logo
Trump to join Washington patrol while feds deploy checkpoints around city

Trump to join Washington patrol while feds deploy checkpoints around city

Boston Globe5 hours ago
Trump's presence during his controversial crackdown, which has lasted for two weeks, would be the latest show of force from the White House. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard soldiers have surged into Washington this month, leaving some residents on edge and creating tense confrontations in the streets.
Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday visited some of the troops at Union Station, showing their support while protestors chanted 'free D.C.'
Advertisement
Although the city has historically struggled with crime, statistics show the problem was declining before Trump declared there was a crisis that required his intervention.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Immigration enforcement has been a core part of the crackdown, rattling people in some of the city's neighborhoods. A daycare was partially closed on Thursday when staff became afraid to go to work because they heard about federal agents nearby. An administrator asked parents to keep their children at home if possible.
Other day cares have stopped taking kids on daily walks because of fears about encountering law enforcement.
Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, there have been 630 arrests, including 251 people who are in the country illegally, according to the White House. Trump has been ratcheting up the pressure since then, seizing control of the D.C. police department on Aug. 11 and deploying more National Guard troops, mostly from Republican-led states.
Advertisement
Soldiers have been largely stationed in downtown areas, such as monuments on the National Mall and transit stations.
However, federal agents are operating more widely through the city. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledged the proliferation of traffic checkpoints on Thursday.
'The surge of federal officers is allowing for different types of deployments, more frequent types of deployments, like checkpoints,' Bowser said.
Not a normal traffic stop
On Thursday morning, as Martin Romero rode through Washington's Rock Creek Park on his way to a construction job in Virginia, he saw police on the road up ahead. He figured it was a normal traffic stop, but it wasn't.
Romero, 41, said that U.S. Park Police were telling pickup trucks with company logos to pull over, reminding them that commercial vehicles weren't allowed on park roads. They checked for licenses and insurance information, and then U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents came over.
Romero said there were two agents on one side of his truck and three on the other. He started to get nervous as the agents asked where they were from and whether they were in the country illegally.
'We just came here to work,' Romero said afterwards. 'We aren't doing anything bad.'
Two people in his truck were detained and the agents didn't give a reason, he said. He also saw three other people taken from other vehicles.
'I feel really worried because they took two of our guys,' he said. 'They wouldn't say where they're taking them or if they'll be able to come back.'
Advertisement
Romero said he called his boss, who told him to just head home. They wouldn't be working today.
Enrique Martinez, a supervisor at the construction company, came to the scene afterwards. He pondered whether to call families of the detained men.
'This has never happened to our company before,' Martinez said. 'I'm not really sure what to do.'
Checkpoints are legal, to a point
The Supreme Court has upheld the use of law enforcement and government checkpoints for specific purposes, such as for policing the border and for identifying suspected drunk drivers.
But there are restrictions on that authority, especially when it comes to general crime control. Jeffrey Bellin, a former prosecutor in Washington and professor at Vanderbilt Law School who specializes in criminal law and procedures, said the Constitution doesn't allow 'the government to be constantly checking us and stopping to see if we're up to any criminal activity.'
He said checkpoints for a legally justifiable purpose — like checking for drivers' licenses and registrations — cannot be used as 'subterfuge' or a pretext for stops that would otherwise not be allowed. And though the court has affirmed the use of checkpoints at the border, and even some distance away from it, to ask drivers about immigration status, Bellin said it was unlikely the authority would extend to Washington.
Anthony Michael Kreis, a professor at Georgia State College of Law, said the seemingly 'arbitrary' and intrusive nature of the checkpoints in the capital could leave residents feeling aggrieved.
'Some of the things could be entirely constitutional and fine, but at the same time, the way that things are unfolding, people are suspicious — and I think for good reason,' he said.
Advertisement
From Los Angeles to D.C.
There are few places in the country that have been unaffected by Trump's deportation drive, but his push into D.C. is shaping into something more sustained, similar to what has unfolded in the Los Angeles area since early June.
In Los Angeles, immigration officers — working with the Border Patrol and other federal agencies — have been a near-daily presence at Home Depots, car washes and other highly visible locations.
In a demonstration of how enforcement has affected routines, the bishop of San Bernardino, California, formally excused parishioners of their weekly obligation to attend Mass after immigration agents detained people on two parish properties.
Immigration officials have been an unusually public presence, sending horse patrols to the city's famed MacArthur Park and appearing outside California Gov. Gavin Newsom's news conference last week on congressional redistricting. Authorities said an agent fired at a moving vehicle last week after the driver refused to roll down his window during an immigration stop.
The National Guard and Marines were previously in the city for weeks on an assignment to maintain order amid protests.
A federal judge blocked the administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops in Southern California but authorities have vowed to keep the pressure on.
Associated Press writers Eric Tucker and Ashraf Khalil in Washington and Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed reporting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump delivers burgers and pizza to D.C. National Guard. The latest on his federal takeover, 10 days in.
Trump delivers burgers and pizza to D.C. National Guard. The latest on his federal takeover, 10 days in.

