BlueScope Steel's profit slumps 90% on impairment charge; shares tumble 7%
Shares of BlueScope, Australia's biggest steel producer, were down at A$22.55, as at 0018 GMT, their lowest point in more than seven weeks. That compared with the broader benchmark index ASX 200 (.AXJO), opens new tab, which was down 0.2%.
BlueScope Steel's coated products business in its North American division reported an annual loss, pressured by lower volumes and operational challenges, leading to a one-off impairment charge of A$438.9 million ($285.90 million).
"There has been a delay in achieving our expectations of the BlueScope Coated Products business, which we acquired in 2022, and an impairment of A$439 million has been recorded," the steel producer said.
Its North America division, one of its top profit-generating divisions, posted underlying operating earnings of A$514.4 million in the year ended June 30, down 45% from last year. The drop was primarily due to lower selling prices at its North Star and Buildings and Coated Products North America operations.
As a result, the company's net profit after tax came in at A$83.8 million ($54.6 million) in fiscal 2025, down from A$805.7 million reported in fiscal 2024.
On an underlying basis, exclusing one-off items, BlueScope's profit halved from the previous year to A$420.8 million, pulled down by price pressures, lower volumes, and higher costs. The result also fell short of the Visible Alpha consensus estimate of A$466.4 million.
The company forecast underlying operating earnings for first half of 2026 between A$550 million and A$620 million, above last year's A$309 million, though its midpoint misses the Visible Alpha consensus of A$618 million.
BlueScope declared a final dividend of 30 Australian cents per share, in line with last year.
($1 = 1.5352 Australian dollars)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Toronto stocks rise as soft inflation data boosts rate cut hopes
Aug 19 (Reuters) - Canada's main index edged up on Tuesday, helped by gains in industrials and telecom stocks, as cooler-than-expected domestic inflation data kept the door open for the Bank of Canada to cut interest rates. At 9:44 a.m. ET (1344 GMT), the Toronto Stock Exchange's S&P/TSX composite index <.GSPTSE> was up 0.12% at 27,956.08 points, hovering near record levels. A Reuters poll released on Tuesday found the index is set to extend its record-setting run this year and next as lower borrowing costs and potential greater clarity on U.S. tariffs offset expected pressure on corporate profits. Canada's annual inflation rate eased to 1.7% in July from 1.9% in the prior month as lower year-on-year gasoline prices kept the consumer price index low, but core measures of inflation stayed sticky, data showed on Tuesday. The annual rate of consumer price inflation moved further below the midpoint of the Bank of Canada's 1% to 3% target range. Two-year government bond yields , influenced by short-term policy expectations, were down about 3.5 basis points at 2.704%. Odds for a quarter-point rate cut by the BoC next month stood at about 40%, above 31.4% seen earlier in the day. Allan Small, senior investment advisor at Allan Small Financial Group with iA Private Wealth, said that the inflation being well below the BoC's target and hits to the economy due to tariffs support the case for a rate cut. Meanwhile, Air Canada ( opens new tab rose 2% after its unionized flight attendants reached an agreement with the country's largest carrier to end a strike. Sector-wise, capped communications (.GSPTTTS), opens new tab and industrials (.GSPTTIN), opens new tab led the gains, rising 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Information technology and healthcare lost around 0.6% each. Heavyweight energy (.SPTTEN), opens new tab fell 0.2%, as crude prices fell on the rising chances of an end to sanctions on Russian crude.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Most Gulf bourses subdued on falling oil prices
Aug 19 (Reuters) - Most Gulf stock markets were subdued in early trade on Tuesday as oil prices fell ahead of possible three-way talks involving Moscow, Kyiv and Washington to end the war in Ukraine. Oil prices, a catalyst for the Gulf's financial markets, slid 1% as investors weighed the possibility of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, which would likely lead to the lifting of sanctions on Russian crude. Brent crude was trading at $65.97 a barrel, as of 0745 GMT. Saudi Arabia's benchmark stock index (.TASI), opens new tab fell 0.2%, with most constituents trading lower. Dar Al Arkan Real Estate ( opens new tab lost 1.3% and Saudi Arabian Mining ( opens new tab declined 0.9%. Company For Cooperative Insurance ( opens new tab rose 1.1% after it won a contract from National Water Company. The Qatari benchmark index (.QSI), opens new tab slipped 0.4%, dragged down by declines in most constituents. Commercial Bank ( opens new tab eased 1.3% and Industries Qatar ( opens new tab fell 0.8%. The Abu Dhabi benchmark index (.FTFADGI), opens new tab was down 0.1%, pressured by a 1.2% fall in Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank ( opens new tab. ADNOC Distribution ( opens new tab shed 0.5% and ADNOC Logistics ( opens new tab declined 0.8%. Meanwhile, Santos said the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC)-led consortium will not be able to finalise its $18.7 billion bid for the Australian gas producer for at least a month, well past the exclusive due diligence deadline. Dubai's benchmark stock index (.DFMGI), opens new tab traded in a narrow range as gains in consumer staples and real estate stocks countered losses in most other sectors. Emaar Properties ( opens new tab gained 0.7% and Spinneys 1961 Holding ( opens new tab advanced 3.3%, while Emirates NBD ( opens new tab, Dubai's largest lender, dropped 1.3%.
