Defamation case: Pune court rejects Rahul's plea seeking maternal family tree of Savarkar's kin
Satyaki Savarkar had filed a defamation complaint against Rahul for his alleged objectionable remarks against the Hindutva ideologue during a speech in London in March 2023.
Satyaki's mother Himani Ashok Savarkar is the daughter of Gopal Godse, the younger brother of Nathuram Godse, Mahatma Gandhi's assassin.
Rejecting Rahul's plea, special judge Amol Shinde of the MP/MLA court on May 28 observed that 'this case is related only to alleged defamatory speech made by the accused in London against VD Savarkar.'
The order was uploaded on the court's website Saturday.
According to Satyaki, Rahul had claimed in his speech that Savarkar had written a book in which Savarkar mentioned that he (Savarkar) and five to six of his friends were beating up a Muslim person, and they were 'delighted' about it.
Satyaki said VD Savarkar had not written any such book, nor had such an incident ever happened. In his petition, Satyaki had stated that Gandhi had intentionally made false, malicious and wild allegations against Savarkar.
Satyaki had submitted a few news reports as well as a YouTube link of a video of Gandhi's speech in London as evidence.
Rahul's lawyer Milind Pawar had filed an application before the court seeking an English translation of the book 'Mazi Janmathep' authored by V D Savarkar, another book 'Hindutva' also authored by him, and the family tree of Satyaki Savarkar.
Satyaki's lawyer Sangram Kolhatkar provided the same to advocate Pawar in the court.
But, on March 28, advocate Pawar filed an application on behalf of Rahul saying, 'The complainant (Satyaki) has deliberately, systematically, very brilliantly avoided, and suppressed to disclose the family tree from his maternal side in the present complaint.
Therefore this is one of the most important issues and circumstances in this case to decide on merits and that should be ascertained before plea and commencement of this trial… Therefore directions be issued to the complainant to file a family tree on the maternal side and explanation be sought on the suppression.'
Advocate Kolhatkar called the application 'baseless, false and filed with malafide intent.'
Rejecting the plea, the court, its order, stated that Satyaki is the grandson of one of the brothers of late V D Savarkar and the said case is not related to the family tree of his mother Himani Savarkar.
'Therefore, this court does not find any merit in the application of the accused (Rahul Gandhi). There is also no need to send the matter for further investigation. Hence the application sans merits and the same is liable to be rejected,' the court order stated.
Meanwhile, Satyaki has filed an application requesting the court to direct Rahul Gandhi to produce the book that he quoted while making the alleged defamatory statement during his speech in London.
Advocate Pawar is likely to reply to this application. The next hearing on this matter is scheduled on June 12.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Making a point: On the election of the Vice-President
The BJP-led NDA and the Congress-led Opposition parties have announced their respective candidates for the post of the Vice-President of India, which fell vacant after the abrupt and intriguing resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar on July 21, 2025, setting the stage for a fresh face-off. The numbers are foretold and there is no surprise in store about the outcome. However, this is a significant ideological battle, and both sides see it as such. The NDA's candidate, C.P. Radhakrishnan, is a veteran RSS activist from Tamil Nadu, who has served as a two-term Member of Parliament, from 1998 to 2004. He is the Governor of Maharashtra. The INDIA bloc parties have chosen B. Sudershan Reddy, a retired judge of the Supreme Court of India, born and raised in undivided Andhra Pradesh. The NDA has a majority and is on a drive to canvas additional unattached individual voters and parties such as the BJD and the BRS. The YSRCP, bitterly opposed to the TDP, the NDA's partner, in Andhra Pradesh, has pledged its support to Mr. Radhakrishnan. Justice Reddy's candidacy has set off some regionalist political posturing in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, while Mr. Radhakrishnan's has caused the same in Tamil Nadu. On this count, the INDIA bloc managed to push back the NDA's attempt to put the DMK on the defensive ahead of the State Assembly election. The BJP hopes that Mr. Radhakrishnan's elevation will gain it some mileage in the Assembly election. The political messaging cannot be clearer. By offering the second-highest office in the country to a life-long adherent of Hindutva, the BJP has fastened its ties with its mother ship, the RSS. Mr. Radhakrishnan's profile is in stark contrast with Mr. Dhankhar, who was a late entrant into the Sangh Parivar and failed to fit in. The BJP has used state power, which it controls, in a systematic and effective manner to advance Hindutva. Numerous personality clashes notwithstanding, these shared convictions hold the Sangh Parivar together. Not only has the BJP managed to hold its existing partners firmly behind its candidate but it has also managed to win over the YSRCP. As for the Congress and the Opposition, Justice Reddy's candidacy is an assertion of its resistance to the Parivar and an attempt to amplify their social justice slogan. Justice Reddy recently headed the 11-member independent expert working group that had analysed and interpreted the data collected during the Telangana Congress government's Socio, Economic, Education, Employment, Political and Caste (SEEEPC) Survey 2024. They also hope to use this contest as a rallying cry for the Opposition to consolidate against the BJP.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Parliamentary panel raises concern on SAI's financial health
