Toy makers nix batteries and other materials to save costs amid tariff war
Toy makers that serve retail giants like Walmart, Target and Amazon are reducing the number of accessories in toy kitchen sets, removing batteries from electronic playsets, simplifying doll makeup and reducing packaging, as a 30% blanket tariff currently imposed on Chinese imports puts a damper on their bottom lines.
The duties imposed on China by U.S. President Donald Trump are particularly painful for companies like Hasbro and Mattel, as 80% of toys sold in the U.S. come from China, according to trade group The Toy Association.
Educational toy maker Popular Playthings — whose China-made animal sets, trucks, and magnetic food sets can be bought on Amazon — is delaying and paring down a magnetic cake set it had planned to launch in June, CEO Jason Cheung said in an interview. The company is reducing the power of the magnet, using cheaper packaging, and removing one of two serving plates that were to come with the set — all while upping the price from $29.99 to $34.99.
"Originally it would come with two plates so two kids can have cake at the same time,' Cheung said. Now, "one (child) will serve, while the other can eat."
"Still multiplayer, but less cost," Cheung said, while adding "the original item would have been better."
Toys are a top category in the U.S. holiday shopping season, the biggest spending season of the year. Adobe Analytics projected an $8.1 billion online spend on toys last holiday season, marking a 5.8% increase from the previous year.
Toy maker Basic Fun!, which sources most of its products from China, makes 40% of its annual sales in North America through Amazon, meaning the company can't risk removing merchandise from the ubiquitous e-commerce platform this holiday season, said CEO Jay Foreman.
The company, which also sells to Walmart and Target, is offering retailers the option to remove batteries from the packages of its electronic toys, and plans to reduce or remove its toys' packaging in 2026, said Foreman.
"The consumer will either pay more or get less value," Foreman said.
Some companies, like Bratz and L.O.L. Surprise! dolls-maker MGA Entertainment, are moving supply chains out of China — a costly endeavor — while others are reducing the number of items available on shelves this winter.
Isaac Larian, the CEO of MGA Entertainment, one of the biggest U.S. privately-held toy companies, said it takes nine to 12 months to make cost-cutting changes to toys. MGA is planning to modify its products for later next year.
"But we cannot take the magic out of the box," Larian said. "Too much cost-cutting destroys the play value for the toy, and you turn off the kids."
Historically, sector giant Mattel has invested in more "playable packaging" — making the boxes part of the game itself — to reduce costs. Hasbro, which sources roughly 50% of its U.S. toy and game volume from China, said on a Wednesday earnings call it "retooled and reimagined" its board games Candy Land and Operation, as part of a larger initiative to revamp its materials sourcing, manufacturing processes, designs and packaging to help with cost reductions amid tariffs.
ECR4Kids — whose roughly 1,000 school and daycare supplies range from toys and games to bookshelves and play mats — also sources primarily from China, and makes "well over 50%" of its revenue from selling wholesale to Amazon, according to managing partner Lee Siegel.
"We're very tethered to Amazon," Siegel said, explaining that he can't make substantive changes to the products he sells on the platform, including a $175 foam climbing set for toddlers. For some products, though, the company is reducing variations in color and model, and prioritizing more efficient packaging that uses every inch of space.
These kinds of efficiency efforts were on Siegel's radar even before tariffs, he said. "But now, you really have no choice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
China detained activist-singer, says Tibetan exile government
A young Tibetan singer and activist has been detained by Chinese authorities, the India-based Central Tibetan Administration said. Tzukte, popularly known as Asang, was taken into custody sometime in early July after he sang a song eulogizing Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, the CTA said in a statement Saturday. The CTA, which functions as a government-in-exile but is not officially recognized by any country, said the arrest was "part of Beijing's broader campaign to suppress Tibetan voices, specially Tibetan artists and writers". China considers Tibet an inalienable part of its territory and has ruled the region with an iron fist since its troops crushed an uprising for autonomy in 1959. Chinese authorities did not respond to a request for comment. "His detention, without charge or information on his whereabouts, violates international human rights norms and underscores China's ongoing assault on freedom of expression, cultural rights, and religious belief in Tibet," the CTA said. Asang, who is in his twenties, is a student of Gebe, a prominent Tibetan singer supporting the Tibetan cause through his music. Earlier this year, Asang reportedly appeared in public in the Ngawa region of Sichuan province with the word "Tibet" written on his forehead — a gesture that drew widespread praise online but also intensified scrutiny from officials. Rights activists have regularly voiced alarm at Beijing's alleged efforts to erase cultural and religious identity in Tibet.
