logo
From E-Bikes to Scooters, Roads Are Getting More Crowded and Confusing

From E-Bikes to Scooters, Roads Are Getting More Crowded and Confusing

Across the country, the streets of metro areas are filling with powered vehicles that are neither bikes nor Harleys but something in between—low-cost scooters, minibikes, electric bikes, skateboards and more, often with surprising speed. Some varieties top out at 20 mph or 28 mph, while others can hit 40 to 60 mph.
As ridership has grown, these two-wheelers are all crowding into bike lanes—when they aren't zipping through traffic or hopping up onto the sidewalk. And they are making traffic enforcement challenging, threatening pedestrian safety and complicating life for transit planners.
'We didn't know we were building the bike lanes for scooters,' says Laura Dierenfield, bike infrastructure chief in Austin, Texas, who is overseeing a build-out of bike paths.
Dierenfield sees the arrival of scooters, e-bikes and other two-wheeled vehicles as a plus overall, because they are less polluting and cause many fewer deaths than cars. But, she says, Austin is starting to see the need to separate different two-wheelers by speed. Just how to do that is to come; the city hasn't developed a strategy yet.
Crowded roads
Whether a city has established bike lanes or has yet to delineate space for two-wheelers, the traffic jam has only begun. McKinsey, the consulting firm, estimates that global 'micromobility' sales—including everything from powered scooters and skateboards to mopeds and e-bikes—will hit $340 billion by 2030, more than doubling from $160 billion in 2022. And, McKinsey says, 46% of people in a global survey said they would consider replacing their current private vehicles, mostly cars, with micromobility ones.
The U.S. lags behind Asia and Europe in two-wheeler adoption, so people aren't accustomed to dealing with the vehicles in such abundance. Their presence often surprises drivers, pedestrians and conventional cyclists, and many locales are still trying to work out how to regulate the two-wheelers.
Requirements on age, licenses and helmets vary from place to place, not to mention rules about where the vehicles can travel. Many of them end up traveling in bike lanes, which would be a challenge to safety even if all the riders were experienced, courteous and patient. And often they aren't.
'Many of our riders are new,' says Calvin Thigpen, director of public partnerships and policy research for scooter-rental company Lime. He says scooter riders have an overwhelming preference for bike lanes, but end up on sidewalks when bike lanes are lacking. 'They encounter a very hostile car environment,' he says.
Lime, like some other rental companies, uses technology on the scooters to limit their maximum speed.
Among powered two-wheeler riders, erratic riding and failure to follow traffic laws can be particularly dangerous to others. In New York, some 65,000 food-delivery workers ply the streets, bike lanes and sidewalks on a range of two-wheelers, alongside an increasing number of commuters and others, also on a range of two-wheelers. Steve Vaccaro, a New York lawyer who represents cyclists and pedestrians injured in crashes, used to litigate mostly against drivers of cars and trucks. Increasingly, he says, his clients were hit by someone on a two-wheeler.
'I have seen an explosion of novel, motorized two-wheelers in New York City traffic over the last five to 10 years,' Vaccaro says.
Vaccaro, who is also an avid cyclist and cycling activist, says the city has been slow to make clear which traffic rules apply to which devices, and in how it enforces the rules. The city has of late launched a variety of enforcement efforts, including setting a 15 mph speed limit on e-bikes. Vaccaro and some others want food-delivery-app companies made legally responsible for the conduct of their drivers.
A spokesman for delivery service DoorDash says that the company doesn't tolerate unsafe driving. If it receives a police report about rule-breaking, it warns the driver to follow regulations and drive safely at all times. Repeat offenders are removed from the platform.
Relative risks