New Delhi: Sports Authority of India (SAI) is 'critically' under-funded and under-staffed, the parliamentary standing committee on sports has said, recommending a slew of measures to the union sports ministry. The panel, headed by Congress' Rajya Sabha MP Digvijaya Singh, presented a 40-page report to the upper house on Wednesday. Union Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Mansukh Mandaviya addresses a press conference at the Sports Authority of India (SAI). (Vipin Kumar) The report expresses concern over India's poor returns at the Olympics. 'It is extremely painful that we being a country of approximately 1.4 billion population could not win even a single gold medal in the last Olympics in 2024 and most of the Olympics before that. The Committee feels that there is some gap or deficiency at the policy level in this regard,' it said. It calls for broad-based talent spotting and holding more age-group domestic competitions. The committee also urged the sports ministry to adopt a targetted approach towards those sports in which India is likely to win more medals. 'Countries like Australia, Cuba, Kenya, China, USA are powerhouses in select sports like swimming, boxing, cross country, badminton, table tennis, and track & field events respectively. Each of these countries participates in a few targeted sporting events and win most of the medals in such events. The committee feels that it is worth emulating this model and recommends the ministry to take the concentrated approach in picking up the sports as such in which we have the potential and talent,' it said. Further, the parliamentary panel observed a 'substantial staff crunch in coaching and scientific cadres' in SAI and urged the body to fill up vacant posts. '...about 45 per cent of sanctioned posts in the Authority are presently lying vacant. The fact that these shortfalls in staff are being managed through contractual appointment may at best be only an ad hoc arrangement,' the report stated while commending to complete the recruitment in six months and furnish an Action Taken Report. The committee noted that during the last two financial years, the funds for Khelo India Scheme have been diverted to National Centres of Excellence (NCOEs) of SAI. 'This diversion has denied precious funds of ₹38.79 crores to the Khelo India Scheme. This is more alarming as ₹122.30 crore of allocated funds under this scheme has also been returned to the Consolidated Fund of India,' it observed. '...such practice of diversion of funds from one central scheme to another is not a healthy one as it reflects poor estimation, planning and implementation on the part of a Central Scheme.' The report also said that an amount of ₹19.50 crore was allocated for play-field development under the Khelo India Scheme but has not been spent 'due to lack of proposal from eligible entities'
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
JNUSU terms closure of proceedings in Najeeb Ahmed case 'attempt to deny justice'
New Delhi, The Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union on Wednesday organised a public meeting at the Constitution Club of India, reiterating its demand for justice to Najeeb Ahmed, a student of the university who went missing in 2016 after being allegedly assaulted. JNUSU terms closure of proceedings in Najeeb Ahmed case 'attempt to deny justice' President of the students' union, Nitish Kumar, alleged that neither the CBI nor the Delhi Police could deliver justice in nine years. "The recent closure of the case proceedings is an attempt to deny justice, but this movement will continue until accountability is ensured," he said. A Delhi court, on June 30, allowed the CBI to close the case of first-year JNU student Najeeb Ahmed, who went missing on October 15, 2016, saying the agency "exhausted all options". While it accepted the agency's closure report, the court granted liberty to the CBI to re-open the investigation on the receipt of any credible information on Ahmed's whereabouts and intimate the court accordingly. The meeting at the Constitution Club of India on Wednesday was attended by parliamentarians, student leaders, human rights activists and academics, who expressed solidarity with Najeeb's family. Rajya Sabha MPs Manoj Jha and V. Sivadasan, IUML representative Ahmed Saju, activist Nadeem Ahmed and N. Sai Balaji from CPI Liberation also addressed the gathering. From the JNU academic community, JNUTA president Surajit Majumdar reaffirmed support. The most emotional moment came when Najeeb's mother, Fatima Nafees, addressed the audience. For eight years, she has been at the forefront of the campaign for her missing son. Speakers said her resilience continues to inspire students and civil society groups. Concluding the programme, JNUSU general secretary Munteha Fatima said, "The courage shown by Fatima Ammi must become our collective strength. This struggle is not only for Najeeb but also for all minority and Muslim students who face discrimination in universities and beyond." JNUSU said it would continue to pursue the case in higher courts and intensify the movement with "greater determination" until justice is delivered. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
