, and social issues like gender definition and classroom displays.
Democratic lawmakers expressed a desire for more detailed plans and raised concerns about specific proposals, particularly those related to criminal justice and immigration.
Gov. Kay Ivey touted Alabama's improvements in education, infrastructure and economic development in her 2025 State of the State address Tuesday while outlining legislative priorities focused on public safety and workforce participation.
Speaking before lawmakers in the Alabama State Capitol, Ivey pointed to education policy changes that may have helped Alabama students improve in national academic rankings, and said 'we are, in fact, not just a football state—Alabama is an education state.'
'When I took office, Alabama ranked 49th in reading. Today, we are 34th. In math, we were 52nd—now, we are 32nd,' she said, crediting initiatives such as the Alabama Literacy Act and Numeracy Act in helping Alabama climb in national rankings for reading and math proficiency.
While Alabama made significant gains in math and improved overall proficiency in reading, it was largely due to stagnant national scores. Reading scores for 4th graders remained unchanged from 2022, while 8th grade reading and math scores remained flat.
Democratic leadership seemed generally pleased with Ivey's State of the State address. Sen. Bobby Singleton, D-Greensboro, said he did not think that bragging about being 37th and 32nd ranks in fourth grade math was deserved.
'I think the governor wanted to expand on education and make sure that our students are growing. We want to do that some more,' he said. 'But to brag on our scores at 37 and 32, we got to get a little bit higher.'
The governor also said expanding using tax dollars to pay for private education and homeschooling is a key driver of progress, pointing to the CHOOSE Act, a voucher-like program which provides families up to $7,000 per qualifying child for non-public education expenditures, including private school tuition. Currently capped at 300% of the federal poverty line, or around $75,000 for a family of three, the program will eventually be open to all families in Alabama with no cap on expenditure.
House Minority Leader Rep. Anthony Daniels, D-Huntsville, said the speech lacked specificity, especially regarding the governor's praise of the CHOOSE Act.
'When we talk about the CHOOSE Act, I'm trying to understand, we've not seen any results,' he said. 'So, we're promoting something that has yet to tell us exactly what the benefits of it, if any?'
Ivey also endorsed a new legislative effort to ban cell phones in schools, saying that social media use is negatively impacting student focus and well-being.
'We have to know the time, the place, and how to use these tools,' she said, calling on lawmakers to pass a bill requiring internet safety policies and social media training for students.
On the economy, Ivey said that since taking office, Alabama has secured over $55 billion in new business investments and created 93,000 jobs but said there is 'still a lot of work' to be done to increase workforce participation.
Public safety was another theme in Ivey's address, with the governor pledging to crack down on violent crime and illegal firearm modifications. She endorsed a legislative package aimed at increasing penalties for felons caught with firearms; expanding the list of offenses covered by Aniah's Law, allowing judges to deny bond to those arrested for violent offenses, and banning Glock switches, which convert semi-automatic handguns into fully automatic weapons.
More:City seized 1,866 illegal guns in 2024; Montgomery mayor calls for state law reform
'To back the blue, we will provide law enforcement with enhanced legal protections that allow them to carry out their duties courageously and effectively without fear of Monday morning quarterbacking in the courts,' Ivey said.
Rep. Phillip Ensler, D-Montgomery, has sponsored bills in the last two legislative sessions to ban Glock switches. The bill passed the House late in the 2024 session with some Republican support but did not emerge from the Senate. Ensler is bringing the bill for the third time this year.
'I'm really glad that she announced that,' Ensler said after the speech. 'It's not a Democrat or Republican issue, it's a human issue. I know people in my district, you know, and a lot of the big cities have really been calling for that.'
Singleton and Daniels said they need to see details of the crime package. Singleton said he wants communities to be safer.
'I want protection in my community, just like anyone else. But I want to make sure that what's in that package is going to be something that we can live with in our communities,' he said.
Daniels said he has a lot of questions about the package and needs to know what these bills would mean.
'One of the things that really got me alarmed is the immunity, the legal protections. I have to understand exactly, 'What do you mean by that?'' he said. 'You know, you hear rumors about immunity. You hear rumors about tort police, tort reform for law enforcement. I want to know what that means. I guess I need more specificity on those particular items as well.'
