Why ethereum is suddenly beating bitcoin
Bitcoin has rallied to record highs in recent months, but its performance has lagged behind ethereum. Ethereum's price is up 54% over the last month, compared to bitcoin's 10% increase.
Zack Shapiro, an attorney at the Bitcoin Policy Institute, told BI there were a handful of reasons ethereum has pulled ahead in recent weeks.
"I think a lot of it is that it's a speculation trade," he said of ethereum's latest rally. "Long term, we have to see."
Here are some of the things Shapiro thinks are driving the fervor for ethereum.
Bullish for stablecoins
Markets are enthusiastic about stablecoins after the passing of the GENIUS Act, the Senate's landmark bill that sets the terms surrounding stablecoin regulation and opens the door for more issuers to mint their own fiat-backed tokens.
Tether, USD Coin, Binance USD, and other top stablecoins on the crypto market are issued on the Ethereum network.
"People think that stablecoins might proliferate a lot more. Maybe some of those stablecoins will be on ethereum," Shapiro said of the market's psychology.
Retail giants like Walmart and Amazon are reportedly considering their own stablecoins, and using the tokens for retail payments would be a "big breakthrough" for the market, according to Apollo chief economist Torsten Sløk.
Support from ETFs
Shapiro says institutional investors have also recently offered ethereum ETFs, another factor driving inflows into the token.
BlackRock, Fidelity, and Grayscale are among the firms that now offer a spot ethereum ETF.
BlackRock's iShares Ethereum Trust ETF is up 48.9% over the last month. Fidelity's Ethereum Fund is up 33.1%, while Grayscale's Ethereum Mini Trust ETF is up 49.2% over that time frame.
Cumulative spot ethereum ETF volumes rose to $123.5 billion as of Wednesday, according to data compiled by The Block.
Corporate buyers
Corporate crypto treasuries have also proliferated in 2025, and recently, many have been scooping up ethereum.
Bitmine Immersion, one such crypto treasury, said last week it raised its ethereum holdings to over $2 billion.
The Ether Machine, another crypto treasury firm, said on Wednesday that its total ethereum holdings had climbed to $56.9 million.
"Those vehicles are out there buying ethereum. And so that could also be additional buy-pressure that's moving up the price," Shapiro said.
Shapiro isn't certain that the momentum will last for ethereum. He believes much of the hype for the coin in recent weeks has to do with excitement and uncertainty over ethereum's potential catalysts.
The crypto's rally could lose steam once more regulatory details are solidified, he said. He pointed in particular to the CLARITY Act, the crypto market structure bill that's awaiting approval in Congress.
"Is the market structure bill going to pass? Are these sort of crypto primitives going to find product market fit in the market? And then is Ethereum, as opposed to other blockchain systems, going to be the winner from that?" Shapiro said. "I would personally probably sell the news."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ether Bullish Divergence? ETH's 10% Weekly Price Loss Clashes With $300M Whale Buy
The ether (ETH) market is at a critical juncture as a whale snapped up ether (ETH) worth millions, positioning itself bullishly against the cryptocurrency's first weekly loss in over a month. Programmable blockchain Ethereum's native token, ether, has dropped nearly 10% this week, hitting lows under $3,400 at one point, CoinDesk data show. The decline follows a robust five-week winning streak, signaling profit-taking or de-leveraging alongside losses on Wall Street. The bearishness, however, contrasts with a powerful signal of long-term conviction from a whale. According to on-chain data tracked by Arkham Intelligence, a single entity snapped up a massive $300 million worth of ether as prices fell, executing a major "buy the dip" operation. It's the case of bullish divergence. While the weekly price action suggests a loss of immediate upward momentum and potential profit-taking, the significant whale purchase indicates a belief that the recent downturn is merely a temporary setback. The message is clear: As the price drop flushes out weaker hands, the process if being met with determined buying from a high-conviction entity. A fresh bout of macro jitters, sparked by the buoyant U.S. dollar and Friday's disappointing U.S. jobs data, has put the crypto market on the back foot. Bitcoin, the largest digital asset by market value, has held relatively resilient, down just 4.5% for the week. BTC's outperformance relative ETH confirms the change in market sentiment sentiment against ETH that was first signaled by the options market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Should Investors View Stablecoins: As a Utility or a Speculative Asset?