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
The Fed needs to tread carefully with this strange dollar
The U.S. economy hasn't seen tariffs like these in around 80 years. Given the lack of recent precedent, the Federal Reserve is right to wait on more evidence that consumer prices aren't spiking before proceeding with interest rate cuts. There's another reason to tread carefully in these uncertain times: The extremely unusual behavior of the U.S. dollar. Many economists — including Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran — expected the buck to strengthen when U.S. President Donald Trump implemented tariffs. In an essay published last November, Miran wrote that the exchange rate was "more likely than not' to appreciate alongside an improving trade balance, as it did during Trump's first trade war in 2018 and 2019. The so-called currency offset was critical to his view that the new duties wouldn't necessarily be passed through to consumers, at least not entirely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made the same point during his confirmation hearings. Bafflingly, the dollar actually weakened for reasons that are still hotly debated (more on that shortly.) The U.S. dollar Index has declined by 6.8% since just before the "Liberation Day' tariffs unveiled on April 2 and it's down about 10% in 2025, the worst year-to-date performance in at least a quarter century. The median forecaster surveyed by Bloomberg expects the greenback to depreciate further over the next year or so. All else equal, you might expect the upward pressure on U.S. consumer prices to be even worse than tariffs alone would suggest. In the past, for a given move in developed nation currencies, economists have identified long-run pass-through into import prices on the order of 60%. (Estimates were around 40% for the U.S. specifically.) But pass-through is highly context-dependent and all else is never equal. So far, measures of consumer inflation remain relatively tame, either because the transmission will take time to materialize; retailers are "eating' the higher costs in the form of narrower margins; or because the doomsayers were just plain wrong. Realistically, it could even be some combination of the three. Given that range of possibilities, it's prudent to wait for the data to tell the story, exactly as Fed Chair Jerome Powell is currently planning. This is much to the chagrin of Trump, who regrettably insists that he can have tariffs and expeditiously lower policy rates too. In an ill-advised effort to get his way, he's exerting extraordinary public pressure on the independent central bank and its outgoing chair. So why is the dollar weakening in the first place? In the heat of the April selloff, many of us interpreted it as a sign of cracks in America's "exorbitant privilege.' The idea was that the U.S. — with the world's deepest and most liquid markets — had long occupied a special place at the center of the global financial system. That special status meant that we probably had a slightly stronger currency and relatively lower borrowing costs than would otherwise have been the case. When the the dollar weakened alongside rising borrowing costs after April 2, an argument advanced in market commentary and academia was that haphazard policymaking was eroding the American brand in the eyes of the world. Another somewhat related argument was tied to capital flows. At the time of the tariff announcement, investors around the world were extremely exposed to U.S. equities, thanks in part to the remarkable outperformance of the U.S.'s mega-cap growth stocks, known as the Magnificent 7. From the start of 2020 until March 2025, the S&P 500 Index had outperformed the rest of the developed world's equity markets by more than two-to-one. Global investors had piled into the stocks to get a piece of the action, often through unhedged positions. The hasty unwind of some holdings briefly created a macroeconomically significant wave of outflows. Plausible as these theories may be in explaining that wild week or so in early April, it's far from clear that the narratives around cracks in U.S. exorbitant privilege and equity outflows are still reasons to bet against the dollar going forward. As far as the former is concerned, America's brand may suffer additional damage from Trump's overt threats to Fed independence. But we're talking about a very nuanced change: a move from an extraordinarily special status in global markets to just very special. In practice, there's still no viable alternative to U.S. debt and its currency. European debt markets lack our market depth and China lacks our transparency, while Bitcoin is as volatile as a tech stock. Meanwhile, a solid streak of Treasury auctions has more or less ended the debate about caution among overseas investors. In the U.S. equity market, the panic is in the rearview mirror. Since bottoming on April 8, the S&P 500 has returned to all-time highs and is again outperforming the rest of the developed world's markets. The story isn't over, though. While the dollar hasn't weakened much more from its April lows, the durability of the move makes it more likely that currency weakness will have a meaningful impact on the economy, including consumer prices. In recent weeks, the greenback seems to have resumed its typical correlation with Treasury yields, opening the door to further declines if markets begin to price in significant rate cut expectations. That's why the Fed needs to proceed with extreme caution. Policymakers shouldn't lower borrowing costs and implicitly weaken the exchange rate until they can be sure that higher consumer prices aren't already in train. Without question, they should hold rates at their July meeting and the inflation data would need to stay quite tame to justify a cut at the subsequent meeting in September, at least in the absence of a labor market deterioration. The tariff experiment, coupled with the shock exchange-rate reaction, is an event study unlike any other in recent memory and the stewards of stable prices can't take anything for granted. Even if prices do jump, it's still possible that the uptick won't lead to a lasting increase in the rate of inflation and the Fed can eventually get on with easier monetary policy. But at this point, the responsible option is to wait and see how it plays out in the data. Jonathan Levin is a columnist focused on U.S. markets and economics. He is a CFA charterholder.
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-Lung Makes Rare Visit to Japan; China Lodges Protest
TAIPEI/BEIJING — Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung made a rare trip to Japan, where his stops include a visit to the 2025 Osaka-Kansai Expo, Taiwan's Central News Agency reported Friday. With Japan and Taiwan not having official diplomatic relations, it is extremely unusual that the foreign minister's visit to Japan would be made public, and China quickly responded with an objection. The Chinese Foreign Ministry announced that Liu Jinsong, director general of its Department of Asian Affairs, had lodged a protest regarding Lin's visit with Akira Yokochi, chief minister of the Japanese Embassy in Beijing. Taiwan's foreign ministry claimed that Lin's visit to Japan is being done in a private capacity. According to the Taiwan news agency, Lin first paid a call on the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in Japan, which is Taiwan's contact point with Japan. In a posting on Facebook, lawmaker Keiji Furuya said that he met with Lin, along with Sanae Takaichi, a former minister for economic security, among others. Furuya is a Liberal Democratic Party member of the House of Representatives who is chairman of the Japan-ROC Diet Members' Consultative Council, a suprapartisan league of lawmakers for friendly ties with Taiwan. According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Liu criticized Japan's handling of Lin's visit. Liu told Yokochi that the Japanese government 'tolerated the visit under the guise of a so-called 'private person,' and provided a stage for anti-China political activities aimed at dividing China.' The Japanese Embassy in Beijing said that Yokochi provided an explanation of the Japanese government's stance regarding Taiwan.