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump delivers burgers and pizza to D.C. National Guard. The latest on his federal takeover, 10 days in.

Reports suggest that federal authorities have focused more on detaining immigrants and clearing homeless encampments than on fighting violent crime. Ten days after President Donald Trump ordered 800 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to crack down on what he described as 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor' in the nation's capital, Trump paid them and other federal agents a personal visit Thursday evening to praise their efforts — and deliver burgers and pizza. 'We're going to have the best capital ever,' Trump said. 'It's going to look better than it ever did.' Earlier in the day, the president implied that he would be patrolling the city's streets with law enforcement, but he returned to the White House immediately after the brief event. 'I'm going to be going out tonight with the police and with the military, of course,' the president had told conservative talk show host Todd Starnes. Either way, Thursday's presidential dinner delivery will draw attention to the events of the past week and a half — and raise questions about whether Trump's push to impose federal control over the city is working to reduce crime. To catch up, here are the latest beats in this developing story. Taking over the D.C. police — sort of By invoking Section 740 of the Home Rule Act — and unilaterally declaring an emergency in D.C. — Trump was able to take control of the District's Metropolitan Police Department last week. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' he claimed. 'And we're not going to let it happen anymore.' But when Attorney General Pam Bondi tried to replace current D.C. police chief Pamela Smith with an 'emergency police commissioner" in the form of Drug Enforcement Administrator Terry Cole, D.C.'s attorney general sued to block the move. 'If effectuated, the Bondi Order would upend the command structure of MPD, endangering the safety of the public and law enforcement officers alike," Smith wrote in a declaration filed in the suit. "In my nearly three decades in law enforcement, I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive." On Friday, a federal judge effectively sided with D.C., saying that while Bowser must follow White House directives, the Home Rule Act does not grant the administration full control of the police force. As a result, Cole has been reduced to serving as an intermediary between the administration and the MPD — and Smith is still in charge of D.C.'s police. Boots on the ground No one is debating who commands the D.C. National Guard: the president, according to the Code of the District of Columbia. So there's been no legal pushback to Trump mobilizing an estimated 800 D.C. Guard members, some armed, to patrol the city. The same goes for the 500 federal law enforcement agents he's deployed from agencies such as the FBI. Over the last week, 'armoured vehicles have lined up near monuments and other tourist sites, and drivers have been stopped on a popular nightlife corridor,' according to the BBC. 'Helicopters from the police force for the national park system have swept through the sky.' And reinforcements are on the way. Responding to a Trump administration request, six Republican-led states — West Virginia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Ohio and Tennessee — have pledged to send more than 1,100 National Guard troops to join their D.C. counterparts. A focus on immigration In addition to trying to install an emergency police commissioner, Bondi has also sought to end D.C. policies that prohibit local police from collaborating with federal immigration authorities and arresting residents solely for being in the country illegally. That issue is still being contested in court — but the same federal judge who blocked the Trump administration's total MPD takeover last week is allowing the White House to use city police for immigration enforcement (for now). The upshot is that so far, reports suggest that federal authorities have focused more on detaining immigrants and clearing homeless encampless than on fighting violent crime. Checkpoints are becoming increasingly common. Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, 630 people have been arrested, according to the White House — 251 of whom were in the country illegally. That's a rate of 40%. Only about 5% of D.C. residents are undocumented immigrants, according to a recent Pew estimate. 'We're finding these criminally illegal aliens, and at the first opportunity we're picking them up, and we're sending them out of the country,' Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told Fox News on Saturday. Trump has also suggested that if his approach 'works' in D.C., he could export it elsewhere in the future. 'We're going to take back our capital," the president said last week. "And then we'll look at other cities also.' Questions about crime stats Increasingly, Bowser has been questioning Trump's motives, noting that while D.C.'s violent crime rate rose to historic levels in 2023 and remains a concern for many residents, it has fallen substantially over the past two years, as is true in most major U.S. cities, according to police data cited by the Justice Department. 'Our police department has been consistently precipitously driving down crime,' she said at a news conference Thursday, calling the department's work 'effective.' Bowser then added that Bondi's orders 'almost exclusively focused on immigration enforcement and homeless encampment enforcement,' rather than crime. 'I'll let you draw your own conclusions,' Bowser said. In response, the White House has questioned D.C.'s crime stats. On Monday, Trump accused the District of releasing 'Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety'; the following day, Fox News and other outlets reported that the Department of Justice is actively investigating claims that the MPD 'manipulated crime data to publish more favorable stats.' This isn't the first time such accusations have been leveled. In May, the city placed a police commander on leave to investigate whether he was manipulating crime data, and the head of D.C.'s police union has cast doubt on official numbers. But so far, there's no evidence of systemic or widespread tampering, and D.C.'s data aligns with national trends. According to the Associated Press, the average number of people arrested each day in Washington has increased by about 20% during the first 10 days of Trump's federal takeover. Play Farm Merge Valley

