Bill to ban some food additives moves to full Illinois Senate
On Tuesday, Senate Bill 93, also known as the Illinois Food Safety Act, passed the Senate Public Health Committee and will now advance to the full body for consideration.
'We have taken a pivotal step forward to protect all Illinoisans,' said Sen. Willie Preston (D-Chicago). 'A significant milestone in our effort to protect every Illinoisan from having a dangerous, poisonous food supply.'
If passed, it would ban certain additives in candy, soda, and other food items sold and manufactured in Illinois. The bill, which is a bipartisan effort, had support in the Senate last spring but failed to make it to the House.
'We've worked diligently to create legislation that is fair, that is science-based, and that is effective,' said Preston, who introduced the legislation.
In its current language, which Preston will look to modify considering recent federal developments, Senate Bill 93 includes banning food products containing brominated vegetable oil (BVO), potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye No. 3.
On Jan. 15, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned the use of red dye No. 3 in food, citing the Delaney Clause, a section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act that prohibits the use of cancer-causing chemicals in food. Since its approval in 1969, red dye No. 3 has been found in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals.
FDA bans red dye No. 3 from foods: What to know
In July, the FDA also banned the use of BVO in food. It previously was used in small amounts as a stabilizer for fruit flavoring in drinks to keep the citrus flavor from floating to the top.
Preston plans to keep language to ban propylparaben and potassium bromate in food products produced in the state. The bill would also prohibit businesses from selling or distributing food products with these additives.
Propylparaben, according to the Environmental Working Group, is a preservative found in 49-widely available processed foods, including some cinnamon rolls, cakes, and corn tortillas. The group argues propylparaben disrupts the endocrine system, and its been critical of the FDA's failure to take action to ban it in food or to reassess its safety.
Potassium bromate, an oxidizing agent used as a food additive, mostly in the bread-making process to strengthen dough and allow for better rising in the oven, has been flagged by some health experts as posing a serious risk, including a potential for cancer. The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services said it may be a carcinogen since it has been shown to cause kidney, thyroid, and gastrointestinal cancer in animals.
'Make no mistake: food, and the security of our food, and the quality of our food, is a bipartisan issue,' said Sen. Seth Lewis (R-Carol Stream).
Proponents of the bill argue the legislation would impact people in all areas of Illinois, from rural to urban, including areas of Chicago impacted by food deserts.
'Think about how many people in Illinois would be so much healthier if they didn't have all these unnecessary additives in their food,' said Sen. Lakesia Collins (D-Chicago).
Not everyone is in support of the bill. During Tuesday's committee hearing, several people voiced opposition, including lawmakers and food industry representatives who testified.
'Different laws in all 50 states would severely disrupt the economy, and a strong collaborative approach between state and federal policymakers is vital to protect the food supply,' argued Jennifer Gardner with the National Confectioners Association.
'I'm not supporting your bill, but not because I don't believe in it. I think it needs to be managed at the federal level,' said Sen. Andrew Chesney (R-Freeport).
If enacted into law, which will still require votes in each chamber before reaching the governor's desk, thousands of products would be impacted, lawmakers said during Tuesday's committee hearing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Walmart Frozen Shrimp Subject To Recall Due To Potential Radioactive Risks
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has protocols in place to detect contaminated foods before they enter the country. And, as of today, it has advised the public not to eat specific Great Value brand frozen raw shrimp sold in Walmart stores due to a possible radioactive risk. During regular inspections, the U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) detected Cesium-137 (Cs-137) in a single sample of breaded shrimp, and all related containers and products were prevented from entering the United States. Cs-137 is a manmade radioisotope of cesium that's so widespread that it can be found in the air, soil, and food. After the FDA was alerted to the presence of this chemical, its own testing found about 68.48 Bq/kg — much lower than the 1200 Bq/kg threshold — in the breaded product (per the FDA advisory). Although the chemical wasn't found in other products tested, the agency says some could still be contaminated, representing a potential health concern but not an acute hazard. Since the investigation is ongoing, it's unclear if this frozen shrimp will become one of the worst seafood recalls that swept across America or even be among the biggest Walmart Great Value brand recalls in history. Read more: 14 Canned Foods To Stock Up On Before They Go Up In Price Specific Products Affected And What To Do The convenience and versatility of frozen shrimp make it a staple for many households. When you're looking for high-quality frozen shrimp to buy, though, reading the package label and looking for quality characteristics won't always protect you when some kind of contamination has occurred. The 2-pound bags of Great Value Raw Ez Peel Tail-On Farm-Raised White Vannamei Shrimp that the FDA is concerned about are processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati, an Indonesian company that does business as BMS Foods. The lot codes are 8005540-1, 8005538-1, and 8005539-1 — all with a Best by Date of March 15, 2027. Exposure to possible low-level radiation from Cs-137 in these products could impact consumers' health with prolonged exposure. Because of that, the FDA suggests that customers who have purchased any of these packages throw them away; do not eat or serve them. It also advises that customers contact their healthcare teams if they have already eaten these products and experience adverse symptoms. Meanwhile, the FDA has recommended that Walmart issue a recall and that all distributors and retailers not sell or serve the products. Hungry for more? Sign up for the free Daily Meal newsletter for delicious recipes, cooking tips, kitchen hacks, and more, delivered straight to your inbox. Read the original article on The Daily Meal. Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
FDA Warns Against Eating Shrimp Brand, Citing Radioactive Matter
The US Food and Drug Administration has advised the public not to eat a brand of shrimp sold at Walmart Inc. over concerns about radioactive contamination. The agency told Walmart to pull three lots of raw frozen shrimp sourced from Indonesia after officials detected radioactive Cesium-137 in a shipment that did not enter the US, the FDA said in a statement on Tuesday. The isotope can lead to an elevated risk of cancer through repeated exposure to low doses, though the detected levels were not high enough to cause an acute risk, the FDA said.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
As 90% Of Adults Stress Over Food Prices, Are Radioactive Shrimp A Result Of Cost Cutting?
