Bill to ban some food additives moves to full Illinois Senate
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Illinois lawmakers have renewed their push to pass a food safety bill that would ban certain additives shown to negatively impact human health.
On Tuesday, Senate Bill 93, also known as the Illinois Food Safety Act, passed the Senate Public Health Committee and will now advance to the full body for consideration.
'We have taken a pivotal step forward to protect all Illinoisans,' said Sen. Willie Preston (D-Chicago). 'A significant milestone in our effort to protect every Illinoisan from having a dangerous, poisonous food supply.'
If passed, it would ban certain additives in candy, soda, and other food items sold and manufactured in Illinois. The bill, which is a bipartisan effort, had support in the Senate last spring but failed to make it to the House.
'We've worked diligently to create legislation that is fair, that is science-based, and that is effective,' said Preston, who introduced the legislation.
In its current language, which Preston will look to modify considering recent federal developments, Senate Bill 93 includes banning food products containing brominated vegetable oil (BVO), potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye No. 3.
On Jan. 15, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned the use of red dye No. 3 in food, citing the Delaney Clause, a section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act that prohibits the use of cancer-causing chemicals in food. Since its approval in 1969, red dye No. 3 has been found in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals.
FDA bans red dye No. 3 from foods: What to know
In July, the FDA also banned the use of BVO in food. It previously was used in small amounts as a stabilizer for fruit flavoring in drinks to keep the citrus flavor from floating to the top.
Preston plans to keep language to ban propylparaben and potassium bromate in food products produced in the state. The bill would also prohibit businesses from selling or distributing food products with these additives.
Propylparaben, according to the Environmental Working Group, is a preservative found in 49-widely available processed foods, including some cinnamon rolls, cakes, and corn tortillas. The group argues propylparaben disrupts the endocrine system, and its been critical of the FDA's failure to take action to ban it in food or to reassess its safety.
Potassium bromate, an oxidizing agent used as a food additive, mostly in the bread-making process to strengthen dough and allow for better rising in the oven, has been flagged by some health experts as posing a serious risk, including a potential for cancer. The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services said it may be a carcinogen since it has been shown to cause kidney, thyroid, and gastrointestinal cancer in animals.
'Make no mistake: food, and the security of our food, and the quality of our food, is a bipartisan issue,' said Sen. Seth Lewis (R-Carol Stream).
Proponents of the bill argue the legislation would impact people in all areas of Illinois, from rural to urban, including areas of Chicago impacted by food deserts.
'Think about how many people in Illinois would be so much healthier if they didn't have all these unnecessary additives in their food,' said Sen. Lakesia Collins (D-Chicago).
Not everyone is in support of the bill. During Tuesday's committee hearing, several people voiced opposition, including lawmakers and food industry representatives who testified.
'Different laws in all 50 states would severely disrupt the economy, and a strong collaborative approach between state and federal policymakers is vital to protect the food supply,' argued Jennifer Gardner with the National Confectioners Association.
'I'm not supporting your bill, but not because I don't believe in it. I think it needs to be managed at the federal level,' said Sen. Andrew Chesney (R-Freeport).
If enacted into law, which will still require votes in each chamber before reaching the governor's desk, thousands of products would be impacted, lawmakers said during Tuesday's committee hearing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Collins calls Kennedy's firing of vaccine experts ‘excessive'
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) on Monday called Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s firing of all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel 'excessive,' but she cautioned she needs to learn more about the decision. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, catching many GOP lawmakers by surprise. 'I did not know that that had happened,' Collins, a senior member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, said. 'It seems to me to be excessive to ask for everybody's resignations, but I can't judge because I don't know who he's replacing them with.' The Maine senator said the CDC's vaccine advisory committee 'provided helpful guidance to the public on what they should do.' Collins said that Kennedy didn't promise members of the HELP Committee that he would keep the vaccine experts in place. 'I'm just learning about it for the first time,' she said. 'I don't know what the basis was.' Kennedy said in his Wall Street Journal column that he removed the experts so that President Trump could shape the membership of the committee. 'Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028,' he wrote. Kennedy argued that vaccines have become 'a divisive issue in American politics' and that public confidence is waning' in health agencies, pharmaceutical companies and vaccines themselves. 'That is why, under my direction, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is putting the restoration of public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda. The public must know that unbiased science guides the recommendations from our health agencies. This will ensure the American people receive the safest vaccines possible,' he wrote. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) in a statement blasted Kennedy's move as 'reckless.' 'RFK Jr. and the Trump administration are taking a wrecking ball to the programs that keep Americans safe and healthy. Firing experts that have spent their entire lives protecting kids from deadly disease is not reform — it's reckless, radical, and rooted in conspiracy, not science,' Schumer said in a statement. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The impact of Medicaid, SNAP cuts in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
