logo
What Britain owes Afghanistan

What Britain owes Afghanistan

AFGHANISTAN - JULY 8: British Royal Marines of 45 Commando stop an Afghan tractor during an eagle vehicle check point (VCP) operation as part of the ongoing Operation Buzzard July 8, 2002 in southeastern Afghanistan. During VCPs, small groups of marines are dropped quickly by helicopters to search random vehicles on dirt roads and trails near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to deny al Qaeda and Taliban fighters freedom of movement across the region. (Photo by)
In 1999 Nooralhaq Nasimi, my father, fled Taliban-held Afghanistan for Britain. The journey, at one point, included spending 12 hours inside a refrigerated lorry. He was unable to speak a word of English.
Building a new life had its difficulties, both administrative and personal, but my father did it. Today, nearly three decades later, I work alongside him running the Afghanistan and Central Asian Association (ACAA), a London-based charity dedicated to helping refugees integrate. The ACAA now has branches across the country.
My father gained a law degree. He learned English. He founded a charity. He received an honorary doctorate and an MBE. His work – and mine – attempts to build bridges between Britain and Afghanistan, two nations linked by history and tragedy for the best part of two centuries.
We have also attempted to build relationships between refugees from around the world and their host nation. Perhaps – especially in recent years – there has never been a harder time to do this in Britain's history.
The news this afternoon that the previous government set up a secret relocation scheme, the Afghan Response Route (ARR), involving 20,000 people at a cost in the order of £2bn after a 2023 data breach in the Ministry of Defence has caused a political sensation. The data leak put the lives of thousands of Afghans.
Between 2001 and 2021 over 150,000 UK Armed Forces personnel served in Afghanistan. 457 were killed. 2188 were injured. Thousands of Afghans worked with them as interpreters and in other capacities. Those left behind after Western forces left Afghanistan in 2021 feared for their lives as the Taliban took control of the country.
In February 2023, the Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood, said: 'The withdrawal from Afghanistan was a dark chapter in UK military history. For the Afghans who cooperated with the UK, and the British troops who served in the country, the nightmare is far from over.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
'They are at risk of harm as a direct result of assisting the UK mission. We can't change the events that unfolded in August 2021, but we owe it to those Afghans, who placed their lives in danger to help us, to get them and their families to safety.'
Ellwood's words remain salient. The two year cover-up by the British government of the ARR does nothing to change these facts. Britain owed these men a safe home, like the home my father found.
Darius Nasimi is the founder of Afghanistan Government in Exile (AGiE).
[Further reading: The Tories are responsible for the Afghan fiasco]
Related
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry
Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

Leader Live

time9 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to pledge a 'root and branch' reform of the water industry on Monday, saying that 'regulation has failed customers and the environment'. He will promise that 'hardworking British families will never again face huge shock hikes to their bills like we saw last year', according to a report in The Times. Water bills rose by an average of 26% in April, with the cost of repairing long-neglected infrastructure said to be a significant factor. It is understood that Mr Reed's promised reforms, along with greater investment in the crumbling sewerage network, are expected to make further significant increases unnecessary. Monday's reforms have also been widely reported to include the abolition of water regulator Ofwat. The beleaguered regulator has faced widespread criticism in recent years for failing to curb sewage discharges into rivers while allowing increasingly debt-ridden water companies to continue paying large dividends to their shareholders. On Friday, Downing Street did not deny that it was preparing to abolish Ofwat, and a spokesman said the Government would wait for a report from Sir Jon Cunliffe, who has been conducting a major review of the industry. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the division of water regulation between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. The former Bank of England deputy governor is due to publish his final report on Monday, which is likely to recommend replacing Ofwat with a single regulator for the whole water industry. On Friday, a report by the Environment Agency found serious pollution incidents caused by water firms across England rose by 60% in 2024. The watchdog disclosed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country, despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Every year it records the number of times pollution, including untreated sewage, is released into waterways from water company infrastructure such as pumping stations, pipes and treatment works. The figures, released on Friday, show companies recorded a total of 2,801 incidents, a 29% increase on the 2,174 recorded in 2023. But the number of so-called category one and category two incidents, the most serious, rose by 60% from 47 to 75. Three water firms were responsible for 81% of these serious incidents – Thames Water with 33, Southern Water with 15, and Yorkshire Water with 13. Meanwhile, just two companies, Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water, had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. Mr Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways.

