logo
GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

GOP eyes redistricting in Ohio and Texas as it looks to bolster slim majority

The Hill05-07-2025
Republicans are eyeing potential redistricting opportunities in Ohio and Texas as they seek extra cushion to protect their thin majority in the House next year.
In Ohio, redistricting laws mandate a redraw ahead of 2026 because the last map passed without bipartisan support. And in Texas, redistricting could be added to an upcoming special session agenda as the White House reportedly pushes the Lone Star State to consider redrawing to protect the party's numbers.
Defending a narrow 220-212 majority, Republicans are bracing for a competitive election cycle as they look to defy traditional headwinds typically associated with the president's party in midterm years.
'I think the Speaker and party leadership look at even a handful of districts as really important, particularly if the natural trend — given the president's popularity at this point and given historic midterm conditions — means that the Republican Party starts out assuming they're going to lose a couple districts right off the bat,' said Justin Levitt, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University who founded the database 'All About Redistricting.'
'Ohio is going to have to redraw, one way or the other. Texas is mulling whether to redraw. And there are a lot of competing pressures.'
Each state redraws its maps once a decade, after the U.S. Census. But in Ohio, the lines used for the last four years are up for a redraw under a wonky state law that effectively sped up the expiration date because they didn't earn bipartisan support.
Should Republicans decide to make the maps more competitive, Ohio Democratic Reps. Marcy Kaptur and Emilia Sykes, who represent Ohio's 9th and 13th Congressional Districts respectively, would likely be impacted.
President Trump won Kaptur's district, which includes Toledo, by close to 7 points, while Sykes's seat, which includes Akron, was essentially tied by Trump and former Vice President Harris in 2024, according to The Downballot. Both are already competitive for Democrats, though both Kaptur and Sykes have been strong candidates despite the political terrain.
'It's no surprise that special interests in Washington and Columbus want to ignore the voters and rig the game,' Sykes campaign spokesman Justin Barasky said in a statement.
Kaptur campaign political director David Zavac projected confidence over the congresswoman's election next year, while also pointing out that the state will have seen three different maps this decade alone.
'The Congresswoman looks forward to a spirited campaign next year,' Zavac said in a statement, 'but will let the GOP focus on what will surely be another messy primary ahead once they finish their illegal gerrymandering process to try and rig the maps further in their favor.'
The Ohio Constitution lays out detailed rules for drawing House districts , meaning that only certain counties and cities can be divided, some of that based on population stipulations.
Ahead of the required 2025 redistricting, Democrats had sought to pass an amendment to the state Constitution last year that would have reformed the redistricting process in the state, giving the party a better chance of making seats more competitive between the parties.
But voters rejected the ballot measure amid confusion over the amendment language; the Ohio Ballot Board approved language that said the amendment would 'repeal constitutional protections against gerrymandering' when its supporters said the initiative stated it would do the opposite.
While the redistricting process offers Republicans a unique opportunity to reconfigure better maps for its House members, it's not without its own perils.
'I do think the best pressure that could force them to do some things that are more reasonable would be Republicans in nearby districts saying, 'Don't carve up our districts, we like our [districts], we don't want them to change,'' said former state Democratic Party Chair David Pepper.
In Texas, where there are no specific timing rules for re-making maps, state lawmakers are reportedly under pressure from the White House and national Republicans to consider making mid-decade changes that could help shore up GOP numbers.