ST. LOUIS – Last week, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued its analysis of President Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' The CBO predicted the legislation would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade and leave nearly 11 million people without health insurance. 'They're asking the poorest Americans to tighten their belts, so that the richest Americans can loosen their belts, and that's what makes it so extra unfair,' Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, said. Kogan says the president's tax bill could feature the largest Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) cuts in history. 'By putting up so much red tape, tons of people who're doing everything right fall through the cracks,' Kogan said. 'These are incredibly meager benefits and all of the sudden, lots of people are going to lose them.' Police crackdown on reckless, disabling dozens of cars Kogan says the bill freezes Medicaid provider taxes, which many states use to help pay for large portions of their Medicaid programs. 'Already, a lot of hospitals are struggling, and this would definitely make the situation much worse,' he said. Senator Josh Hawley warned this could force rural hospitals to close. 'You've got some senators who now want to change this bill to cut Medicaid benefits. That's ridiculous. That's insane. 1.3 million people in Missouri are on Medicaid, including hundreds of thousands of kids. These are working people who cannot afford health insurance otherwise,' Hawley said in a June 5 interview. Last week, Hawley posted on his X social media account, 'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the big, beautiful bill. He said again, no Medicaid benefit cuts.' 'Failure is not an option. And we intend to deliver, along with the president, for the American people,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said. With Senate Republicans planning to get the bill to the president's desk by July 4, Kogan fears the fallout. 'There's a lot at stake here and a lot of people's livelihoods could be upended, so I hope the senators could see differently,' Kogan said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
COVID Crusader Writes Open Letter To RFK Jr On mRNA
A prominent group of health activists is threatening a political revolt against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over what they call a betrayal of their movement's central cause. In a blistering open letter dated June 4, COVID crusader Dr. Mary Talley Bowden and several allies from the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) movement — a grassroots coalition of vaccine-critical and medical freedom activists — accused Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary of watering down policies related to the controversial mRNA vaccine platform, especially in guidance affecting children and pregnant women. 'We did not fight for you to be in positions of leadership so that our clearly stated policy goals would suffer a 'bait and switch,'' Bowden wrote, warning Kennedy that MAHA voters 'can walk away' if their demands are not met. The letter criticizes recent CDC and FDA policy changes, calling them deceptive and insufficient, and claims the administration is engaging in 'linguistic misdirections' to hide the continued recommendation of mRNA shots for vulnerable populations. The MAHA letter insists the mRNA platform — particularly COVID vaccines — should be pulled from the market entirely, citing adverse event data and peer-reviewed studies. It demands sweeping reforms: a full ban on mRNA technologies, repeal of the PREP Act, elimination of vaccine-related conflicts of interest in federal agencies, and an end to direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising. The signatories include author Naomi Wolf, podcaster Shannon Joy, and several other activists who rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic by challenging government vaccine narratives. The backlash comes amid growing scrutiny of RFK Jr.'s recent actions as HHS secretary. Once one the nation's most vocal mRNA vaccine skeptic, Kennedy has walked a careful line in office, telling Congress in May that his personal views on vaccines are 'irrelevant' and vowing not to make sudden changes to CDC policy. 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me,' Kennedy told lawmakers, as reported by The Hill on June 2. Still, his critics on both sides see Kennedy's recent moves as consequential. Late last month, he released a 58-second video on X stating that COVID vaccines for healthy children and healthy pregnant women had been removed from the CDC's immunization schedule — a declaration Bowden and others say was misleading. Indeed, as The Hill previously reported, the CDC quietly changed its guidance to say healthy children may receive the COVID vaccine after consultation with a healthcare provider, while maintaining stronger recommendations for other vulnerable categories. For pregnant women, the recommendation was similarly softened but not eliminated, and pregnancy remains classified by the FDA as a high-risk health condition, allowing continued vaccine use under certain circumstances. Bowden's letter zeroes in on this ambiguity, arguing that wordplay is being used to sustain vaccine availability under the appearance of reform. 'Pregnant women have not been made any safer by your wordplay,' she writes, warning that MAHA activists are prepared to run their own candidates in upcoming elections if their demands are ignored. The political threat underscores the friction between Kennedy and the movement that once celebrated his nomination. While Kennedy has taken steps to reshape HHS in ways consistent with his skepticism — including canceling hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for Moderna's mRNA flu vaccine— his first few months of actions have not thus far rendered the swift action that some would have hoped. Former CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser and other public health experts have voiced alarm at Kennedy's willingness to circumvent the CDC's vaccine advisory panel, which has traditionally guided immunization policy through public, evidence-based deliberation. 'We're seeing a total side-stepping of the nation's leading public health agency,' Besser told The Hill. The vaccine panel has not yet weighed in on the updated COVID shot guidance. Its next meeting is scheduled for late June, and observers expect tense debate over whether Kennedy's changes represent science-based reform or political overreach. In the meantime, Bowden's warning reflects the fragile coalition Kennedy is attempting to hold together. The MAHA movement — built in part from disaffected MAGA voters, vaccine skeptics, and parents concerned about government overreach — played a pivotal role in rallying support for Kennedy's confirmation and the broader medical freedom agenda. Now, its leaders are openly questioning whether Kennedy's tenure will deliver the systemic change they demand — or whether they were simply used to fuel a political ascent. 'MAHA is not the possession of Secretary Kennedy,' Bowden wrote. 'It is the voice of millions of desperate parents… and their activism will outlast any administration.' The Dallas Express reached out to HHS but did not immediately receive a response. Kennedy previously spoke to The Dallas Express about a lawsuit Bowden brought against the FDA for misleading the public about using ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 during his presidential campaign in 2024 and just after the FDA settled the case. 'All three of the principal health agencies [CDC, NIH, FDA] suffer from agency capture,' Kennedy said. 'I would say 50% of the FDA's budget is from pharmaceutical companies. NIH scientists are allowed to collect royalties on drugs that they regulate –– which is clearly a conflict of interest. CDC … has devolved into an agency that primarily promotes the mercantile interests of the pharmaceutical companies.' He told DX that the agencies are overly influenced by perverse incentives from the pharmaceutical industry and added, 'I will change those incentives and unravel the culture of corruption that now has turned these agencies against public health.'
