Solicitor at self-styled 'work hard, play hard' law firm fined almost £100,000 for groping two female colleagues
'Well-remunerated' Lewis Brady molested the women after drinking heavily on nights out, a disciplinary hearing was told.
The tribunal found he touched one woman's bottom while standing behind her at a bar and touched the breast of another married colleague in a taxi home from a night out.
The 33-year-old managing associate said he had an 'awful feeling' the day after one of the incidents that he had acted inappropriately.
After finding him guilty of misconduct the Solicitors Regulation Authority has suspended Mr Brady from practising as a solicitor for 12 months.
The shamed solicitor must also pay legal costs of £95,389.
The hearing, held in London, was told Mr Brady worked as a solicitor at US firm Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe in London.
The law firm serves the sectors of technology, energy, infrastructure, finance and health tech.
Mr Brady, who has been a solicitor since 2017, took part in the 'work hard, play hard' culture of the firm which saw employees go out to bars and nightclubs after working long hours, the panel was told.
The tribunal was told 'heavy drinking was a defining aspect of these gatherings', and it found 'within this setting, the 'pushing of boundaries' was a commonly accepted aspect of social interaction'.
A colleague named only as Person A by the tribunal claimed he had inappropriately touched her in October 2021 at an afterparty in Apulia, an Italian restaurant near the Barbican.
Following a wine tasting event organised by their employer, Mr Brady and Person A went to the restaurant along with other colleagues.
The tribunal heard: 'At Apulia, [Mr Brady] touched Person A's bottom while standing beside her at the bar, although no one witnessed the act.
'The touching occurred on more than one occasion.
'The nature of the touching was unwanted by Person A, inappropriate and sexually motivated.'
The tribunal was told Mr Brady also groped a married colleague, referred to as Person B by the tribunal.
The incident happened in March 2022 when he was sharing a taxi with Person B following a trainee handover dinner.
The tribunal heard: 'During the initial part of the journey, while conversing, [Mr Brady] put his arms around Person B on two occasions, neither of which initially caused her undue concern.
'Approximately ten minutes into the journey, [Mr Brady] placed his right hand under Person B's bra, touching her left breast.
'In response, Person B immediately pulled his hand away, smacked it back, and confronted him, saying, "What do you think you are doing? No".
'Shortly afterwards, [Mr Brady] again put his hand under Person B's bra, squeezing her nipple, to which Person B responded by pushing him away with her left arm.
'During the journey, [Mr Brady] touched Person B's breast a third time, prompting Person B to grab his right wrist and firmly tell him, "No, you can't do that. Stop", after which she released his wrist.'
The tribunal heard the nature of Brady's touching was 'unwanted, inappropriate and sexually motivated'.
The journey with Person B ended 'without further incident', with Brady messaging his colleague the following day.
The incident in the taxi was reported on March 28, 2022, after the woman 'sent him a message demanding an apology and a 'promise you are never going to do it again'.
'[Mr Brady] acknowledged Person B's account of what happened during the journey, in his response to her message when he replied, "Holy f*** I'm not even sure what I was doing. I had an awful feeling the next day I was being inappropriate",' the tribunal heard.
'He immediately followed this with, 'I am sorry'.'
The tribunal also heard Person A 'sought assistance from a specialist psychologist' because of Mr Brady's behaviour towards her, and Person B said her 'marital and work relationships' had been negatively impacted by what he did.
Mr Brady denied all of the allegations made against him by Person A and Person B, and said he was 'heartbroken' hearing evidence from people he 'had considered close friends'.
He said in mitigation the proceedings had left him feeling suicidal.
The tribunal found Mr Brady's conduct was 'sexually motivated', and he was suspended from April 2025.