The state legislature just gaveled out their latest regular session, with the next not slated until 2027. But amid the chatter about redistricting, Gov. Greg Abbott (R) called a special session to kick off July 21.
Though redistricting isn't among the governor's official 'initial agenda' items, there's still time for the matter to be added to the docket or included in a future special session.
'The Republicans in Congress are looking at a very, very narrow majority, and they're looking for every opportunity around the country to increase that majority with things like redistricting [and] the election. They're gonna use every tool at their disposal to do that,' said Texas Republican strategist Brendan Steinhauser.
'Texas is a very red state, so if they can pick up two seats or three seats, then they might give it a try. And even if it makes a seat in a very deep red state a little more competitive, so be it. I think that's some of the thinking,' he said.
One Republican strategist who requested anonymity to speak candidly told The Hill that the party will be on 'offense' regardless of how either state's map shakes out ahead of 2026.
A second GOP strategist pointed out that there's more Democrats – 13 – that won in Trump districts, while there's only three Republicans hailing from districts won by former Vice President Harris in 2024 overall.
'The numbers are in our favor,' the GOP strategist said. 'It's a game of inches right now.'
If Republicans do decide to redraw lines in Texas, it could blunt challenges to the maps that Texas drew after the 2020 census, including an ongoing trial in El Paso in which voter advocates allege that the maps discriminate against some Black and Latino voters.
The 2021 maps were already seen as shoring up Republican power in the Lone Star State, but proponents of redistricting reportedly think the GOP's 25-12 congressional edge could expand by several seats.
The situation has given some lawmakers a sense of deja vu. Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) was among the more than 50 state lawmakers who fled Texas for Oklahoma to deny Republicans a quorum in 2003 as the GOP revisited drawing the state's congressional lines. Texas Republicans, however, were ultimately successful at redrawing favorable lines for their party.
'It's just a total partisan power grab that's gonna completely mess with representation in Texas,' Castro, who was a freshman during the 2003 walkout, told The Hill last month. 'And I hope that cooler minds will prevail, and they'll do redistricting when they're supposed to, which is after the end of the decade.'
Another layer of uncertainty is how the courts could weigh in on potential redistricting challenges. Both Texas and Ohio have conservative majorities on the state Supreme Courts, but legal challenges over redistricting from other states have been brought up to the U.S. Supreme Court. While the high court, too, has a conservative majority, it notably struck down Alabama's maps in 2023, saying they likely violated the Voting Rights Act.
But while shifting voters from solidly red districts to bluer ones could make Democratic-held seats more competitive, it could similarly blunt the edge of some now-safe GOP seats. The House Democrats' campaign suggested in a statement that the predicament is a lose-lose situation for Republicans.
'House Republicans are running scared because they know they will lose the House majority next November, and their only solutions are corrupt attempts to suppress battleground voters' voices,' Madison Andrus, a spokeswoman for the House Democrats' campaign arm, said in a statement.
'Any changes they try to make to existing maps may endanger existing Republican-held seats,' she continued, 'and in an environment where the public is wildly unhappy with the Republican agenda of broken promises, they should be careful what they wish for.'
Ahead of the midterms, though, that might be a risk some are willing to take to put more districts in play for Republicans.
'Republican redistricting was key to flipping the House in 2022, preserving the majority in 2024, and can help defend it again in 2026,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Speaker Johnson says it would be 'great service to country' if Ghislaine speaks on Epstein
Speaker Johnson says it would be 'great service to country' if Ghislaine speaks on Epstein