Of course, conventional motor vehicles exact a greater toll than the two-wheelers, about 40,000 deaths a year. For 2022, deaths from motor-vehicle crashes included about 7,500 pedestrians and more than 1,000 cyclists.
A 2020 international study found that about 80% of crashes that result in the death of a bike or scooter rider involved a car or truck. (Data on crashes in which two-wheelers hit pedestrians is spotty.)
'A trip by car or by motorcycle in a dense urban area is much more likely to result in the death of a road user—this includes pedestrians—than a trip by a microvehicle,' according to the report, written by Alexandre Santacreu, a French transit-policy analyst. Getting more people onto scooters and bikes, and out of cars, 'can thus make a city safer.'
But accommodating the variety of two-wheelers takes space, be it a shared, wider bike lane or an altogether separate lane.
Countries like the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway have been taking roadway from cars and giving it over to bikes and pedestrians for more than 50 years. But even the Dutch, who place bikes at the top of their transportation setup, haven't conquered the problem of proliferation of two-wheeled vehicles traveling at varying speeds. The country's ubiquitous bike paths—which essentially connect all points within and between cities—are increasingly home to faster-going scooters, mopeds and e-bikes.
'This is the major challenge of Dutch cities in 2025,' says Chris Bruntlett, international-relations manager for the Dutch Cycling Embassy, a government-supported organization in the Netherlands.
For its part, Amsterdam is experimenting with new regulations and signage that direct the faster two-wheelers into normal traffic lanes used by cars. Meanwhile, the speed limits in those car lanes have been lowered to 20 mph—making it easier to integrate two-wheelers. Helping things further: Dutch drivers are already accustomed to being surrounded by bikes. (The country, in fact, has more bikes than people.)
The road ahead
In the U.S., some experts argue that the problems will diminish with time, as people replace car trips with two-wheeler trips, and local officials learn how to regulate the various streams of traffic.
Kersten Heineke, a Frankfurt-based partner who co-leads McKinsey's micromobility practice, says the U.S. is merely early in a transition that other countries have made. U.S. cities are generally still 90%-car reliant, he says, while a European city well into transit investment is at 50% or less.
U.S. localities need to look to the example of Amsterdam in slowing cars and then integrating them with two-wheelers, Heineke says. What's more, he says, technology already exists to speed-limit two-wheelers and other vehicles based on their location, using governing devices that work with GPS.
'It's a matter of regulation,' Heineke says. As two-wheeled transit grows—both motorized and conventional—the idea of taking space from cars should be less of a hot topic. 'You can repurpose lanes. You just need some paint,' he says.
Ultimately, 'we won't be in a world where we have three different lanes,' says Heineke. 'Two is enough.'
In the U.S., where many city avenues hum along at 45 mph, and speed limits often are disregarded, slowing cars will be a tall order. So will expanding bike lanes, in a country where carving out even a single bike lane is often met with driver and voter hostility.
For now, that leaves every two-wheeler on his or her own. Nicole McSpirit—a Denver school crossing guard and e-bike enthusiast—has a Dutch model that tops out at 16.5 mph. The city has well over 100 miles of bike lanes, though many are merely a line of paint a few feet from the curb and are along major thoroughfares, offering little real protection from cars and trucks.
Like a lot of experienced city bicyclists, McSpirit avoids those bike lanes and winds her way through the city on quieter side streets, when possible. 'Drivers think the roads are for them,' she says.
Jeff Bailey is a writer in Denver. He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India needs homegrown management consultancies
India needs homegrown management consultancies