It said he is currently 'employed outside the profession'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Facial recognition vans to be rolled out across police forces in England
The police's use of facial recognition technology is to be significantly expanded in an attempt to catch more offenders, ministers have announced. Under the plans, 10 live facial recognition (LFR) vans will be used by seven forces across England to help identify "sex offenders or people wanted for the most serious crimes", according to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. The tech, which has been trialled in London and south Wales, will be subject to strict rules, the Home Office said, but human rights groups have warned it is "dangerous and discriminatory". Amnesty International UK said the plans should be "immediately scrapped", with facial recognition proven to be "discriminatory against communities of colour". "It has been known to lead to misidentification and the risk of wrongful arrest," said Alba Kapoor, the charity's racial justice lead, "and it's also known to be less accurate in scanning the faces of people of colour." The Home Office said the LFR vans will only be deployed when there is "specific intelligence", and will be operated by trained officers who will check every match made by the cameras. The vehicles will also only be used against bespoke watch lists, compiled for each use under guidelines set by the College of Policing. The vans will be operated by police forces in Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey and Sussex (jointly), and Thames Valley and Hampshire (jointly). 'The most serious offenders' Ms Cooper has said ministers are focused on making sure "there are proper safeguards in place". As part of the plans, the home secretary has announced she will be launching a consultation on how and when the cameras should be used, and with what safeguards, which the government will use to draw up a new legal framework for the use of the cameras. Ms Cooper said the tech had been used in London and South Wales "in a targeted way", and helped catch "the most serious offenders, including people wanted for violent assaults or for sex offences". According to the Metropolitan Police, the tech has led to 580 arrests for offences such as rape, domestic crime and knife crime in the space of 12 months. The government has pointed to independent testing by the National Physical Laboratory, which it said found the tech was "accurate" and showed "no bias for ethnicity, age, or gender". Liberty has welcomed the government's decision to create a statutory framework for using facial recognition, but said that should be in place before the tech is rolled out. "There's no reasonable excuse to be putting even more cameras on our streets before the public have had their say and legislation is brought in to protect all of us," said a statement. The civil liberties charity cited how more than 1.6 million people have had their faces scanned in South Wales, mostly on football match days in Cardiff city centre. But Lindsey Chiswick, from the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), has said the expansion "is an excellent opportunity for policing", and will help officers locate suspects "quickly and accurately".
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects
Police should consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects when they are charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, new national guidance says. Coming into force today, it says there must be a policing reason to release the information, such as where there are high levels of disinformation, if it will improve public safety, or if it is significantly in the public interest. A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they will support the new guidance by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information if appropriate. The change comes after two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton were reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, sparking protests. Warwickshire Police did not confirm the immigration status, leading to Reform UK accusing them of a cover-up, something the force strongly denied. Responding to the row, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said last week she wanted police to be more transparent, and that new guidance was being worked up. 2:41 How high-profile cases sparked debate When considering what information to release, police must consider contempt of court laws which aim to give defendants a fair trial, as well as media guidance from the College of Policing. Until now, the media guidance said once a suspect has been charged, police can give out information such as their name, date of birth and address. It did not mention anything about ethnicity, nationality, or immigration status. The Southport murders committed by Axel Rudakubana last July led to speculation about his ethnicity and immigration status, fuelling riots in many parts of the country. While the details were not initially released in that case, when a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool's Premier League win earlier this year, Merseyside Police were quick to say the suspect was a white British man. In the Nuneaton case, Reform leader Nigel Farage said retaining the "basic and sober facts" was "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings". Warwickshire Police said officers "did not and will not cover up such criminality", and followed national guidance. How will new guidance work? The new guidance says it is at the discretion of the police force to decide whether to release ethnicity and nationality details, and that they must consider the ethical and legal implications. It says it is not the job of police to verify a suspect's immigration status, which rests with the Home Office. The advice has been developed by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, in consultation with the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said: "We saw during last summer's disorder, as well as in several recent high-profile cases, what the major, real-world consequences can be from what information police release into the public domain. "We have to make sure our processes are fit for purpose in an age of social media speculation and where information can travel incredibly quickly across a wide range of channels. "Disinformation and incorrect narratives can take hold in a vacuum. It is good police work for us to fill this vacuum with the facts about issues of wider public interest." 