India close to hitting Guyana-type 2 lakh crore liter jackpot in Andaman that may make us $20 trillion economy, says Oil Minister Hardeep Puri
Exploration costs high, but so are the stakes
From import-reliant to energy-resilient?
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
India's Union Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri has revealed that India is very close to discovering a Guyana-scale oil field in the Andaman Sea, which could hold as much as 184,440 crore litres of crude oil. In an interview with The New Indian, Hardeep Singh Puri said the government's recent reforms and aggressive exploration drive are laying the groundwork for a major find. He added that apart from smaller finds, a large-scale oil discovery in the Andaman region—similar to Guyana's—could help expand India's economy from $3.7 trillion to $20 trillion. If confirmed, a find of this scale—comparable to Guyana's 11.6 billion barrel discovery—could reshape India's energy landscape.'When I made this statement about the Krishna Godavari Basin, at that point in time, that was one place. Now we have found green shoots, oil, and several other places. And I think it's only a matter of time before we find a big Guyana in the Andaman Sea. So that is ongoing.'The minister's confidence follows increased drilling in previously inaccessible areas and a major push to attract investment in exploration.Puri also pointed out the high costs involved in finding the oil drills. 'It costs a lot of money. In Guyana, they dug 43 or 44 wells, each costing $100 million. It's on the 41st that they found it," he said. 'Here, ONGC this year has dug the maximum number of wells. Highest in 37 years.' In FY24, ONGC drilled 541 wells—103 exploratory and 438 development—investing ₹37,000 crore in capital expenditure, the highest in its history.If exploration in the Andaman succeeds, India could significantly reduce oil imports and boost its economic position. India continues to rely heavily on crude oil imports to meet its energy needs. Government data shows that more than 85% of the country's crude oil is sourced from international suppliers. Globally, India ranks as the third-largest importer of crude oil, following the United States and China.During the interview, Hardeep Puri drew a comparison to Guyana's oil discovery made by Hess Corporation and China's CNOOC. That discovery, which uncovered an estimated 11.6 billion barrels of oil and gas, transformed Guyana into a significant player in the global energy market. It now stands 17th in the world in terms of oil reserves.Within India, crude oil production is currently concentrated in regions like Assam, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Mumbai High, and the Krishna-Godavari Basin. Strategic petroleum reserves are also maintained at Visakhapatnam, Mangalore, and Padur, with additional sites proposed in Odisha and Rajasthan.Exploration activities are now expanding to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, where companies such as Oil India and ONGC have begun survey and drilling operations in search of new reserves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Former Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik slams govt for scrapping metro project
Former Odisha CM Naveen Patnaik has lashed out at the BJP-led state government for scrapping the Bhubaneswar Metro Rail project . Patnaik, in a strongly worded post on X, called it a betrayal of the city's future. "The Bhubaneswar Metro Rail Project would have reshaped how the city moves. Now, the double-engine government has pushed it 10 years back," Patnaik wrote. The first phase of the Rs 6,255 crore project, from the airport to Trisulia, was greenlit during Patnaik's tenure and scheduled to complete by December 2027. But the project was shelved recently, with DMRC issuing termination notices to contractors. The BJP government defended the move, saying the earlier route wasn't viable and that a more expansive Puri-Bhubaneswar-Cuttack corridor is being planned. "We are preparing a new DPR and forming a committee to study similar metros. The revised plan will connect all major cities," said Urban Development Minister Krushna Chandra Mohapatra . Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Overturning the global trade system, Trump puts his ideas to the test
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump 's plan to impose stiff tariffs on dozens of trading partners next week will bring about one of his longtime goals: smashing a global trade system that he believes has robbed America of jobs and double-digit tariffs that the president has announced on nearly 100 countries represent a momentous change from the trading order that the United States has helped to build up globally since World War will scrap the low import taxes that the United States agreed to charge on all exports from members of the World Trade Organization in favor of much higher tariffs that vary widely from country to country. That will shift the playing field for many companies and set a new course for trade flows and the global economy in the years to Trump, the moves accomplish a campaign promise to use stiff levies to rebalance global trade to try to benefit America. The president and his economic advisers believe that tariffs will reduce the flow of imports into the United States and increase U.S. exports , bolstering the factory sector and creating more prosperity while filling government coffers But critics have said the approach will leave the United States more economically and diplomatically isolated, while drawing other parts of the world closer together. And many economists remain skeptical that tariffs will work in the way Trump intends, saying import taxes will spill over into higher prices for consumers, backfire on some manufacturers and slow economic growth Data released Thursday showed inflation picked up in June, the latest sign that tariffs were starting to bleed through to consumer prices. On Friday, the government also reported a significant slowdown in job growth, a sign that the blow of punishing tariffs may finally be landing on the economy.'The United States has destroyed the global trade system it created and left nothing in its place but a set of ad hoc arrangements,' said Edward Alden, a trade expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'For trade, the result will be long-term instability that will be bad for business, bad for consumers and bad for global growth.'The series of executive orders that Trump signed Thursday will raise tariffs on more than 90 countries by levels ranging from 10% to 41%. In so doing, they put in place a vision for global trade that the president first introduced in a Rose Garden ceremony at the White House on April 2, which he called 'Liberation Day.'In April, Trump announced that he would impose a 10% tariff on nearly all global imports, as well as significantly higher tariffs on dozens of nations that are net exporters to the United 10% baseline tariffs have been in place for months, but the higher tariffs that Trump wanted to charge on many countries ultimately went into effect for only a few hours. After