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Speaker Johnson says it would be 'great service to country' if Ghislaine speaks on Epstein

House Speaker Mike Johnson on Sunday said it would be a 'great service to the country' if late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, comes clean and discloses the information she has. Johnson (R-La.) acknowledged he is unsure whether Maxwell can be trusted to tell the truth to the House Oversight Committee, which has subpoenaed her for testimony, and argued that she should still face more than 20 years behind bars. Asked on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday if Maxwell could be trusted, the speaker admitted, 'It's a good question. 4 House Speaker Mike Johnson admits Sunday he has reservations about whether Ghislaine Maxwell can be trusted to be truthful. NBC/Meet the Press 'I hope so,' Johnson said. 'I hope that she would want to come clean. We certainly are interested in knowing everything that she knows. 'She is convicted. She is serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking, and so her character is in some question,' he said. But if she wants to come clean now, that would be a great service to the country, and we'd like to know every single bit of information that she has.' A rift among MAGA faithful and President Trump ripped open earlier this month when the Justice Department and FBI concluded that evidence indicated Epstein did not have an 'incriminating client list' and that he had in fact killed himself in prison. 4 Maxwell is accused of helping to procure underage girls and sex-assault victims for late sicko pal financier Jeffrey Epstein. US District Court for the Southe 4 Epstein's former lawyer has said Maxwell 'knows everything' about the sex predator. US District Court for the Southe On Thursday and Friday, US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche — President Trump's former defense lawyer — met with Maxwell in Florida for several hours of questioning. Her lawyer has said she is still mulling whether to testify before the Oversight panel or invoke her Fifth Amendment rights. Trump has publicly claimed that he hasn't thought about pardoning her but also stressed, 'I am allowed to do it.' Johnson suggested that he would not be in favor of Maxwell getting presidential clemency. 'If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance. I think she should have a life sentence at least,' Johnson told the show. 'Think of all these unspeakable crimes, and as you noted earlier, probably 1,000 victims. 'It's hard to put into words how evil this was and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it,' he said. 'I think it is an unforgivable thing. So again, not my decision, but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would.' 4 Johnson talks about the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case to NBC's Kristen Welker. NBC/Meet the Press Johnson dealt with the political reverberations over the MAGA rift on Epstein. Amid the firestorm, Trump publicly lashed out against his base, and Democrats worked to put Johnson on the spot by attempting to force votes compelling the disclosure of the Epstein files. Last Monday, Democrats on the House Rules Committee, a gatekeeper panel that determines the manner in which most pieces of legislation come up for a vote on the House floor, again attempted to put Republicans on the spot over the kerfuffle. The GOP opted to recess the Rules Committee, which effectively froze up the House of Representatives. Johnson decided to send the House home a day early for the August recess as a result. 'What we did do this week is end the chaos in the Rules Committee because the Democrats are trying to use this in a shameless manner for political purposes,' Johnson said Sunday. 'Quite obviously, they hijacked the Rules Committee, and they tried to turn it into an Epstein hearing. 'That's not what the Rules Committee is about.'

Massie Criticizes Johnson on Recess as He Tries to Force Epstein Files Vote
Massie Criticizes Johnson on Recess as He Tries to Force Epstein Files Vote

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Massie Criticizes Johnson on Recess as He Tries to Force Epstein Files Vote

Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, lashed out at Speaker Mike Johnson on Sunday for sending the House home early for its six-week summer recess to avoid having to hold votes on releasing files related to Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sex trafficking. 'I don't know why it should be politically painful to be transparent,' Mr. Massie said on 'Meet The Press' on Sunday. At a news conference this week, Mr. Johnson accused Mr. Massie of inflicting political pain on his own party by teaming with Democrats to try to circumvent leadership and force a floor vote on releasing the files. Mr. Johnson, for his part, has deferred to President Trump and the Justice Department on the matter, while continuing to say that he is calling for transparency. But sending members home to their districts did not succeed in quieting Mr. Massie, who predicted on Sunday that the pressure to hold a vote would only increase during the summer break. 'Is the pain he's talking about that they'll, somebody in our party, will be embarrassed by those files? Then that's not a good excuse,' Mr. Massie said of the speaker. 'Is the pain he's talking about is that the legislators, when they vote, have to pick between protecting embarrassment of the rich and powerful versus getting justice for victims? I don't really understand what he means by that.' He added: 'Why is it painful for Mike Johnson to call a vote on this? The American people deserve this, regardless of what the political ramifications are for the speaker.' Mr. Massie, the lone House Republican who routinely breaks with the Trump administration despite the president's threats to find a primary challenger to unseat him, predicted that he would not be the one to suffer politically for pressing the issue. Instead, he said, Republicans would lose their slim majority in the midterm elections next year if they did not take a vote on releasing the files. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Democrats self-own bragging about inflation shows the left has learned NOTHING
Democrats self-own bragging about inflation shows the left has learned NOTHING