3:31 'A chilling message' The guidance is interim, and will be considered as part of a wider review of the College of Policing's authorised professional practice for media relations later this year. Chief constable Sir Andy Marsh, the college's CEO, said officers will continue to police "without fear or favour". But the guidance is likely to provoke backlash from anti-racism campaigners. Last week, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants warned that revealing ethnicity and migration status would "send a chilling message: that some people are inherently more 'suspect'". 'Public trust requires transparency' A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they welcome the new guidance, adding: "Public trust requires transparency and consistency from the authorities that serve them." They added: "The public, and police forces themselves, want greater clarity on when, why and how information is released and the legitimate and compelling reasons it may need to be withheld. "The Home Office will support that effort by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information in future cases, where it is appropriate to do so, and where the police have requested it. All cases will of course take account of consultation with the police and CPS. "The government also asked the Law Commission at the end of February to speed up the elements of its review around the law of contempt in relation to what can be said publicly ahead of a trial."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Group sex talk, a lust for married men and cancer': Blow-by-blow, read the astonishing accusations Mark Latham is making about his ex in court
Mark Latham's ex-girlfriend told acquaintances her husband had died of bowel cancer and that she was a grieving widow - when nothing of the sort happened, the politician claims in an explosive court document. In a sworn affidavit, filed in local court as part of restraining order proceedings Nathalie Matthews is bringing against Latham, the politician also claims Ms Matthews told him in a conversation in London in June 2023 that she had an interest in group sex and had a 'fetish' for married men. 'In f***ng me, it shows how much they value it, risking their marriage,' she told him, Latham alleges in his affidavit. During that same alleged conversation, held during a six-week trip to London, he also learned Ms Matthews ran an OnlyFans account under the name 'BondiC**S**t', Latham claimed in the court document. Latham, who had recently left a 22-year marriage, said in the affidavit that the conversation in London was 'a lot to take in', adding it was 'wild and beyond my experience in life'. That night, Latham decided to pursue what he called a 'situationship' with Ms Matthews because, he said, he wanted to embrace a 'modern approach of not being judgmental about a woman's morality' and to 'enjoy' himself before he passed away. 'At my age (62 when we met on 3 March 2023) my father had already dropped dead, and if that was going to happen to me one day, at least I was going to enjoy myself beforehand,' he wrote. 'So, I decided to see how it went for those six weeks, if our time together was compatible and happy, comforted by the fact that Nathalie spent a lot of time in Dubai, meaning if I needed a break from her intensity, I had that back in Sydney. 'I saw 90 per cent benefit in our situation and ten per cent downside. 90 beat ten, as I rationalised it at 3-4am in Putney that night and eventually fell asleep.' Elsewhere in the affidavit, Latham accused Ms Matthews of telling people her ex-husband had died of bowel cancer despite being alive to this day. 'When she went to Dubai in 2022, following a break in her time with (her husband), she told people there her husband had died of bowel cancer and she was in Dubai as a grieving widow,' he wrote. Ms Matthew's ex-husband, who asked not to be named, told the Daily Mail he was not aware of the alleged claims, and that he had never suffered from bowel cancer. Ms Matthews declined to comment. The affidavit was filed on July 31 in response to Ms Matthews' AVO application with the NSW Local Court. Ms Matthews, 37, alleged that Latham, 64, inflicted 'a sustained pattern' of psychological, financial and emotional abuse against her for almost three years. The former federal opposition leader has denied all abuse claims made by Ms Matthews, alleging the pair's relationship was consensual. The relationship, which Latham said was founded on 'sexual pleasure', would devolve within the next nearly two years. Also in the court document, Latham accused Ms Matthews of planning to meet a senior corporate figure for sex in May 2024. 'She called me on my mobile that day. I remember it well because she rarely called (preferring to message) and the Parliament was sitting. 'I took her call as I was walking down a corridor back towards my office.' Daily Mail does not suggest Ms Matthews is dishonest nor that Latham's claims are true, simply that they have been made in an affidavit sworn by Latham. Latham has denied all abuse accusations, claiming that he had 'scores of documents' which would vindicate him, and enjoyed a 'fantastic' sex life with Ms Matthews. In the affidavit, Mr Latham also rebuffed the idea relationships should be entirely equal, claiming Ms Matthews enjoyed elements of 'consensual subservience'. 'A feature of today's politics is the woke feminist idealisation of the notion of Equality. This is a political theory, popularised by the #MeToo movement, that every aspect of every relationship must have equal power relations and practices. 'But as a colleague said to me last week, "It's not uncommon for relationships to be internally unequal, in fact there are plenty of them in private, it's just the way some people like it by choice". 'Nathalie was one of those people, enjoying elements of consensual subservience.' Ms Matthews describes herself as the managing director of Skynet Global Logistics, a company involved in freight forwarding which has a presence in Sydney, Perth and Dubai. Latham and Ms Matthews began dating in 2023 and ended their relationship earlier this year. The matter will return to court next month.