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry
Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

The Herald Scotland

time9 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

He will promise that 'hardworking British families will never again face huge shock hikes to their bills like we saw last year', according to a report in The Times. Water bills rose by an average of 26% in April, with the cost of repairing long-neglected infrastructure said to be a significant factor. It is understood that Mr Reed's promised reforms, along with greater investment in the crumbling sewerage network, are expected to make further significant increases unnecessary. Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to promise 'root and branch reform' of the water sector to prevent 'huge shock hikes' in bills (Yui Mok/PA) Monday's reforms have also been widely reported to include the abolition of water regulator Ofwat. The beleaguered regulator has faced widespread criticism in recent years for failing to curb sewage discharges into rivers while allowing increasingly debt-ridden water companies to continue paying large dividends to their shareholders. On Friday, Downing Street did not deny that it was preparing to abolish Ofwat, and a spokesman said the Government would wait for a report from Sir Jon Cunliffe, who has been conducting a major review of the industry. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the division of water regulation between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. The former Bank of England deputy governor is due to publish his final report on Monday, which is likely to recommend replacing Ofwat with a single regulator for the whole water industry. On Friday, a report by the Environment Agency found serious pollution incidents caused by water firms across England rose by 60% in 2024. The watchdog disclosed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country, despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Every year it records the number of times pollution, including untreated sewage, is released into waterways from water company infrastructure such as pumping stations, pipes and treatment works. The figures, released on Friday, show companies recorded a total of 2,801 incidents, a 29% increase on the 2,174 recorded in 2023. But the number of so-called category one and category two incidents, the most serious, rose by 60% from 47 to 75. Three water firms were responsible for 81% of these serious incidents – Thames Water with 33, Southern Water with 15, and Yorkshire Water with 13. Meanwhile, just two companies, Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water, had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. Mr Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways.

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry
Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

Glasgow Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Ministers to pledge ‘root and branch reform' of water industry

Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to pledge a 'root and branch' reform of the water industry on Monday, saying that 'regulation has failed customers and the environment'. He will promise that 'hardworking British families will never again face huge shock hikes to their bills like we saw last year', according to a report in The Times. Water bills rose by an average of 26% in April, with the cost of repairing long-neglected infrastructure said to be a significant factor. It is understood that Mr Reed's promised reforms, along with greater investment in the crumbling sewerage network, are expected to make further significant increases unnecessary. Environment Secretary Steve Reed is expected to promise 'root and branch reform' of the water sector to prevent 'huge shock hikes' in bills (Yui Mok/PA) Monday's reforms have also been widely reported to include the abolition of water regulator Ofwat. The beleaguered regulator has faced widespread criticism in recent years for failing to curb sewage discharges into rivers while allowing increasingly debt-ridden water companies to continue paying large dividends to their shareholders. On Friday, Downing Street did not deny that it was preparing to abolish Ofwat, and a spokesman said the Government would wait for a report from Sir Jon Cunliffe, who has been conducting a major review of the industry. In his interim report, Sir Jon criticised the division of water regulation between economic regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. The former Bank of England deputy governor is due to publish his final report on Monday, which is likely to recommend replacing Ofwat with a single regulator for the whole water industry. On Friday, a report by the Environment Agency found serious pollution incidents caused by water firms across England rose by 60% in 2024. The watchdog disclosed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country, despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Every year it records the number of times pollution, including untreated sewage, is released into waterways from water company infrastructure such as pumping stations, pipes and treatment works. The figures, released on Friday, show companies recorded a total of 2,801 incidents, a 29% increase on the 2,174 recorded in 2023. But the number of so-called category one and category two incidents, the most serious, rose by 60% from 47 to 75. Three water firms were responsible for 81% of these serious incidents – Thames Water with 33, Southern Water with 15, and Yorkshire Water with 13. Meanwhile, just two companies, Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water, had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. Mr Reed called the figures 'disgraceful' and a 'stark reminder' of how underinvestment and weak regulation have led to sewage polluting England's waterways.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store