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Democrats self-own bragging about inflation shows the left has learned NOTHING

Everybody makes mistakes. Not everyone makes the same mistakes over and over again. Last week, the geniuses in charge of maintaining the Democratic Party's social media picked at a fresh wound — and showed, again, exactly why it lost the 2024 election. The blue team's official X account shared a line chart showing the change in the price of various groceries — meat, dairy, produce, etc. — over time, and asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.' 'Trump's America,' read the caption. The problem? The last part of the line barely went up. The blue team's official X account, with the caption 'Trump's America,' shared a chart showing the change in the price of various groceries, asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.' Eric Daugherty, /X And what it actually showed was a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024. In other words: over the course of former President Joe Biden's White House tenure. 'I would just advise Democrats not to post about inflation given their track record,' suggested conservative influencer A.G. Hamilton. 'Might save them the embarrassment of having to delete their posts after getting dunked on' — which is exactly what they did. 'This is the gang that couldn't shoot straight!' marveled Fox Business host Stuart Varney. And of course Team Trump got in on the action. The problem with the chart was that it actually showed a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024 – when Biden was president. RapidResponse47/X What's notable about the braindead blunder, though, is not the blunder itself. It was that it represented yet another admission, eight and a half months after they surrendered the presidency to Donald Trump for the second time in three election cycles, that the Democrats still haven't made a sincere effort at diagnosing the reasons for their unpopularity — much less addressing them. A new Wall Street Journal poll found that their party continues to suffer as a result — to the point that just 33% of Americans hold a favorable view of it, and 63% view it unfavorably. Both Donald Trump (-7) and the GOP (-11) are also underwater, but may as well be polling as well as ice cream compared to the Democrats. The same holds true of the public's view of various issues; voters still trust the GOP more than the alternative when it comes to the economy, inflation, immigration and foreign policy. If that doesn't wake Democrats up to the provenance of all their political pain, nothing will. The Left has long relied on comforting fallacies to numb the discomfort that accompanies defeat. After 2016, elected Democrats and their media allies insisted that Trump's shocking victory was only possible thanks to Russian meddling. And now, they're laboring under the misimpression that return to power can be attributed to Republicans' superior, but decepting messaging — an almost supernatural ability to compel Americans to believe that which isn't so. If only they could convince the public of the truth, they'd surely prevail. But the cold, hard truth is that it's always been about the substance, stupid — as the unflattering data they so proudly shared last week demonstrates. Kamala Harris was deposited into the dustbin of history because she was the top lieutenant in an administration that had proven a miserable failure long before her boss's implosion last summer. Americans spent the entirety of the Biden years telling pollsters that their lives were demonstrably, palpably worse as a result of historic price hikes. Biden & Co. responded to these pleas for relief by denying the existence of inflation until they couldn't any longer. Then, when they finally did implicitly admit to the effects of the nearly $2 trillion boondoggle they passed in 2021, they slapped the name 'Inflation Reduction Act' on yet another profligate spending bill that every layman in America knew would only compound the problem. There are similar stories to be told about Americans' dissatisfaction with Biden's approach to foreign policy, his abdication of his duty to secure the border, and his championing of a radical social agenda that maintains up is down, left is right, and black is white. Their stubborn refusal to grapple with this incontrovertible truth is also reportedly set to be reflected in an upcoming 2024 autopsy conducted by the DNC. The New York Times reports that it will 'steer clear of the decisions made by the Biden-turned-Harris campaign,' and instead 'focus more on outside groups and super PACs that spent hundreds of millions of dollars aiding the Biden and Harris campaigns through advertising, voter registration drives and turnout efforts.' It's like watching a restaurant serving inedible food invest in new plateware. The gripe has never been with the Democrats' presentation or voters' tastes. It's with the product itself.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store