logo
Budget 2025: Government saves $12.8b in pay equity, funnels money at $6.6b tax change to stimulate economy

Budget 2025: Government saves $12.8b in pay equity, funnels money at $6.6b tax change to stimulate economy

NZ Herald22-05-2025

Finance Minister Nicola Willis unveiled the business incentive, which will allow firms to deduct 20% of a new productive asset's value from their tax return.
But any return on that investment might be a long time coming for New Zealand's workers. While Treasury advised that ultimately the incentive would be good for growth, it revised up its unemployment forecast and revised down its wage forecast, prepping New Zealanders for another year with the unemployment rate over 5%.
Willis also announced how the tax incentive, along with other parts of the Budget would be paid for, revealing the amount of money the Government would be saving by reforms to the pay equity regime: $12.8b over four years (a figure that includes changes to how the government approaches the funded sector).
The grand total of cuts in the Budget was $21.4b over four years, meaning more than half of the cuts in the Budget have come from changes to pay equity.
Willis said pay equity costs had 'blown out' saying that in 2020, the Labour Government's pay equity regime was expected to cost just $3.7b over the forecast period.
In the Budget lockup, Willis launched a broadside on Labour alleging the cost of the blowout was 'hidden' by the last Government from the public in order to preserve commercially sensitive negotiations.
How much money Willis has left for new pay equity is also sensitive, so the Government has not revealed how much it has set aside to fund claims brought under the new regime.
Bigger cuts than last year - $4.8b a year
Elsewhere, the Government announced a sweep of initiatives to hack back at the growth of Crown expenses – cuts that are even larger than last year's.
Including the pay equity savings, the Government is 'saving' $4.8b a year from cuts. Last year the equivalent figure was $3.8b or $4.4b if you include the Emissions Trading Scheme.
Student loan borrowers will also start paying more, with the Government freezing the repayment threshold, which usually (though not always) rises with inflation, saving $64m. Every dollar a student loan borrower earns over $24,128 will pay 12 cents off their student loan.
Investment Boost
Treasury estimates the centre piece of the Budget, the depreciation changes will actually lift New Zealand's growth, increasing GDP by 1% and wages by 1.5% - but that lift takes place over 20 years (although half the growth occurs in the next 5).
The new rules will begin today, passing under urgency.
The effect of the tax changes will be to encourage businesses to bring forward investment, stimulating the economy.
Willis quoted from a Regulatory Impact Statement on the change that a large amount of the benefit of the credit would flow through to workers, although Treasury's forecasts show that this has not been enough to stop it from revising work-related changes.
KiwiSaver reforms – Government cuts contribution, asks savers to raise theirs
Alongside the cuts to KiwiSaver, the Government will try to get KiwiSaver users to front up more money themselves, lifting the default rate of employee and matching employer KiwiSaver contributions from 3 % to 4%. This will be optional, people can opt to stay at 3% if they choose.
The new rate will be phased-in. Next year it will go to 3.5% and on 1 April 2028 it will go to 4%.
Younger people will be able to contribute with eligibility extended to 16 and 17 year-olds, who will be able to get employer and Government contributions.
The Government is keen to personalise these changes and has launched a calculator on the Treasury website that calculates what they will mean to people's savings over their lifetime.
Do you have questions about the Budget? Ask our experts - business editor at large Liam Dann, senior political correspondent Audrey Young and Wellington business editor Jenee Tibshraeny - in a Herald Premium online Q&A here at nzherald.co.nz at 9.30am, Friday, May 23.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI job losses are coming – and entry-level workers could be the first to go
AI job losses are coming – and entry-level workers could be the first to go