Hindustan Times

timea day ago

  • Hindustan Times

India needs homegrown management consultancies

India has built global leaders in IT services, pharmaceuticals and AI, but not yet in management consulting. India-bred management consulting firms still face challenges due to weaker brand recognition and legacy biases. This needs to change. Thinking in India is as important as making in India. For Indian firms to become globally influential, they must build intellectual property. Global firms like McKinsey gained ground not just through execution, but by shaping the discourse through platforms. (Shutterstock) Management consulting is soft power. These firms shape decisions and public policy. They influence how reforms are structured and how large-scale initiatives are executed. Consulting firms have helped define industrial policy in Europe, health care reform in the UK, and digital transformation in Southeast Asia. This makes management consulting a powerful form of soft power. The models and frameworks aren't just tools, but worldviews. For a country that seeks to lead in the decades ahead, shaping these worldviews becomes a strategic imperative. This is not about displacing international firms. It's about widening the field and ensuring that Indian firms with the capability and context get a seat at the table. Firms like YCP Auctus, Praxis Global Alliance, Takshashila Consulting, Redseer Strategy Consultants, Zinnov, and Vector Consulting Group are built in India but work across the globe. In the case of YCP Auctus, more than 40% of revenue comes from international clients. Vector Consulting Group works extensively across Asia, driving supply chain and operational improvements. These firms are globally integrated and culturally agile. India is not their boundary but their launchpad. Some of them have attracted long-term investment from Japanese partners, underscoring their global preparedness. This is an evolution from support functions to strategic leadership. India began as the world's back office, moved up to strategic GCCs, and today leads the world in Artificial Intelligence (AI). India-bred firms like Fractal Analytics, Quantiphi and LatentView are solving high-value analytics problems using Indian talent, platforms, and delivery models. Management consulting is the next logical step. The underlying capabilities of structured problem-solving, functional expertise, sectoral depth and execution discipline are already established. The time has come for Indian firms to shape global strategy. Many have scaled, with teams of over 200 consultants. They recruit from top institutes in the same slot as global majors. Having worked with governments, unicorns, and conglomerates, these firms bring contextual judgment and deep institutional memory. India-based operating models enable these firms to deliver top-tier advisory at a fraction of global prices. For most clients, whether established conglomerates or emerging companies, this quality-to-cost ratio is a decisive advantage. For Indian firms to become globally influential, they must build intellectual property. Global firms like McKinsey gained ground not just through execution, but by shaping the discourse through platforms like The McKinsey Quarterly. India-bred firms must do the same. Thought capital in areas like digital public goods, infrastructure, skilling, or inclusive growth can become both a differentiator and a bridge to influence. Equally important is fostering alumni networks, institutional memory, and repeat ecosystems to create trust and longevity. Management consulting can amplify India's influence across the Global South. The opportunity for Indian management consulting firms is no longer confined to traditional clients. Today, economies across the broader Global South are seeking advisory partners who can balance vision with pragmatism, scale with sensitivity. Indian firms, having operated in similarly complex and dynamic environments, are well positioned to meet this need. Whether it's modernising logistics in East Africa, redesigning skilling ecosystems in Southeast Asia, or supporting state reforms in West Asia, Indian consultants bring more than just capability. They bring shared context. In doing so, they export Indian models of execution, collaboration, and innovation. That is soft power in action and an enabler of diplomacy. To realise this potential, Indian firms need better access to Boards and procurement channels. Governments and private clients can play a critical role by creating a level-playing field where Indian firms are evaluated based on capability and fit, not just brand. Indian conglomerates, emerging companies, PE funds, and PSUs can serve as launchpads for Indian firms to build transformational proof points. And perhaps NASSCOM can broaden its remit to include management consulting as a strategic capability for global export. India has long proven its ability to deliver talent to the world. The next step is to deliver intellectual leadership. If we want to shape how the world thinks about business and development, we must invest in our own institutions of strategic thought. Abhisek Mukherjee is managing partner, YCP Auctus. The views expressed are personal.

From E-Bikes to Scooters, Roads Are Getting More Crowded and Confusing
From E-Bikes to Scooters, Roads Are Getting More Crowded and Confusing