Taking on the Fed, Trump Combines Retribution Tactics With a Power Play
Taking on the Fed, Trump Combines Retribution Tactics With a Power Play

New York Times

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Taking on the Fed, Trump Combines Retribution Tactics With a Power Play

Since taking office again, President Trump has aggressively sought to expand his power, asserting a right to override spending decisions by Congress, dismiss leaders of traditionally independent agencies and push through legal and even constitutional barriers on issues including immigration and birthright citizenship. At the same time, he has used the government to pursue his campaign of retribution against political and personal foes, instigating criminal investigations, demanding big payments, revoking security clearances and dismissing federal employees. But when Mr. Trump called for the resignation of a Federal Reserve governor this week, it marked the merging of those two defining features of his second term. He was using the tactics he has employed in targeting his enemies in the service of an attempt to exert control over the central bank, which by law is structured to maintain substantial independence from political influence. Mr. Trump called for the resignation of the Fed governor, Lisa Cook, after Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and a key political ally of the president, said that his office had investigated Ms. Cook and found that she appeared to have falsified bank documents to obtain favorable mortgage loan terms. His agency referred the matter to the Justice Department, which confirmed it received the referral. Mr. Trump's move to push out Ms. Cook, an appointee of President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and specialist in international economics, came as he pursues a pressure campaign to install new leaders at the Fed who will heed his demand for lower interest rates. Mr. Trump has relentlessly attacked and threatened to fire the Fed chair, Jerome H. Powell, and accused Mr. Powell of mismanaging the renovation of the central bank's headquarters in Washington. Mr. Trump has only limited ability to fire an official from the central bank, a protection recently reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. Policymakers on the Board of Governors can be removed only for 'cause,' which legal experts define as breaking the law or gross misconduct. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons
HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

