logo
Everything Is a ‘False Flag' Now

Everything Is a ‘False Flag' Now

WIRED22-07-2025
Jul 22, 2025 11:18 AM Conspiracy theories about so-called false flag attacks have been around for decades. But as trust in media and public institutions craters, every single major news event is now being labeled as fake. Photo-Illustration:As President Donald Trump struggles to contain the fallout related to his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, some of his own supporters have decided only one conspiracy theory could possibly explain what's going on. Welcome to the era of the 'false flag.'
Almost every news development is now labeled a 'false flag,' or a distraction designed to deflect attention from the real story, by some conspiracy theorist online. 'All these floods popping up around the country is a false flag,' an anonymous X account which posts far-right content wrote on July 10. 'They want us to forget Epstein!'
False flag conspiracy theories have been around for decades, long before the emergence of the internet—and like many conspiratorial prisms, they're rooted in something real, in this case the fact that militaries and intelligence services have staged attacks in order to give pretexts for war. But the volume of social media posts mentioning 'false flags' is now at an unprecedented high, according to new research from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) shared exclusively with WIRED. Basically, according to the conspiratorial corners of the internet, everything is a false flag now.
'False flag attacks in the form of severe and unprecedented flooding are currently being carried out across the country as a diversion from Trump spiking the Epstein files,' Stew Peters, a podcaster with a long history of promoting antisemitism and conspiracy theories, wrote on X, alongside a video of actual flooding in North Carolina.
'I didn't need ChatGPT to tell me it was a false flag assassination,' RC DeWinter, an artist with 70,000 followers on X wrote on the anniversary of the Trump assassination attempt.
'Everything you are watching on TV is a false flag, especially the nonsense about Elon Musk & Trump spat,' another X user wrote last week, referencing the fallout between the president and the richest man in the world.
Data from ISD shows that over the past five years, false flag claims have increased by more than 1100 percent on X, and the situation is getting increasingly worse. There were one million mentions of 'false flag' on X between April 26 and June 26, 2025, a nearly 350 percent increase compared to the prior two months.
'It's unprecedented in terms of the volume, the speed at which it spread and the level of engagement that we saw. Some of these accounts were not that big and yet they were garnering millions of views in a matter of hours,' Valeria de la Fuente Suárez, a digital research analyst with ISD and author of the research, tells WIRED. 'It's just becoming this common response to these high-profile crises when there's chaos and confusion and uncertainty and in many cases, it doesn't align with their agenda.'
De la Fuente Suárez says the institute's research focused on X, but adds that she was also able to find many examples of 'false flag' conspiracizing on other platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook.
X, TikTok, and Meta did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
False flag operations, which are carried out by governments or militaries in an effort to blame an adversary for something they did not actually do, have a rich history. In one of the most famous examples, German soldiers pretended that Polish troops had stormed across the Poland-Germany border in 1939 and taken over a German radio station. The next day, Germany invaded Poland—and Adolf Hitler referenced the previous day's fake attack in order to legitimize the incursion.
But for as much as real false flag incidents have occurred, conspiracy theorists have used these histories as a way of legitimizing false flag conspiracy theories. Major incidents, including the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the September 11 attacks, and the Sandy Hook shooting, are framed by conspiracy theorists as 'false flags.' Today, after any major incident—whether it's the attempted assassination of Trump last year, the devastating Texas flooding, or the shooting of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman—people on the right and left now regularly respond by claiming they are simply distractions.
'Vance Boelter is not a real person,' one X account holder posted about the charged Minnesota shooter. 'This is a false flag psyop that the news media is using to instill fear into the people.'
In her report, de la Fuente Suárez outlines a number of reasons why these conspiracy theories have flourished online, including the collapse in trust of mainstream media and public institutions, social media platforms abandoning fact checking, and the rise in popularity of so-called 'news influencers' like Peters. 'It creates the sense that nothing can be trusted, that all we read, we see, we hear, on TV, on the news, it's part of this deception,' de la Fuente Suárez says. 'But one of the things that concerns me the most is that within these frameworks, those that are harmed in these attacks are also dehumanized. They are depicted not as victims of attacks, but as these elements of a grand staged plan of deception, downplaying acts of violence and the suffering of the victims in it.'
De la Fuente Suárez says that antisemitism is also driving false flag conspiracies to an unprecedented level.
Antisemitic posts were among the main drivers of the most recent spike in false flag conspiracies on X. This began, she says, in response to the shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers who were leaving an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, DC on May 21. Less than two weeks later, a man in Boulder, Colorado allegedly used incendiary devices to attack participants in a march held to support Israeli hostages in Gaza.
'False Flag 100%,' a conspiracy-focused X account posted two days after the DC shooting. The post was accompanied by a video of the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and has been viewed 3.6 million times to date.
In the aftermath of the Boulder attack, an X account that describes its author as an 'anti-zionist Jew' posted an image of the suspected attacker with the caption: 'This man is an Israeli agent who has just perpetrated a false flag event in Boulder Colorado.' The post has been viewed over 2.2 millions times.
'Antisemitism is at the center of these conspiracy claims, so they resonate more, and in these moments, it's just an easy response and one that is, in many cases, very difficult to debunk,' says de la Fuente Suárez.
Other experts see the rise in false flag conspiracy theories as a reflection of the increasingly fractured political environment.
"The rise in 'false flag' conspiracy theories is closely tied to the political climate,' Pradeep Krishnan, an expert in conspiracy theory and communication at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, tells WIRED. 'The Trump presidency has mainstreamed conspiracist rhetoric to mobilise political distrust and promote anti-establishment sentiment.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors
AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has announced its support for the bill introduced by Senator John Fetterman that aims to provide a critical tax filing option for individuals who have experienced spousal abuse or abandonment. The Survivor Assistance for Fear-free and Easy Tax Filing Act of 2025 (SAFE Act), identified as S. 2129, proposes that survivors of domestic violence or spousal abandonment be allowed to file their taxes as if they were single. Currently, the tax code mandates that married individuals file under one of two categories: married filing jointly or married filing separately. These requirements can compel survivors to engage with an abusive or absent spouse, complicating the filing process. The SAFE Act intends to empower survivors by enabling them to file their tax returns independently, thereby granting them access to tax benefits such as credits and deductions without being financially linked to their abusive or absent partners. This legislation seeks to enhance the autonomy of survivors in managing their tax obligations, thereby reducing the influence that abusive or absent spouses may have over their financial matters. AICPA Tax Policy & Advocacy senior manager Daniel Hauffe said: 'Many tax practitioners have one or more clients to which this legislation is applicable in some form and they are restrained due to current law in how to best help these clients. 'This legislation addresses a critical gap in the US tax system that affects survivors of domestic abuse or spousal abandonment. 'This is a practical step toward tax equity and survivor protection, ensuring that the tax system does not unintentionally perpetuate harm or dependency in abusive situations. We are grateful to Senator Fetterman for his leadership on this issue and ask that other members of Congress join us in supporting this bill.' "AICPA backs SAFE Act to aid tax filing for domestic abuse survivors" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