his approach stoked turmoil in financial markets, the president abruptly paused the levies, saying he would give countries time to negotiate deals that would open their markets to U.S. exports in exchange for lower tariff the past few months, the United States has been inundated with trade offers and announced preliminary deals with Britain, Indonesia, the Philippines, Japan, the European Union and other trading countries have promised to purchase vast amounts of American energy and airplanes, make investments in U.S. factories and lower their barriers to U.S. farm and industrial goods, while still accepting higher tariffs on their exports. Countries that have signed deals face a 10% to 20% tariff rate when exporting to the United States, while those that do not confront levies of up to 50%.The Trump administration is moving forward with other tariffs as well. It has raised the price of foreign steel, cars and copper, and taxed imports from Canada, Mexico and China over concerns about their role in the flow of fentanyl into the United the president's changes will lift U.S. tariff rates to levels not seen in a century. According to calculations by Yale Budget Lab, American consumers will face an average tariff rate of 18.3%, the highest since 1934, and up from an average of just 2.5% when Trump came into office this year. That tax increase has started to slow U.S. imports and push up the price of goods, though the changes are taking some time to take morning, after a weak jobs report stoked fears in financial markets, the president wrote on social media, 'The good news is that tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!'Trade experts emphasized that Trump's moves will not only raise the cost of bringing goods into the United States, but will make it significantly more complex to do so. Instead of having one tariff rate that generally applies when bringing in a sneaker or toaster from any WTO country, the president has now assigned every country its own rate, which means a sneaker from Vietnam would be taxed at a higher rate than a sneaker from Irwin, a trade historian at Dartmouth College, said that over the past few weeks the world had 'been witnessing the greatest restructuring of U.S. trade policy since World War II.''The United States is moving to a system where imports from different countries are assessed at widely different tariff rates, introducing a degree of discrimination across trading partners that has never been a feature of traditional U.S. tariff policy,' he previous tariffs that Trump is replacing were negotiated over the past 80 years by the United States and its trading partners at the World Trade Organization and its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and a few exceptions, WTO members agree to offer one another the same tariff rates, as a way of ensuring fairness and increasing trade. Members of the organization can still set higher tariff rates globally for industries they want to protect, and lower rates for sectors where they welcome imports. The United States, for example, has long set high tariffs on foreign pickup trucks and apparel, while charging low or zero tariffs on electronics, fish and many decades, the United States worked with other countries to lower import taxes globally, believing it would increase prosperity. Since the general agreement was established after World War II, global trade has grown 45-fold, and U.S. per capita income has the rise of factories in other countries also led to offshoring and deindustrialization. That destroyed millions of manufacturing jobs, hurt factory towns across the United States and left the United States dependent on foreign sources of medicines, semiconductors and minerals. And WTO members, including the United States, proved unwilling to police trade violations from a rapidly growing outcomes, combined with growing income inequality and a lack of opportunity for less-educated communities, fueled support for Trump's proposals to dash the existing system in favor of something totally untested. That new system will now set much higher tariffs on countries that run trade surpluses with the United States or have otherwise earned the ire of Greer, the U.S. trade representative, said in a statement Thursday that the president's tariffs had 'accomplished what the World Trade Organization and multilateral negotiations have not been able to achieve at scale,' including market access for American exporters, increased tariffs to defend U.S. industries and investments that would create American Thursday morning on Fox Business Network, Peter Navarro, Trump's trade adviser, said the president was leading 'a fundamental restructuring of the international trade environment' and argued that he should be up for the Nobel Prize in economics.'The biggest market in the world has said: 'You're not going to cheat us anymore. We're going to have fair deals,'' Navarro said. 'And everything he's doing has defied the critics.'Over the past several months, Trump has, with the exception of China, been proven right that the U.S. economy is a powerful weapon to wield with its largest trading partners. Europe and Japan ultimately accepted less favorable terms to preserve access to the United States and avoid a painful trade what exactly these changes will mean for the United States and the world remains an open question. Some critics say that the tactics not only could drag on the economy, but strain long-standing American alliances and leave the country increasingly isolated.'The United States has decided to opt out from the existing rules of the world trading system,' said Alan Wolff, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the former deputy director general of the World Trade Organization. 'Other countries are very likely to try to trade to a greater extent with each other, given the uncertainties of dealing with the United States.'Wolff said the president was correct that the United States was the world's 'most desirable' market, but accounted for only about 13% of global trade. At least so far, no other country has followed its lead by raising tariffs. He predicted that world trade would continue to grow after the tariffs, though somewhat more slowly than it would have because of the U.S. have also questioned how permanent this new system will be, given Trump's history of scrapping deals he himself has negotiated. The details of trade agreements with many countries remain unclear, and in many cases still must be worked tariff authorities have also been challenged in U.S. courts and could be overturned in the coming months, forcing the administration to either scrap its levies or, more likely, search for new legal authorities to impose different Bartnick, a fellow at Columbia University and a former White House official, said that, for Trump, tariffs had become 'the hammer for all economic and political nails.''All of this has been done with no discernible thought to its impacts on broader great-power competition,' he said. 'Trump may hope that fashioning this new order will win him the Nobel Peace Prize. But American taxpayers are more likely to get higher prices and volatility.'
