Pro-Palestine protesters in UK call for Israel arms embargo, sanctions
Wednesday's march, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), came as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer took weekly questions from parliamentarians.
Thousands of protesters created a 'Red Line for Palestine', wearing red while encircling the building.
Starmer told Parliament that Israel's actions in the besieged and bombarded enclave are 'appalling' and 'intolerable'.
'It is right to describe these days as dark,' Starmer said. 'We have strongly opposed the expansion of Israeli military operations, and settler violence, and the blocking of humanitarian aid.'
Starmer added that the UK has imposed sanctions, suspended free trade negotiations, and is currently considering further sanctions.
But the UK leader, his Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and his government have come under heavy criticism in the UK for not speaking more forcefully backed by actual action earlier in the war, and for not doing enough now as Palestinians face what United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called the 'cruellest phase of this cruel conflict'.
Al Jazeera's Rory Challands, reporting from London, said the protest went on for several hours and throughout Starmer's entire speech to Parliament.
'There was a red line around the whole of Parliament,' Challands said.
'These protesters had formed a cordon, essentially all the way down from Parliament to the first bridge … that goes across to the other side of the [River] Thames, and they came back up … and returned over Westminster Bridge to join up here to make a full loop,' he added.
According to Challands, protesters say that their 'red line' is to show that the UK government should have its own red lines when it comes to Gaza.
It has not had 'sufficient' red lines in place, he said. 'The protesters say there should have been red lines before 54,000 deaths.'
In his remarks, Starmer also called for an end to the siege and said humanitarian aid must reach Gaza quickly and in the required quantities.
Israel has maintained a crippling blockade on the territory, barring the entry of much-needed aid, including food, medicine, clean water, and fuel required by generators. A famine now looms as more than two million people are facing starvation, the UN has warned.
Meanwhile, a controversial, United States-backed group that runs aid distribution points in Gaza – the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – has suspended operations for a full day. The move came after Israeli forces opened fire at hungry aid seekers several times, killing dozens of Palestinians and injuring hundreds more since the organisation started operating in the enclave on May 27.
The killing of people desperately seeking food supplies has triggered mounting international outrage as many say aid is being weaponised and with the UN's Guterres demanding an independent inquiry.
Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 54,607 Palestinians and wounded 125,341, according to the Health Ministry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Microsoft employee protests lead to arrests as company reviews its work with Israel's military
REDMOND, Wash. (AP) — Worker-led protests erupted at Microsoft headquarters this week as the tech company promises an 'urgent' review of the Israeli military's use of its technology during the ongoing war in Gaza. A second day of protests at the Microsoft campus on Wednesday called for the tech giant to immediately cut its business ties with Israel. The police department began making arrests after Microsoft said the protesters were trespassing. 'We said, 'Please leave or you will be arrested,' and they chose not to leave so they were detained,' said police spokesperson Jill Green. Microsoft late last week said it was tapping a law firm to investigate allegations reported by British newspaper The Guardian that the Israeli Defense Forces used Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform to store phone call data obtained through the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. 'Microsoft's standard terms of service prohibit this type of usage," the company said in a statement posted Friday, adding that the report raises 'precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review.' The company said it will share the findings after law firm Covington & Burling completes its review. The promised review was insufficient for the employee-led No Azure for Apartheid group, which for months has protested Microsoft's supplying the Israeli military with technology used for its war against Hamas in Gaza. In February, The Associated Press revealed previously unreported details about the American tech giant's close partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defense, with military use of commercial AI products skyrocketing by nearly 200 times after the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack. The AP reported that the Israeli military uses Azure to transcribe, translate and process intelligence gathered through mass surveillance, which can then be cross-checked with Israel's in-house AI-enabled targeting systems. Following The AP's report, Microsoft acknowledged the military applications but said a review it commissioned found no evidence that its Azure platform and artificial intelligence technologies were used to target or harm people in Gaza. Microsoft did not share a copy of that review or say who conducted it. Microsoft in May fired an employee who interrupted a speech by CEO Satya Nadella to protest the contracts, and in April, fired two others who interrupted the company's 50th anniversary celebration.
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Microsoft employee protests lead to arrests as company reviews its work with Israel's military
REDMOND, Wash. (AP) — Worker-led protests erupted at Microsoft headquarters this week as the tech company promises an 'urgent' review of the Israeli military's use of its technology during the ongoing war in Gaza. A second day of protests at the Microsoft campus on Wednesday called for the tech giant to immediately cut its business ties with Israel. The police department began making arrests after Microsoft said the protesters were trespassing. 'We said, 'Please leave or you will be arrested,' and they chose not to leave so they were detained,' said police spokesperson Jill Green. Microsoft late last week said it was tapping a law firm to investigate allegations reported by British newspaper The Guardian that the Israeli Defense Forces used Microsoft's Azure cloud computing platform to store phone call data obtained through the mass surveillance of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. 'Microsoft's standard terms of service prohibit this type of usage,' the company said in a statement posted Friday, adding that the report raises 'precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review.' The company said it will share the findings after law firm Covington & Burling completes its review. The promised review was insufficient for the employee-led No Azure for Apartheid group, which for months has protested Microsoft's supplying the Israeli military with technology used for its war against Hamas in Gaza. In February, The Associated Press revealed previously unreported details about the American tech giant's close partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defense, with military use of commercial AI products skyrocketing by nearly 200 times after the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack. The AP reported that the Israeli military uses Azure to transcribe, translate and process intelligence gathered through mass surveillance, which can then be cross-checked with Israel's in-house AI-enabled targeting systems. Following The AP's report, Microsoft acknowledged the military applications but said a review it commissioned found no evidence that its Azure platform and artificial intelligence technologies were used to target or harm people in Gaza. Microsoft did not share a copy of that review or say who conducted it. Microsoft in May fired an employee who interrupted a speech by CEO Satya Nadella to protest the contracts, and in April, fired two others who interrupted the company's 50th anniversary celebration.
Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
State Dept. fires official after internal debates over Israel
The State Department fired its top press officer for Israeli-Palestinian affairs following multiple disputes over how to characterize key Trump administration policies, including a controversial plan to relocate hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip that critics consider ethnic cleansing, according to U.S. officials and documents reviewed by The Washington Post. Monday's firing of c occurred days after an internal debate about releasing a statement to the news media that said, 'We do not support forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza.' Ghoreishi drafted the line, which resembled previous remarks made by President Donald Trump and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who said in February the United States would not pursue an 'eviction plan' for Gaza. State Department leadership vetoed the move, instructing officials to 'cut the line marked in red and clear,' according to a memo dated last week. U.S. officials said Ghoreishi's firing has sent a chilling message to State Department employees that communication straying from ardent pro-Israel messaging — even if it's in line with long-standing U.S. policy — will not be tolerated. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. The State Department did not offer a rationale for Ghoreishi's firing but suggested he had strayed from the White House's agenda. 'We do not comment on leaked emails or allegations,' said State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott. 'Federal employees should never put their personal political ideologies ahead of the duly elected president's agenda.' Ghoreishi told The Post he was not given an explanation for his firing, which the State Department was not required to provide due to his status as a contractor. He said the incident raised troubling questions about the department's position on the potential expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza. 'Despite a strong reputation and close working relationship with many of my colleagues, I was unable to survive these disputes,' he said, noting the language he recommended for the media statement had been previously cleared by the State Department since Trump took office on Jan. 20. Another dispute inside the State Department occurred earlier this month following Israel's targeted killing of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and several other journalists in Gaza City. Israel claimed al-Sharif was a Hamas member, a charge denied by Al Jazeera. Israel has not made similar claims about the cameraman and other journalists killed along side al-Sharif. As officials contemplated how the State Department should address the incident, Ghoreishi recommended including a line that said 'We mourn the loss of journalists and express condolences to their families.' State Department leadership objected in an email sent Aug. 10. 'No response is needed,' said the email. 'We can't be sending out condolences if we are unsure of this individual's actions.' A key opponent of Ghoreishi within the department was David Milstein, a senior adviser to Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Milstein is known for confronting staff throughout the department in defense of the Israeli government, said officials familiar with the matter. Critics of Milstein within the State Department contend he appears overly eager to please Israeli officials and frequently involves himself in matters that are beyond the scope of his responsibilities. 'Milstein is an adviser to an ambassador,' one official said. 'That's it, yet he has his hands in everything.' Milstein did not respond to a request for comment. Milstein and other State Department officials clashed in July when Milstein sought to release a statement under Secretary of State Marco Rubio's name that condemned Ireland for considering legislation that would ban trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, said officials. The effort alarmed U.S. diplomats in Europe, who viewed the appropriate next step to be consulting with Irish officials in private before publicly condemning the country's actions. Ultimately, U.S. diplomats overseeing Europe and the Middle East prevailed over Milstein and prevented the statement's release. More recently, Milstein and Ghoreishi disagreed over Milstein's push for the State Department to refer to the West Bank as 'Judea and Samaria,' the biblical name for the region that is widely used within Israel. The territory is internationally recognized as the West Bank and Palestinians object to the use of Judea and Samaria as legitimizing Israeli settlements and potential annexation — a concern also shared by advocates of a two-state solution. A Milstein memo reviewed by The Post was drafted in response to questions from the Associated Press about House Speaker Mike Johnson's visit to the territory. The memo praised Johnson (R-Louisiana) for 'making history as the highest-ranking U.S. official and first speaker of the House to ever go to Judea and Samaria.' Ghoreishi managed to cut that line before it was shared with the news media and inserted previously approved State Department language that used West Bank while referring other questions about Johnson's trip to his 'office for further information,' the line said. The question about displacement from Gaza is particularly relevant given reports that Israeli officials are in talks with South Sudan about relocating thousands of Palestinians to the war-torn African nation. Critics say the plan, if implemented, would amount to ethnic cleansing and a war crime. Israeli officials say the plan would amount to 'voluntary migration,' a characterization challenged by those noting the besieged enclave's chronic lack of food and water, and sustained Israeli military campaign. Ghoreishi's supporters in the department rebutted spokesman Pigott's suggestion that he worked against Trump's agenda. One State Department official said Ghoreishi always cleared his recommendations internally and had a 'proven track record of being able to channel President Trump and Rubio in the public talking points' and noted that, 'He's the guy who wrote the Secretary's tweet 'Make Gaza Beautiful Again.'' Ghoreishi said he was not motivated by anti-Trump animus and had been inspired by Trump's May speech about the Middle East, which he said some senior State Department officials continued to resist. 'Trump called out neocons and western interventionists for failing the Middle East, and claimed he wanted to help pave a new path for the region,' he said. 'The hawks on the seventh floor of the State Department do not match that vision.' The department's seventh floor houses Rubio's office and those of other top officials. Other U.S. officials have noted that Trump's language on Israel has ranged from critical to extremely supportive, and contradictory remarks about establishing a 'Riviera of the Middle East' in Gaza have allowed competing ideological camps to stake a claim for the Trump mantle. On Wednesday, Ghoreishi came under attack from Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and unofficial adviser to Trump with a track record of leveling unsubstantiated claims. In a post on social media, she called Ghoreishi a 'Pro-Iranian Regime Jihadi Muslim Tied To NIAC,' a reference to the National Iranian American Council, a group that supported the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Ghoreishi said he was an intern there in the fall of 2013.