HHS nixes California sex ed grant after refusal to drop ‘radical' gender lessons

An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum, Fox News Digital exclusively learned Thursday. 'California's refusal to comply with federal law and remove egregious gender ideology from federally funded sex-ed materials is unacceptable,' Andrew Gradison, acting assistant secretary at the Administration for Children and Families, said in comment provided to Fox News Digital Thursday. 'The Trump Administration will not allow taxpayer dollars to be used to indoctrinate children. Accountability is coming for every state that uses federal funds to teach children delusional gender ideology.' Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. The PREP program aims to educate California's youth, ages 10–19, on preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted infections, which the state says has led to students in the program 'delaying sexual activity, increasing condom or contraceptive use for sexually active youth, or reducing number of sexual partners.' 4 An office within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) terminated a federal grant funding California's sex education program aimed at preventing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases after the West Coast state reportedly refused to remove 'radical gender ideology' from its curriculum. REUTERS 'Program services are engaging, nonjudgmental, medically accurate and tailored to the unique needs of youth participants and their communities,' the PREP website states. 'Services are offered in a range of settings, including schools, juvenile justice facilities, homeless shelters and foster care group homes. CA PREP activities also include community engagement and promotion of clinical linkages to youth-friendly reproductive health services.' Advertisement PREP specifically aims to assist those who 'reside, attend school or receive reproductive health services in a high-need geographic area; are homeless and/or runaway; attend an alternative or continuation school; are in or emancipated from foster care; are in the juvenile justice or probation system; identify as LGBTQ; are receiving treatment for mental health or substance abuse issues; have special needs; live in migrant farmworker families or are expectant/parenting female youth up to age 21.' The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. The probe was initially launched to ensure the state's sexual education programming is medically accurate and age-appropriate. 4 The Administration for Children and Families, an office under HHS' umbrella that funds state, local and tribal organizations to provide support for families such as child care, announced Thursday morning that it was terminating the funding to California's Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) grant. AFP via Getty Images Previous grant funding shows California's PREP program received just under $6 million from the federal government in fiscal year 2022. All in, California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Advertisement The Administration for Children and Families reviewed the program's curriculum and other teaching materials, and found a lengthy list of subjects and language deemed to fall outside the program's 'authorizing statute,' in particular references to 'gender ideology.' In June, Fox News Digital reported Administration for Children and Families gave the sex education program a 60-day deadline to remove all references to gender identity or face potential termination of its funding. The 60-day deadline just ran dry, with the Administration for Children and Families subsequently terminating the funding and sending a letter to Sydney Armendariz, the division chief of Maternal Child, and Adolescent Health Division at the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and Matthew Green, the deputy director of the Center for Family Health at CDPH, declaring it was 'terminating all California State Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) awards and suspending the funding effective August 21, 2025.' The letter sent Thursday reported that following the Administration for Children and Families' June request to remove what it said was radical gender ideology from PREP teachings, California refused in a letter of its own. 4 The PREP grant has been under scrutiny by the Trump administration since at least March, when the Administration for Children and Families requested program leaders send copies of its curriculum and other relevant course materials to them for review. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'CDPH will not make any such modifications at this time for several reasons,' the California Department of Public Health said in a letter to ACF earlier this week, according to HHS. 'The listed reasons were: 1) PREP materials had already been reviewed and approved by ACF; 2) the materials are medically accurate; 3) the gender ideology content is relevant to purposes identified in the authorizing statute, specifically the adult preparation subjects listed at 42 U.S.C. § 713(b)(2)(C); and 4) ACF does not have authority to take an enforcement action.' Among the materials Administration for Children and Families found amid its review of the curriculum was a lesson for middle school-aged students that sought to introduce them to the concepts of transgenderism, Fox News Digital previously reported. 'We've been talking during class about messages people get on how they should act as boys and girls—but as many of you know, there are also people who don't identify as boys or girls, but rather as transgender or gender queer,' the lesson states to students. 'This means that even if they were called a boy or a girl at birth and may have body parts that are typically associated with being a boy or a girl, on the inside, they feel differently.' Other flagged lessons in the materials included curriculum for high school-aged students with instructions on what it means to be 'nonbinary' and language that informed students 'gender-identity' is 'essentially a social status.' 4 California could lose $12.3 million in funding that it has not yet received, covering multiple years, according to HHS. Christopher Sadowski 'In a disturbing and egregious abuse of federal funds, California has been using taxpayer money to teach curricula that could encourage kids to contemplate mutilating their genitals, 'altering their body… through hormone therapy,' 'adding or removing breast tissue,' and 'changing their name.' It instructed teachers to 'remind students that some men are born with female anatomy,'' HHS said in a Thursday press release of the teachings. The Administration for Children and Families also had raised concerns over materials for teachers within the program, including lessons on avoiding misgendering individuals. Advertisement 'All people have a gender identity,' the teacher training materials stated, Fox Digital previously reported. It also instructed educators to refer to people who identify with their sex 'assigned at birth' as 'cisgender,' and added that those who are not 'cisgender' may identify as 'non-binary, agender, bigender, genderfluid, (or) genderqueer.' Gradison's letter to the California health leaders Thursday underscored that Administration for Children and Families' decision to terminate the grant is final unless California health leaders file an appeal. 'This is the final decision of the Administration for Children and Families,' the letter reads. 'It shall be the final decision of the Department unless, within 30 days after receiving this decision, you submit a notice of appeal to the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB).'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store