Democrats use obscure law to seek release of Epstein files
Democrats use obscure law to seek release of Epstein files

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats use obscure law to seek release of Epstein files

Democrats moved Wednesday to force Donald Trump to release files from the investigation into notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, invoking an obscure law to keep up the pressure on an issue that has roiled the US president's administration. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent about the disgraced financier, who died in federal prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The president raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein on Tuesday when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after the disgraced financier "stole" employees from the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The Justice Department angered Trump supporters earlier this month when it said Epstein had died by suicide and had no "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories about the supposed complicity of high-profile Democrats that leading figures in Trump's MAGA movement had been pushing for years. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Democrats on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee wrote to the Justice Department asking for the materials under a section of federal law known as the "rule of five." The measure -- introduced a century ago but rarely used -- requires government departments to provide relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief watchdog panel request it. It is not clear if it could be enforced in court but even if the effort fails it keeps the spotlight on an issue that has upended Trump's summer, dividing Republicans and leading to the early closure of the House of Representatives. Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in Congress -- with limited Republican support -- have been seeking a floor vote to force their release. House Oversight Committee Democrats, backed by some Republicans, approved a subpoena last week for the Justice Department to hand over the documents, although the demand has yet to be sent. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his crimes. Maxwell's lawyer has said she would speak to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity for her testimony. "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony," a spokesman for the panel said. Democrats have also sought to attach votes on the Epstein files to unrelated bills multiple times, prompting Speaker Mike Johnson to send lawmakers home for the summer a day early last week rather than risk them succeeding. "Donald Trump promised he would release the Epstein files while he was on the campaign trail. He made that promise, and he has yet to do it," Schumer said in a speech Tuesday on the Senate floor. ft/dw

The Jeffrey Epstein saga: a new national security threat?
The Jeffrey Epstein saga: a new national security threat?