The Spinoff

time34 minutes ago

  • The Spinoff

AI job losses are coming – and entry-level workers could be the first to go

After years of hype and hesitation, artificial intelligence is beginning to displace real jobs, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. The quiet start of a loud disruption For many workers, the presence of artificial intelligence in the office has so far been subtle – a bit of text from ChatGPT here, an AI-generated image there. But a profound shift in the labour market is coming, many business and AI insiders say. Anthropic, maker of the Claude AI models, has found that while AI is being used mainly for the augmentation of tasks, a transition toward automation – actually doing the job – is well underway. 'Most [workers] are unaware that this is about to happen,' Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told Axios. 'It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it.' His warning was echoed by Axios co-founders Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, who said they had 'talked to scores of CEOs' about how they're thinking about AI. 'Every single one of them is working furiously to figure out when and how agents or other AI technology can displace human workers at scale,' they wrote. 'The second these technologies can operate at a human efficacy level, which could be six months to several years from now, companies will shift from humans to machines.' Tech jobs may be the canary in the coal mine If that sounds alarmist, the numbers suggest otherwise. A global survey of senior executives found that 10% of all job roles could be eliminated by AI within five years. That figure, described as 'modest' by Dr Paul Henderson in his recent Maxim Institute report, Gone for Good: AI and the Future of Work, would still cause 'a marked disruption in New Zealanders' lives'. Some sectors are already showing signs of strain. Software development, in particular, has seen entry-level jobs disappear with the rise of coding assistants and no-code platforms. The IT news site CIO reports that teams are being restructured around AI tools, favouring experienced developers who can supervise machine-generated code over junior staff who once cut their teeth writing it. As Meta's Mark Zuckerberg put it earlier this year, mid-level engineers – and presumably the junior coders aspiring to join them – may become unnecessary 'in 2025'. A grim forecast for new graduates It seems that those searching for their first office jobs are most at risk. Amodei has predicted AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white collar jobs in the next five years and in the New York Times (paywalled), Kevin Roose reports that numerous firms are 'making rapid progress toward automating entry-level work', while others are becoming 'AI-first', evaluating whether a job even needs a human before posting the vacancy. While this trend is most visible in the US, its implications are global – including for New Zealand, where many graduate roles mirror their overseas counterparts. The IMF has warned that up to 60% of jobs in advanced economies may be affected by AI. If so, the dream of a secure professional career may become a luxury afforded only to those already through the door. Education in the age of artificial answers For those still in education, the concern is not just if there'll be a job waiting – but whether they're truly learning anything at all. In The Spinoff this morning, Hera Lindsay Bird documents the creeping use of generative AI in New Zealand schools and universities. Some of the quotes from teachers and lecturers are eye-popping. 'My main beef with AI is that it made me into a grown adult asshole who had 18-year- old enemies,' one says. 'I wanted to be a teacher not a cop.' Lindsay Bird writes: 'Almost every educator I spoke with, from primary school teachers to those supervising postgraduate dissertations, raised serious concerns,' she writes, 'with some teachers estimating that up to 80% of their students relied on ChatGPT to complete assignments. 'I spoke to MA supervisors whose history students theses were riddled with fictitious sources and 'archival' Midjourney photographs, and primary and intermediate school teachers, who said students as young as 11 were using it to answer simple personal prompts, such as 'what did you do in the summer holidays?' and 'what was your favourite penguin in the text?''

NZ's means-testing creep
NZ's means-testing creep

Newsroom

time36 minutes ago

  • Newsroom

NZ's means-testing creep

Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in KiwiSaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. 'There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means-tested with one big exception.' Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. 'You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. 'Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation.' Means testing superannuation is also not as straightforward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing, 'which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire'. Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of 'two horrible options' and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is 'more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age'. 'But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well-thought-through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about KiwiSaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners,' Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. 'The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected.' The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means-tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a KiwiSaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well-off, 'because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age … you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. 'This is not what's happened here.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.

Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines
Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Cutting superannuation costs without setting off political landmines

Photo: 123RF Means testing is being introduced on a wide range of benefits. Questions are being asked over how long it will be before superannuation is targeted. Whatever age we're at, means testing for benefits is creeping into our lives. From the Best Start allowance for parents of newborns, to the parents of teens applying for Jobseeker, and those in Kiwisaver earning over $180,000. But when it comes to the old age pension, means testing is too touchy politically, says NZ Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan. He tells The Detail why the pension is off limits, for now. "There are things we get universally. Universal free education, a lot of health services are free. But cash payments, those are mostly means tested with one big exception." Every New Zealander who hits 65 is entitled to NZ Superannuation. "You could be a billionaire or you could have absolutely nothing and you will get it. "Culturally, politically we tell ourselves that we earn superannuation, we work hard we pay taxes our whole lives and when you retire you deserve to get the benefit from the government that you have paid for for your entire working life. That is the political bargain, I guess, at the heart of superannuation." Means testing superannuation is also not as straight forward as other benefits where Inland Revenue knows exactly how much beneficiaries or their parents earn. But most superannuitants don't work, making a means test on income difficult to manage. That leaves asset or wealth testing "which is just uranium wrapped in barbed wire". Coughlan says raising the retirement age is seen as the better of "two horrible options" and National has already signalled plans to gradually raise it to 67. But that is also fraught. The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson doesn't like either option but is "more keen on the consideration of means testing than I am of raising the age". "But if that became a thing (raising the retirement age) then I would be arguing that it's a really comprehensive and well thought through policy change that considers a retirement system as a whole, not just about NZ Super, not just about Kiwisaver but the impact overall on future citizen New Zealand pensioners," Wrightson says. She calls the debate around superannuation a gender issue. "The commentators are mainly men. The issues around NZ Super, and who gets it and when, need to be looked at with a really strong gender lens because women are the ones who get disproportionately affected." The Detail also talks to pensioner Doug Beever in Australia where the pension kicks in at 67 and is means tested. Beever says he's happy with the arrangement because all of his working life he has been paying into a private retirement fund, a compulsory version of a Kiwisaver scheme that has been in place for decades. Wrightson says that is the difference between the two countries and why we can't copy Australia's pension model. The historic superannuation plan is a reason why the country is quite well off, "because those funds are in the billions and billions now. And secondly, people have got a decent pot themselves, so when you get that you can absolutely then talk about means testing, you can talk about raising the age ... you've got more levers to your bow when your citizens have been protected by a decent regulatory environment. "This is not what's happened here." Check out how to listen to and fol low The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store