UK faced more producer inflation than thought, corrected official data shows
The ONS is in the process of fixing problems with a wide range of economic data including unemployment figures as well as the producer prices figures. Last month an official review called for a major restructuring of the organisation's management.
Producer price data measure how input costs and selling prices of manufacturing and services companies change. The figures are used in gross domestic product data to adjust for different rates of inflation in different industries, and in some trade data too.
The ONS suspended the publication of producer price data in March after finding an error in how 'chain-linking' methods had been coded into its data production systems and said on Thursday that it expected to resume normal publication in October.
Thursday's figures represent work so far in correcting the data and show big upward revisions for annual input and output inflation rates for factories in 2023. They were pushed higher by average of 1.0 and 1.1 percentage points, respectively.
Whereas the uncorrected data suggested that Britain flirted with deflation for factory output prices in the second half of 2023, the new series show prices rising at an annual rate of around 1%.
The most recent previously published annual rate of producer output price inflation, for January 2025, was revised up to 0.6% from 0.3% and the ONS estimated that April's reading on the corrected methodology was 0.5%.
"Further corrections are mostly expected to be small in magnitude," the ONS said.
Annual factory input and output inflation rates peaked in 2022 at slightly higher levels than previously thought when Britain was hit by an energy price shock caused by Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Revisions to producer input price inflation showed a similar pattern to those for output price inflation.
The new data show annual input price inflation stood at 0.6% in January 2025, compared with a previous estimate of -0.1%. April 2025 figures showed a 1.1% annual fall in manufacturers' input costs.
The new series for the services sector producer prices showed a more nuanced picture. The ONS had overestimated services output price inflation during 2022, but underestimated it through 2023 and some of 2024.
(Editing by David Milliken)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Business
an hour ago
- Arabian Business
Jazeera Airways offers 'buy 1 get 1 free' flights across its network
Jazeera Airways has announced a new 'Buy 1 Get 1 Free' promotion, making travel more affordable across its entire network. From August 18–24, 2025, customers who book a one-way or round-trip ticket on the airline's website or mobile app will receive a second ticket free of charge. The offer applies to journeys taken between September 1 and December 15, 2025, with no limit on the number of tickets that can be booked. Jazeera Airways flight sale The promotion opens up the chance to explore destinations across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Travelers can stroll the streets of Budapest and Prague, experience the souks of Istanbul, visit Tashkent's historic landmarks, or relax on the beaches of Sharm El Sheikh and Colombo. Other destinations include Salalah's waterfalls and the mountains of Abha. Paul Carroll, Chief Commercial Officer at Jazeera Airways, said: 'At Jazeera Airways, we believe that incredible travel experiences should be accessible to everyone. Our Buy 1 Get 1 Free offer isn't just a deal—it's a way to unlock new destinations and make travel more affordable. 'Now, you can explore a new city or revisit a favourite place with a friend or family member, all while getting double the value for your money.' The promotion applies to Jazeera Airways' popular Light fare, offering travellers value with the option to add extras such as checked baggage, in-flight meals, preferred seating, and packages at 60 per cent off. To redeem the deal, customers must enter the promo code J9B1G1 when booking on the Jazeera Airways website or mobile app.