UPI

time24 minutes ago

  • UPI

The Jeffrey Epstein saga: a new national security threat?

U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman speaks during a news conference about the arrest of American financier Jeffrey Epstein in New York on July 8, 2019, on sex trafficking charges, File photo by Jason Szenes July 30 (UPI) -- The sordid saga of the long dead and convicted predator Jeffrey Epstein not only poses a threat to Donald Trump's presidency, but it also conceivably threatens the credibility of the U.S. political system. Yet, an even more sinister and potentially dangerous threat lurks for the United States and its friends. The two threats are linked, ironically, by Epstein's ghost. Trump's MAGA base is furious that the promised Epstein files have not been released. What's worse is that that Attorney General Pam Bondi apparently informed Trump his name was in the file -- high-test fuel for that blaze. And, now, possibly to deflect attention, Trump and his director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, have accused former President Barack Obama of treason by interfering in the 2016 election with Russian help. In a nation as politically divided as America, any spark could ignite a political firestorm. Beijing, Moscow and others with malicious intent are intensely watching this saga. One conclusion must be that even greater opportunities exist today to interfere in United States and Western politics, not just exploiting this debacle. More importantly, creating new crises that manipulate and fracture political and social cohesion is a formidable danger. The U.K.'s Brexit is an example of manipulation. In the effort to withdraw from the European Union -- the Leave campaign -- former Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his key adviser, Dominic Cummings determined that 1 million or so Britons lacked party affiliation. Then, using social media, this group was targeted with Leave propaganda generated by Cummings. That swung the vote to leave. Cummings was not alone. Substantial evidence exists that Moscow helped influence Brexit and the Leave campaign to weaken the Atlantic Alliance. And Moscow also interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections. Consider the infamous Steele Dossier. Among the allegations, the dossier accused Trump of lewd sexual behavior in Moscow. Suspend reality and imagine Vladimir Putin intervened to help elect Hillary Clinton as president in 2016. Following Cummings' lead, Russian trolls would have filled the Internet with deep-fake photos and invented stories exaggerating or inventing Trump's misconduct. One wonders who might have been elected 45th president. China and Moscow have significant interests in manipulating and fracturing American and Western cohesion. Putin is focused on winning in Ukraine, minimizing sanctions, and in the process, weakening Western solidarity. China is keen on reducing American economic and political influence, as well as annexing Taiwan. It would be negligent to not assume China and Russia are identifying critical weaknesses and potential future fracture points in the United States and elsewhere. In that event where might they focus? National political systems, given the Epstein debacle and national infrastructures, are the two most obvious candidates. Regarding the United States, the Constitution and its system of government based on checks and balances and a division of power among three co-equal branches are the best targets. A super-majority of Americans is highly distrustful and disdainful of government. Exploiting this distrust would not be difficult using the ubiquity of social media and the propensity of Americans to embrace conspiracy theories. Epstein and the Steele Dossier are two examples of how possible future fractures can be invented to sow political, social and economic disruption. The difference is that these effects could be even more destructive. Regarding infrastructure, Israeli and Ukrainian infiltration of two societies with seeming control of their borders and people to launch surprise attacks deep into Iran and Russia underscores how potentially vulnerable military bases and installations are to drones. And even more susceptible to drone attacks are electric generation and power grids, which could cause nationwide disruption. Kinetic attacks on military and civilian infrastructure are fraught with risk. But perceived threats are not. The strategy would be to use a variant of Orson Welles' provocation of massive public and psychological panic in his radio broadcast of War of the Worlds in 1938. Consider future Wellesian scenarios on steroids that threaten catastrophic events or apply fake news reports of spreading epidemics or environmental, financial and other disasters to induce fear and disruption. Concocting new and credible conspiracy theories would be part of this disruptive strategy. None of this is new. The USSR used the Comintern, Cominform and KGB to misinform, disinform, disrupt and provoke. The United States and the U.K. employed similar techniques principally against the Nazis in World War II. However, today is different because social and other media can turn these activities into political weapons of mass disruption. The United States will survive Epstein. Against determined adversaries who intend to create and exploit new political fractures, are the United States and the West ready? That answer is sadly no. Harlan Ullman is UPI's Arnaud de Borchgrave Distinguished Columnist, senior adviser at Washington's Atlantic Council, chairman of a private company and principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. His next book, co-written with Field Marshal The Lord David Richards, former U.K. chief of defense and due out next year, is Who Thinks Best Wins: Preventing Strategic Catastrophe. The writer can be reached on X @harlankullman.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store