Hindustan Times

timea day ago

  • Hindustan Times

From E-Bikes to Scooters, Roads Are Getting More Crowded and Confusing

Across the country, the streets of metro areas are filling with powered vehicles that are neither bikes nor Harleys but something in between—low-cost scooters, minibikes, electric bikes, skateboards and more, often with surprising speed. Some varieties top out at 20 mph or 28 mph, while others can hit 40 to 60 mph. As ridership has grown, these two-wheelers are all crowding into bike lanes—when they aren't zipping through traffic or hopping up onto the sidewalk. And they are making traffic enforcement challenging, threatening pedestrian safety and complicating life for transit planners. 'We didn't know we were building the bike lanes for scooters,' says Laura Dierenfield, bike infrastructure chief in Austin, Texas, who is overseeing a build-out of bike paths. Dierenfield sees the arrival of scooters, e-bikes and other two-wheeled vehicles as a plus overall, because they are less polluting and cause many fewer deaths than cars. But, she says, Austin is starting to see the need to separate different two-wheelers by speed. Just how to do that is to come; the city hasn't developed a strategy yet. Crowded roads Whether a city has established bike lanes or has yet to delineate space for two-wheelers, the traffic jam has only begun. McKinsey, the consulting firm, estimates that global 'micromobility' sales—including everything from powered scooters and skateboards to mopeds and e-bikes—will hit $340 billion by 2030, more than doubling from $160 billion in 2022. And, McKinsey says, 46% of people in a global survey said they would consider replacing their current private vehicles, mostly cars, with micromobility ones. The U.S. lags behind Asia and Europe in two-wheeler adoption, so people aren't accustomed to dealing with the vehicles in such abundance. Their presence often surprises drivers, pedestrians and conventional cyclists, and many locales are still trying to work out how to regulate the two-wheelers. Requirements on age, licenses and helmets vary from place to place, not to mention rules about where the vehicles can travel. Many of them end up traveling in bike lanes, which would be a challenge to safety even if all the riders were experienced, courteous and patient. And often they aren't. 'Many of our riders are new,' says Calvin Thigpen, director of public partnerships and policy research for scooter-rental company Lime. He says scooter riders have an overwhelming preference for bike lanes, but end up on sidewalks when bike lanes are lacking. 'They encounter a very hostile car environment,' he says. Lime, like some other rental companies, uses technology on the scooters to limit their maximum speed. Among powered two-wheeler riders, erratic riding and failure to follow traffic laws can be particularly dangerous to others. In New York, some 65,000 food-delivery workers ply the streets, bike lanes and sidewalks on a range of two-wheelers, alongside an increasing number of commuters and others, also on a range of two-wheelers. Steve Vaccaro, a New York lawyer who represents cyclists and pedestrians injured in crashes, used to litigate mostly against drivers of cars and trucks. Increasingly, he says, his clients were hit by someone on a two-wheeler. 'I have seen an explosion of novel, motorized two-wheelers in New York City traffic over the last five to 10 years,' Vaccaro says. Vaccaro, who is also an avid cyclist and cycling activist, says the city has been slow to make clear which traffic rules apply to which devices, and in how it enforces the rules. The city has of late launched a variety of enforcement efforts, including setting a 15 mph speed limit on e-bikes. Vaccaro and some others want food-delivery-app companies made legally responsible for the conduct of their drivers. A spokesman for delivery service DoorDash says that the company doesn't tolerate unsafe driving. If it receives a police report about rule-breaking, it warns the driver to follow regulations and drive safely at all times. Repeat offenders are removed from the platform. Relative risks Of course, conventional motor vehicles exact a greater toll than the two-wheelers, about 40,000 deaths a year. For 2022, deaths from motor-vehicle crashes included about 7,500 pedestrians and more than 1,000 cyclists. A 2020 international study found that about 80% of crashes that result in the death of a bike or scooter rider involved a car or truck. (Data on crashes in which two-wheelers hit pedestrians is spotty.) 