Types of shrimp, tuna, stingray, and squid serve as a seafood chili sauce food menu at a food stall in Malang, East Java, Indonesia, on January 16, 2025. The seafood menu sells for USD 0.62 - USD 20.13 per package. (Photo by Aman Rochman/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images As food costs rise, and tariffs began to come into play, are radioactive shrimp just the beginning? Yesterday, Walmart customers across 13 states were confronted this with an unsettling recall notice: raw frozen shrimp, sold under the retailer's Great Value brand, were being pulled from shelves after U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing detected traces of Cesium-137, a man-made radioactive isotope. The discovery sparked a huge reaction online, a concern about food safety, and also what this episode reveals about a global seafood supply chain already under strain from tariffs, rising costs, and growing consumer mistrust. According to a press release by FDA officials, the contaminated shrimp originated from Indonesia and was processed by PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati also known as BMS Foods. Due to this recall, BMS Foods is now on the FDA's 'red list,' barred their products from the U.S. until further notice. The radioactive shrimp were detected at four U.S. ports—Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and Savannah, GA—before an import alert was issued by the FDA. Walmart quickly recalled the affected products at the agency's direction, advising customers to discard lot numbers - 8005540-1, 8005538-1 and 8005539-1. While none of the products exceeded federal intervention thresholds for a recall, the suggestion of radioactive shrimp being sold and served on American dinner tables was enough to ignite public anxiety. A farmer dries fish in Suqian, China, on October 15, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images) NurPhoto via Getty Images Indonesia is one of the world's top exporters of shrimp, and the United States is the largest purchaser of the crustacean worldwide. In the last 5 years, shrimp sales volume has increased from 275 million to 415 million pounds annually. Yet its aquaculture industry has faced repeated scrutiny for sanitary conditions. Environmental watchdogs have flagged processing facilities where seafood, particularly shrimp, is held in substandard environments, with overcrowded farm raised fishing ponds and questionable sanitary practices designed to cut costs - they are also creating condistions for contamination. And while Indonesia's Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries has vowed to introduce a quality and safety assurance system for marine and fisheries products to align with U.S. and global import standards, there is still work to be done. At the same time, American shrimpers along the Gulf Coast say they are being squeezed out by lower-priced imports, but they are looking forward to the tariffs to ease the pain. Shrimp caught in U.S. waters is generally more expensive, as domestic producers must follow stricter safety protocols. U.S. shrimpers have called on federal regulators to impose stronger protections, warning that unfair foreign trade practices and cheap imports are undermining their livelihood. But the impending tariffs on imported foods, may further disrupt seafood markets by driving up the costs. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that new tariffs could raise food costs by another 3%, with some categories like fresh produce initially jumping up by 7% and processed rice rising in price by 10.2% in the long term. Other items expected to cost more include cereal, meat and dairy products. For fish and shellfish, the added expense could tempt suppliers and distributors to cut costs elsewhere in the chain— through the reduction of quality controls, or cheaper processing. A shopper browses near the poultry section at a Walmart in Rosemead, California on December 19, 2024. An elderly patient in Louisiana is in "critical condition" with severe avian influenza, US authorities announced December 18, 2024, the first serious human case in the country as fears grow of a possible bird flu pandemic. Genetic sequencing revealed that the H5N1 virus in the patient belonged to the D1.1 genotype. This genotype has recently been detected in wild birds and poultry in the United States, and in human cases reported in Washington state and in the Canadian case, in British Columbia province (Photo by Frederic J. BROWN / AFP) (Photo by FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images This shrimp recall is hitting at a time when Americans are already deeply uneasy about the cost and safety of their food. According to a recent Associated Press-NORC poll, nearly 90% of U.S. adults report being stressed out regarding the cost of groceries, making it the #1 financial worry ahead of housing, healthcare, and savings. The data backs up those fears. Over the past year, the Consumer Price Index shows food prices increasing faster than inflation with groceries and restaurants up 2.4% and 3.8% respectively. In just one year, from June 2024 to June 2025, egg prices rose 27.3%, while meats, poultry, and fish climbed 5.6%. Consumers are absorbing these increases at the same time as they are told to be vigilant about recalls—whether it's lettuce linked to E. coli, baby formula shortages, or, in this case, shrimp carrying detected radioactive material. Each incident chips away at trust in the food system. 21 May 2025, Lower Saxony, Cuxhaven: Crabs (North Sea prawns) already cooked on the crab cutter are loaded onto a truck in the port. German North Sea fishermen have suffered a setback in the legal dispute over special fishing bans. The EU court dismissed their lawsuit against the EU Commission's corresponding bans in their entirety. Photo: Sina Schuldt/dpa (Photo by Sina Schuldt/picture alliance via Getty Images) dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images So, are radioactive shrimp just the latest symptom of a broken supply chain—or an isolated event unlikely to be repeated? The answer may not be clear for months. The FDA says it is working with Indonesian authorities to trace the source of the contamination and in turn wants to tighten oversight. But the discovery underscores how global food systems, already stretched thin by inflation and tariffs, are vulnerable to lapses that would have once seemed unimaginable. While some consumers will point to the system working, others will refer to this incident as a cause for deepening anxieties that food is both too expensive and too unreliable. For businesses, it's a warning that cutting corners—even through complex, faraway supply chains—can end up costing far more in reputational damage than in upfront savings. Whether this was a one-off mishap or an early glimpse of what's ahead, it has landed squarely in the middle of America's growing uneasiness over what to eat, how much it costs, and whether the system designed to protect consumer interests can still be trusted.