Ensler said he wished Ivey had mentioned mental health in her speech and he believes that should be a priority of the legislature.
'I think that, you know, that's a huge issue,' he said. 'Look, the state has made some good progress on it, but I think we have to continue to focus on that, and that has to be a priority.'
Ivey also announced support for the Second Chance Act, a criminal justice reform measure designed to ensure state prison space is used for the most serious offenders. House Republicans killed a bill in the 2024 legislative session by Rep. Chris England, D-Tuscaloosa, in a procedural vote.
Rep. Russell Bedsole, R-Alabaster, said after the speech this is an 'opportunity' to have 'common sense approach when it comes to criminal justice.'
'These are a group of offenders who, if they were sentenced today, would never get anything even close to the sentence they got back then,' Bedsole said.
The governor also said immigration is 'top security concern of every American,' aligning with former President Donald Trump, adding that 'securing the southern border is securing Alabama's border.'
Daniels urged caution regarding immigration bills this session. He made the point that artificial intelligence cannot do the work in the construction and hospitality industries that migrants do.
'I think we've got to be very cautious about how it impacts our construction industry, how it impacts our hospitality industry,' he said. 'And so understanding the impact of this and our economy, how that's going to work impact workforce participation.'
Ivey also endorsed legislation to provide education and state employees with parental leave. Two pieces of legislation, one by Sen. Vivian Davis Figures, D-Mobile, for education employees, and another by Rep. Ginny Shaver, R-Leesburg, for state employees, gained momentum in the 2024 legislative session but failed after lawmakers said they wanted the bills to be in line with one another.
Shaver said she's excited to have Ivey's support and thinks the bill can pass this year.
'This will give mothers time to properly bond their children, and that'll give us more very well-adjusted children, stronger families and better employees,' Shaver said.
Amy Marlowe, executive director of the Alabama Education Association (AEA), said in a statement that is a 'step forward for Alabama's educators, their families, and, most importantly, their students.'
'Ensuring educators have the opportunity to care for and bond with their children without the fear of financial hardship is not just the right thing to do—it's an investment in the long-term success of our schools and communities,' she said in the statement.
Ivey also backed the 'What is a Woman' bill, which defines gender as strictly male or female. She also called for legislation allowing the Ten Commandments and other historical documents to be displayed in classrooms, a law that Louisiana passed in 2024 and is currently on hold after U.S. District Judge John W. deGravelles blocked the law as 'unconstitutional on its face.'
In closing, Ivey called for 'responsible budgets that do not grow government' and continued investment in job creation.
'The people of Alabama deserve our very best,' she said. 'Future generations of Alabamians deserve our hardest work today. This is our opportunity—so let's not waste a moment.'
Alabama Reflector is part of States Newsroom, an independent nonprofit website covering politics and policy in state capitals around the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. States split on whether to aid or resist Trump Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools , churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey , alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision . Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Legislation supporting immigrants takes a variety of forms Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Many new measures reinforce existing policies Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.' ___ Associated Press writers Susan Haigh, Trân Nguyễn, Jesse Bedayn, John O'Connor and Brian Witte contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Two House Republicans issue megabill threats as Senate ponders changes - Live Updates
Two House Republicans drew firm red lines Friday on changes to the House GOP megabill, threatening to vote 'no' if the Senate made any changes whatsoever to key provisions. Rep. Nick LaLota of New York warned GOP senators against lowering the House's $40,000 cap on the state-and-local-tax deduction, while Rep. Chip Roy of Texas vowed to oppose any attempt to delay or otherwise water down the phaseout of clean-energy tax credits provided for in the House-passed megabill. 'If the Senate waters it down by a dollar, I'm a no,' LaLota posted on X, arguing that the SALT cap as it stands is 'unfair' to his constituents. Roy was equally strict about GOP senators' hesitations on quickly phasing out clean-energy tax credits signed into law under former President Joe Biden — even calling out skeptical Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) by name in a floor speech Friday. Tillis has been critical of the phaseouts, saying the House bill is 'void of any understanding of just how these supply chains work.' 'You backslide one inch on those IRA subsidies and I'm voting against this bill,' Roy said. 'Because those god-forsaken subsidies are killing our energy, killing our grid, making us weaker, destroying our landscape, undermining our freedom. I'm not going to have it.'