'A trip by car or by motorcycle in a dense urban area is much more likely to result in the death of a road user—this includes pedestrians—than a trip by a microvehicle,' according to the report, written by Alexandre Santacreu, a French transit-policy analyst. Getting more people onto scooters and bikes, and out of cars, 'can thus make a city safer.' But accommodating the variety of two-wheelers takes space, be it a shared, wider bike lane or an altogether separate lane. Countries like the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway have been taking roadway from cars and giving it over to bikes and pedestrians for more than 50 years. But even the Dutch, who place bikes at the top of their transportation setup, haven't conquered the problem of proliferation of two-wheeled vehicles traveling at varying speeds. The country's ubiquitous bike paths—which essentially connect all points within and between cities—are increasingly home to faster-going scooters, mopeds and e-bikes. 'This is the major challenge of Dutch cities in 2025,' says Chris Bruntlett, international-relations manager for the Dutch Cycling Embassy, a government-supported organization in the Netherlands. For its part, Amsterdam is experimenting with new regulations and signage that direct the faster two-wheelers into normal traffic lanes used by cars. Meanwhile, the speed limits in those car lanes have been lowered to 20 mph—making it easier to integrate two-wheelers. Helping things further: Dutch drivers are already accustomed to being surrounded by bikes. (The country, in fact, has more bikes than people.) The road ahead In the U.S., some experts argue that the problems will diminish with time, as people replace car trips with two-wheeler trips, and local officials learn how to regulate the various streams of traffic. Kersten Heineke, a Frankfurt-based partner who co-leads McKinsey's micromobility practice, says the U.S. is merely early in a transition that other countries have made. U.S. cities are generally still 90%-car reliant, he says, while a European city well into transit investment is at 50% or less. U.S. localities need to look to the example of Amsterdam in slowing cars and then integrating them with two-wheelers, Heineke says. What's more, he says, technology already exists to speed-limit two-wheelers and other vehicles based on their location, using governing devices that work with GPS. 'It's a matter of regulation,' Heineke says. As two-wheeled transit grows—both motorized and conventional—the idea of taking space from cars should be less of a hot topic. 'You can repurpose lanes. You just need some paint,' he says. Ultimately, 'we won't be in a world where we have three different lanes,' says Heineke. 'Two is enough.' In the U.S., where many city avenues hum along at 45 mph, and speed limits often are disregarded, slowing cars will be a tall order. So will expanding bike lanes, in a country where carving out even a single bike lane is often met with driver and voter hostility. For now, that leaves every two-wheeler on his or her own. Nicole McSpirit—a Denver school crossing guard and e-bike enthusiast—has a Dutch model that tops out at 16.5 mph. The city has well over 100 miles of bike lanes, though many are merely a line of paint a few feet from the curb and are along major thoroughfares, offering little real protection from cars and trucks. Like a lot of experienced city bicyclists, McSpirit avoids those bike lanes and winds her way through the city on quieter side streets, when possible. 'Drivers think the roads are for them,' she says. Jeff Bailey is a writer in Denver. He can be reached at reports@

GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off
GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off

Business Standard

time2 days ago

  • Business Standard

GenAI paradox: Companies pouring billions into AI; it has yet to pay off

Nearly four decades ago, when the personal computer boom was in full swing, a phenomenon known as the 'productivity paradox' emerged. It was a reference to how, despite companies' huge investments in new technology, there was scant evidence of a corresponding gain in workers' efficiency. Today, the same paradox is appearing, but with generative artificial intelligence. According to recent research from McKinsey & Company, nearly eight in 10 companies have reported using generative AI, but just as many have reported 'no significant bottom-line impact'. AI technology has been racing ahead with chatbots like ChatGPT, fueled by a high-stakes arms race among tech giants and superrich start-ups and prompting an expectation that everything from back-office accounting to customer service will be revolutionised. But the payoff for businesses outside the tech sector is lagging behind, plagued by issues including an irritating tendency by chatbots to make stuff up. That means that businesses will have to continue to invest billions to avoid falling behind — but it could be years before the technology delivers an economywide payoff, as companies gradually figure out what works best. Call it the 'the generative AI paradox,' as McKinsey did in its research report. Investments in generative AI by businesses are expected to increase 94 per cent this year to $61.9 billion, according to IDC, a technology research firm. But the percentage of companies abandoning most of their AI pilot projects soared to 42 per cent by the end of 2024, up from 17 per cent the previous year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 technology and business managers by S&P Global, a data and analytics firm. Projects failed not only because of technical hurdles, but often because of 'human factors' like employee and customer resistance or lack of skills, said Alexander Johnston, a senior analyst at S&P Global. Gartner, a research and advisory firm that charts technological 'hype cycles,' predicts that AI is sliding toward a stage it calls 'the trough of disillusionment.' The low point is expected next year, before the technology eventually becomes a proven productivity tool, said John-David Lovelock, the chief forecaster at Gartner. That was the pattern with past technologies like personal computers and the internet — early exuberance, the hard slog of mastering a technology, followed by a transformation of industries and work. The winners so far have been the suppliers of AI technology and advice. They include Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, which offer AI software, while Nvidia is the runaway leader in AI chips. Executives at those companies have bragged how AI is reshaping their own work forces, eliminating the need for some entry-level coding work and making other workers more efficient. AI will eventually replace entire swaths of human employees, many predict, a perspective that is being widely embraced and echoed in the corporate mainstream. At the Aspen Ideas Festival in June, Jim Farley, the chief executive of Ford Motor, said, 'Artificial intelligence is going to replace literally half of all white-collar workers in the US' Whether that type of revolutionary change occurs, and how soon, depends on the real-world testing ground of many businesses. 'The raw technological horsepower is terrific, but it's not going to determine how quickly AI transforms the economy,' said Andrew McAfee, a principal research scientist and co-director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Initiative on the Digital Economy. Still, some businesses are finding ways to incorporate AI — although in most cases the technology is still a long way from replacing workers. One company where AI's promise and flaws are playing out is USAA, which provides insurance and banking services to members of the military and their families. After several pilot projects, some of which it closed down, the company introduced an AI assistant to help its 16,000 customer service workers provide correct answers to specific questions. USAA is tracking its AI investments, but does not yet have a calculation of the financial payoff, if any, for the call center software. But the response from its workers, the company said, has been overwhelmingly positive. While it has software apps for answering customer questions online, its call centers field an average of 200,000 calls a day. 'Those are moments that matter,' said Ramnik Bajaj, the company's chief data analytics and AI officer. 'They want a human voice at the other end of the phone.' That's similar to an AI app developed more than a year ago for fieldworkers at Johnson Controls, a large supplier of building equipment, software and services. The company fed its operating and service manuals for its machines into an AI program that has been trained to generate a problem summary, suggest repairs and deliver it all to the technician's tablet computer. In testing, the app has trimmed 10 to 15 minutes off a repair call of an hour or more — a useful efficiency gain, but hardly a workplace transformation on its own. Fewer than 2,000 of the company's 25,000 field service workers have access to the AI helper, although the company is planning an expansion. 'It's still pretty early days, but the idea is that over time everyone will use it,' said Vijay Sankaran, the chief digital and information officer at Johnson Controls. The long-term vision is that companies will use AI to improve multiple systems, including sales, procurement, manufacturing, customer service and finance, he said. 'That's the game changer,' said Sankaran, who predicts that shift will take at least five years. Two years ago, JPMorgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, blocked access to ChatGPT from its computers because of potential security risks. Only a few hundred data scientists and engineers were allowed to experiment with AI Today, about 200,000 of the bank's employees have access to a general-purpose AI assistant — essentially a business chatbot — from their work computers for tasks like retrieving data, answering business questions and writing reports. The assistant, tailored for JPMorgan's use, taps into ChatGPT and other AI tools, while ensuring data security for confidential bank and customer information. Roughly half of the workers use it regularly and report spending up to four hours less a week on basic office tasks, the company said. The bank's wealth advisers are also employing a more specialized AI assistant, which uses bank, market and customer data to provide wealthy clients with investment research and advice. The bank says it retrieves information and helps advisers make investment recommendations nearly twice as fast as they could before, increasing sales. Lori Beer, the global chief information officer at JPMorgan, oversees a worldwide technology staff of 60,000. Has she shut down AI projects? Probably hundreds in total, she said. But many of the shelved prototypes, she said, developed concepts and code that were folded into other, continuing projects. 'We're absolutely shutting things down,' Ms. Beer said. 'We're not afraid to shut things down. We don't think it's a bad thing. I think it's a smart thing.' McAfee, the M.I.T. research scientist, agreed. 'It's not surprising that early AI efforts are falling short,' said McAfee, who is a founder of Workhelix, an AI-consulting firm. 'Innovation is a process of failing fairly regularly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store