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
New KnowBe4 Report Finds Key African Industries May Be Dangerously Overestimating Cyber Defences
KnowBe4 ( the world-renowned cybersecurity platform that comprehensively addresses human risk management, today released its new report 'Africa Human Risk Management Report 2025'. The report reveals a mismatch between employer perceptions and employee experience of organisational cybersecurity in key African industries – with potentially costly consequences. The report ( captures insights from cybersecurity decision-makers across 30 African countries. One of the biggest themes the survey uncovers is a mismatch between perception and reality: what employers believe is not necessarily what employees feel or experience. In key growth-industries across the continent, cybersecurity preparedness and the actual structures needed to support secure behaviour seem misaligned. The report highlights, for instance, that just 10% of cybersecurity leaders are fully confident that staff would report a phishing attack or other cyber threat, despite rating employee security awareness of cyber threats at four out of five or higher. Furthermore, a significant perception gap exists between decision-makers and general employees in Africa regarding security awareness training, with 68% of leaders believing that training is tailored to roles, compared to only a third of employees feeling adequately trained. This contrast is underscored by the data showing that there is a difference between what leaders believe about security awareness training effectiveness and what employees actually experience. This is further emphasised by the fact that many organisations only conduct annual or biannual training that is too generic to effectively change behaviour, contributing to uncertainty about its effectiveness. Previous end-user based responses ( revealed that only 43% of African respondents felt confident in their ability to recognise a cyber threat, and just one in three believed their security awareness training was adequately tailored to their role. This comparison suggests the development of a dangerous perception gap in many organisations. 'There's a disconnect here – between what leaders think is happening, and what employees are actually experiencing,' says Anna Collard, SVP content strategy&evangelist at KnowBe4 Africa. 'The data shows that without procedural and cultural follow-through, awareness simply doesn't translate into readiness.' The KnowBe4 Africa Human Risk Management Report 2025 provides a glimpse into human cyber risk that reflects the real challenges – and overlooked opportunities – facing African organisations. Key findings include: Confidence vs. awareness: While cybersecurity awareness is high, leaders express uncertainty about their workforce's ability to act on that awareness. Many feel employees may overestimate their capabilities in recognising, reporting, and mitigating threats. Larger organisations face greater challenges as they tend to train less frequently (often biannually or annually) and have lower confidence in their employees' incident response capabilities compared to smaller organisations. The need for adaptive and personalised security awareness training: Many organisations, across various sectors, fail to personalise security awareness training to specific roles or risk exposures. Sectors such as manufacturing and healthcare are particularly susceptible to using one-size-fits-all training approaches, where 50% and 40%, respectively, report no personalisation whatsoever. Tailoring addresses the specific needs and risks of different roles and sectors, leading to more effective security awareness. Widespread BYOD usage: A large percentage of employees (between 41% and 80%) use their personal devices for work. This BYOD (bring your own device) trend introduces security risks because personal devices may not have adequate security measures. This can make organisations more vulnerable to breaches. AI policy development is lagging: Many organisations (46%) are still in the process of developing policies for using AI tools in the workplace. Without clear guidelines, employees might use AI in ways that create security vulnerabilities for their organisations. Establishing clear AI governance is crucial to mitigate these risks. Regional variation: Southern Africa trains more, East Africa governs AI better, and West/Central Africa sees the most human-related security incidents. "This report reveals a critical paradox in African cybersecurity: while organisations feel aware and prepared, significant blind spots remain, especially concerning how they manage human risk,' Collard notes. 'The continent's cybersecurity posture may be more confident than it is truly resilient." The report concludes with a roadmap for turning awareness into action – including role-specific training, measurable outcomes, AI policy development and better reporting structures. The full report is now available for download here ( Distributed by APO Group on behalf of KnowBe4. Contact details: Anne Dolinschek KnowBe4 anned@ TJ Coenraad Red Ribbon tayla@ About KnowBe4: KnowBe4 empowers workforces to make smarter security decisions every day. Trusted by over 70,000 organisations worldwide, KnowBe4 helps to strengthen security culture and manage human risk. KnowBe4 offers a comprehensive AI-driven 'best-of-suite' platform for Human Risk Management, creating an adaptive defense layer that fortifies user behaviour against the latest cybersecurity threats. The HRM+ platform includes modules for awareness&compliance training, cloud email security, real-time coaching, crowdsourced anti-phishing, AI Defense Agents, and more. As the only global security platform of its kind, KnowBe4 utilises personalised and relevant cybersecurity protection content, tools and techniques to mobilise workforces to transform from the largest attack surface to an organisation's biggest asset.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