Key Points Stablecoins exist to move fiat currency value onto blockchains. They shouldn't ever grow much in value. Not all of these assets are equally safe or equally easy to use. 10 stocks we like better than Tether › Cash has always been the grease of capitalism, shuffling quietly from buyer to seller so the real business can get done. In crypto, something still has to play that crucial but unglamorous role, and that something is the stablecoin. Without a trustworthy on-chain dollar to use as a medium of exchange, every trade would involve swapping in and out of volatile tokens that often experience 10% moves in a day. Yet the headlines that push stablecoins into the spotlight tend to trumpet new regulations, billion-dollar market caps, fresh exchange listings, and -- occasionally -- dramatic deviation from their intended fixed value (de-pegging) that leaves destruction in its wake. That can make them look like the next hot trade rather than the digital equivalent of the crumpled bills in a supermarket till. To decide whether they belong in your portfolio at all, it pays to separate their utilitarian purpose from their real but frequently misunderstood risks. When you hear about stablecoins, you're hearing about cash At the simplest level, a stablecoin is a crypto token designed to track the price of a target fiat currency, -- usually the U.S. dollar -- so that people can send, store, and settle value on-chain without worrying about minute-by-minute price swings. USDC (CRYPTO: USDC) is the poster child for this model, and the second largest of all stablecoins. Every token is said to be backed 1-for-1 by cash and short-term U.S. Treasury bills held by the issuer Circle, with independent attestations posted monthly. Meanwhile, Circle's own valuation ballooned to roughly $60 billion as USDC's circulating supply hit $61.3 billion in June -- though the company now has a market cap of $46.2 billion, whereas its coin's value now is about $64 billion. Tether's stablecoin, USDT (CRYPTO: USDT) -- the sector's biggest stablecoin with a market cap of $164 billion -- publishes daily snapshots that claim its reserves exceed liabilities, though critics note that the level of detail in its disclosures varies. And, in late 2024, Ripple USD (CRYPTO: RLUSD) entered the fray, pitched by Ripple Labs as an institutional investor-friendly alternative that lives on XRP's chain but is quickly finding retail takers, too. Viewed through that lens, holding a stablecoin is less an investment than a convenience fee. You trade the rock-bottom risk of a bank deposit for the same amount of purchasing power embedded on 24/7 blockchain rails and near-instant transaction settlements. If your goal is long-term capital appreciation, then assets like other cryptocurrencies or equities or even fairly conservative bonds will almost certainly do incalculably more heavy lifting. But if you routinely move funds between exchanges, stake in yield pools, or settle invoices with global partners, the ability to snap digital dollars across chains is invaluable. These risks could turn utility into liability Stablecoins are, at this point of their maturity as an asset, riskier than holding the equivalent amount of cash. For stablecoins, stability hinges on three pressure points that every investor should keep in mind. First, there's asset issuer quality. Fully collateralized coins can break their peg if the issuer's reserves prove shakier than advertised or if they are frozen by regulators. If you're going to hold significant value in a stablecoin, read the attestation reports and audits, not the marketing copy. And check the price history for any evidence of past de-pegging. Second, there are chain and bridge risks to consider. In the same vein, there are also interoperability risks or, more colloquially, the risk that the stablecoin you own is not compatible with the blockchain that you want to do business on. As an example, a USDT stored on Ethereum is not the same asset as a USDT bridged to Solana, and moving between chains relies on third-party bridges that have been prime hacker targets, and which also tend to incur fees. Developers are racing to build native cross-chain standards, but for now, every hop between chains introduces another potential point of failure. To be clear, this issue is common to many types of cryptocurrencies, but it's important to identify it specifically in the context of stablecoins because of the (incorrect) assumptions that investors often have about them due to their interchangeability with cash. Third, not all pegs rely on holding old-fashioned cash -- much to the detriment of their holders. Algorithmic models in the past have attempted to hold parity through burn-and-mint mechanics, which reduce or add coins to the supply to maintain the $1 equilibrium point. But during times of market turmoil, rapid withdrawals can lead to oversupply and breaking the peg. Investors who mistake such structures for a boring digital dollar end up learning the hard way that complexity and leverage can masquerade as stability right up until they don't. So where does that leave the long-term investor? Treat stablecoins as working capital, not high-yield savings. It's not a bad idea to diversify across at least two issuers, and favor tokens that publish frequent, detailed reserve attestations. If you operate on multiple chains, consider maintaining the native version of a coin on each chain rather than relying on bridges. Lastly, remember that new jurisdictions, from the U.S. Congress to Hong Kong's monetary authority, are rolling out licensing regimes that may well reshuffle the leaderboard of the top or best stablecoins in short order. Should you invest $1,000 in Tether right now? Before you buy stock in Tether, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Tether wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Circle Internet Group. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. How Should Investors View Stablecoins: As a Utility or a Speculative Asset? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?