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
'Recession indicators' flood TikTok in US: Labubus, lipsticks and low-rise jeans trigger panic
Is US headed for a recession? Live Events What about lipstick sales and labubu dolls? (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The term 'recession indicator' is trending all over social media in the US. Have you ever wondered what do a Labubu toy and the US Treasury yield curve have in common? For Gen Z, everything from the popularity of Labubus to listening to emo music to lipstick sales are a possible indicator of a Lady Gaga topping the charts to fashionistas stepping out in low-rise jeans and coke bottles with names-- all these are just few hints that social media users see as a sign of recession in US TikTok is brimming with what users are calling modern-day recession indicators . Among the most talked-about are the hemline index—the theory that skirt lengths tend to get longer as economic downturns loom—and the lipstick index, which links spikes in lipstick purchases or Google searches to the onset of past recessions.'A huge recession indicator nobody is talking about, ready? The club is only getting stronger,' one TikTok post said, reports Seattle Times. 'We have an event here in Seattle at Cha Cha Lounge (where) they throw Latin night on a Wednesday and it gets packed.''Five things trending this summer that are actually just recession indicators,' one TikTok creator says in a video, going on to point to short nails, minimalism, people quitting fake tanning and a return to natural hair colors as signs of a posts suggested that signs of cost-cutting or anything evoking the 2007–2009 era are indicators that the US economy may be headed for a downturn. But experts don't share the same views and assessment as actual economic indicators hold steady despite clouds of uncertainty. Economists use metrics to predict recessions, such as the unemployment rate, now at 4.1%, and weekly unemployment insurance US real gross domestic product increased at a 3% annual rate from April through June, an improvement after contracting 0.5% in the first quarter, according to an advance estimate from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released this week. To be in a recession, the economy has to have two consecutive quarters, or six months, of negative GDP growth, economist Mark Gertler told The Seattle Times. This means, currently the US economy is not in a last time the National Bureau of Economic Research, where Gertler works, declared a recession was because of the pandemic. It was the shortest recession in US history, lasting from February to April 2020. Before that, the Great Recession , from 2007 to 2009, was the worst economic downturn in decades, and its impact reverberated through early 2000s culture.'It could be that Lady Gaga concerts were correlated over a certain period,' Gertler was quoted as saying by Seattle Times. 'But if there's not a fundamental economic reason for that, the correlation will likely break down over time.'The Great Recession was a 'different animal' Gertler said, triggered by a bursting of the housing market bubble. When examining actual recession predictors, the US economy is holding fairly Sinclair, chair of George Washington University's Economics Department and an economic forecasting researcher, told NBC Washington while looking for recession indicators may seem strange, some have an underlying validity.'There would be reasons to think that culturally we could come up with a theoretical argument, for example, for the lipstick index, this idea that when you feel like you can't buy a whole new outfit, but maybe you can just buy yourself a new shade of lipstick, that that might somewhat be indicative of people's sense of personal finances,' she said.'I think what's more important is tracking that people are talking about it more. And in general, if people are talking about concerns about the economy, then the next step is for them to pull back on their spending. and if they pull back on their spending, then that can create a self-created recession," she are actually recession indicators? 'I mean, it could be that we all get ourselves a little Labubu and if that's all we're getting everybody for Christmas this year, that's probably a signal that we've cut back a lot on our spending by Christmas," Sinclair said. 'Unless, of course, you're getting one of those collectible ones that cost thousands of dollars.'Economists rely on several key indicators to assess the nation's economic health—one of the most significant being the unemployment rate, which currently sits at around 4.1%. That figure has remained relatively stable over the past few spending is another critical measure. A noticeable drop in purchases of nonessential items can be an early warning sign of an impending recession, according to Ana Espinola-Arredondo, an economist and professor at Washington State University.