The Trump-Putin summit shows why Europe needs to continue re-arming itself
Much store has been placed over the past eight months in how foreign leaders prepare to interact with US President Donald Trump. From a European point of view, there has been a carousel of winners and losers. Take, for example, a write-up in The Wall Street Journal of the golfing prowess of Finnish President Alexander Stubb and how that was key to the relationship between the two men. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer would have enjoyed the headline on Monday that said he was hoping to 'exploit his curious relationship' with the US leader to the benefit of Ukraine. Mr Trump appears to enjoy it all. Going back to his first term and the notorious handshaking with French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Trump sees meeting European leaders as a kind of vaudeville performance. At the start of this week, he was boasting that Monday's White House gathering on Ukraine was a big day in history. 'Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honour to host them!!!' Step back from all the stage management, and the reality is that Mr Trump and the new American political establishment see the Europeans as all one, not the individual performers that the news reports highlight. The war in Ukraine appears to have reached the moment of truth. By abandoning demands for a ceasefire as a gateway to peace talks during his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Trump has established how the conflict can now end. For the Europeans, this means the transactional basis of US foreign policy going forward is a fundamental reality that cannot be wished away anymore. Nor even blunted by the kind of summit theatrics we have seen over recent months. The Europeans must now follow through on the generational change the continent's leaders have promised on its collective defence. This means all nations need to match the kind of uplift that Germany has promised. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arrived at the White House on Monday having promised to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of national gross domestic product by 2029. It also means that leaders must be more ruthless in the dollars versus euros choices that the Europeans are making when buying defence equipment. Put simply, to defend itself Europe must now more aggressively buy European as a long-term strategic play. The third aspect of this is that the Europeans must show they are prepared to join in delivering what it takes to be robust in their own self-defence. That is why I describe this as a generational choice. It is surely true that the defence spending must go back to levels last seen during the Cold War. But it is also true that the population must be mobilised in civil defence and formal security roles in new and wider ways. The war in Ukraine has already changed the trajectory of the European story. A decade that started with the Covid-19 pandemic has seen its growth and prosperity derailed by the subsequent decoupling from Russia. This isn't just in terms of the cost of living, which was severely hit by the resources shock following the war. The wider outlook for the continent is also one of beleaguered choices between welfare and warfare with no real prospect of an economic revival. It is not just Ukraine that is a frontline state. The Baltics and Scandinavians have that mentality, too. Alliances have been formed such as the 10-nation Joint Expeditionary Force, which stretches from Iceland through the UK to those northern frontline states. Most European countries are on a trajectory to higher government spending, but the reforms in the security mentality are not yet as real as the scale of the challenge that the continent is facing. The retired British general Richard Barrons observed last week that no one was talking about a Russian invasion of the UK as a credible prospect, but he queried the readiness for a more wholistic threat landscape. This includes strengthening the digital sphere in the information age. A society mobilised to take on these challenges is clearly just as vital as strong defences in Finland or elsewhere. For now, the Europeans will seek to eke out as much of a security blanket from the US as they can feasibly obtain. That is why the cast at the White House on Monday was not just Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy but also included Mr Starmer, Mr Macron, Mr Merz, Mr Stubb, plus Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. It would be a fool's paradise, however, to not see the writing on the wall. When the Signal chat involving American leaders was leaked during Washington's confrontation with Yemen's Houthis, Vice President JD Vance was shown asking why the US was bailing out European security. The intervention across the Red Sea was quickly curtailed. France has long argued that at least two thirds of the coming European military build-up should be manufactured at home. Vulnerabilities of ordering from the US include long lead times and a de-prioritisation of the European inventory rebuild in areas such as ammunition. Other European countries openly push for the high-capability requirements on offer from the US. This pushes the longer-term restructuring of the continent's defence industries into the long grass. So while orders are flowing from a top-line increase in defence budgets, it is hard to shake the questions around adequacy. Not only is the spending rising as fast as pledged but also can Europe become strong enough, faster? The answer to that question won't be found in this week's trip to Washington.