Professor Andrew Urquhart is Professor of Finance and Financial Technology and Head of the Department of Finance at Birmingham Business School (BBS). This is the eighth installment of the Professor Coin column, in which I bring important insights from published academic literature on cryptocurrencies to the Decrypt readership. In this article, I discuss what gives Bitcoin value. In just over a decade, Bitcoin has gone from a niche innovation in cryptography to a globally traded asset with a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions. Yet despite its prominence, a persistent question remains: what gives Bitcoin its value? Bitcoin doesn't generate cash flow like a company, isn't backed by physical reserves like gold, and has no central authority guaranteeing its worth. So why are people willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a digital token? Recent academic research points to several factors. Scarcity and Monetary Policy The first pillar of Bitcoin's value is its programmed scarcity. Bitcoin has a fixed supply: only 21 million coins will ever be created. This limit is enforced by the network's consensus rules and is viewed by supporters as a bulwark against inflation. Academic studies have likened Bitcoin to gold because of this scarcity. Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) model Bitcoin as a decentralized network whose value stems from user adoption and security, both of which are underpinned by the incentives embedded in its monetary policy. In their equilibrium framework, scarcity plays a key role in sustaining long-term value. Why is Bitcoin's supply limit set to 21 million? Scarcity makes Bitcoin attractive as a hedge against inflation, particularly in a world of expanding money supply. A number of economists have investigated whether Bitcoin's scarcity can explain its valuation with Kruger, Meyer, and Withagen (2022) showing the widely discussed stock-to-flow model fits historical data reasonably well, reaffirming the importance of scarcity as one component of Bitcoin's perceived value. Network Effects and Utility Scarcity is not sufficient without demand—and Bitcoin's demand comes from its use as a peer-to-peer digital asset and from the belief that others will accept it in the future. This is where network effects come into play. According to Cong, Li, and Wang (2021) Bitcoin's value grows with its user base. Their tokenomics model shows that the more people adopt and trust Bitcoin, the more valuable the network becomes. This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has survived multiple boom-and-bust cycles. Furthermore, Bolt and van Oordt (2016) argue that the value of a virtual currency arises if users expect it to retain value and be accepted in transactions. Their model formalizes how expectations of acceptance can stabilize a volatile asset like Bitcoin. Cost of Production and Network Security Bitcoin is also underpinned by a real-world cost: mining. To secure the network and process transactions, Bitcoin relies on a system called proof-of-work, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles using electricity and hardware. This energy-intensive process is not without controversy, but researchers such as Hayes (2015) have shown that the cost of production provides a fundamental floor for Bitcoin's price. He finds that Bitcoin rarely trades below the marginal cost of mining, reinforcing the idea that energy and security provision matter for valuation. Moreover, the work of Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) supports this by showing that mining incentives and the strength of the network's security are central to Bitcoin's equilibrium value, not just supply and demand in the traditional sense. Speculation, Sentiment, and Attention In practice, however, Bitcoin's price also reflects investor sentiment and speculation. A surge in media coverage or social media buzz can trigger price rallies or sharp selloffs. Studies by Urquhart (2018) and Shen et al (2019) demonstrate that Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with online search trends and that trading volume in turn, drives investor attention. Similarly, Liu and Tsyvinski (2021) show that cryptocurrency returns are significantly predicted by investor attention proxies. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin lacks ties to macroeconomic fundamentals, so sentiment and belief play an outsized role. Macroeconomic Role and Portfolio Demand Bitcoin's value is also shaped by its role in the broader financial system. In a low-interest-rate environment and amid concerns about fiat currency debasement, investors have turned to Bitcoin as a non-sovereign store of value. This is demonstrated by early work by Baur et al (2018) who show that investors are holding Bitcoin for long periods, but is supported by followup work by Jahanshahloo et al (2025). Recent research has reassessed Bitcoin's role in portfolios, particularly in times of market stress. Corbet, Larkin, and Lucey (2020) find that Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a traditional safe haven, but it can act as a weak diversifier under certain market conditions. In a similar vein, Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2021) use time-varying spillover models and show that Bitcoin's hedging properties fluctuate significantly, with greater hedging effectiveness during tranquil periods rather than during crises. Professor Coin: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold? Conclusion: Value from Code, Community, and Belief Bitcoin's value emerges from a blend of engineering and economics: scarcity enforced by code, utility derived from decentralized consensus, and demand shaped by sentiment, costs, and macro conditions. It behaves like a commodity, a tech stock, and a speculative token—often all at once. That complexity is what makes Bitcoin both so fascinating and so difficult to value with traditional models. In the end, Bitcoin's worth is anchored not in what it does today, but in what its users believe it can become tomorrow. And as long as that belief persists—backed by utility, adoption, and incentives—the value may persist too. References Baur, D. G., Hong, K-H., Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189. Bolt, W., & van Oordt, M. R. C. (2016). On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 81–91. Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1105–1155. Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. Hayes, A. (2015). A Cost of Production Model for Bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308–1321. Jahanshahloo, H., Irresbeger, F., Urquhart, A. (2025). Bitcoin under the microscope. British Accounting Review, forthcoming. Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101670. Kruger, P., Meyer, C., & Withagen, P. (2022). Is Bitcoin's Stock-to-Flow Model Valid? Finance Research Letters, 48, 102956 Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency. NBER Working Paper No. 24877. Pagnotta, E., & Buraschi, A. (2018). An Equilibrium Valuation of Bitcoin and Decentralized Network Assets. Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3498–3531. Shen, D., Urquhart, A., Wang, P. (2019). Does twitter predict Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 174, 118-122. Urquhart, A. (2018). What Causes the Attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166, 40-44. Sign in to access your portfolio
